Skip to main content

Year in Review: 2025


    So, I guess I’ll start out by saying that … I wasn’t kidding last year when I said I was gonna do better with reviews, folks. 

    This is the first time in three years that my review count landed in the double digits, and I reached that benchmark barely past the year’s halfway point. My total this year landed at 19. This breaks my previous record of 17 from 2021 and also outpaces the total haul from 2024 and 2023 combined. 

    Once again, "WICKED" pulled through as the biggest contributor this year, and I wouldn't have had that any other way. These last two years of active anticipation have been some of the most gratifying I've ever had as a person who feels investment in moving pictures. I'm even more excited, though, for this duology to be folded into film history: that thing I really love writing about. 

 I will always regret not reviewing The Holdovers (2023)
    In the past, I have let myself get away with checking out a new film in the theaters but not bothering to compose a review after the fact. Sometimes it’s because I’m just lazy. Sometimes it’s because I’m worried that the film is smarter than me, and I’m scared of showing my limitation. Thus, I have let really good films go unremarked upon.

    I think it was in watching I’m Still Here earlier this year, having the most profound experience, and feeling it was such a waste that I wasn’t going to have anything to mark the occasion, that set me on the straight and narrow. And I have all around liked what it did for my library to devote more attention to this kind of writing. Dare I say? I'm actually starting to get good at this reviewing thing. 

Cinema Paradiso (1988)
    This was also arguably the first year that I figured out how to make my running list of "Professor's Picks" consistently enjoyable for me. I was able to get three out this year, and I already have designs for another, what I'm anticipating being my 200th post for this blog. 

    My main drive, though, has always been my library of essays. The round-up this year ... 

    - Pan's Labyrinth: The Fantasy and Reality of Good and Evil - An exploration of the practicality of nuanced depictions of evil in the fantasy genre, anchored on the 2006 film, Pan's Labyrinth.

    -1996: The Year Toxic Masculinity Died (sorta') - An analysis of two independent films, Beautiful Girls and Swingers, both released in 1996, revealing something about the state of masculinity during a specific period of American and film history. 
Beautiful Girls (1996)

    -What Does the World Owe Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs? - A tribute to the cultural and artistic innovations brought about by Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. 

    -The Notebook Has No Excuses - A catalogue of all the failings of The Notebook as a romantic film.

    -Millennium Actress: How Personal is Art? - A meditation on the potential relationship between an artist's lived reality and their body of work, as seen through the anime film, Millennium Actress. 

    -JAWS: The Father of All Blockbusters Turns 50 - A retrospective of Jaws and its revolutionary impact on what we now consider "popular film."

The Little Mermaid (2023)
    -The "Seven Brides for Seven Brothers" Question - A sympathetic deconstruction of the moral dilemma posed by consuming Seven Brides for Seven Brothers in the modern day.

    -"When Did Disney Get So Woke?!" pt. 1: The Disney of Your Childhood - A survey of the political and cultural contexts surrounding the behavior of The Walt Disney Company of the 20th century. 

    -"When Did Disney Get So Woke?!" pt. 2: Disney vs. the 21st Century - A rundown of the public cultural battles The Walt Disney Company has faced over the last few decades and particularly the last five years--with speculation for what it means for the company's immediate future.

   -The Earthling: Some Observations About "Natural Masculinity" - A commentary on the popular construct of masculinity inherently championing emotional coarseness and repelling vulnerability, as reflected through the 1980 film, The Earthling.  

The Earthling (1980)

    -The Apartment: What Makes Us Human - A dissection of how Billy Wilder’s The Apartment, and film as an artform, champions human connection and autonomy against a system that demands capitalist pursuits at all costs.

    -Elemental: Savoring Pixar's Fading Light - A celebration of Pixar's Elemental alongside some musings on the unique obstacles facing Pixar Animation's future. 

    Identifying patterns in my essays this year proved more trying than I’d anticipated. But some things that I did notice …

    I’ve given a lot of attention recently to Hollywood during that period of transition in the 1970s. This is weird because my entire body of essays only spotlights two films from that decade—and I got one of them only this year. It’s just not a period of film history that I’m particularly drawn to, even though for many film lovers this was in some ways the birth of film. 

