Skip to main content

YEAR IN REVIEW: 2023

    Confession: I spend all year waiting specifically to design the annual collage for my "Year in Review." What can I say? I really like commemorating things. And there was a lot to commemorate this year for Films and Feelings because, even if my overall post count was slightly lower than usual, I did on occasion experience that fleeting sensation of being proud of the work I put out.

    My lower review count is probably the biggest reason for my desert of posts. I only put out nine reviews in 2023, and only three in the last half of the year. This is only barely over half of what I pulled off two years ago. (I was going to review The Color Purple to get me into the double digits, but Christmas day ended up being a busy one for me.) This year's top-performing review was for this summer's live-action remake of The Little Mermaid, as it should have been--I doubt whether I have ever subjected a film to more intense scrutiny before, or ever will again. I'd say that I'll try harder next year, but with the Hollywood landscape looking so dry over 2024, I don't know if that'll be possible.

    My essay count also came a little short in 2023. A part of this is a direct result of me trying to allow more time to elapse between premiering essays so that they each benefit from the extra attention, and of course wider cuts means fewer pieces of pie. I also just dropped October's essay too late to come up with a suitable replacement. This more than any other year has been plagued with essays that died halfway through development. Strands of some of these may find their way into future installments, so I don't want to give away what any of these ghost essays actually were (though one of them might have talked extensively about Die Hard, and that's all I'm gonna say... ). But take from this the assurance that the essays I ultimately landed on survived multiple screening processes and are much stronger for it. Rounding them up, this year's essays included the following: 

    -Are We in Another Golden Age of Musicals? - A survey of recent Hollywood musicals, probing the possibility of a modern creative and commercial resurgence of the genre. 

West Side Story (2021)
    -Lamb: The Controversy of Vulnerability - An in-depth study of the motivations behind the controversial film centering the precarious friendship between an older man and a neglected pre-teen girl.

    -A Thousand Words for Mamoru Hosada's Belle - A deconstruction of the common argument, that a film's visual splendor is at best a tertiary concern in film analysis, featuring the anime film Belle by Mamoru Hosada. 

    -The Night of the Hunter: Redefining Childhood Innocence - A look at the paradox represented by children's films through the lens of 1955 noir-classic, The Night of the Hunter

    -Bright Young Women: The Legacy of Ariel and The Little Mermaid - A celebration of Ariel, the titular heroine of Disney's The Little Mermaid, in the context of female representation in and out of Disney.

    -Where Are All the Netflix Classics? - An exploration of why Netflix's bounty of exclusive films leave little to no cultural impact. 

Netflix's The Old Guard (2020)
    -Making Room for Classic Movies - An advocation for the continued viewing and discussing of classic films even in the modern age.

    -I Will Not Forget that Power Rangers Reboot - A retrospective on the 2017 feature film reboot of "Power Rangers" and why it deserves far more attention and enthusiasm than it found upon release.

    -Hating Disney Princesses Has Never Been Feminist Pt. 1, 2, 3 - A three-part dive into the backlash against Disney Princess culture, weighing its motivations, truthfulness, and repercussions. 

    -Changing Film History With a Smile--and Perhaps, a Tear: Charlie Chaplin's The Kid - A tribute to Charlie Chaplin and the way his body of work shaped the development of film's place in popular culture, with special emphasis on his 1921 film, The Kid.

    I took to heart many of the goals I expressed in years past. For last year's Year in Review, I aired an idea of perhaps putting out pieces that tracked ideas or concepts within the film discussion that weren't themselves anchored to any specific film or series. I was able to get out more of those out this year than any year previous. This helped expand the total range of films that got attention, though I would be remiss to not acknowledge that I do feel most at my element doing deep-dives into just one or two films at a time. 

The Docks of New York (1928)
    I had also long wondered when I would finally have the gumption to premiere an entire essay about a silent film, and so I was really happy when things finally came together for one such film, and it didn't really surprise me that this film ended up being Charlie Chaplin's The Kid. I wonder when I'll get around to adding more to the roster.

    A common theme through this year's run of essays had a lot to do with how we define "classic," how films and audiences interact to create this thing called "the zeitgeist," and what happens when a film even gets there. I believe that is ultimately why we even discuss film in the first place. The whole conceit behind even throwing my hat into this oversaturated market of online self-appointed film critics is the urgent need to keep film literacy alive, and the foolhardy notion that I could ever be a link on that chain. Film criticism as an institution, across its many manifestations, is only valid to me if we accept the existence of a pantheon--if we abide by the notion that films and film have relevance beyond the transient window in which they premiere, which is why I believe we need to deliberately engage with films that aren't favored by an algorithm.

