Skip to main content

YEAR IN REVIEW: 2023

    Confession: I spend all year waiting specifically to design the annual collage for my "Year in Review." What can I say? I really like commemorating things. And there was a lot to commemorate this year for Films and Feelings because, even if my overall post count was slightly lower than usual, I did on occasion experience that fleeting sensation of being proud of the work I put out.

    My lower review count is probably the biggest reason for my desert of posts. I only put out nine reviews in 2023, and only three in the last half of the year. This is only barely over half of what I pulled off two years ago. (I was going to review The Color Purple to get me into the double digits, but Christmas day ended up being a busy one for me.) This year's top-performing review was for this summer's live-action remake of The Little Mermaid, as it should have been--I doubt whether I have ever subjected a film to more intense scrutiny before, or ever will again. I'd say that I'll try harder next year, but with the Hollywood landscape looking so dry over 2024, I don't know if that'll be possible.

    My essay count also came a little short in 2023. A part of this is a direct result of me trying to allow more time to elapse between premiering essays so that they each benefit from the extra attention, and of course wider cuts means fewer pieces of pie. I also just dropped October's essay too late to come up with a suitable replacement. This more than any other year has been plagued with essays that died halfway through development. Strands of some of these may find their way into future installments, so I don't want to give away what any of these ghost essays actually were (though one of them might have talked extensively about Die Hard, and that's all I'm gonna say... ). But take from this the assurance that the essays I ultimately landed on survived multiple screening processes and are much stronger for it. Rounding them up, this year's essays included the following: 

    -Are We in Another Golden Age of Musicals? - A survey of recent Hollywood musicals, probing the possibility of a modern creative and commercial resurgence of the genre. 

West Side Story (2021)
    -Lamb: The Controversy of Vulnerability - An in-depth study of the motivations behind the controversial film centering the precarious friendship between an older man and a neglected pre-teen girl.

    -A Thousand Words for Mamoru Hosada's Belle - A deconstruction of the common argument, that a film's visual splendor is at best a tertiary concern in film analysis, featuring the anime film Belle by Mamoru Hosada. 

    -The Night of the Hunter: Redefining Childhood Innocence - A look at the paradox represented by children's films through the lens of 1955 noir-classic, The Night of the Hunter

    -Bright Young Women: The Legacy of Ariel and The Little Mermaid - A celebration of Ariel, the titular heroine of Disney's The Little Mermaid, in the context of female representation in and out of Disney.

    -Where Are All the Netflix Classics? - An exploration of why Netflix's bounty of exclusive films leave little to no cultural impact. 

Netflix's The Old Guard (2020)
    -Making Room for Classic Movies - An advocation for the continued viewing and discussing of classic films even in the modern age.

    -I Will Not Forget that Power Rangers Reboot - A retrospective on the 2017 feature film reboot of "Power Rangers" and why it deserves far more attention and enthusiasm than it found upon release.

    -Hating Disney Princesses Has Never Been Feminist Pt. 1, 2, 3 - A three-part dive into the backlash against Disney Princess culture, weighing its motivations, truthfulness, and repercussions. 

    -Changing Film History With a Smile--and Perhaps, a Tear: Charlie Chaplin's The Kid - A tribute to Charlie Chaplin and the way his body of work shaped the development of film's place in popular culture, with special emphasis on his 1921 film, The Kid.

    I took to heart many of the goals I expressed in years past. For last year's Year in Review, I aired an idea of perhaps putting out pieces that tracked ideas or concepts within the film discussion that weren't themselves anchored to any specific film or series. I was able to get out more of those out this year than any year previous. This helped expand the total range of films that got attention, though I would be remiss to not acknowledge that I do feel most at my element doing deep-dives into just one or two films at a time. 

The Docks of New York (1928)
    I had also long wondered when I would finally have the gumption to premiere an entire essay about a silent film, and so I was really happy when things finally came together for one such film, and it didn't really surprise me that this film ended up being Charlie Chaplin's The Kid. I wonder when I'll get around to adding more to the roster.