    Even so, I couldn’t help but key in on the socio-cultural changes that took place around this time and how that tempest was captured on film. As for why that is, we could speculate all day, but we’re also free to trace parallels between that period of American history and current events … I don’t presently have plans to talk specifically about the Taxi Driver era of filmmaking, but I won’t deny that something could very well be brewing in the chasms of my subconscious.

    Something else that's been on my mind ... most trajectories I've seen have a film enthusiast familiarizing themselves with the craft and building blocks of film first, and that is what enables you to study film and its social context. My college's own film program was structured that way. 

    But on the whole, the interests of my earlier essays focused more on the wider themes or else the social context in which these films emerged. Something like my Meet Me in St. Louis essay examining the purpose of musicals for a WWII audience. And it's only been somewhat recently that I have become focused on examining the semantics and mechanics of the film. This has mostly pertained to a film's writing, but more and more my interests are taking me back to the basic ingredients. Cutting images together and syncing them to sound. 

Lonesome (1928) One of the first movies to have spoken dialogue
    In particular, I’m becoming more and more interested in those early, formative years of film. Back when those poor folks with the crank camera were still trying to figure out establishing shots or how you even got actors to speak into a mic. I’d really love to get another essay on a silent film out here before too long.

    I’ve been very proud historically at how often I get to talk about Classic Hollywood films--both specific films as well as Classic Hollywood as an idea. But I'm also not totally mollified with my present body of work on this area because I don’t think the necessity for this focus has dimmed at all. The world still needs informed, textured discussion about film and its history, its legacy. And I don’t mean the film history that started with like Quentin Tarantino. The movements of Classic Hollywood bear profound effect on the Hollywood we see today, and we need to understand how. 

    So this next year, I’m wanting step it up with my analysis. My goal in 2026 is to actually alternate very tightly between discussing classic and contemporary movies. I’d like for every other essay to spotlight Classic Hollywood film. (I’d also like to increase my discussion on international film as well, though I have yet to set any specific parameters.)

    I told myself at the start of this that I didn’t feel good about diving into divisive topics, even though my very first essay, of course, was me advocating for Passengers, a movie that came frontloaded with a lot of controversy. I just told myself that it was going to be a one-and-done deal, and then I would leave the soapbox behind forever. A few years later when I did my piece on Lamb, however, I also told myself that this was going to be just one last time, and then I’d return to manufacture settings.

    Over the last couple of years, though, I have been surprised at how comfortable I feel exploring tumultuous conversations. I’m not a natural boat rocker, but I'm not so sure that those of us who discuss art can ever be truly apolitical, or whether we should even aspire to be so. I don’t think this will ever be a space where I am courting controversy.  Even so, I don’t feel so afraid of hard topics these days, and I won’t be letting such things get in the way of me writing essays I’m passionate about.

Ezra (2023)
    I always ruminate on the kinds of movies I discuss. I have in the past, for example, expressed concern about choosing to examine movies without much coverage. In some ways, I am still chasing this. The Earthling is probably the most obscure movie to receive its own essay. But movies like this tend to only receive one or two opportunities a year. There are just only so many slots available. 

    But this option also remains available in what movies I review. And this is another reason why I am trying to work hard to bring my notebook to the theater to make sure I am creating dialogue for a variety of films.

    Last year, I also made the executive decision to preview some of the movies I was going to be writing about during the year, and I somehow lived to tell the tale. Following that tradition, help yourself to this sneak peek of next year's suspects.


    And looking forward to the state of cinema as a whole, there are definitely reasons for film-lovers to be vigilant. Despite high hopes, 2025's box office failed to punch back after the COVID crash. And meanwhile, the casualties of the streaming wars only continue to mount while studio heads continue to show make reckless gambles with the lifeblood of film.

    But in the days leading up to this post, I had a special experience hosting my nephews' first viewing of The Wizard of Oz. I've shown them some of the earlier Disney films, I know one of them really likes Pinocchio, but these little guys aren't really used to "older movies." The youngest in attendance, aged 3, was confused by the sepia-tones of the Kansas opening and wanted to watch a different movie. I bought his patience by promising that the twister was forthcoming. 


    I knew something was going right when Dorothy opened the door to Oz and sees color for the first time and saw they were all just transfixed. They were seeing something they had never seen before and did not even know was possible. I was watching in real time as they were discovering what cinema could do. The youngest fell asleep through part of the middle, but overall they were enraptured all throughout.

