Skip to main content

REVIEW - The Little Mermaid


    There's been a mermaid on the horizon ever since it became clear sometime in the last decade that Disney did intend to give all of their signature titles the live-action treatment--we've had a long time to prepare for this. (For reference, this July will mark four years since Halle Bailey's casting as Ariel made headlines.) 

    Arguing whether this or any of the live-action remakes "live up" to their animated predecessor is always going to be a losing battle. Even ignoring the nostalgic element, it's impossible for them to earn the same degree of admiration because the terrain in which these animated films rose to legend has long eroded. This is especially the case for The Little Mermaid. Where this remake is riding off a years long commercial high for the Walt Disney Company, the Disney that made The Little Mermaid in 1989 was twenty years past its cultural goodwill. Putting out an animated fairy-tale musical was not a sure thing, yet its success sent ripples through the film world that are at once impossible to miss yet consistently overlooked. 

    What, then, does this live-action rendition bring to the mythology in this age?

    The film finds some success in the visual department. Even with a landscape as lush as the ocean reef, the photorealistic visuals can't quite match the majestic tapestry of hand-drawn animation, but (even as I was questioning the honesty of some of the sea life flailing their fins the way that they do) I won't deny that the choreography of something like the "Under the Sea" number made me glad I invested in a 3d ticket. 

    Roughly half of the spoken lines from this film are carried from the animated film. In a way this adaptation almost can't help but default to the manufacture settings set by 1989 film. The animated text is already close to perfection, but as a consequence of its fidelity, any narrative addition or modification is going to be instantly noticed, and not all of these changes ultimately strengthen the text. 

    There is a case to be made for Ariel herself taking out the villain in her own story, but their approach with this climax was just to have Ariel and Eric swap places, and the result doesn't feel entirely organic or even satisfying. It checks off a box without really granting Ariel a victory that is suited for her specifically. If anything, it betrays a sort of lack of confidence in what Ariel as a character brought to her story. 

    There's little added here that hadn't already been inferred by longtime lovers of the animated film, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. Maybe it's not revelatory to propose that Eric is on the sea so much because he's got some wanderlust, and we all kinda guessed that the humans killed Ariel's mother. Just so, there is something validating about seeing the magic carry across an expanded runtime. If anything, it shows good judgment on this creative team that most of these changes feel like they were already there, like canonized subtext.

    Much of what can be considered truly new comes from the fresh performances of this cast, in which there isn't really a weak link. Halle Bailey walks and swims with equal grace, a wide-eyed beholder of the fantastical landscape she is privy to, save for the moments when she herself becomes yet another ornament in the film's otherworldly storybook. Her energy is matched by the earnest and endearing Jonah Hauer-King as the courageous Prince Eric. And while we're waiting for Disney animation to give Disney villains another try, audiences have found a holdover in Melissa McCarthy, who graciously chooses to play Ursula as a villain with a sense of humor and not a comical villain. 

    Thus far, I've talked about "source material" in relation to the 1989 animated film directed by Ron Clements and John Musker, but of course the story goes way beyond that. Disney inherited this tale from the imaginative pen of Hans Christian Andersen. This connection is referenced within the text of the remake with an overtness that is maybe unprecedented in this train of remakes (you'll see). But it's not just the tip of the hat that nearly brought tears to this critic's eyes. It was the depth afforded to understanding why the story of a mermaid who pined to walk on the shoreline would inspire such elemental feelings across the centuries, and how this emotional pulse has carried through the legendary animated film. There is, after all, a special kind of heartbreak reserved for anyone who reaches for the light even as the world tells them to keep their head underwater. But there is also a special kind of reverie, even triumph, for those who dare to walk on their own two feet just the same. 

    Thanks for reminding us. 