It's a Wonderful Life (1946)
        I have said before that the essay I am proudest of is always the one I just finished. I consider that to be an honest reflection of the love I have for my process and my ever-expanding body of work, but from this vantage point, I think I can identify one specific essay from this year that has perhaps served my ends more than any other: my piece on the necessity of viewing and discussing classic cinema. I invested a lot into the development and promotion of this essay, which is perhaps why it ended up being my most popular piece, even in a year where a lot of my posts performed exceptionally well.

    The last two years, I also gave some passing notion about spotlighting more niche films in this space. I was able to cash into that early this year with my piece on indie-film Lamb and anime-film Belle. And while I certainly enjoy tossing my hat in on why superhero movies are struggling as much as the next guy, I do feel a special urgency to try to give coverage to underappreciated movies of today. Because while I do think all media commentators have some obligation to keep the verified classics alive in the conversation, consideration also needs to be afforded to newly hatched classics that are just trying to crawl to safety before being erased. Earlier this year, director Richard Linklater bemoaned a certain loss of interest among contemporary film journalism surrounding niche films, saying, 

“There were these outlets that were very curious about what was going on in the avant-garde and the underground. And at some point, I don’t know if it’s just Hollywood or capitalism in general, the equation became, ‘Well, that thing’s small, no one’s going to see it anyway.’ Instead of amplifying this cool thing. It doesn’t qualify to be written about in our pages because it’s just not culturally relevant. And I think indie cinema has fallen prey to that. You don’t see a lot of serious writing about it.”

Ben is Back (2018)
    And there used to be better resources for tracking this sort of thing. IMDb used to have an indie-film spotlight on their main page that I actually referred to regularly. That is how I discovered Lamb, among many other films. I have seen many other critics of all pedigrees share similar anxieties, not only about the state of cinema, but of the frightening notion that maybe there's just nothing anyone can do about it. The inability for viewers to engage with niche cinema is only outpaced by their growing antipathy toward it. This year has shown that we can't even lay the blame on tried and true targets like superhero movies. 

  In this riptide where media is everywhere yet media literacy is just kind of out the window and basically every kind of film is in desperate need of attention, I'm honestly still trying to figure out what my specific obligation is in this circle: What is the appropriate rate for niche essays? How do I even draw that line? But these are also things I am willing to figure out. 

    Anyways, to get this ball rolling, I'll be closing out this "Year in Review" with a non-comprehensive reference list of movies that desperately deserve more coverage. Here's hoping that they will be the happy recipients of many more conversations. 

    -Dave Made a Maze (2017): Discouraged by years of failed ambitions, a struggling artist retreats into a giant cardboard maze-fort he built in his living room; when his friends attempt to rescue him, they discover his maze is a lot bigger (and more dangerous) on the inside. 

Skeleton Twins (2014)
    -
Skeleton Twins (2014): After a failed suicide attempt, a man is reunited with his twin sister he hasn't seen in ten years, opening up old wounds for both of them but also posing an opportunity for genuine healing and reconciliation.

    -Beautiful Girls (1996): In the days leading up to their ten-year high school reunion, a group of friends with very specific ideas about love, reflect on their romances, their failed hopes, and their relationship with one another. 

    -Ben is Back (2018): A mother is surprised when her son, a recovering drug addict, shows up on her house on Christmas to spend the holiday with his family, but his demons aren't far behind him. 

    -Pieces of April (2003): An estranged daughter and her family prepare for what might be their last Thanksgiving dinner together before the mother succumbs to her terminal illness, a reunion that none of the parties are actually looking forward to.

    -Time Out (2001): A man who was let go from his job over six months ago spins increasingly elaborate deceptions to hide the truth of his unemployment from his wife, children, and friends. 

Running on Empty (1988)
    -
Running on Empty (1988): A teenager raised by two runaway fugitives starts to yearn for a life with roots and stability. 

    -Millennium Actress (2001): Two television reporters interview an aging actress and are swept up in her journey of self-reflection and self-discovery. 