    Now something to keep in mind is that "Oz" hasn't actually been a favorite of mine for a while. I respect what it did for the fantasy and musical genres, and I honor it as the ancestor to "Wicked," but it doesn't strike the chords of something like "Snow White" for me. But getting to really see it through a child's eyes for the first time in a long time, especially children whose parents haven't shown them a lot of old films, opened my eyes to just how magical movies can be--how magical they have always been. 

    And getting to light that fire in my nephews, who will maybe be less reticent next time they are presented with an old movie, it gave me some hope. It gave me space to envision a future where the rising generation sees movies as some means of divining something special, and that's something we all need to keep in focus. Even knowing that cinema continues to face legitimate challenges, I look forward gratefully to fighting that fight.

        --The Professor

The Music Man (1962)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"What Are Happy Endings For Anyway?" (II) - The Docks of New York

Yes, fellas. Your calendar is correct. We are, in fact, 10 years out from La La Land .          My main point of interest in Damien Chazelle’s groundbreaking 2016 musical has historically been its role in helping set off the sort of stealth renaissance of musicals we’ve been experiencing the last ten years where we all try to see how big we can make the genre before anyone notices. Chazelle explained at the time , “Now more than ever we need hope and romance on the screen, and I think there’s something about musicals that just get at something that only movies can do. That idea of movies as a dreamland, movies as the language of our dreams and movies as a way of expressing a world in which you break into song, that emotions can violate the rules of reality.”      The hook for this film, though, is very much the film’s ultimate rejection of the traditional happy ending for which musicals are so well known. That is the reason why...

An Earnest Defense of Passengers

          I've heard a lot of back and forth over what the purpose of film is and what we should ask from it. Film as a social amenity kind of has a dual purpose. It's supposed to give the population common ground and find things that people of varying backgrounds and beliefs can unify around. On the other hand, film also creates this detached simulated reality through which we can explore complex and even testing ideas about the contradictions in human existence.     In theory, a film can fulfill both functions, but movies exist in a turbulent landscape. It's very rare for a film to try to walk both lanes, and it's even rarer for a film to be embraced upon entry for attempting to do so.  Let me explain by describing the premise of one of my favorite movies, Morten Tyldum's 2016 film, Passengers .      A key piece of this film ’s plot revolves around the main character, Jim Preston, a passenger onboard a spaceship, who premat...

REVIEW: Clayface

    James Gunn promised early on that with his new DC Universe, not everything would be for everybody, but there would be something for everybody.      I have to assume he means he's eventually going to grant us the first proper superhero musical. (No, I still haven't seen "Joker 2.") But until such a time, James Watkins' new take on superheroes and horror with Clayface  is a valid offering just the same.     Rising actor, Matt Hagen (Tom Rhys Harris), is on top of the world, securing his first Oscar nomination, when he has a fatal night of passion with the girlfriend of a lord in the criminal underworld of Gotham. Matt is punished by having his lovely Hollywood face carved up irreparably. Matt's golden ticket to the front of the camera is ruined, and his reputation is smeared.      Driven to desperation, Matt seeks out a neuroscientist, Caitlyn Corr (Naomie Ackie), investing in an experimental form of therapy that could recover his...

How Disney Liberated the Musical Genre

Anytime I’m getting ready for a new musical film, I generally try to put off listening to the soundtrack until after I’ve seen the movie. It’s just my way of ensuring that I experience the narrative in its full context upon its important premiere viewing. Most of the time I’m good about sticking to this, but nowhere is this feat harder than with the arrival of each new Disney musical.     I tried really hard with Encanto , but with Lin-Manuel Miranda writing for Disney, what can I say (except "You're Welcome"...) So, why am I talking about Disney musicals?     W hen I premiered my Jungle Book essay earlier this year, I decided that going forward I was ready to expand how I talked about Disney. Owing to Disney fans constantly having to justify their fandom, a lot of Disney discourse tends to be purely defensive. Disney fans only ever get to use their platform to try convincing the cool kids that--for the last time!--it's okay for adults without kids to go to...

The Notebook Has No Excuses

     The thing about film is … the more you think about it, the less sense it makes. Film tells us, even in a society obsessed with wealth and gain, “Remember, George, no man is a failure who has friends.” Film warns us that the most unnatural evil lies in wait at the Overlook Hotel and peeks out when all the guests leave for the winter–and that the heart of it resides in room 237–knowing we'll trip over ourselves wanting to open that door. Film is what makes us believe that the vessel for the deepest human emotion could be contained in a cartoon clownfish taking his unhatched cartoon son and holding him in his cartoon fin and telling him he will never let anything happen to him.  Nights of Cabiria (1957) Even when it tries to plant its feet aggressively in realism, film winds up being an inherently emotional realm. We feel safer to view and express all manners of passions or desires here in the space where the rules of propriety just don’t matter anymore. So a fa...