        --The Professor



Comments

  1. Hum? Not convinced that it is as good as the original. I'm intrigued by the suggestion that a 2:15 long live-action version of this classic did not lose momentum 2/3rds of the way through. But I struggle to imagine an Ariel as pleasing as the 1989 depiction, though very much thrilled by the thought of Ursula being depicted by Melissa McCarthy! Pros and cons here, but probably enough curiosity piqued to get me to watch the remake...though I remain fearful that it will be a disappointment in comparison to the original. (Your review didn't leave me convinced that it wont be!)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Toy Story 4: Pixar's Tribute to Regression

          It was about this time last year that I came across the one person who actually hated Toy Story 3 .          I was reading Jason Sperb’s book “Flickers of Film: Nostalgia in the Age of Digital Cinema” as part of my research for my essay on Who Framed Roger Rabbit and Pokemon: Detective Pikachu . It was in one of his chapters on the Pixar phenomenon that he shared his observation from the ending of Toy Story 3 , essentially casting the film as this nostalgia mousetrap for adults: “ If Andy lets go of his childhood nostalgia and moves on, then Toy Story fans don’t really have to , as the narrative recognition in the potential value in such an act is sufficient. Actually moving on becomes indefinitely deferred in an endless cycle of consumption (rewatching the movies, purchasing new versions of the movie, purchasing more and more Toy Story-related merchandise, rewatching them yet again with the next generat...

Thawing Disney's Frozen Heart

  As a millennial Disney fan and film student in utero, I often thought about what it would have been like to be there when Aladdin or The Little Mermaid , or even “Snow White” or The Jungle Book , premiered to the culture. It’s one thing to grow up and realize you have a piece of film history with you here in your living room. It’s another to get to watch the culture transform as it engages for the first time with something  And I have this envy for a great many cinematic works. Like, what I would give to go back to 1946 and tell those losers who dismissed It's a Wonderful Life how they had no idea what they were sleeping on. But the Disney canon’s place within the culture is also specific. Their commitment to delivering hopeful stories to an audience that believes itself beyond such frailties as faith or kindness is unparalleled, and that makes their contributions worth studying and celebrating. And so I didn’t take it for granted during that period in late 2013/early ...

The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Clash of the Titans

  Anyone else remember the year we spent wondering if we would ever again see a movie that wasn't coming out in 3D?      T hat surge in 3D films in the early months of 2010 led to a number of questionable executive decisions. We saw a lot of films envisioned as standard film experiences refitted into the 3D format at the eleventh hour. In the ten years since, 3D stopped being profitable because audiences quickly learned the difference between a film that was designed with the 3D experience in mind and the brazen imitators . Perhaps the most notorious victim of this trend was the 2010 remake of Clash of the Titans .        Why am I suddenly so obsessed with the fallout of a film gone from the public consciousness ten years now? Maybe it's me recently finishing the first season of  Blood of Zeus  on Netflix and seeing so clearly what  Clash of the Titans  very nearly was. Maybe it's my  evolving thoughts on the Percy Jacks...

Some Much Needed Love for Megamind

    Following this year's Oscars ceremony, filmmakers Phil Lord and Chris Miller, directors of The Lego Movie , penned an op-ed for Variety bemoaning the stigma around animated films. They report taking issue with Naomi Scott, one of the presenters for best animated film, saying that animated films are some of the most formative experiences a kid has, and that kids tend to watch these films over and over, further noting "I think some of the parents out there know exactly what I'm talking about." Lord and Miller seemed to take this as implying that adults can't appreciate animated films, saying "Surely no one set out to diminish animated films, but it’s high time we set out to elevate them."                    I didn't personally find Scott's observation that kids make their parents watch the same animated films over and over again innately demeaning--certainly not any more than Schumer joking that her toddler made he...

Saying Goodbye to Stranger Things

     There's a quote from critic Mark Caro that I think about a lot. I shared it back when I did my critical survey of Pixar movies . Writing about Finding Nemo , Caro wrote in the  Chicago Tribune in 2003 , "Classic film eras tend to get recognized in retrospect while we take for granted timeless works passing before our eyes. So let's pause to appreciate what's been going on at Pixar Animation Studios."      I think that captures the aspirations of all active-minded media consumers. Or at least, it ought to. "This good thing won't last forever, so savor it before the sun goes down."  Modern Times (1936)      But this is also a very hard mindset to access in an online culture that is always seeking to stamp labels and scores on a thing before we shove it on the conveyor belt and move on to the next parcel.       It's something I have been thinking about for the last year or so as the completion of the Stranger ...