    A common theme through this year's run of essays had a lot to do with how we define "classic," how films and audiences interact to create this thing called "the zeitgeist," and what happens when a film even gets there. I believe that is ultimately why we even discuss film in the first place. The whole conceit behind even throwing my hat into this oversaturated market of online self-appointed film critics is the urgent need to keep film literacy alive, and the foolhardy notion that I could ever be a link on that chain. Film criticism as an institution, across its many manifestations, is only valid to me if we accept the existence of a pantheon--if we abide by the notion that films and film have relevance beyond the transient window in which they premiere, which is why I believe we need to deliberately engage with films that aren't favored by an algorithm.

It's a Wonderful Life (1946)
        I have said before that the essay I am proudest of is always the one I just finished. I consider that to be an honest reflection of the love I have for my process and my ever-expanding body of work, but from this vantage point, I think I can identify one specific essay from this year that has perhaps served my ends more than any other: my piece on the necessity of viewing and discussing classic cinema. I invested a lot into the development and promotion of this essay, which is perhaps why it ended up being my most popular piece, even in a year where a lot of my posts performed exceptionally well.

    The last two years, I also gave some passing notion about spotlighting more niche films in this space. I was able to cash into that early this year with my piece on indie-film Lamb and anime-film Belle. And while I certainly enjoy tossing my hat in on why superhero movies are struggling as much as the next guy, I do feel a special urgency to try to give coverage to underappreciated movies of today. Because while I do think all media commentators have some obligation to keep the verified classics alive in the conversation, consideration also needs to be afforded to newly hatched classics that are just trying to crawl to safety before being erased. Earlier this year, director Richard Linklater bemoaned a certain loss of interest among contemporary film journalism surrounding niche films, saying, 

“There were these outlets that were very curious about what was going on in the avant-garde and the underground. And at some point, I don’t know if it’s just Hollywood or capitalism in general, the equation became, ‘Well, that thing’s small, no one’s going to see it anyway.’ Instead of amplifying this cool thing. It doesn’t qualify to be written about in our pages because it’s just not culturally relevant. And I think indie cinema has fallen prey to that. You don’t see a lot of serious writing about it.”

Ben is Back (2018)
    And there used to be better resources for tracking this sort of thing. IMDb used to have an indie-film spotlight on their main page that I actually referred to regularly. That is how I discovered Lamb, among many other films. I have seen many other critics of all pedigrees share similar anxieties, not only about the state of cinema, but of the frightening notion that maybe there's just nothing anyone can do about it. The inability for viewers to engage with niche cinema is only outpaced by their growing antipathy toward it. This year has shown that we can't even lay the blame on tried and true targets like superhero movies. 

  In this riptide where media is everywhere yet media literacy is just kind of out the window and basically every kind of film is in desperate need of attention, I'm honestly still trying to figure out what my specific obligation is in this circle: What is the appropriate rate for niche essays? How do I even draw that line? But these are also things I am willing to figure out. 

    Anyways, to get this ball rolling, I'll be closing out this "Year in Review" with a non-comprehensive reference list of movies that desperately deserve more coverage. Here's hoping that they will be the happy recipients of many more conversations. 

    -Dave Made a Maze (2017): Discouraged by years of failed ambitions, a struggling artist retreats into a giant cardboard maze-fort he built in his living room; when his friends attempt to rescue him, they discover his maze is a lot bigger (and more dangerous) on the inside. 

Skeleton Twins (2014)
    -
Skeleton Twins (2014): After a failed suicide attempt, a man is reunited with his twin sister he hasn't seen in ten years, opening up old wounds for both of them but also posing an opportunity for genuine healing and reconciliation.

    -Beautiful Girls (1996): In the days leading up to their ten-year high school reunion, a group of friends with very specific ideas about love, reflect on their romances, their failed hopes, and their relationship with one another. 

    -Ben is Back (2018): A mother is surprised when her son, a recovering drug addict, shows up on her house on Christmas to spend the holiday with his family, but his demons aren't far behind him. 

    -Pieces of April (2003): An estranged daughter and her family prepare for what might be their last Thanksgiving dinner together before the mother succumbs to her terminal illness, a reunion that none of the parties are actually looking forward to.

    -Time Out (2001): A man who was let go from his job over six months ago spins increasingly elaborate deceptions to hide the truth of his unemployment from his wife, children, and friends. 

Running on Empty (1988)
    -
Running on Empty (1988): A teenager raised by two runaway fugitives starts to yearn for a life with roots and stability. 

    -Millennium Actress (2001): Two television reporters interview an aging actress and are swept up in her journey of self-reflection and self-discovery. 

