Skip to main content

REVIEW: Pinocchio

    Earlier this summer, in promotion of next year's Dungeons and Dragons: Honor Among Thieves film, actor Chris Pine shared his experience prepping for his role by enlisting the help of his nephew, an avid D&D player. Pine has been very open about not only how fun the experience was, but also of the reverence he's developed for what this game means to its fans. "Honestly, I think a D&D class or activity in every school would be a great idea. You get all kinds of different people to sit together. Even if they don’t have anything in common, it’s almost impossible not to get caught up in the fun of the game.” 

    Why do I bring this up in a review of Disney's live-action remake of its 1940 animated masterpiece? 

    Well, part of it may have to do with the fact that Chris Pine actually does get a verbal shoutout in the new remake (in a pop culture reference that would have felt forced in a mid 00's Dreamworks film). Part of it may be that Pine's adoration for the property he is helping to rebuild for the big screen is sorely missed among the parade of Disney live-action remakes. And, if anything, this perhaps most clear in the new remake of Disney's Pinocchio

    Insecurity abounds from the film's first minutes where Jiminy Cricket lampshades the absurdity of a phrase like “Once Upon a Time," and it does not let up. Back in the days of Beauty and the Beast (2017), these remakes designed themselves around countering aspersions about the animated canon. They wanted to prove that these films could still jive with the cool kids. Here, the film stumbles over itself scrambling to dig up plot contrivances from the 1940 film that you wouldn't dare to think of--all that just so it can laugh at them before anyone else has the chance. 

Yes, this moment is recreated in CGI.
No, it doesn't look anywhere near as graceful 
    Despite its vocalized disdain for the animated film, this remake sketches in an exorbitant amount of specific moments and icons from the film it is adapting. It's not even the uncanny valley of having so many of the character designs come out identical to their animated predecessors that's grating. Not since The Lion King (2019) has a remake used the copy+paste function so generously. So many segments of vivid animation are translated literally into live-action (or CGI). The audience can discover in real time the beauty of hand drawn animation because they’ll feel the empty spaces of this new facsimile. And when a retelling offers little that is new, that’s all you’ll be thinking about. 

    It's also clear that this was a remake of obligation. Disney was not prepared to bring to life many of the sequences that might have actually looked stunning in live-action (e.g. Pinocchio and Jiminy’s underwater hunt for Geppetto), nor to hire more than six extras to appear onscreen at one time, making the film as a whole feel unnecessarily cramped. I can't even guess at the budget window for this project, but it's not even a polished production value itself that I'm missing. 

    I want the adoration that someone like Chris Pine shows when entrusted with bringing a long-running role playing enterprise to the silver screen for the first time. Bob Chapek must not think that such love exists for the animated canon--"seriously, who gives a flying hoot about cartoons anyways, right?" Disney must think that because remakes like this are greenlit pro forma ("I mean, we're remaking all the other cartoons, we can't just leave this one alone) that audiences will consume them in equal heedlessness. 

   It'd be easy to self-soothe with platitudes about how "children will continue to embrace Walt Disney's masterpiece long after they've forgotten this remake," but ... there's no guarantee of that. As long as major film studios measure their success on the size of their catalogue, senior cast members face an uphill battle fighting for recognition among an unending flood of incoming content. And if this the kind of tentpole for which Disney headlines their Disney+ Day celebration, we have reason to feel concern over what exactly that content looks like.

            --The Professor





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: HOPPERS

     In the 1950s under the threat of nuclear warfare, Hollywood premiered such exercises as The Day the Earth Stood Still or War of the Worlds where an alien power would pass judgment on humankind, holding its fate in its hands. Here in the 2020s under the shadow of such threats as climate change, Hollywood sends to be our judge ... beavers.     Let me back up ...      Daniel Chong's new film from Pixar Animation, Hoppers , sees  Mabel (Piper Curda), a college student whose self-appointed mission is to preserve the glade where she used to find sanctuary with her now deceased grandmother. Her biggest opponent is hometown boy and beloved mayor, Jerry (Jon Hamm), who has designs to plow over the glade in order to open his new freeway--estimated to save travelers four whole minutes of commuting.       Mabel gets her golden opportunity when she uncovers secret technology pioneered by her professor which allows a human to rem...

All The Ways Sunset Boulevard Has Aged Gracefully

So, stop me if you’ve heard this before: Hollywood has a dark side.          Particularly in the wake of something like #MeToo or the double strikes of 2023, you can really get a sense for just how famishing, even degrading, it can be trying to make a living in Hollywood. But of course, it all goes back much further than those. One of my very first essays for this blog was a catalogue of all the ways Hollywood ravaged Judy Garland , to point to another example. Yet for all its mess, we cannot take our eyes off of Hollywood, or the people who build it.  Stardom in particular becomes a popular focal point—what is it really like being on the other side of all that spotlighting? And Hollywood has naturally supplied the market with all sorts of imaginings for this as well. Thus, each generation gets its own version of A Star is Born. John Wayne and Maureen O'Hara in The Quiet Man (1952)      Ty Burr wrote in his landmark work,...

REVIEW: Project Hail Mary

    The elements in Project Hail Mary are all mostly straightforward and build to a fairly familiar end: drop an average Joe into an extraordinary situation where he is required to be extraordinary also, and watch extraordinary things happen. This is proven territory.      And I spent most of the time drafting this review trying to decide whether that was a point for or against the film, helmed by Phil Lord and Chris Miller--and whether that made a difference for a non-franchise piece like this, the exact kind of film we need to succeed at the box office in order to have a healthy landscape. I think the answer to that question is honestly bigger than any one film, even a reasonably well-done one such as this.     But I will say that a movie like Project Hail Mary gives me some hope, and it's my wish that the film continues to find people who will receive it with zeal. And I hope that the people who do will continue to search for other films that they...

