Skip to main content

REVIEW: Pinocchio

    Earlier this summer, in promotion of next year's Dungeons and Dragons: Honor Among Thieves film, actor Chris Pine shared his experience prepping for his role by enlisting the help of his nephew, an avid D&D player. Pine has been very open about not only how fun the experience was, but also of the reverence he's developed for what this game means to its fans. "Honestly, I think a D&D class or activity in every school would be a great idea. You get all kinds of different people to sit together. Even if they don’t have anything in common, it’s almost impossible not to get caught up in the fun of the game.” 

    Why do I bring this up in a review of Disney's live-action remake of its 1940 animated masterpiece? 

    Well, part of it may have to do with the fact that Chris Pine actually does get a verbal shoutout in the new remake (in a pop culture reference that would have felt forced in a mid 00's Dreamworks film). Part of it may be that Pine's adoration for the property he is helping to rebuild for the big screen is sorely missed among the parade of Disney live-action remakes. And, if anything, this perhaps most clear in the new remake of Disney's Pinocchio

    Insecurity abounds from the film's first minutes where Jiminy Cricket lampshades the absurdity of a phrase like “Once Upon a Time," and it does not let up. Back in the days of Beauty and the Beast (2017), these remakes designed themselves around countering aspersions about the animated canon. They wanted to prove that these films could still jive with the cool kids. Here, the film stumbles over itself scrambling to dig up plot contrivances from the 1940 film that you wouldn't dare to think of--all that just so it can laugh at them before anyone else has the chance. 

Yes, this moment is recreated in CGI.
No, it doesn't look anywhere near as graceful 
    Despite its vocalized disdain for the animated film, this remake sketches in an exorbitant amount of specific moments and icons from the film it is adapting. It's not even the uncanny valley of having so many of the character designs come out identical to their animated predecessors that's grating. Not since The Lion King (2019) has a remake used the copy+paste function so generously. So many segments of vivid animation are translated literally into live-action (or CGI). The audience can discover in real time the beauty of hand drawn animation because they’ll feel the empty spaces of this new facsimile. And when a retelling offers little that is new, that’s all you’ll be thinking about. 

    It's also clear that this was a remake of obligation. Disney was not prepared to bring to life many of the sequences that might have actually looked stunning in live-action (e.g. Pinocchio and Jiminy’s underwater hunt for Geppetto), nor to hire more than six extras to appear onscreen at one time, making the film as a whole feel unnecessarily cramped. I can't even guess at the budget window for this project, but it's not even a polished production value itself that I'm missing. 

    I want the adoration that someone like Chris Pine shows when entrusted with bringing a long-running role playing enterprise to the silver screen for the first time. Bob Chapek must not think that such love exists for the animated canon--"seriously, who gives a flying hoot about cartoons anyways, right?" Disney must think that because remakes like this are greenlit pro forma ("I mean, we're remaking all the other cartoons, we can't just leave this one alone) that audiences will consume them in equal heedlessness. 

   It'd be easy to self-soothe with platitudes about how "children will continue to embrace Walt Disney's masterpiece long after they've forgotten this remake," but ... there's no guarantee of that. As long as major film studios measure their success on the size of their catalogue, senior cast members face an uphill battle fighting for recognition among an unending flood of incoming content. And if this the kind of tentpole for which Disney headlines their Disney+ Day celebration, we have reason to feel concern over what exactly that content looks like.

            --The Professor





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thawing Disney's Frozen Heart

  As a millennial Disney fan and film student in utero, I often thought about what it would have been like to be there when Aladdin or The Little Mermaid , or even “Snow White” or The Jungle Book , premiered to the culture. It’s one thing to grow up and realize you have a piece of film history with you here in your living room. It’s another to get to watch the culture transform as it engages for the first time with something  And I have this envy for a great many cinematic works. Like, what I would give to go back to 1946 and tell those losers who dismissed It's a Wonderful Life how they had no idea what they were sleeping on. But the Disney canon’s place within the culture is also specific. Their commitment to delivering hopeful stories to an audience that believes itself beyond such frailties as faith or kindness is unparalleled, and that makes their contributions worth studying and celebrating. And so I didn’t take it for granted during that period in late 2013/early ...

Toy Story 4: Pixar's Tribute to Regression

          It was about this time last year that I came across the one person who actually hated Toy Story 3 .          I was reading Jason Sperb’s book “Flickers of Film: Nostalgia in the Age of Digital Cinema” as part of my research for my essay on Who Framed Roger Rabbit and Pokemon: Detective Pikachu . It was in one of his chapters on the Pixar phenomenon that he shared his observation from the ending of Toy Story 3 , essentially casting the film as this nostalgia mousetrap for adults: “ If Andy lets go of his childhood nostalgia and moves on, then Toy Story fans don’t really have to , as the narrative recognition in the potential value in such an act is sufficient. Actually moving on becomes indefinitely deferred in an endless cycle of consumption (rewatching the movies, purchasing new versions of the movie, purchasing more and more Toy Story-related merchandise, rewatching them yet again with the next generat...

The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Clash of the Titans

  Anyone else remember the year we spent wondering if we would ever again see a movie that wasn't coming out in 3D?      T hat surge in 3D films in the early months of 2010 led to a number of questionable executive decisions. We saw a lot of films envisioned as standard film experiences refitted into the 3D format at the eleventh hour. In the ten years since, 3D stopped being profitable because audiences quickly learned the difference between a film that was designed with the 3D experience in mind and the brazen imitators . Perhaps the most notorious victim of this trend was the 2010 remake of Clash of the Titans .        Why am I suddenly so obsessed with the fallout of a film gone from the public consciousness ten years now? Maybe it's me recently finishing the first season of  Blood of Zeus  on Netflix and seeing so clearly what  Clash of the Titans  very nearly was. Maybe it's my  evolving thoughts on the Percy Jacks...