    -April and the Extraordinary World (2015): In an alternate timeline where all the scientists of the early 20th century have been kidnapped, a young girl searches for her parents among the missing scientists and uncovers an elaborate conspiracy.

    -In Your Eyes (2014): Two strangers living on opposite sides of the country discover a telepathic bond that allows them to feel and sense each other's experiences.

    This world of film can be a fantastic thing when we bring our hearts and our heads with us and create the zeitgeist together. Let's keep doing this for a long time, folks, and let's make room for a lot of people at the table. 

                       --The Professor

The Holdovers (2023)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PROFESSOR'S PICKS: Five Lessons Hollywood Ought to Learn from the Success of WICKED

    That which has teased studios since the freak success of La La Land and The Greatest Showman has finally come to pass: Hollywood has finally launched a successful musical. Or rather, they've launched two.     The musical is sort of like the golden idol at the start of Raiders of the Lost Ark . It's valuable beyond imagination--but only if you know just how to retrieve it. There have been specific periods where the musical has yielded tremendous rewards for Hollywood, but for the greater part of the lifespan of feature-filmmaking, studios have been punished for reaching beyond their means.     Yet after ages of dormancy, t he years leading up to the Wicked movies were lined with musicals, more than we'd seen in the previous decade. A few of them were quite well crafted. Others were ... learning experiences. None really became what we'd call "mainstream."      But Wicked and Wicked: For Good have both seen rare success. I'm publishing ...

REVIEW: ELIO

    Here's a fact: the term "flying saucer" predates the term "UFO." The United States Air Force found the former description too limiting to describe the variety of potential aerial phenomena that might arise when discussing the possibility of life beyond earth.      There may have to be a similar expansion of vocabulary within the alien lexicon with Pixar's latest film, Elio , turning the idea of an alien abduction into every kid's dream come true.      The titular Elio is a displaced kid who recently moved in with his aunt after his parents died. She doesn't seem to understand him any better than his peers do. He can't imagine a place on planet earth where he feels he fits in. What's a kid to do except send a distress cry out into the great, big void of outer space?      But m iracle of miracles: his cries into the universe are heard, and a band of benevolent aliens adopt him into their "communiverse" as the honorary ambassador o...

Saying Goodbye to Stranger Things

     There's a quote from critic Mark Caro that I think about a lot. I shared it back when I did my critical survey of Pixar movies . Writing about Finding Nemo , Caro wrote in the  Chicago Tribune in 2003 , "Classic film eras tend to get recognized in retrospect while we take for granted timeless works passing before our eyes. So let's pause to appreciate what's been going on at Pixar Animation Studios."      I think that captures the aspirations of all active-minded media consumers. Or at least, it ought to. "This good thing won't last forever, so savor it before the sun goes down."  Modern Times (1936)      But this is also a very hard mindset to access in an online culture that is always seeking to stamp labels and scores on a thing before we shove it on the conveyor belt and move on to the next parcel.       It's something I have been thinking about for the last year or so as the completion of the Stranger ...

REVIEW: Mickey 17

Coming into Mickey 17 having not read the source material by Edward Ashton, I can easily see why this movie spoke to the sensibilities of Bong Joon Ho, particularly in the wake of his historic Academy Award win five years ago. Published in 2022, it feels like Ashton could have been doing his Oscars homework when he conceived of the story--a sort of mashup of Parasite , Aliens , and Charlie Chaplin's Modern Times . Desperate to escape planet earth, Mickey applies for a special assignment as an "expendable," a person whose sole requirement is to perform tasks too dangerous for normal consideration--the kind that absolutely arise in an outer space voyage to colonize other planets. It is expected that Mickey expire during his line of duty, but never fear. The computer has all his data and can simply reproduce him in the lab the next day for his next assignment. Rinse and repeat. It's a system that we are assured cannot fail ... until of course it does.  I'll admit my ...

REVIEW: ZOOTOPIA 2

       Any follow-up to the 2016 masterpiece,  Zootopia , is going to be disadvantaged. Cinema was still a year ahead of Jordan Peele's "Get Out" when Disney released one of the most articulate explanations of race, allyship, and accountability ever put to film. Now that everyone knows how good, even "timely," a Disney pic can be, how do you surprise everyone a second time?      The insights in this sequel won't spur any new chapters in your sociology 101 textbook. Though honestly, neither was the deflection of white saviourship  that  novel back in 2016. We more or less knew how racial profiling and biases played out in the landscape. What surprised many of us (and validated the rest of us) was the idea that these ideas could be articulated so eloquently in a children's film.     It seems that the studio tried the same thing here with Zootopia 2 that it did with Frozen II six years ago. I think a lot of people wanted that m...

