REVIEW: HOPPERS

In the 1950s under the threat of nuclear warfare, Hollywood premiered such exercises as The Day the Earth Stood Still or War of the Worlds where an alien power would pass judgment on humankind, holding its fate in its hands. Here in the 2020s under the shadow of such threats as climate change, Hollywood sends to be our judge ... beavers.

Let me back up ...

Daniel Chong's new film from Pixar Animation, Hoppers, sees Mabel (Piper Curda), a college student whose self-appointed mission is to preserve the glade where she used to find sanctuary with her now deceased grandmother. Her biggest opponent is hometown boy and beloved mayor, Jerry (Jon Hamm), who has designs to plow over the glade in order to open his new freeway--estimated to save travelers four whole minutes of commuting.

Mabel gets her golden opportunity when she uncovers secret technology pioneered by her professor which allows a human to remotely pilot the body of a robotic recreation of, in this case, a beaver. And once she's infiltrated the nearest colony of woodland animals, and earned favor with the benevolent mammal king, King George (Bobby Moynihan), it seems she's finally secured the means to correct the encroachment of the humans. But Mabel quickly discovers that she is not advocating in a vacuum, and once her actionable message is out there, she may not be able to control what the world does with it.

So, this is an ecological film in the vein of WALL-E or Watership Down. Animation has been here a few times. The common impulse for this directive is the "Wild Robot" approach of making the nature rich and ornate, to express the beauty of nature through vivid and picturesque animation techniques. Not so here. The character designs in Hoppers are much less contoured or refined, more akin to the likes of Cartoon Network than anything we've seen from Pixar.

The designs of this world feel more geared toward hand-drawn animation, and Chong applying his design method from We Bare Bears onto CG models comes with some costs. While most of the film traffics in pleasant nonsense, there are some scenes of genuine pathos and authentic stakes, and trying to convey all that with such basic designs had mixed results, like trying to have a serious conversation using mostly emojis.

But there were gains to be had also. Displaying this ecosystem as something elastic and chaotic reveals a different face for the animal kingdom: maybe they're just as messy as the human world, and just as proximate to madcappery. This is perhaps the most unhinged we have ever seen Disney or Pixar. These laughs are impossible to anticipate. I saw and heard things I never imagined I would find in a Pixar movie. (Just ask Meryl Streep.) I think I still default to the Bambi approach to this conversation, but I would be remiss to not concede that it takes a special eye to look at the animal world and imagine those critters are just as crazy as we are, and maybe that's why they deserve an advocate.

Relative unknown Piper Curda brings vitality into her role. I came out of this thinking that Jon Hamm should consider doing more voice work, but apparently he has participated in features like Transformers One or Minions, so maybe I'm just late to this party. Meanwhile, career voice talent, Bobby Moynihan, makes King George into a sort of couch potato hero. This is a very well-cast film.

Early scenes have Mabel's support team telling her that hopping technology is meant to be used just for observing and that if she tries to directly interfere with the animal kingdom, there will be catastrophic consequences. The transgression that first earns her an audience with King George is stopping a grizzly bear from eating a beaver she rightfully claimed. What right does she have to interfere with the status quo? So, it's not totally clear at first how far this movie is going to challenge her righteous convictions as a young person trying to hold onto something that perhaps never truly belonged to her.

I knew I never would be able to sign off on this film had it ultimately tried to talk Mabel down from caring too much or learning to accept reckless human consumption as just some natural process that didn't actually hurt the animals so just "fuhgeddaboudit, man!" There were parts of the narrative where I worried that's what they were building toward.

So I had the experience of not knowing what the film's ultimate takeaway was going to be--not something I usually encounter with children's entertainment. The marketing seems to want the audience to discover for themselves while they're watching the film what it means to try to be a counteragent in a world that prefers to placidly flow down the river of progress and development, and so I'll respect that.

But I will say that ... I suppose if the movie does pull off saying something both novel and useful, I honestly think part of that is because it manages to defuse its thesis across a lot of loosely related truisms about community, purpose, trust, and the like. In the end, the movie becomes as much about humanizing the powerholders making these messes as it is about anthropomorphizing an underclass of animals. Someone's probably already drafting a piece about how this is the latest example of Disney needing to water down its messaging to appease its capitalist sovereigns. I myself wouldn't call this toothless, there is still action to be taken at the end, or imagine that present struggles would be worse if we found more peaceable ways to frame these conflicts.

