Skip to main content

REVIEW: Jurassic World - Rebirth

 


   I had a mixed reaction to Jurassic World: Rebirth, but it did make for one of the most enjoyable theater experiences I've had in recent memory. 

    I have to imagine that a part of this is because my most common theater appointments are matinee screenings, but I had the opportunity to see this one at a fairly well-attended midnight screening. And there's nary a film more tailored for surround-sound roaring and screens wide enough to contain these de-extinct creatures. ("Objects on the screen feel closer than they appear.") It was natural for me to cap the experience by applauding as the credits stared to roll, even if, as usual, I was the only one in the auditorium to do so. 

   Yes, I am that kind of moviegoer; yes, I enjoyed the experience that much, and I imagine I will revisit it across time. 

    That's not to imagine the movie is beyond reproach, but for I suppose it bears mentioning that, generally, this is a movie plagued more by missed opportunities than active transgressions. 

     I will admit I have complicated feelings about the film's premise. It is something of a retcon to decide that dinosaurs all just kind of migrated to the forgotten corners of the world once we were done chasing them across the country with our motorcycles. Moreover, it undermines the muscle of the entire Jurassic saga--learning to live with the consequences of scrambling the ecosystem. All it took was one new director in order to tuck dinosaurs away to where we don't have to worry about them anymore: I don't know if this is what Malcom meant when he said, "life finds a way." 

    But this is nonetheless the situation in which our main characters are assigned to go into dinosaur land and obtain DNA samples from three specific dinosaurs in order to concoct a cure for heart disease.

    Naturally, there are complications to this mission. A civilian family on vacation becomes an accidental casualty in the dinosaur game. This is where I want to say "and suddenly the extraction mission becomes a rescue mission," but that's really only halfway true. The two parties have a crucial intersection at the end of Act I, but they spend too little time together during the middle to affect each other the way you want them to. 

    All the headliners look happy to be here. Scarlett Johanssen, Jonathan Bailey, and Mahershala Ali all look comfortable in their gear and bring an appropriate level of levity to the adventure. 

    But the performers that carry the heaviest load are actually the newcomers--Manuel Garcia-Rulfo, Luna Blaise, David Iacono, and Audrina Miranda--the players bringing the Delgado family to life. (That's "relative newcomers," I guess. Turns out Garcia-Rulfo was in The Lincoln Lawyer.) These guys feel more vulnerable without the clout of celebrity to safeguard them against the T-rex, and this goes a long way to bring more gravity to the situation. I was certain I was going to hate Iacono's character as the dopey boyfriend, a character type that has historically enabled some gross real-life imitators, but he sticks the landing. 

    Director Gareth Edwards behaves like a spiritual medium and treats his dinosaurs as the greatest fantastical apparitions he could be charged with summoning. Sometimes the phantoms are frightening, other times they're regal. The way DP John Mathieson captures the titanosaur ballad is perhaps the loveliest thing put to film in the Jurassic franchise.

    The film is strongest in the middle when things are a little more open-ended and it can revel in these little side quests without having to answer for its plot expenditures. It's really only toward the end when you have to confront that it could have been any gaggle of humans assigned to this adventure, and the ending would have been the exact same. The task force mostly spends the film performing various gymnastic routines untethered to any real introspection. 

    The film isn't missing any "To Be or Not To Be," scale moral quandaries. Action-adventure films generally focus on some very basic question about the human condition--and I'm also talking about the original Jurassic Park here. The arc in that film was rather straightforward, but it was good about making sure that the main characters believed something at the end of the film that they didn't at the beginning. RE: Grant starts the film hating kids, but learns that he can actually be a pretty good dad when thrown into that position. 

    There is some attempt at that here. A-team debates about whether they ought to give the miracle treatment to the rich folks or the common man, but there's very little about their island adventure that naturally puts them in positions to wrestle with such a dilemma. I'm stretching to try to connect something like their rock-climbing field trip with the Quetzalcoatlus (sp?) to Zora and Henry learning that they don't need money after all. 

    I'd expect them to come to that conclusion as they spent time trying to keep this unlucky family alive, but again these two parties spend tragically little time interacting. 

