Skip to main content

REVIEW: AVATAR - Fire and Ash


    The "Avatar" chapters have generally renewed their interest to the masses based on which exciting new locale and which new culture whichever film opts to explore. 

    Following that dance, "Fire and Ash" introduces yet another Na'Vi clan, this one hailing from the scorched plains under the shadow of an erupted volcano. But their biome is decidedly less spectacular than the lush jungles of the Omaticaya or the rich coral reefs where the Metkayina dive. Between the ashen grounds of the volcano clan and the metallic fortress of the humans, this is comfortably the most monochromatic of the three Avatar films. And yet, Avatar: Fire and Ash is no less gripping for it.

    And this is where the internet really starts to reckon with what us fans of the franchise have always kind of known: that the many screensavers offered by the Avatar world ... they have been nice. But these films would have never made the impact they have if they did not respond to something inside of us that we know to be true, something we know to transcend culture or time.

    Some months after the death of their oldest son, the Sulley family is still in the thick of their grief. (Though, these lucky ducks don't seem even moderately consoled in the knowledge that at least Pandora heaven comes with visiting hours.) But a vicious enemy, an aggressive Na'Vi clan led by the merciless Varang, intercepts both the Sulley clan as well as Colonel Quaritch, threatening to unleash a whole new storm of violence upon the planet. And as new developments in the world of Pandora turn the human child, Spider, into the human forces' number one target, Jake and Neytiri will have to determine once and for all exactly how they define family. 

    This adventure offers some fun new set pieces, like the air blimps of the nomadic air-people, as well as some capital action playgrounds. But trying to scout out which new battlefield the camera is scanning for runs the risk of distracting from the real visual marvels of the film.

    Cameron has long maintained that the motion-capture rendering of the Na'Vi is nothing more than a thin interface for the performance that comes directly from the human actors. This film has done the most to prove Cameron's thesis. The blue transformation has always been what I'd call lifelike, but the human piece of that equation is as bright as ever in this film. I'll give a specific shoutout to newcomer Oona Chaplin as the star player this round. Her slick savagery builds the case for Varang as one of the most delicious sci-fi villains in film history. I don't know whether that's the technology advancing or the actors reaching new levels with their character.


    Perhaps it's just easier for all these performances to rise to the surface in the most character-driven Avatar film yet. Planet-wide repercussions ripple from the decisions the Sulley family makes, but the decisions themselves hang mostly on what it means for the people they care for most, and the profound sense of belonging and devastation that can emerge when you see yourself as belonging to something bigger than yourself. Imagine Robert Redford's Ordinary People, but with a lot more gunships and bioluminescent trees. Every player feels like a main character here. Everyone follows their own track to discovery, and you watch these characters cross their respective finish lines with something a lot like pride.

    Yet the fire of violence and the need to deliver retribution upon those who have wronged you is also an agent in the heroes' self-actualizing. In this way, the heroes have more in common with Varang than the film seems interested in discussing. Theirs is a more reactive kind of violence, emerging purely out of the instinct to protect your own after someone else throws the first punch, which is perhaps how Cameron reconciles it with the pacificist credo of something like T2, but I'm still unresolved about whether or not the film reconciles this responsibly. 

    And where "The Way of Water" leaned just a little too much on Jake's narration, parts of "Fire and Ash" require a bit more explanation than the film affords them, both as it relates to character motivations and the supernatural phenomena that unfold. Jake resists joining up with old dragon-mount, Toruk, because he doesn't want to give into his bloodlust ... and yet he is actively trying to coax the Metkayina clan into arming themselves with human weapons. 

    This is most apparent in the last five or so minutes where the movie phones in some falling action, as though exhausted by its own rigorous third act that it just didn't feel like crossing the t's and dotting the i's. Perhaps it is Cameron's intention to clarify these things in follow-up installments, or perhaps that was a collision between filmmaker and studio. "Alright, Jim. You can have 3 hours and 17 minutes, but not one second more!"

    The world of the Avatar saga is scorched by rage and despair. It is also a world full of joy. A world where we watch families forming in real time. A world where heroes demand in front of their peers that the humanity and dignity of their friends be recognized. A world where choosing love even when it doesn't make sense can bring unimaginable restoration to a land and a soul out of balance.