REVIEW: MERCY

     Everyone who was despairing that Star-Lord and Taser-Face never got their showdown, your moment in the sun has come.      In MERCY , out this weekend, future Los Angeles has adopted a justice system in which criminals are weighed before an AI judge. Those on trial are allowed the full disposal of public surveillance and digital footprints in order to clear their name within a 90-minute timeframe. And this is the situation in which recovering alcoholic and policeman, Chris Raven, (Chris Pratt) find himself as he is charged with the murder of his wife, and he is left to make his case before the commanding Judge Maddox (Rebecca Ferguson) or face execution.      The movie's buoyed up by a respectable ensemble cast, including Kali Reis, Annabelle Wallis, Kylie Rogers, Jeff Piere, and Chris Sullivan.  Pratt and Ferguson are both up to the task, but we've also seen more memorable work from both of them.      The movie knows ...

Edward G. Robinson: Patron Saint of Forgotten Men

             I want to start off this essay by talking about one of my go-to movie stars, Chris Pratt.            My first exposure to him was at the end of my freshmen summer term when he landed as Peter Quill/Star Lord in Guardians of the Galaxy , a film I very much enjoyed, as you all know. (I would also see The Lego Movie for the first time around here). And by the time he was up for Jurassic World the next summer, I was up to date with my Parks and Recreation viewing, and the world had accepted him as a household name.           Like a lot of celebrities who came into prominence in the wake of social media, part of Pratt’s strengths lies in his supreme accessibility. But where someone like Ryan Reynolds found his market as being this cynical son-of-a-gun, Pratt’s appeal was his complete lack of pretense. His sincerity. Whe...

REVIEW: The Running Man

      A lot of people have wanted to discuss Edgar Wright's new The Running Man outing as "the remake" of the 1987 film (with Arnold Schwarzenegger playing a very different Ben Richards). As for me, I find it more natural to think of it as "another adaptation of ..."      Even so, my mind was also on action blockbusters of the 1980s watching this movie today. But my thoughts didn't linger so much on the Paul Michael Glaser film specifically so much as the general action scene of the day. The era of Bruce Willis and Kurt Russell and the he-men they brought to life. These machine-gun wielding, foul-mouthed anarchists who wanted to tear down the establishment fed a real need for men with a lot of directionless anger.       This was, as it would turn out, the same era in which Stephen King first published The Running Man , telling the story of a down-on-his luck man who tries to rescue his wife and daughter from poverty by winning a telev...

REVIEW: West Side Story

      Slight spoiler, the first shot of Steven Spielberg's West Side Story adaptation opens on a pile of rubble, a crumbled building wrecked to make way for new development. I amusedly wondered if this was maybe an accidental metaphor, a comment on this new adaptation of the stage show supplanting the legendary film version in 1961.     There's not a lot about the 2021 film adaptation that deviates largely from the blueprint of the 1961 film or the stage musical on which it is based. That blueprint, of course, being the romance between two teenagers on opposite ends of a gang rivalry in 1950s New York. A few songs get swapped around, the casting is more appropriate, but there's no gimmick.     We have to assume, then, that at the end of the day, Spielberg just wanted to try his hand at remaking a childhood favorite. Filmmakers, take note. Follow Spielberg's example. When revisiting an old text, you don't need a gimmick. Good taste is enough. ...

Fine, I Will Review The Percy Jackson Show (again)

     I have wondered if I was the only one who thought that "Sea of Monsters" was the weakest of the Percy Jackson and the Olympians pentalogy, but I have seen my reading echoed by other book loyalists.      This second installment is perhaps penalized partially because it marks several major junctions in the larger series. This is, for example, the part of the series where the scope of the adventure really starts to enlarge. We know going in that there's an angry, deceased titan out to destroy Olympus, and that he's amassing an army, and so we need a sense that this threat is growing stronger. But this also marks a turning point in how series author, Rick Riordan, chooses to develop his main character. And so, season 2 of the Disney+ television adaptation faces similar crossroads.     Season 3 of this show is already filming as we speak, so its immediate future is already spoken for, as far as production goes. But stylistically, this second seas...