Skip to main content

REVIEW: HOPPERS


    In the 1950s under the threat of nuclear warfare, Hollywood premiered such exercises as The Day the Earth Stood Still or War of the Worlds where an alien power would pass judgment on humankind, holding its fate in its hands. Here in the 2020s under the shadow of such threats as climate change, Hollywood sends to be our judge ... beavers.

    Let me back up ... 

    Daniel Chong's new film from Pixar Animation, Hoppers, sees Mabel (Piper Curda), a college student whose self-appointed mission is to preserve the glade where she used to find sanctuary with her now deceased grandmother. Her biggest opponent is hometown boy and beloved mayor, Jerry (Jon Hamm), who has designs to plow over the glade in order to open his new freeway--estimated to save travelers four whole minutes of commuting. 

    Mabel gets her golden opportunity when she uncovers secret technology pioneered by her professor which allows a human to remotely pilot the body of a robotic recreation of, in this case, a beaver. And once she's infiltrated the nearest colony of woodland animals, and earned favor with the benevolent mammal king, King George (Bobby Moynihan), it seems she's finally secured the means to correct the encroachment of the humans. But Mabel quickly discovers that she is not advocating in a vacuum, and once her actionable message is out there, she may not be able to control what the world does with it.

    So, this is an ecological film in the vein of WALL-E or Watership Down. Animation has been here a few times. The common impulse for this directive is the "Wild Robot" approach of making the nature rich and ornate, to express the beauty of nature through vivid and picturesque animation techniques. Not so here. The character designs in Hoppers are much less contoured or refined, more akin to the likes of Cartoon Network than anything we've seen from Pixar. 

    The designs of this world feel more geared toward hand-drawn animation, and Chong applying his design method from We Bare Bears onto CG models comes with some costs. While most of the film traffics in pleasant nonsense, there are some scenes of genuine pathos and authentic stakes, and trying to convey all that with such basic designs had mixed results, like trying to have a serious conversation using mostly emojis. 

    But there were gains to be had also. Displaying this ecosystem as something elastic and chaotic reveals a different face for the animal kingdom: maybe they're just as messy as the human world, and just as proximate to madcappery. This is perhaps the most unhinged we have ever seen Disney or Pixar. These laughs are impossible to anticipate. I saw and heard things I never imagined I would find in a Pixar movie. (Just ask Meryl Streep.) I think I still default to the Bambi approach to this conversation, but I would be remiss to not concede that it takes a special eye to look at the animal world and imagine those critters are just as crazy as we are, and maybe that's why they deserve an advocate.

    Relative unknown Piper Curda brings vitality into her role. I came out of this thinking that Jon Hamm should consider doing more voice work, but apparently he has participated in features like Transformers One or Minions, so maybe I'm just late to this party. Meanwhile, career voice talent, Bobby Moynihan, makes King George into a sort of couch potato hero. This is a very well-cast film.

    Early scenes have Mabel's support team telling her that hopping technology is meant to be used just for observing and that if she tries to directly interfere with the animal kingdom, there will be catastrophic consequences. The transgression that first earns her an audience with King George is stopping a grizzly bear from eating a beaver she rightfully claimed. What right does she have to interfere with the status quo? So, it's not totally clear at first how far this movie is going to challenge her righteous convictions as a young person trying to hold onto something that perhaps never truly belonged to her. 

    I knew I never would be able to sign off on this film had it ultimately tried to talk Mabel down from caring too much or learning to accept reckless human consumption as just some natural process that didn't actually hurt the animals so just "fuhgeddaboudit, man!" There were parts of the narrative where I worried that's what they were building toward. 

    So I had the experience of not knowing what the film's ultimate takeaway was going to be--not something I usually encounter with children's entertainment. The marketing seems to want the audience to discover for themselves while they're watching the film what it means to try to be a counteragent in a world that prefers to placidly flow down the river of progress and development, and so I'll respect that.

    But I will say that ... I suppose if the movie does pull off saying something both novel and useful, I honestly think part of that is because it manages to defuse its thesis across a lot of loosely related truisms about community, purpose, trust, and the like. In the end, the movie becomes as much about humanizing the powerholders making these messes as it is about anthropomorphizing an underclass of animals. Someone's probably already drafting a piece about how this is the latest example of Disney needing to water down its messaging to appease its capitalist sovereigns. I myself wouldn't call this toothless, there is still action to be taken at the end, or imagine that present struggles would be worse if we found more peaceable ways to frame these conflicts.