Pixar has pivoted in recent years to elevating the role of the auteur with outings like ONWARD, Turning Red, and, to an extent, last year's ELIO. I don't know how much of Hopper's situation is autobiographical for Daniel Chong, but his unique artistic sensibility in this film does feel like a highly personalized toolset, which makes Hoppers feel truly unique within the Pixar library.

It'll be interesting to see where this movie takes the future of Pixar animation. I honestly hope this movie doesn't do for Pixar animation what Thor - Ragnarok did to the MCU, but in the meantime, I think all the other Pixar gems owe a little gratitude to this movie for reminding us just how versatile this Pixar style can be, and probably always was.

--The Professor

Comments

"What Are Happy Endings For Anyway?" (II) - The Docks of New York

Yes, fellas. Your calendar is correct. We are, in fact, 10 years out from La La Land . My main point of interest in Damien Chazelle’s groundbreaking 2016 musical has historically been its role in helping set off the sort of stealth renaissance of musicals we’ve been experiencing the last ten years where we all try to see how big we can make the genre before anyone notices. Chazelle explained at the time , “Now more than ever we need hope and romance on the screen, and I think there’s something about musicals that just get at something that only movies can do. That idea of movies as a dreamland, movies as the language of our dreams and movies as a way of expressing a world in which you break into song, that emotions can violate the rules of reality.” The hook for this film, though, is very much the film’s ultimate rejection of the traditional happy ending for which musicals are so well known. That is the reason why...

PROFESSOR'S PICKS: Ranking Decades of Film

This piece's lead image very much puts the modern landscape of blockbusters in competition with classic Hollywood. And the state of things can often feel that way, that film literacy is somehow a zero-sum game between popular film and "real film." But lo, this is just a fun way to visually represent eras of film competing for top placement on one person's ranking. I'm not here to add to any divide. Rather than argue that one period of film is better than the other, I want to explore how the mutating DNA of cinema carries a base code of magnificence across its lifetime. The way that manifests will vary across each decade, and I'm organizing them in such a way that privileges how I personally favor any given variant, but the lifeblood of the movies is vibrant across the ages. There is fantastic work in every time era, just as every era has its stumbles. But there are certainly periods where I feel more attuned to the work that Hollywood is puttin...

We're Back! a Dinosaur's Story - Getting Lost in the "Last Frontier of Imagination"

Last month, Variety ran a piece observing, “Hollywood Can’t Survive Without Animation. So Why Won’t the Industry Respect It?” by Clayton Davis, who reported , “In the nearly five decades that domestic grosses have been tracked, an animated film has finished the year as the No. 1 release just seven times, beginning with Disney’s 'Aladdin' in 1992. Now the medium is having an unprecedented run, with 'Inside Out 2' and 'Zootopia 2' topping the last two calendar years (a first for animated movies to lead the box office for two consecutive years) and the latter becoming the highest-grossing animated film ever domestically. 'The Super Mario Galaxy Movie' is leading 2026 so far and is the only film to cross $1 billion. Setting aside the 2020 and 2021 pandemic seasons, which emptied theaters of family films, animated features have made up about 20% of the year’s 10 top-grossing releases over the past decade. And yet, the artists who make these movies have rarely...

REVIEW: COYOTE VS. ACME

The secret weapon of The Looney Tunes has always been their natural eloquence with meta-textuality. Seriously. Go rewatch "Duck Amuck." It's high art. That trick isn't really new here in a landscape where "self-awareness" is just generally baked into the fabric of most millennial media. But Coyote vs Acme nonetheless feels cut from a very different cloth. I don't even know if that's from anything extra this film does so much as what it doesn't do. This movie never feels like it's trying to prove how much smarter it is than the audience. It doesn't feel smug or self-promoting. Like, it takes a different kind of self-awareness to look at how many times a certain Wile E. Coyote has tried to get his hands around a certain speeding bird and ask if maybe the poor guy, who has literally tried everything under the sun, has just had the odds stacked against him. It takes a certain kind of movie to decide that this dude just needs so...

REVIEW: Disenchanted

Once Upon a Time, Disney's Enchanted reminded us that deep down inside, even the most cynical of us was pining for a fairy-tale. In those days, a musical rom-com featuring hand-drawn animation and overtly referencing films of the Disney animated catalog actually felt novel, even daring. But today is a different climate. Disney fairy-tales are unambiguously a popular presence in modern pop culture. They are regularly referenced, discussed, and abused both by their parent company and the public at large. Any sequel to such a film wouldn't have the same opportunity to feel revelatory or groundbreaking. But this proves to be an inadequate defense for this movie's shortcomings. Turns out, you can sing about fairy-tales for two hours without earnestly exploring what makes them so special to begin with. I say shortcomings deliberately because there's not a lot that's actively wrong with this movie. Almost everything about this movie could have worked if it had been pr...