Some Much Needed Love for Megamind

    Following this year's Oscars ceremony, filmmakers Phil Lord and Chris Miller, directors of The Lego Movie , penned an op-ed for Variety bemoaning the stigma around animated films. They report taking issue with Naomi Scott, one of the presenters for best animated film, saying that animated films are some of the most formative experiences a kid has, and that kids tend to watch these films over and over, further noting "I think some of the parents out there know exactly what I'm talking about." Lord and Miller seemed to take this as implying that adults can't appreciate animated films, saying "Surely no one set out to diminish animated films, but it’s high time we set out to elevate them."                    I didn't personally find Scott's observation that kids make their parents watch the same animated films over and over again innately demeaning--certainly not any more than Schumer joking that her toddler made he...

REVIEW: Project Hail Mary

    The elements in Project Hail Mary are all mostly straightforward and build to a fairly familiar end: drop an average Joe into an extraordinary situation where he is required to be extraordinary also, and watch extraordinary things happen. This is proven territory.      And I spent most of the time drafting this review trying to decide whether that was a point for or against the film, helmed by Phil Lord and Chris Miller--and whether that made a difference for a non-franchise piece like this, the exact kind of film we need to succeed at the box office in order to have a healthy landscape. I think the answer to that question is honestly bigger than any one film, even a reasonably well-done one such as this.     But I will say that a movie like Project Hail Mary gives me some hope, and it's my wish that the film continues to find people who will receive it with zeal. And I hope that the people who do will continue to search for other films that they...

REVIEW: Supergirl

      Some will say, "We don't need another edgy superhero!" But that's not what makes the utter mediocrity of DC's new Supergirl so devastating. People were saying "We don't need another X superhero" since 2012, and the post-Infinity saga stupor we've slogged through was not triggered by piling one-too-many superheroes onto the camel's back.     The Flash sucked because its perversion of the butterfly effect theory was convoluted and ham-fisted. Black Adam sucked because nobody on that film knew what a moral dilemma actually looks like. "Love and Thunder" sucked because, despite what everyone thought in 2017, Waititi's style only barely worked in "Ragnarok" and was not going to work in a script which feels like it was farted out half-past midnight.     Supergirl had none of those issues. The real tragedy of Supergirl is that it so easily could have worked.     Drifting around the universe has mostly worked for Sup...

Reveling in the Mixed Messages of Miss Congeniality

In book ten of Metamorphoses, Greek poet Ovid tells the tale of Pygmalion, a talented sculptor living in the height of ancient Greek society.      According to the story, Pygmalion’s sculpting prowess was so impeccable that one of his pieces, a marble woman he christened Galatea, was said to be the lovelier than any woman of flesh and blood. Pygmalion was so taken by his creation that he brought her exotic gifts, kissed her marble cheeks, even prepared a luxurious bed for her. Pygmalion so pined to be loved by Galatea that he prayed to the goddess Aphrodite to allow Galatea to reciprocate his love and affection. Aphrodite was apparently in a good mood that day, so she granted Pygmalion’s wish, giving life to Galatea, whom he then wed. The story of Pygmalion is in essence the story of a man who creates his own idealized woman out of whole cloth (or more appropriately, marble), endowing her with all the traits that he finds appealing or alluring. The story also provides a m...

REVIEW: WICKED - For Good

      I'm conflicted about how to approach this review. I know everyone has their own yellow brick road to the myth of The Wizard of Oz as a whole and the specific Broadway adaptation that brought us all here.   I don't want to write this only for others who are familiar with the source material.       Even so, I can't help but review this from the perspective of a fan of the Broadway show--someone who has been tracking the potential for a film adaptation since before Jon M. Chu's participation was announced for the ambitious undertaking of translating one of Broadway's most electric shows onto film. I can't help but view this from the vantage point of someone who knew just how many opportunities this had to go wrong.     And it's from that vantage point that I now profess such profound relief that the gambit paid off. We truly have the " Lord of the Rings of musicals ."  What Jon M. Chu and his team have done here with these two...

Children of a Lesser God: Between Sound and Silence

    So ... you all remember how I was really annoyed by The Power of the Dog ?      Despite being an early prediction for the big trophy, I found that attempt rather shallow and self-congratulatory. I am more than perfectly fine that the Best Picture award went to the much better CODA . I thought it was much more enjoyable as a piece of film, and unlike The Power of the Dog , it did showed honest interest in the community it was reporting to champion. In the case of CODA , that was, of course, the deaf community.      But it's actually not CODA I want to talk about in detail at this time. That movie's milestones exist along a timeline that extends ... further back than I can track today, but at least as far back as  March 30, 1987, when Marlee Matlin became the first deaf actor to receive an Academy Award for her performance in Children of a Lesser God . Randa Haines’ 1986 film centers on the romance between a hearing man and a deaf woman a...

Saying Goodbye to Stranger Things

     There's a quote from critic Mark Caro that I think about a lot. I shared it back when I did my critical survey of Pixar movies . Writing about Finding Nemo , Caro wrote in the  Chicago Tribune in 2003 , "Classic film eras tend to get recognized in retrospect while we take for granted timeless works passing before our eyes. So let's pause to appreciate what's been going on at Pixar Animation Studios."      I think that captures the aspirations of all active-minded media consumers. Or at least, it ought to. "This good thing won't last forever, so savor it before the sun goes down."  Modern Times (1936)      But this is also a very hard mindset to access in an online culture that is always seeking to stamp labels and scores on a thing before we shove it on the conveyor belt and move on to the next parcel.       It's something I have been thinking about for the last year or so as the completion of the Stranger ...