    Pixar has pivoted in recent years to elevating the role of the auteur with outings like ONWARD, Turning Red, and, to an extent, last year's ELIO. I don't know how much of Hopper's situation is autobiographical for Daniel Chong, but his unique artistic sensibility in this film does feel like a highly personalized toolset, which makes Hoppers feel truly unique within the Pixar library.

    It'll be interesting to see where this movie takes the future of Pixar animation. I honestly hope this movie doesn't do for Pixar animation what Thor - Ragnarok did to the MCU, but in the meantime, I think all the other Pixar gems owe a little gratitude to this movie for reminding us just how versatile this Pixar style can be, and probably always was. 

            --The Professor



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thawing Disney's Frozen Heart

  As a millennial Disney fan and film student in utero, I often thought about what it would have been like to be there when Aladdin or The Little Mermaid , or even “Snow White” or The Jungle Book , premiered to the culture. It’s one thing to grow up and realize you have a piece of film history with you here in your living room. It’s another to get to watch the culture transform as it engages for the first time with something  And I have this envy for a great many cinematic works. Like, what I would give to go back to 1946 and tell those losers who dismissed It's a Wonderful Life how they had no idea what they were sleeping on. But the Disney canon’s place within the culture is also specific. Their commitment to delivering hopeful stories to an audience that believes itself beyond such frailties as faith or kindness is unparalleled, and that makes their contributions worth studying and celebrating. And so I didn’t take it for granted during that period in late 2013/early ...

The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Clash of the Titans

  Anyone else remember the year we spent wondering if we would ever again see a movie that wasn't coming out in 3D?      T hat surge in 3D films in the early months of 2010 led to a number of questionable executive decisions. We saw a lot of films envisioned as standard film experiences refitted into the 3D format at the eleventh hour. In the ten years since, 3D stopped being profitable because audiences quickly learned the difference between a film that was designed with the 3D experience in mind and the brazen imitators . Perhaps the most notorious victim of this trend was the 2010 remake of Clash of the Titans .        Why am I suddenly so obsessed with the fallout of a film gone from the public consciousness ten years now? Maybe it's me recently finishing the first season of  Blood of Zeus  on Netflix and seeing so clearly what  Clash of the Titans  very nearly was. Maybe it's my  evolving thoughts on the Percy Jacks...

REVIEW: Supergirl

      Some will say, "We don't need another edgy superhero!" But that's not what makes the utter mediocrity of DC's new Supergirl so devastating. People were saying "We don't need another X superhero" since 2012, and the post-Infinity saga stupor we've slogged through was not triggered by piling one-too-many superheroes onto the camel's back.     The Flash sucked because its perversion of the butterfly effect theory was convoluted and ham-fisted. Black Adam sucked because nobody on that film knew what a moral dilemma actually looks like. "Love and Thunder" sucked because, despite what everyone thought in 2017, Waititi's style only barely worked in "Ragnarok" and was not going to work in a script which feels like it was farted out half-past midnight.     Supergirl had none of those issues. The real tragedy of Supergirl is that it so easily could have worked.     Drifting around the universe has mostly worked for Sup...

Some Much Needed Love for Megamind

    Following this year's Oscars ceremony, filmmakers Phil Lord and Chris Miller, directors of The Lego Movie , penned an op-ed for Variety bemoaning the stigma around animated films. They report taking issue with Naomi Scott, one of the presenters for best animated film, saying that animated films are some of the most formative experiences a kid has, and that kids tend to watch these films over and over, further noting "I think some of the parents out there know exactly what I'm talking about." Lord and Miller seemed to take this as implying that adults can't appreciate animated films, saying "Surely no one set out to diminish animated films, but it’s high time we set out to elevate them."                    I didn't personally find Scott's observation that kids make their parents watch the same animated films over and over again innately demeaning--certainly not any more than Schumer joking that her toddler made he...

REVIEW: The Wild Robot

     I think I must have known that Chris Sanders had another movie on deck, but I guess I had forgotten it was coming out so soon. For whatever reason, when I saw his name at the end of the credits for The Wild Robot , out this weekend, I was caught off guard ... and then realized that it actually explained a lot. The basic premise felt broadly reminiscent of Lilo & Stitch , and there was at least one sequence that definitely recalled How to Train Your Dragon , both of which Sanders co-directed with Dean Deblois (executive producer on this film). With his latest offering for Dreamworks, Sanders cements his position as a titan in the world of animation.     The movie sees ROZ, a shipwrecked robot stranded on an island completely untouched by humans. One would think that such an Eden would be bereft of the squabbles that humans seem so happy to create, but the animals of the island revile this new intruder and put up every fence they have. The only thin...