Making Room for Classic Movies

Way back in my film school days, I had an interaction with a favorite cousin whom I had not seen in some time. This opportunity to reconnect saw our first interaction since I had been accepted as a film student, and so he asked me what basically everyone asks me right after I tell them I’m studying film, “So, like what’s your favorite movie, then?” When approached with this question, at least by associates who are not necessarily film buffs, my default response is usually something I know has been on Netflix in the last year. (Though if I had to pick an answer ... maybe Silver Linings Playbook .) I think this time I said James Cameron’s Titanic . He then had a sort of illuminated reaction and followed up with, “I see, so you like … old movies.” My response to this was something in the vein of, “Well, yes , but NOOOO …” Steven Spielberg being a 29-year-old on the set of Jaws In academic circles, t he demarcation between “c...

PROFESSOR'S PICKS: 10 Movie Theater Experiences That Changed Me

So, January 2012: Disney is rereleasing their 1991 animated masterpiece, Beauty and the Beast into theaters, and in 3D format, and I'm able to coerce a friend into seeing it with me. This was a big deal because, as with most of the Disney movies we'd call "classic," Beauty and the Beast had its day in theaters before my time, and this was an opportunity to experience the movie in its proper element, and maybe imagine what it would have been when the legendary tunes by Howard Ashman and Alan Menken graced the public for the first time. My larger circle was none-too-impressed with my choice. Didn't I know that the movie was already on DVD? That I could just watch it anytime in the comfort of my own home without having to pay for another ticket? How could I be so careless with my finances? (Incidentally, many of these same friends would pay top-dollar to see the Beauty and the Beast remake five years later on opening weekend ...) ...

REVIEW: Soul

Pixar's latest film, Soul , dropped on Disney+ Christmas day, another regrettable casualty of the virus. This time around, we follow a hopeful musician bursting with enthusiasm. Music is an oddly appropriate metaphor for the film: both certainly touch the outer rim of mankind's emotional faculty, but good luck summarizing the experience to your friends. Joe Gardner is a music teacher at a public school whose enthusiasm for music is spilling out of the walls of his classroom. Opportunity strikes Joe the same day that misfortune does, and a fatal accident lands him in a celestial plane of existence known as "The Great Before," where souls are developed and finessed before being sent to earth to experience human existence. Joe is saddled with mentoring 22, a soul sapling who has settled in The Great Before for several hundred years and has no intention of ever giving mortality a chance. But in 22, Joe sees a chance to return back to earth and fulfill his purpose if he ca...

REVIEW: The Rivals of Amziah King

The first note I made for this film is that I knew a bunch of cowboys growing up. But I regretfully did not know any who were just so willing to burst into song. I thought then that I knew what I was getting into with this movie. But I could not anticipate what this story would try to feed me. The movie sees Amziah King, a good-natured beekeeper, smalltown musician, and all-around good dude, sorting through some business deals as he happens to reunite with his former foster-daughter, Kateri. Crossing paths again allows them to mutually rediscover what they gave to each other as two people who lifted each other up. But when King's entire stock is stolen at the worst possible moment, Kateri gets to step-up and defend what is theirs. Amziah King is McConaughey at his most endearing. His ability to put the viewer at ease is the film's greatest trick. I've heard some buzz about this being his best performance ever. I'd...

REVIEW: Forgotten Island

It's fun to consider whether or not you chose your friends or whether they chose you, particularly when it seems you and your friends have nothing in common. That's certainly true of Raissa and Jo, the protagonists of Dreamworks' newest film, but they are nonetheless determined to keep hold of one another, and have been since one fateful meeting outside the principal's office when they were kids--even as Raissa's looming departure for college across the seas threatens to tear them apart. The night before Raissa leaves, forces beyond their control draw Jo and Raissa to Nakali, the Forgotten Island from the stories Jo's grandmother told them as children. It's a dream come true. But this island's magic is mysterious. Jo and Raissa wake up on the beach and realize they have approximately 12 hours unaccounted for. Moreover, they had a ticket home, but its location is buried somewhere in that time gap, in memories lost. Trying ...

Films and Feelings

Search This Blog