    And the grand old irony is ... despite the internet digging in its heels against Trevorrow's trilogy, this was something that those films actually understood and actually committed to: what did the characters believe about the world at the start, and how did being chased by dinosaurs change all that? Again, that arc was sometimes as straightforward as "Do I believe that my adopted parents actually love me?" 

    But underestimating that anchor in the discourse penalized those movies in the conversation, and neglecting it here is what appears to have crippled this one in production. 

                    --The Professor



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: ELIO

    Here's a fact: the term "flying saucer" predates the term "UFO." The United States Air Force found the former description too limiting to describe the variety of potential aerial phenomena that might arise when discussing the possibility of life beyond earth.      There may have to be a similar expansion of vocabulary within the alien lexicon with Pixar's latest film, Elio , turning the idea of an alien abduction into every kid's dream come true.      The titular Elio is a displaced kid who recently moved in with his aunt after his parents died. She doesn't seem to understand him any better than his peers do. He can't imagine a place on planet earth where he feels he fits in. What's a kid to do except send a distress cry out into the great, big void of outer space?      But m iracle of miracles: his cries into the universe are heard, and a band of benevolent aliens adopt him into their "communiverse" as the honorary ambassador o...

JAWS: The Father of All Blockbusters Turns 50

  The saga of Hollywood lives and dies on the ripples of a thousand different choices. Hundreds of movies each year from hundreds of artists serving hundreds of markets creates a complex, interconnected ecosystem that can never really be explored in its totality. Still, if there was one film, one moment, that trampolined Hollywood from one era into the next, it was in 1975 with Steven Spielberg’s Jaws .      Moviegoing had naturally been a part of the global industry since moving pictures stole everyone’s attention at the start of the century. Tentpole films were also very much a part of the program. But the treatment of movies like The Sound of Music and Ben-Hur was done with an eye for prestige, more comparable to how Oscar hopefuls handle things today.  Theaters at this time were still generally accustomed to having sporadic releases across the country over a period of several weeks. Limited roadshow releases were how you signaled that a movie’s importanc...

An Earnest Defense of Passengers

          Recall with me, if you will, the scene in Hollywood December 2016. We were less than a year away from #MeToo, and the internet was keenly aware of Hollywood’s suffocating influence on its females on and off screen but not yet sure what to do about it.       Enter Morten Tyldum’s film Passengers , a movie which, despite featuring the two hottest stars in Hollywood at the apex of their fame, was mangled by internet critics immediately after take-off. A key piece of Passengers ’ plot revolves around the main character, Jim Preston, a passenger onboard a spaceship, who prematurely awakens from a century-long hibernation and faces a lifetime of solitude adrift in outer space; rather than suffer through a life of loneliness, he eventually decides to deliberately awaken another passenger, Aurora Lane, condemning her to his same fate.    So this is obviously a film with a moral dilemma at its center. Morten Tyldum, direc...

REVIEW: The Legend of Ochi

    This decade has seen a renaissance of movies claiming to be "this generation's ET ," but you probably can't remember their names any better than I can. We could have all sorts of debates why it is no one seems to know how to access that these days, though I don't think for a moment that it's because 2020s America is actually beyond considering what it means to touch that childhood innocence.      But A24's newest film, The Legend of Ochi , does have me thinking this mental block is mostly self-inflicted by a world whose extoling of childhood is more driven by a dislike of the older generation than anything else.  Fitting together narratives like How to Train Your Dragon with Fiddler on the Roof and tossing it in the sock drawer with 1980s dark fantasy, The Legend of Ochi is intermittently enchanting, but it's undermined by its own cynicism.     On an island stepped out of time, a secluded community wages war against the local population of ...

REVIEW: Materialists

      In seminal romantic comedies or dramas, the mark of great writing was in artfully burying the lovebirds' insecurities and hangups in artifice. Pretense. The lovebirds didn't know how to honestly approach their own feelings at first. The distortion revealed the personality of both the situation and the relationship. What's more, it was just fun. The film would slowly thaw this facade until Cary Grant and Irene Dunne finally had, what Materialists calls, the ugliest parts of themselves laid bare for one another. Only then were they ready to embrace.       Yet with Materialists , out this weekend, even in moments when the situation calls for vulnerability, the characters are oddly empirical and clinical with describing the things about them that they are ashamed of. These players might as well be performing a passionate reading of a Walmart receipt. Yes, Materialists is very obviously about the transactionality of the dating scene, but the movie ...