    Three movies in, and the world of Pandora continues to surprise and heal. 

        --The Professor

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: HOPPERS

     In the 1950s under the threat of nuclear warfare, Hollywood premiered such exercises as The Day the Earth Stood Still or War of the Worlds where an alien power would pass judgment on humankind, holding its fate in its hands. Here in the 2020s under the shadow of such threats as climate change, Hollywood sends to be our judge ... beavers.     Let me back up ...      Daniel Chong's new film from Pixar Animation, Hoppers , sees  Mabel (Piper Curda), a college student whose self-appointed mission is to preserve the glade where she used to find sanctuary with her now deceased grandmother. Her biggest opponent is hometown boy and beloved mayor, Jerry (Jon Hamm), who has designs to plow over the glade in order to open his new freeway--estimated to save travelers four whole minutes of commuting.       Mabel gets her golden opportunity when she uncovers secret technology pioneered by her professor which allows a human to rem...

The Official Story: When Oppression Hits Home

  This last month, Wim Wenders, the director behind movies such as Wings of Desire (1987) and Perfect Days (2023), made a statement at the 76th Berlin Film Festival that’s been scratching at me. In his words, “Yes, movies can change the world. Not in a political way. No movie has really changed any politician’s idea, but … we can change the idea that people have of how they should live.” Wenders was speaking specifically on the subject of film festivals taking active stances on things such as the Israel-Palestine conflict, further describing, “Cinema has an incredible power of being compassionate and empathetic. The news is not empathetic. Politics is not empathetic, but movies are. And that’s our duty.”   I think the dressing of this verdict was supposed to be optimistic, but the sentiment reminded me of something that actress Jennifer Lawrence said also very recently on why she’s pulled back from using her official platforms to speak out against the Trump Administrati...

Silver Linings Playbook: What are Happy Endings For Anyway?

            Legendary film critic Roger Ebert gave the following words in July of 2005 at the dedication of his plaque outside the Chicago Theatre: Nights of Cabiria (1957) “For me, movies are like a machine that generates empathy. If it’s a great movie, it lets you understand a little bit more about what it’s like to be a different gender, a different race, a different age, a different economic class, a different nationality, a different profession, different hopes, aspirations, dreams and fears. It helps us to identify with the people who are sharing this journey with us. And that, to me, is the most noble thing that good movies can do and it’s a reason to encourage them and to support them and to go to them.” Ebert had been reviewing films for coming on forty years when he gave that assessment. I haven’t been doing it for a tenth as long. I don’t know if I’ve really earned the right to pontificate in this same manner. But film ...

Social Utopia in Raya and the Last Dragon

          I think every filmmaker hopes that their film will change the world for the better, but how to measure that when the exact effects a film has on society are impossible to quantify? Did Patty Jenkins’   Wonder Woman   instigate #MeToo, or were both just natural products of the shifting social dynamics that had been morphing for a long time? Maybe we're just kidding ourselves when we put our faith in movies to heal the wrongs of the world.  After all,  Kramer vs Kramer has been out for over forty years now, and some dads still struggle to prioritize love and attention for their kids.          I'm also thinking of  Raya and the Last Dragon. Disney's 59th animated film takes place in a fictional world known as Kumandra, a land that was once home to the benevolent and majestic dragons. In the film’s prologue we learn that the dragons disappeared thousands of years ago to seal away an ancient evil know...

An Earnest Defense of Passengers

          I've heard a lot of back and forth over what the purpose of film is and what we should ask from it. Film as a social amenity kind of has a dual purpose. It's supposed to give the population common ground and find things that people of varying backgrounds and beliefs can unify around. On the other hand, film also creates this detached simulated reality through which we can explore complex and even testing ideas about the contradictions in human existence.     In theory, a film can fulfill both functions, but movies exist in a turbulent landscape. It's very rare for a film to try to walk both lanes, and it's even rarer for a film to be embraced upon entry for attempting to do so.  Let me explain by describing the premise of one of my favorite movies, Morten Tyldum's 2016 film, Passengers .      A key piece of this film ’s plot revolves around the main character, Jim Preston, a passenger onboard a spaceship, who premat...

