Skip to main content

The Great Movie Conquest of 2022: September

 

    I mentioned that I chose Brazil as my spotlight for this month because I wanted to immerse myself in the library of a country whose films I wasn't super familiar with. I was glad for to break this barrier, but this admittedly makes writing about my experience this month difficult because, unlike with my month watching Japanese films where I started with a base of knowledge for the films, my context for the films I viewed is somewhat limited.

    Arguably the most famous film from Brazil is 2002's City of God, which I hit right at the start of the month. The film follows a group of boys growing up in the crime-filled streets a neglected community. The film received widespread acclaim for its visceral displays of gang violence and its effects on communities. 

    Reading about this topic is always interesting to me because filming a community's dark underbelly for commercial purposes is always a tricky game, especially as it relates to the representation of historically marginalized communities onscreen. The last few years have seen major pushback against white filmmakers crafting films that depict things like racism and impoverished communities for effectively exploiting the suffering of historically marginalized communities for the entertainment of privileged audiences. 

    One key factor that often pops up in discussions like this, and is certainly relevant as it pertains to City of God, is the question of authorship. This is a sensitive subject, and even if we could expect someone not part of the relevant community to magically attain the experience and perspective to depict the community in all the nuance required, there's still an imbalance between the storyteller and the subject matter, and that imbalance is seeing increased scrutiny. Director Fernando Meirelles says that he did not grow up in the kind of community depicted in City of God, but being born and raised in Brazil affords Meirelles a measure of authority when depicting the harsher realities of his home country. Meirelles shared in an interview with Slant Magazine in 2003,

"When I was traveling with the film through different festivals, journalists would ask me how my society allows things like this to happen and why we don’t take care of this problem. My answer is always the same. I live in middle-class Brazil and not in the other side of Brazil. No matter what happens in that part, it seems like it doesn’t affect us. We allow things to get to this point because we don’t think this is our problem. It’s the same relationship everywhere-in the U.S., in Latin America, in Africa. There are a lot of people without food and everyone thinks it isn’t their problem. This isn’t true because it’s a worldwide problem, especially since all economies are so related."

    My personal favorite film from this batch was 1998's Central Station, which follows a cynical old woman who is moved to help a young boy find his father after his mother is killed. Watching the film, I had the experience feeling at different times that the film was forecasting certain endings. This made it very difficult to gauge where it ultimately landed, but I was still moved by the film's conclusion, and I recommend the film to everyone.

    My lone review this month followed Disney's atrocious remake of Pinocchio. Goodness, all the effort I put into trying to facilitate earnest discussion about the Disney remakes, and they just dump this on me without apology. Del Toro's adaptation of the fairy-tale won't have much competition come this December.

    This month also saw us pass the original release date set for Warner Bros' Salem's Lot, an adaption of Stephen King's 1975 book. The movie was set to release on September 9, only to be bumped to April 23 during the summer only to be removed from the release calendar in August. Heaven knows when we're finally getting this movie. In solidarity, I caught the 2004 mini-series adaptation on that first prescribed release date. While certain plot elements bothered me (what the crud did they do to Callahan?), I was actually fascinated by other story flourishes unique to this adaptation, and most of the casting was spot-on (except for the fact that 12-year-old Mark was again played by a college sophomore). I found this adaptation much preferable to the sterile 1979 adaptation, which I also watched earlier this year, but what I really want is to compare both adaptations to the upcoming film feature film. Someday ... 

    Some of you might remember this summer that I opined for a nearly 7,000 words about how I don't appreciate the direction of Thor in the MCU in recent years, which is why I elected to skip "Love and Thunder" in theaters. I finally caught the film on Disney+ this last week, and even given my irritation with Thor's recent MCU appearances, I was surprised at how sloppy this film was. Most of my issues with "Ragnarök" were there, including cashing in on an ending it did not build up to, but slapped together with an uncharacteristic carelessness. I really need "Black Panther 2" to be good. There has to be one Marvel movie this year that I don't despise.

    With 90 days left in this challenge, I'm hoping there are a lot of films I don't despise. Wish me luck. 

