![]() |
| I will always regret not reviewing The Holdovers (2023) |
I think it was in watching I’m Still Here earlier this year, having the most profound experience, and feeling it was such a waste that I wasn’t going to have anything to mark the occasion, that set me on the straight and narrow. And I have all around liked what it did for my library to devote more attention to this kind of writing. Dare I say? I'm actually starting to get good at this reviewing thing.
![]() |
| Cinema Paradiso (1988) |
My main drive, though, has always been my library of essays. The round-up this year ...
![]() |
| Beautiful Girls (1996) |
![]() |
| The Little Mermaid (2023) |
-"When Did Disney Get So Woke?!" pt. 1: The Disney of Your Childhood - A survey of the political and cultural contexts surrounding the behavior of The Walt Disney Company of the last century.
-"When Did Disney Get So Woke?!" pt. 2: Disney vs. the 21st Century - A rundown of the public cultural battles The Walt Disney Company has faced over the last few decades and particularly the last five years--with speculation for what it means for the company's immediate future.
-The Earthling: Some Observations About "Natural Masculinity" - A commentary on the popular construct of masculinity inherently championing emotional coarseness and repelling vulnerability, as reflected through the 1980 film, The Earthling.
![]() |
| The Earthling (1980) |
-The Apartment: What Makes Us Human - A dissection of how Billy Wilder’s The Apartment, and film as an artform, champions human connection and autonomy against a system that demands capitalist pursuits at all costs.
-Elemental: Savoring Pixar's Fading Light - A celebration of Pixar's Elemental alongside some musings on the unique obstacles facing Pixar Animation's future.
Identifying patterns in my essays this year proved more trying than I’d anticipated. But some things that I did notice …
I’ve given a lot of attention recently to Hollywood during that period of transition in the 1970s. This is weird because my entire body of essays only spotlight two films from that decade—and I got one of them this year. It’s just not a period of film history that I’m particularly drawn to, even though for many film lovers this was in some ways the birth of film.
Something else that's been on my mind ... most trajectories I've seen have a film enthusiast familiarizing themselves with the craft and building blocks of film first, and that is what enables you to study film and its social context. My college's own film program was structured that way.
But on the whole, the interests of my earlier essays focused more on the wider themes or else the social context in which these films emerged. Something like my Meet Me in St. Louis essay examining the purpose of musicals for a WWII audience. And it's only been somewhat recently that I have become focused on examining the semantics and mechanics of the film. This has mostly pertained to a film's writing, but more and more my interests are taking me back to the basic ingredients. Cutting images together and syncing them to sound.
![]() |
| Lonesome (1928) One of the first movies to have spoken dialogue |
I’ve been very proud historically at how often I get to talk about Classic Hollywood films--both specific films as well as Classic Hollywood as an idea. But I don’t think the necessity for this focus has dimmed at all. The world still needs informed, textured discussion about film and its history, its legacy. And I don’t mean the film history that started with like Quentin Tarantino. The movements of Classic Hollywood bear profound effect on the Hollywood we see today, and we need to understand how.
So this next year, I’m wanting step it up with my analysis. My goal in 2026 is to actually alternate very tightly between discussing classic and contemporary movies. I’d like for every other essay to spotlight Classic Hollywood film. (I’d also like to increase my discussion on international film as well, though I have yet to set any specific parameters.)
I told myself at the start of this that I didn’t feel good about diving into divisive topics, even though my very first essay, of course, was me advocating for Passengers, a movie that came frontloaded with a lot of controversy. I just told myself that it was going to be a one-and-done deal, and then I would leave the soapbox behind forever. A few years later when I did my piece on Lamb, however, I also told myself that this was going to be just one last time, and then I’d return to manufacture settings.
Over the last couple of years, though, I have been surprised at how comfortable I feel exploring tumultuous conversations. I’m not a natural boat rocker, but I'm not so sure that those of us who discuss art can ever be truly apolitical, or whether we should even aspire to be so. I don’t think this will ever be a space where I am courting controversy. Even so, I don’t feel so afraid of hard topics these days, and I won’t be letting such things get in the way of me writing essays I’m passionate about.
![]() |
| Ezra (2023) |
But this option also remains available in what movies I review. And this is another reason why I am trying to work hard to bring my notebook to the theater to make sure I am creating dialogue for a variety of films.
Last year, I also made the executive decision to preview some of the movies I was going to be writing about during the year, and I somehow lived to tell the tale. Following that tradition, help yourself to this sneak peek of next year's suspects.
![]() |
--The Professor
![]() |
| The Music Man (1962) |













Comments
Post a Comment