REVIEW: Project Hail Mary

    The elements in Project Hail Mary are all mostly straightforward and build to a fairly familiar end: drop an average Joe into an extraordinary situation where he is required to be extraordinary also, and watch extraordinary things happen. This is proven territory.      And I spent most of the time drafting this review trying to decide whether that was a point for or against the film, helmed by Phil Lord and Chris Miller--and whether that made a difference for a non-franchise piece like this, the exact kind of film we need to succeed at the box office in order to have a healthy landscape. I think the answer to that question is honestly bigger than any one film, even a reasonably well-done one such as this.     But I will say that a movie like Project Hail Mary gives me some hope, and it's my wish that the film continues to find people who will receive it with zeal. And I hope that the people who do will continue to search for other films that they...

REVIEW: Supergirl

      Some will say, "We don't need another edgy superhero!" But that's not what makes the utter mediocrity of DC's new Supergirl so devastating. People were saying "We don't need another X superhero" since 2012, and the post-Infinity saga stupor we've slogged through was not triggered by piling one-too-many superheroes onto the camel's back.     The Flash sucked because its perversion of the butterfly effect theory was convoluted and ham-fisted. Black Adam sucked because nobody on that film knew what a moral dilemma actually looks like. "Love and Thunder" sucked because, despite what everyone thought in 2017, Waititi's style only barely worked in "Ragnarok" and was not going to work in a script which feels like it was farted out half-past midnight.     Supergirl had none of those issues. The real tragedy of Supergirl is that it so easily could have worked.     Drifting around the universe has mostly worked for Sup...

Reveling in the Mixed Messages of Miss Congeniality

In book ten of Metamorphoses, Greek poet Ovid tells the tale of Pygmalion, a talented sculptor living in the height of ancient Greek society.      According to the story, Pygmalion’s sculpting prowess was so impeccable that one of his pieces, a marble woman he christened Galatea, was said to be the lovelier than any woman of flesh and blood. Pygmalion was so taken by his creation that he brought her exotic gifts, kissed her marble cheeks, even prepared a luxurious bed for her. Pygmalion so pined to be loved by Galatea that he prayed to the goddess Aphrodite to allow Galatea to reciprocate his love and affection. Aphrodite was apparently in a good mood that day, so she granted Pygmalion’s wish, giving life to Galatea, whom he then wed. The story of Pygmalion is in essence the story of a man who creates his own idealized woman out of whole cloth (or more appropriately, marble), endowing her with all the traits that he finds appealing or alluring. The story also provides a m...

Children of a Lesser God: Between Sound and Silence

    So ... you all remember how I was really annoyed by The Power of the Dog ?      Despite being an early prediction for the big trophy, I found that attempt rather shallow and self-congratulatory. I am more than perfectly fine that the Best Picture award went to the much better CODA . I thought it was much more enjoyable as a piece of film, and unlike The Power of the Dog , it did showed honest interest in the community it was reporting to champion. In the case of CODA , that was, of course, the deaf community.      But it's actually not CODA I want to talk about in detail at this time. That movie's milestones exist along a timeline that extends ... further back than I can track today, but at least as far back as  March 30, 1987, when Marlee Matlin became the first deaf actor to receive an Academy Award for her performance in Children of a Lesser God . Randa Haines’ 1986 film centers on the romance between a hearing man and a deaf woman a...

REVIEW: Soul

Pixar's latest film, Soul , dropped on Disney+ Christmas day, another regrettable casualty of the virus. This time around, we follow a hopeful musician bursting with enthusiasm. Music is an oddly appropriate metaphor for the film: both certainly touch the outer rim of mankind's emotional faculty, but good luck summarizing the experience to your friends. Joe Gardner is a music teacher at a public school whose enthusiasm for music is spilling out of the walls of his classroom. Opportunity strikes Joe the same day that misfortune does, and a fatal accident lands him in a celestial plane of existence known as "The Great Before," where souls are developed and finessed before being sent to earth to experience human existence. Joe is saddled with mentoring 22, a soul sapling who has settled in The Great Before for several hundred years and has no intention of ever giving mortality a chance. But in 22, Joe sees a chance to return back to earth and fulfill his purpose if he ca...