Finding Nemo: The Thing About Film Criticism ...

       Film is a mysterious thing. It triggers emotional responses in the audience that are as surprising as they are all-encompassing. As a medium, film is capable of painting stunning vistas that feel like they could only come to life behind the silver screen, but many of the most arresting displays on film arise from scenes that are familiar, perhaps even mundanely so.       It’s an artform built on rules and guidelines–young film students are probably familiar with principles like the rule of thirds or the Kuleshov effect–but someone tell me the rule that explains why a line like “We’ll always have Paris,” just levels you. There are parts of the film discussion that cannot be anticipated by a formula or a rulebook, and for that we should be grateful.         Arrival (2016)      But the thing about film–and especially film criticism–is that film critics are not soothsayers. Their means of divining the artis...

Reveling in the Mixed Messages of Miss Congeniality

In book ten of Metamorphoses, Greek poet Ovid tells the tale of Pygmalion, a talented sculptor living in the height of ancient Greek society.      According to the story, Pygmalion’s sculpting prowess was so impeccable that one of his pieces, a marble woman he christened Galatea, was said to be the lovelier than any woman of flesh and blood. Pygmalion was so taken by his creation that he brought her exotic gifts, kissed her marble cheeks, even prepared a luxurious bed for her. Pygmalion so pined to be loved by Galatea that he prayed to the goddess Aphrodite to allow Galatea to reciprocate his love and affection. Aphrodite was apparently in a good mood that day, so she granted Pygmalion’s wish, giving life to Galatea, whom he then wed. The story of Pygmalion is in essence the story of a man who creates his own idealized woman out of whole cloth (or more appropriately, marble), endowing her with all the traits that he finds appealing or alluring. The story also provides a m...

REVIEW: WICKED - For Good

      I'm conflicted about how to approach this review. I know everyone has their own yellow brick road to the myth of The Wizard of Oz as a whole and the specific Broadway adaptation that brought us all here.   I don't want to write this only for others who are familiar with the source material.       Even so, I can't help but review this from the perspective of a fan of the Broadway show--someone who has been tracking the potential for a film adaptation since before Jon M. Chu's participation was announced for the ambitious undertaking of translating one of Broadway's most electric shows onto film. I can't help but view this from the vantage point of someone who knew just how many opportunities this had to go wrong.     And it's from that vantage point that I now profess such profound relief that the gambit paid off. We truly have the " Lord of the Rings of musicals ."  What Jon M. Chu and his team have done here with these two...

Saying Goodbye to Stranger Things

     There's a quote from critic Mark Caro that I think about a lot. I shared it back when I did my critical survey of Pixar movies . Writing about Finding Nemo , Caro wrote in the  Chicago Tribune in 2003 , "Classic film eras tend to get recognized in retrospect while we take for granted timeless works passing before our eyes. So let's pause to appreciate what's been going on at Pixar Animation Studios."      I think that captures the aspirations of all active-minded media consumers. Or at least, it ought to. "This good thing won't last forever, so savor it before the sun goes down."  Modern Times (1936)      But this is also a very hard mindset to access in an online culture that is always seeking to stamp labels and scores on a thing before we shove it on the conveyor belt and move on to the next parcel.       It's something I have been thinking about for the last year or so as the completion of the Stranger ...

REVIEW: Project Hail Mary

    The elements in Project Hail Mary are all mostly straightforward and build to a fairly familiar end: drop an average Joe into an extraordinary situation where he is required to be extraordinary also, and watch extraordinary things happen. This is proven territory.      And I spent most of the time drafting this review trying to decide whether that was a point for or against the film, helmed by Phil Lord and Chris Miller--and whether that made a difference for a non-franchise piece like this, the exact kind of film we need to succeed at the box office in order to have a healthy landscape. I think the answer to that question is honestly bigger than any one film, even a reasonably well-done one such as this.     But I will say that a movie like Project Hail Mary gives me some hope, and it's my wish that the film continues to find people who will receive it with zeal. And I hope that the people who do will continue to search for other films that they...