                    --The Professor

Me bracing myself for the final quarter

September's Harvest:

City of God (2002)

Feet First (1930)

Sidewalk Stories (1989)

Mister Roberts (1955)

Honey, I Shrunk the Kids (1989)

Central Station (1998)

Sabateour (1942)

Pinocchio (2022)

Salem's Lot (2004)

Fantastic Voyage (1966)

Damn Yankees (1958)

Erin Brockovich (2000)

The Thing (1982)

Bye Bye Brazil (1980)

Sorry to Bother You (2018)

Now, Voyager (1941)

50/50 (2011)

Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind (1984)

Blood Diamond (2006)

They Don't Wear Black Tie (1981)

Cadillac Man (1990)

Paris Blues (1967)

King Richard (2021)

Deliverance (1972)

Dick Johnson is Dead (2020)

The Bad and the Beautiful (1952)

I.Q. (1994)

Thor: Love and Thunder (2022)

Jagga Jasoos (2017)

The Perfect Storm (2000)



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"When Did Disney Get So Woke?!" pt. 1 The Disney of Your Childhood

  So, I’m going to put out a somewhat controversial idea here today: The Walt Disney Company has had a tremendous amount of influence in the pop culture landscape, both in recent times and across film history. Further controversy: a lot of people really resent Disney for this.  I’ve spent a greater part of this blog’s lifetime tracking this kind of thing. I have only a dozen or so pieces deconstructing the mechanics of these arguments and exposing how baseless these claims tend to be. This sort of thing is never that far from my mind. But my general thoughts on the stigmatization of the Disney fandom have taken a very specific turn in recent times against recent headlines.       The Walt Disney Company has had some rather embarrassing box office flops in the last two or three years, and a lot of voices have been eager to link Disney’s recent financial woes to certain choices. Specifically, this idea that Disney has all the sudden “gone woke.”  Now,...

"When Did Disney Get So Woke?!" pt. 2 Disney vs the 21st Century

  In the first half of this series , we looked at this construction of the Disney image that the company has sold itself on for several decades now. Walt himself saw the purpose of his entertainment enterprise as depiction a happier world than that which he and the audience emerged from, and that formed the basis of his formidable fanbase. But because the larger culture only knows how to discuss these things in the context of consumerism, a lot of intricacies get obscured in the conversation about The Walt Disney Company, its interaction with larger culture, and the people who happily participate in this fandom.  Basically, critics spent something like fifty years daring The Walt Disney Company to start being more proactive in how they participated in the multi-culture. And when Disney finally showed up in court to prove its case, the world just did not know what to do ... The 21st Century          With the development of the inter...

The Earthling: Some Observations on "Natural Masculinity"

I’ve talked quite a bit about “toxic masculinity” across his blog, but I want to talk for a moment about a companion subject–“natural masculinity.” I’ve heard several other names and labels assigned to the idea, but the general concept is this idea that men are disposed to behave a certain way and that sOciETy forces them to subjugate this part of themselves. Maybe some of us were raised by someone, or currently live with someone, who buys into these attitudes. Maybe they’re perfectly fine most of the time, but once they meet up with Brian from sophomore year and go out into the mountains for a “weekend with the guys,” a sort of metamorphosis takes place. Jokes that were unacceptable to them become hilarious. Certain transgressions lose their penalty. Gentle Joe kinda mutates into a jerk. This is all propelled and reinforced by the idea that this is how men just are , and that entitles them to certain actions. And who are these women to infringe upon that God-given right? Gladiator (2...

An Earnest Defense of Passengers

          Recall with me, if you will, the scene in Hollywood December 2016. We were less than a year away from #MeToo, and the internet was keenly aware of Hollywood’s suffocating influence on its females on and off screen but not yet sure what to do about it.       Enter Morten Tyldum’s film Passengers , a movie which, despite featuring the two hottest stars in Hollywood at the apex of their fame, was mangled by internet critics immediately after take-off. A key piece of Passengers ’ plot revolves around the main character, Jim Preston, a passenger onboard a spaceship, who prematurely awakens from a century-long hibernation and faces a lifetime of solitude adrift in outer space; rather than suffer through a life of loneliness, he eventually decides to deliberately awaken another passenger, Aurora Lane, condemning her to his same fate.    So this is obviously a film with a moral dilemma at its center. Morten Tyldum, direc...