    -April and the Extraordinary World (2015): In an alternate timeline where all the scientists of the early 20th century have been kidnapped, a young girl searches for her parents among the missing scientists and uncovers an elaborate conspiracy.

    -In Your Eyes (2014): Two strangers living on opposite sides of the country discover a telepathic bond that allows them to feel and sense each other's experiences.

    This world of film can be a fantastic thing when we bring our hearts and our heads with us and create the zeitgeist together. Let's keep doing this for a long time, folks, and let's make room for a lot of people at the table. 

                       --The Professor

The Holdovers (2023)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: WICKED - For Good

      I'm conflicted about how to approach this review. I know everyone has their own yellow brick road to the myth of The Wizard of Oz as a whole and the specific Broadway adaptation that brought us all here.   I don't want to write this only for others who are familiar with the source material.       Even so, I can't help but review this from the perspective of a fan of the Broadway show--someone who has been tracking the potential for a film adaptation since before Jon M. Chu's participation was announced for the ambitious undertaking of translating one of Broadway's most electric shows onto film. I can't help but view this from the vantage point of someone who knew just how many opportunities this had to go wrong.     And it's from that vantage point that I now profess such profound relief that the gambit paid off. We truly have the " Lord of the Rings of musicals ."  I'll give last year's movie the edge for having a slightly...

REVIEW: ZOOTOPIA 2

       Any follow-up to the 2016 masterpiece,  Zootopia , is going to be disadvantaged. Cinema was still a year ahead of Jordan Peele's "Get Out" when Disney released one of the most articulate explanations of race, allyship, and accountability ever put to film. Now that everyone knows how good, even "timely," a Disney pic can be, how do you surprise everyone a second time?      The insights in this sequel won't spur any new chapters in your sociology 101 textbook. Though honestly, neither was the deflection of white saviourship  that  novel back in 2016. We more or less knew how racial profiling and biases played out in the landscape. What surprised many of us (and validated the rest of us) was the idea that these ideas could be articulated so eloquently in a children's film.     It seems that the studio tried the same thing here with Zootopia 2 that it did with Frozen II six years ago. I think a lot of people wanted that m...

Elemental: Savoring Pixar's Fading Light

I’ve only been doing this writing thing for a short while. But in that space, I have been surprised at many of the developments I’ve gotten to witness unfolding in the popular film landscape. It was only five years ago, for example, that superhero movies were still thought to be unstoppable. Here in 2025, though, we know better. But the wheels coming off the Marvel machine accompanied a shift in their whole method of production and distribution, and it didn’t take long for the natural consequences to catch up with them as verifiable issues started appearing in their films. Thor: Love and Thunder (2022) No. The development that has most surprised me has been critics and their slow-motion break-up with Pixar. The only way I know how to describe what I’ve seen over the last five years … imagine that your roommate has been stuck for a long time dating a girl who was obviously bad for him, and after he finally breaks up with her he gets back into the dating ring. All the girls he takes out ...

REVIEW: Mufasa - The Lion King

    To get to the point, Disney's new origin story for The Lion King 's Mufasa fails at the ultimate directive of all prequels. By the end of the adventure, you don't actually feel like you know these guys any better.           Such  has been the curse for nearly Disney's live-action spin-offs/remakes of the 2010s on. Disney supposes it's enough to learn more facts or anecdotes about your favorite characters, but the interview has always been more intricate than all that. There is no catharsis nor identification for the audience during Mufasa's culminating moment of uniting the animals of The Pridelands because the momentum pushing us here has been carried by cliche, not archetype.      Director Barry Jenkins' not-so-secret weapon has always been his ability to derive pathos from lyrical imagery, and he does great things with the African landscape without stepping into literal fantasy. This is much more aesthetically interestin...

The Apartment: What Makes Us Human

Earlier this year, director of the Guardians of the Galaxy trilogy and this summer's Superman movie, James Gunn, attributed the chaos of modern Hollywood to one simple factor. Speaking with Rolling Stone, he said , “I do believe that the reason why the movie industry is dying is not because of people not wanting to see movies. It’s not because of home screens getting so good. The number one reason is because people are making movies without a finished screenplay.” Without the insider knowledge that a Hollywood director has, I’m still inclined to agree. While the artistic and corporative threads of filmmaking have always been in competition, watching many tentpole films of the last fifteen years or so has felt more analogous to a dentist appointment than anything I'd call entertainment, and I can almost always trace the problem to something that should have been taken care of before the cameras ever started rolling. Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore (2022)  ...