PROFESSOR'S PICKS: 10 Movie Theater Experiences That Changed Me

   So, January 2012: Disney is rereleasing their 1991 animated masterpiece, Beauty and the Beast into theaters, and in 3D format, and I'm able to coerce a friend into seeing it with me.       This was a big deal because, as with most of the Disney movies we'd call "classic," Beauty and the Beast had its day in theaters before my time, and this was an opportunity to experience the movie in its proper element, and maybe imagine what it would have been when the legendary tunes by Howard Ashman and Alan Menken graced the public for the first time.     My larger circle was none-too-impressed with my choice. Didn't I know that the movie was already on DVD? That I could just watch it anytime in the comfort of my own home without having to pay for another ticket? How could I be so careless with my finances? (Incidentally, many of these same friends would pay top-dollar to see the Beauty and the Beast remake five years later on opening weekend ...)  ...

REVIEW: WICKED - For Good

      I'm conflicted about how to approach this review. I know everyone has their own yellow brick road to the myth of The Wizard of Oz as a whole and the specific Broadway adaptation that brought us all here.   I don't want to write this only for others who are familiar with the source material.       Even so, I can't help but review this from the perspective of a fan of the Broadway show--someone who has been tracking the potential for a film adaptation since before Jon M. Chu's participation was announced for the ambitious undertaking of translating one of Broadway's most electric shows onto film. I can't help but view this from the vantage point of someone who knew just how many opportunities this had to go wrong.     And it's from that vantage point that I now profess such profound relief that the gambit paid off. We truly have the " Lord of the Rings of musicals ."  I'll give last year's movie the edge for having a slightly...

The Many Fathers of Harry Potter

     Despite being a Harry Potter fan for most of my life, I didn’t make it to "Harry Potter Land" at Universal until November of 2019.      Some relatives invited me on a SoCal theme park tour, a trip which also saw my last visit to Disneyland before the shutdown. And when you and a bunch of other twenty-somethings are walking through a recreation of Hogwarts for the first time, you inevitably start playing this game where you call out every artifact on display and try to trace it back to whatever movie or even specific moment the mise en scene is trying to invoke:           There’s the greenhouse from "Chamber of Secrets." Now they’re playing the “Secrets of the Castle” track from "Prisoner of Azkaban." Here we are loading in the Room of Requirement from "Order of the Phoenix." From start to finish, the attraction, like the franchise from which it spawned, is just one giant nostalgia parade.     See, t he Wiza...

REVIEW: ONWARD

     The Walt Disney Company as a whole seems to be in constant danger of being overtaken by its own cannibalistic tendency--cashing in on the successes of their past hits at the expense of creating the kinds of stories that merited these reimaginings to begin with.       Pixar, coming fresh off a decade marked by a deluge of sequels, is certainly susceptible to this pattern as well. Though movies like Inside Out and Coco have helped breathe necessary life into the studio, audiences invested in the creative lifeblood of the studio should take note when an opportunity comes for either Disney or Pixar animation to flex their creative muscles.       This year we'll have three such opportunities between the two studios. [EDIT: Okay, maybe not. Thanks, Corona.] The first of these, ONWARD directed by Dan Scanlon, opens this weekend and paints a hopeful picture of a future where Pixar allows empathetic and novel storytelling to gui...

REVIEW: AVATAR - Fire and Ash

     The "Avatar" chapters have generally renewed their interest to the masses based on which exciting new locale and which new culture whichever film opts to explore.      Following that dance,  "Fire and Ash" introduces yet another Na'Vi clan, this one hailing from the scorched plains under the shadow of an erupted volcano. But their biome is decidedly less spectacular than the lush jungles of the Omaticaya or the rich coral reefs where the Metkayina dive. Between the ashen grounds of the volcano clan and the metallic fortress of the humans, this is comfortably the most monochromatic of the three Avatar films. And yet, Avatar: Fire and Ash is no less gripping for it.      And this is where the internet really starts to reckon with what us fans of the franchise have always kind of known: that the many screensavers offered by the Avatar world ... they have been  nice . But these films would have never made the impact they have if th...

The Seven Brides for Seven Brothers Question

    I spend a lot of effort in this space trying to champion the musical genre as the peak of cinematic achievement.  And so it sometimes surprises my associates to find out that, no, I wasn't at all raised in a household that particularly favored musicals. I wasn't the kid who went out for the annual school musical or anything. My environment wasn't exactly hostile toward these things, but it actually did very little to nurture my study of the genre.  Cinderella (1950)      I obviously had exposure through things like the Disney animated musicals, which absolutely had a profound effect on the larger musical genre . But I didn’t see The Sound of Music until high school, and I didn’t see Singin’ in the Rain until college.      Seven Brides for Seven Brothers , though, it was just always there. And so I guess that's really where I got infected. I'm referring to the 1954 musical directed by Stanley Donen with music by Gene de Paul ,...

What's Up, Doc?: Why Everyone Needs the Rom-Com

            Though the library of master songwriter, Stephen Sondheim, reaches a pedigree of acclaim that is perhaps unrivaled, his most profound work is arguably his Tony award winning show, Company .  Premiering in 1969,  Company  follows Bobby, the only bachelor among his loving network of married friends.  Yeah, I know Bobby is sometimes played as a woman, but this particular metaphor is more clear with a male protagonist      The story is presented through a series of snapshots showing Bobby’s interactions with his coupled friends intercut with scenes from Bobby’s own romantic pursuits, and it’s through these little vignettes that we understand what it is that keeps Bobby tethered to single life: Bobby fears the chaos of being married to another person. Seeing up front all the turmoil that his married cohorts are subjected to, and faced with his own relationship woes, Bobby contemplates h...