REVIEW: ONWARD

     The Walt Disney Company as a whole seems to be in constant danger of being overtaken by its own cannibalistic tendency--cashing in on the successes of their past hits at the expense of creating the kinds of stories that merited these reimaginings to begin with.       Pixar, coming fresh off a decade marked by a deluge of sequels, is certainly susceptible to this pattern as well. Though movies like Inside Out and Coco have helped breathe necessary life into the studio, audiences invested in the creative lifeblood of the studio should take note when an opportunity comes for either Disney or Pixar animation to flex their creative muscles.       This year we'll have three such opportunities between the two studios. [EDIT: Okay, maybe not. Thanks, Corona.] The first of these, ONWARD directed by Dan Scanlon, opens this weekend and paints a hopeful picture of a future where Pixar allows empathetic and novel storytelling to gui...

The Banshees of Inisherin: The Death Knell of Male Friendship

           I’m going to go out on a limb today and put out the idea that our society is kind of obsessed with romance. In popular storytelling, t he topic has two whole genres to itself (romantic-comedy, romantic-drama), which gives it a huge slice of the media pie. Yet even in narratives where romance is not the focus, it still has this standing invitation to weave itself onto basically any kind of story. It’s almost more worth remarking upon when a story doesn’t feature some subplot with the main character getting the guy or the girl. Annie Hall (1977)      And it’s also not just the romantic happy ending that we’re obsessed with. Some of the most cathartic stories of romance see the main couple breaking up or falling apart, and there’s something to be gained from seeing that playing out on screen as well. But what’s interesting is that it is assumed that a person has a singular “one and only” romantic partner. By contras...

Meet Me in St. Louis: The Melancholy Window of Nostalgia

I don’t usually post reviews for television shows, but it feels appropriate to start today’s discussion with my reaction to Apple TV+’s series, Schmigadoon! If you’re not familiar with the series, it follows a couple who are looking to reclaim the spark of their fading romance. While hiking in the mountains, they get lost and stumble upon a cozy village, Schmigadoon, where everyone lives like they’re in the middle of an old school musical film. She’s kinda into it, he hates it, but neither of them can leave until they find true love like that in the classic movie musicals. I appreciated the series’ many homages to classical musical films. And I really loved the show rounding up musical celebrities like Aaron Tveit and Ariana Debose. Just so, I had an overall muddled response to the show. Schmigadoon! takes it as a given that this town inherits the social mores of the era in which the musicals that inspired this series were made, and that becomes the basis of not only the show...

REVIEW: Mufasa - The Lion King

    To get to the point, Disney's new origin story for The Lion King 's Mufasa fails at the ultimate directive of all prequels. By the end of the adventure, you don't actually feel like you know these guys any better.           Such  has been the curse for nearly Disney's live-action spin-offs/remakes of the 2010s on. Disney supposes it's enough to learn more facts or anecdotes about your favorite characters, but the interview has always been more intricate than all that. There is no catharsis nor identification for the audience during Mufasa's culminating moment of uniting the animals of The Pridelands because the momentum pushing us here has been carried by cliche, not archetype.      Director Barry Jenkins' not-so-secret weapon has always been his ability to derive pathos from lyrical imagery, and he does great things with the African landscape without stepping into literal fantasy. This is much more aesthetically interestin...

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind: Do Clementine and Joel Stay Together or Not?

                    Maybe. The answer is maybe.             Not wanting to be that guy who teases a definitive answer to a difficult question and forces you to read a ten-page essay only to cop-out with a non-committal excuse of an answer, I’m telling you up and front the answer is maybe.  Though nations have long warred over this matter of great importance, the film itself does not answer once and for all whether or not Joel Barrish and Clementine Krychinzki find lasting happiness together at conclusion of the film Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Min d. I cannot give a definitive answer as to whether Joel and Clementine’s love will last until the stars turn cold or just through the weekend. This essay cannot do that.             What this essay can do is explore the in-text evidence the film gives for either ...

REVIEW: In The Heights

  I can pinpoint the exact moment in the theater I was certain I was going to like In the Heights after all. There's a specific shot in the opening number, I believe it even features in one of the trailers, that has lead character Usnavi staring out the window of his shop observing the folks of his hometown carried away in dance. The reflection of this display of kinetic dreaming is imposed on the window over Usnavi's own yearnful expression as he admires from behind the glass plane. He's at once a part of the magic, yet totally separate from it. The effect has an oddly fantastical feel to it, yet it's achieved through the most rudimentary of filming tricks. This is but one of many instances in which director Jon M. Chu finds music and light in the most mundane of corners.       The film is anchored in the life of storeowner, Usnavi, as he comes to a crossroads. For as long as he's run his bodega, Usnavi's guiding dream has been to return to his parent's co...