REVIEW: AVATAR - Fire and Ash

     The "Avatar" chapters have generally renewed their interest to the masses based on which exciting new locale and each new culture whichever film opts to explore.      Following that dance,  "Fire and Ash" introduces yet another Na'Vi clan, this one hailing from the scorched plains under the shadow of an erupted volcano. But their biome is decidedly less spectacular than the lush jungles of the Omaticaya or the rich coral reefs where the Metkayina dive. Between the ashen grounds of the volcano clan and the metallic fortress of the humans, this is comfortably the most monochromatic of the three Avatar films. And yet, Avatar: Fire and Ash is no less gripping for it.      And this is where the internet really starts to reckon with what us fans of the franchise have always kind of known: that the many screensavers offered by the Avatar world ... they have been  nice . But these films would have never made the impact they have if the...

REVIEW: Wake Up Dead Man

     Last week when I reviewed WICKED: For Good , I mentioned that I couldn't help but analyze the film specifically from the lens of a lifelong fan of the Broadway phenomenon.       I find myself in a similar position here examining the new "Knives Out" movie and its meditation on faith and religion. I can't help but view the film through my own experiences as a practicing believer.       But first, some notes on the filmmaking itself.      The third installment in the Knives Out saga sees Benoit Blanc investigating the murder of a tyrannical priest, Monsignor Wicks, presiding over a smalltown flock. The prime suspect is none other than the young, idealistic Father Jud, the new priest who found Wicks' approach to spirituality repulsive and completely counter to Christ's teachings. Thus, this mystery is a contest between two representations of Christianity, each desperate to define the function of religion in the mod...

Fine, I Will Review The Percy Jackson Show

   The YA scene in the late 2000s and early 2010s was stuffed full of failed book-to-movie adaptations, desperate attempts to ride the Harry Potter train.  Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief  was not the first book to receive this treatment. Yet it somehow became the most infamous.      We can speculate as to why it is that Percy Jackson never really exited the discourse the way properties like Eragon or Inkheart did. Perhaps it's because Rick Riordan continued to add to the lore with two follow-up sagas set in the same universe. (As of this writing, Riordan is preparing a whole additional Percy Jackson trilogy.) Perhaps it's because, while those other movie adaptations merely tried to replicate the Harry Potter effect , Percy Jackson admittedly borrowed generously from the Harry Potter story template. Whatever the reason, young millennials have never really been allowed to forget the crimes committed by FOX back in 2010 ...

An Earnest Defense of Passengers

          Recall with me, if you will, the scene in Hollywood December 2016. We were less than a year away from #MeToo, and the internet was keenly aware of Hollywood’s suffocating influence on women on and off screen but not yet sure what to do about it.       Enter Morten Tyldum’s film Passengers , a movie which, despite featuring the two hottest stars in Hollywood at the apex of their fame, was mangled by internet critics immediately after take-off. A key piece of Passengers ’ plot revolves around the main character, Jim Preston, a passenger onboard a spaceship, who prematurely awakens from a century-long hibernation and faces a lifetime of solitude adrift in outer space; rather than suffer through a life of loneliness, he eventually decides to deliberately awaken another passenger, Aurora Lane, condemning her to his same fate.    So this is obviously a film with a moral dilemma at its center. Morten Tyldum, director of...

Wicked vs Maleficent

  “Witch” has historically been used as a pejorative for a non-conformist woman, someone who does not obey the expectations of her culture. It’s little wonder, then, that a society with more progressive mores would commandeer the witch archetype into a warrior for social justice, or that the most famous witch of them all would spearhead this retyping.      Yes, I am thinking of a certain Broadway musical and a fiery, green-skinned, justice-bent rebel-rouser.  Wicked is a stage musical that follows the infamous Wicked Witch of the West as featured in the 1939 film The Wizard of Oz . By shedding light on what happened before Dorothy dropped into Oz, Wicked recasts the witch as not a villain, but a misunderstood heroine. The show has been defying gravity on Broadway for coming on twenty years now, and it’s showing no signs of slowing down.   When Disney’s Maleficen t came along a little over ten years later, the shorthand description of the film was basic...