REVIEW: Lilo & Stitch

       By now the system errors of Disney's live-action remake matrix are well codified. These outputs tend to have pacing that feels like it was okayed by a chain store manager trying to lower the quarterly statement. They also show weird deference to very specific gags from their animated source yet don't bother to ask whether they fit well in the photorealistic world of live-action. And combing through the screenplay, you always seem to get snagged on certain lines of dialogue that someone must have thought belonged in a children's movie ("Being gross is against galactic regulation!).      These are all present in this  summer's live-action reinvention of "Lilo & Stitch." But mercifully, this remake allows itself to go off-script here and there. The result may be one of the stronger Disney remakes ... whatever that's worth.     The 2002 animated masterpiece by Dean Deblois and Chris Sanders (who voices the little blue alien in bo...

You're Not Stupid for Loving Jurassic World

        I had an experience in the comment section of a YouTube video essay back in 2018 . This was around the release of Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom, and the essay traced out how the original Jurassic Park developed its character arcs. I thought it was a nice analysis, and many of the comments seemed to agree. But I inevitably came across one comment lamenting how far the "Jurassic" franchise had fallen and how the new "Jurassic World" films just didn't care about things like character arcs anymore. I did a foolish thing and replied to this comment with my honest opinion, that being ... the JW films actually took a very similar approach to their character arcs, and arguments to the contrary weren’t giving the new films proper credit. One person replied directly to my comment, countering my point with “HAAHAHAHAAHA.” And, well, I just couldn’t argue with that …       The Jurassic World movies are especially vulnerable to a certa...

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind: Do Clementine and Joel Stay Together or Not?

                    Maybe. The answer is maybe.             Not wanting to be that guy who teases a definitive answer to a difficult question and forces you to read a ten-page essay only to cop-out with a non-committal excuse of an answer, I’m telling you up and front the answer is maybe. Though nations have long warred over this matter of great importance, the film itself does not answer once and for all whether or not Joel Barrish and Clementine Krychinzki find lasting happiness together at conclusion of the film Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Min d. I cannot give a definitive answer as to whether Joel and Clementine’s love will last until the stars turn cold or just through the weekend. This essay cannot do that.             What this essay can do is explore the in-text evidence the film gives for either side t...

REVIEW: Belfast

     I've said it before, and I'll say it again: the world needs more black and white movies.      The latest to answer the call is Kenneth Branagh with his  semi-autobiographical film, Belfast . The film follows Buddy, the audience-insert character, as he grows up in the streets of Belfast, Ireland in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Though Buddy and his family thrive on these familiar streets, communal turmoil leads to organized violence that throws Buddy's life into disarray. What's a family to do? On the one hand, the father recognizes that a warzone is no place for a family. But to the mother, even the turmoil of her community's civil war feels safer than the world out there. Memory feels safer than maturation.      As these films often go, the plot is drifting and episodic yet always manages to hold one's focus. Unbrushed authenticity is a hard thing to put to film, and a film aiming for just that always walks a fine line betwe...

REVIEW - The Little Mermaid

     There's been a mermaid on the horizon ever since it became clear sometime in the last decade that Disney did intend to give all of their signature titles the live-action treatment--we've had a long time to prepare for this. (For reference, this July will mark four years since Halle Bailey's casting as Ariel made headlines.)       Arguing whether this or any of the live-action remakes "live up" to their animated predecessor is always going to be a losing battle. Even ignoring the nostalgic element, it's impossible for them to earn the same degree of admiration because the terrain in which these animated films rose to legend has long eroded. This is especially the case for The Little Mermaid . Where this remake is riding off a years long commercial high for the Walt Disney Company, the Disney that made The Little Mermaid in 1989 was twenty years past its cultural goodwill. Putting out an animated fairy-tale musical was not a sure thing, yet its suc...