REVIEW: Project Hail Mary

    The elements in Project Hail Mary are all mostly straightforward and build to a fairly familiar end: drop an average Joe into an extraordinary situation where he is required to be extraordinary also, and watch extraordinary things happen. This is proven territory.      And I spent most of the time drafting this review trying to decide whether that was a point for or against the film, helmed by Phil Lord and Chris Miller--and whether that made a difference for a non-franchise piece like this, the exact kind of film we need to succeed at the box office in order to have a healthy landscape. I think the answer to that question is honestly bigger than any one film, even a reasonably well-done one such as this.     But I will say that a movie like Project Hail Mary gives me some hope, and it's my wish that the film continues to find people who will receive it with zeal. And I hope that the people who do will continue to search for other films that they...

The Banshees of Inisherin: The Death Knell of Male Friendship

           I’m going to go out on a limb today and put out the idea that our society is kind of obsessed with romance. In popular storytelling, t he topic has two whole genres to itself (romantic-comedy, romantic-drama), which gives it a huge slice of the media pie. Yet even in narratives where romance is not the focus, it still has this standing invitation to weave itself onto basically any kind of story. It’s almost more worth remarking upon when a story doesn’t feature some subplot with the main character getting the guy or the girl. Annie Hall (1977)      And it’s also not just the romantic happy ending that we’re obsessed with. Some of the most cathartic stories of romance see the main couple breaking up or falling apart, and there’s something to be gained from seeing that playing out on screen as well. But what’s interesting is that it is assumed that a person has a singular “one and only” romantic partner. By contras...

REVIEW: WICKED - For Good

      I'm conflicted about how to approach this review. I know everyone has their own yellow brick road to the myth of The Wizard of Oz as a whole and the specific Broadway adaptation that brought us all here.   I don't want to write this only for others who are familiar with the source material.       Even so, I can't help but review this from the perspective of a fan of the Broadway show--someone who has been tracking the potential for a film adaptation since before Jon M. Chu's participation was announced for the ambitious undertaking of translating one of Broadway's most electric shows onto film. I can't help but view this from the vantage point of someone who knew just how many opportunities this had to go wrong.     And it's from that vantage point that I now profess such profound relief that the gambit paid off. We truly have the " Lord of the Rings of musicals ."  I'll give last year's movie the edge for having a slightly...

The Many Fathers of Harry Potter

     Despite being a Harry Potter fan for most of my life, I didn’t make it to "Harry Potter Land" at Universal until November of 2019.      Some relatives invited me on a SoCal theme park tour, a trip which also saw my last visit to Disneyland before the shutdown. And when you and a bunch of other twenty-somethings are walking through a recreation of Hogwarts for the first time, you inevitably start playing this game where you call out every artifact on display and try to trace it back to whatever movie or even specific moment the mise en scene is trying to invoke:           There’s the greenhouse from "Chamber of Secrets." Now they’re playing the “Secrets of the Castle” track from "Prisoner of Azkaban." Here we are loading in the Room of Requirement from "Order of the Phoenix." From start to finish, the attraction, like the franchise from which it spawned, is just one giant nostalgia parade.     See, t he Wiza...

REVIEW: ONWARD

     The Walt Disney Company as a whole seems to be in constant danger of being overtaken by its own cannibalistic tendency--cashing in on the successes of their past hits at the expense of creating the kinds of stories that merited these reimaginings to begin with.       Pixar, coming fresh off a decade marked by a deluge of sequels, is certainly susceptible to this pattern as well. Though movies like Inside Out and Coco have helped breathe necessary life into the studio, audiences invested in the creative lifeblood of the studio should take note when an opportunity comes for either Disney or Pixar animation to flex their creative muscles.       This year we'll have three such opportunities between the two studios. [EDIT: Okay, maybe not. Thanks, Corona.] The first of these, ONWARD directed by Dan Scanlon, opens this weekend and paints a hopeful picture of a future where Pixar allows empathetic and novel storytelling to gui...