The "Stephen King's IT" Paradox - Can You Ever Go Home Again?

Though I think of myself as putting my heart and soul into this blog, I generally like to keep my offline persona mysterious. This is why I use a pen name and why you’ll never see a picture of my face on this page. But I’ll pull behind the curtain just a little today and share that … I attended my high school reunion not too long ago.           I actually ended up attending this reunion twice simply because the first reunion, our “real reunion,” was planned at sort of the last minute and had rather sparse attendance. And so those of us who made it to that resolved to see if we couldn’t pull off something a little more robust, which we did some months later with much more success. And I honestly didn’t mind going twice over.          I never actively put any distance between myself and my old pals, but I also never really made any effort to hold onto them after graduating beyond liking their posts on...

REVIEW: Disenchanted

 Once Upon a Time, Disney's Enchanted reminded us that deep down inside, even the most cynical of us was pining for a fairy-tale. In those days, a musical rom-com featuring hand-drawn animation and overtly referencing films of the Disney animated catalog actually felt novel, even daring. But today is a different climate. Disney fairy-tales are unambiguously a popular presence in modern pop culture. They are regularly referenced, discussed, and abused both by their parent company and the public at large. Any sequel to such a film wouldn't have the same opportunity to feel revelatory or groundbreaking.  But this proves to be an inadequate defense for this movie's shortcomings. Turns out, you can sing about fairy-tales for two hours without earnestly exploring what makes them so special to begin with. I say shortcomings deliberately because there's not a lot that's actively wrong with this movie. Almost everything about this movie could have worked if it had been pr...

Hating Disney Princesses Has Never Been Feminist pt. 1

     Because the consumption of art, even in a capitalist society, is such a personal experience, it can be difficult to quantify exactly how an individual interprets and internalizes the films they are participating in.      We filter our artistic interpretations through our own personal biases and viewpoints, and this can sometimes lead to a person or groups assigning a reading to a work that the author did not design and may not even accurately reflect the nature of the work they are interacting with (e.g. the alt-right seeing Mel Brooks’ The Producers as somehow affirming their disregard for political correctness when the film is very much lampooning bigotry and Nazis specifically). We often learn as much or more about a culture by the way they react to a piece of media as we do from the media itself. Anyways, you know where this is going. Let’s talk about Disney Princesses. Pinning down exactly when Disney Princesses entered the picture is a hard thi...

Finding Nemo: The Thing About Film Criticism ...

       Film is a mysterious thing. It triggers emotional responses in the audience that are as surprising as they are all-encompassing. As a medium, film is capable of painting stunning vistas that feel like they could only come to life behind the silver screen, but many of the most arresting displays on film arise from scenes that are familiar, perhaps even mundanely so.       It’s an artform built on rules and guidelines–young film students are probably familiar with principles like the rule of thirds or the Kuleshov effect–but someone tell me the rule that explains why a line like “We’ll always have Paris,” just levels you. There are parts of the film discussion that cannot be anticipated by a formula or a rulebook, and for that we should be grateful.         Arrival (2016)      But the thing about film–and especially film criticism–is that film critics are not soothsayers. Their means of divining the artis...

REVIEW: Jungle Cruise

  Disney has relied on branding for their box-office since Walt himself started using fairy-tales as a launching pad. Flash forward 80 years, and the branding wars have escalated not just within the Disney company, but the industry all around. Disney's Jungle Cruise walks the line between original and remix, and not just because it's adapted from a theme-park ride. This film, a pastiche of adventure flicks over the last 60 years, absorbs the best from its sources of inspiration but falls just short of congealing them into something truly groundbreaking. Tales a mythical tree of life have beckoned explorers since it bloomed into legend hundreds of years ago. This catches the interest of explorer Lily Houghton who makes it her mission to find the tree, first to distribute its gifts to the world and second to keep it from the hands of less benevolent seekers. Her success hinges on joining forces with the gruff Frank Wolff. He'll ferry Lily and her brother, McGregor, across th...