The Great Movie Conquest of 2022: May

Welcome back to The Professor's desperate campaign to watch every film he should have seen in film school. As I mentioned last time, we'll be looking specially at James Stewart this month.

Your Intro to James Stewart

Back when I was teaching labs for TMA 102, I would introduce James Stewart to my students as "basically the Tom Hanks of the 1940s and 50s," and they instantly knew what I meant. Indeed, Stewart made his mark playing characters who were extraordinarily likeable and extraordinarily virtuous. Many of his most iconic roles come through his films with Frank Capra, including It's a Wonderful Life, You Can't Take it With You, and Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. But he was also a favorite of directors like Alfred Hitchcock and Anthony Mann, both of whom would sometimes lean into this aspect of his star persona and sometimes subvert it.

Stewart collected two Oscars during his career. One for his performance in The Philadelphia Story (1940) and an honorary Oscar in 1984 "For his fifty years of memorable performances, for his high ideals both on and off the screen, with respect and affection of his colleagues."

One of Stewart's signature strengths was making idealism and gentility look like the most reasonable characteristics a person could possess. His contemporaries, like Cary Grant or John Wayne, valorized a more roguish leading man quality, which makes the soft-spoken politeness seem all the more striking. Stewart would have the chance to play opposite both Grant and Wayne, and they, like many of his coworkers, spoke highly of Stewart's character.

Films I Watched With James Stewart

Of the films I caught this month, the film that probably most floated on Stewart's persona was 1950's Broken Arrow, a fascinating glimpse into the 1950s brand of combatting racism. I think that when most modern viewers think about Native Americans and Westerns, they mostly think of the Cowboy vs Indian story. While you definitely had a lot of those, even classical Hollywood would sometimes use the Western genre to tell stories that were sympathetic to Native Americans. Mind you, they weren't necessarily perfect pictures of social equality. Even here most of the Apache characters were in fact portrayed by white actors. But they were trying, I guess ...

This is relevant because Broken Arrow presents Stewart's character as an advocate for peace between the warring Apache tribe and the white settlers. His first notable action is treating the wounds of an injured Apache boy, and he spends the reminder of the film learning the customs and language of the tribe while trying to curb the aggression of the white settlers. James Stewart is exactly the kind of person one would cast for an apostle of peace.

No Highway in the Sky saw Stewart bring a certain insecurity that I don't generally associate with him. Most the time he's quiet and unassuming, yes, but not necessarily lacking in confidence or borderline awkward, which makes this film's portrait of Stewart at once novel and familiar. The story saw him as a scientist who anticipates that the unique design of the airplane on which he is boarded will cause it to malfunction midflight. His claim is a little out there, but he gradually finds allies who are willing to trust him. I don't know. Probably because he's James Stewart.

Stewart started to age out of Hollywood around the 1970s, when the cinematic anti-hero was on the rise and films started to revel in moral ambiguity. As I dig further into Stewart's filmography, I find myself more and more grateful that film has icons like him, people who make moral rightness seem like an aspiration. I'm certain the real James Stewart had his character flaws, but they were for him to wrestle with. The James Stewart who lit up the screen with his idealism and courage, we owe him a lot.

Films I Watched that Didn't Necessarily Have James Stewart

You won't find my one review this month among this month's harvest. While Stranger Things is a force of nature in the pop culture world, as a television series it doesn't technically meet the conditions of this challenge. But I reviewed the first set of season 4 episodes anyways.

I was a bit late to the game with both of my theater trips this month, so I opted to not put in the time to formally review them, but while we're here ...

I almost felt obligated to give The Bad Guys a viewing after coming off my Megamind essay, an essay in which I highlighted the uphill battle animated films face. That said, I considered it a worthwhile investment. Heist films aren't really my forte (though I did recently discover that I like Baby Driver), but I liked the film taking a Zootopia-esque approach to the genre. And I've said it before (no, really, I said it in my review of The One and Only Ivan), but Sam Rockwell really has a talent for voice-acting.

I was totally here for Marvel making a horror film, but no part of me found Wanda's storyline in "Multiverse of Madness" a logical progression of her character, and for that I can't feel anything for the film but irritation. Maybe I'll get into it some other time ...

I actually recently had a conversation with a friend about Captains Courageous, the 1937 version, which I saw this month. That's Spencer Tracy you see in the picture teaching Freddie Bartholemew's "Harvey" how to man the fishing boat which takes him on after falling overboard from his own boat. The two of them build a relationship that moved me deeply. Anyone who's read my essay on A Perfect World and its presentation of intergenerational male affection will likely see a throughline between the two films.

The film is based on a novel by Rudyard Kipling and even saw Tracy win an Oscar for actor in a leading role, yet my friend and I both remarked on a how this film, and many others like, fly completely under the radar. In a world where a film from the 1990s is considered vintage, what chance does a movie like this have at being discovered or celebrated? A lot of what I want to do with this blog is give coverage to films that deserve attention but feel out of reach toward mainstream audiences. It's admittedly an uphill battle, and I can't even say for certain I'm doing enough in that regard, but there are just way too many gems out there for me to feel comfortable writing only about Disney remakes.

A couple of other films deserve mention, I suppose. I really enjoyed Ben-Hur and Sliding Doors, and I'm haunted by the borderline necrophilia that plagued Branagh's "Frankenstein" adaptation.

Looking Forward

The verdict is out, and this month I will be centering my studies on the works of the irreplaceable Amy Adams. (Watch this be the month I finally watch Justice League.) I've always admired Adams for the way she demonstrates how light and intellect can coexist in one space at the same time so effortlessly, and I look forward to exploring her filmography even further.

Meanwhile I'll confess I have yet to select options for a theme for July, but I'll try to get on that. Check back on my blog's Facebook page for updates.

As always, thanks for reading, and congratulations on making it almost halfway through the year.

---The Professor

May we all aspire to have the class of Shirley MacLaine telling Meryl Streep she is good enough to play Carrie Fisher

May's Harvest

Under the Tuscan Sun (2003)

The Bad Guys (2022)

Broken Arrow (1950)

The Hollars (2016)

Five Easy Pieces (1970)

Love Affair (1936)

St. Vincent (2014)

The Flight of the Phoenix (1965)

Blinded by the Light (2019)

Ben-Hur (1959)

Dazed and Confused (1993)

Sliding Doors (1998)

Take Her, She's Mine (1963)

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022)

No Highway in the Sky (1951)

Clouds (2020)

Captains Courageous (1937)

How to Murder Your Wife (1965)

Winchester '73 (1950)

Corpse Bride (2005)

Breaking Away (1979)

Without Love (1945)

Girl, Interrupted (1999)

The Glen Miller Story (1954)

Yojimbo (1961)

Postcards from the Edge (1990)

Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (1994)

Bell, Book, and Candle (1958)

Libeled Lady (1936)

Monster's Ball (2001)

Raging Bull (1980)

Comments

Fine, I Will Review The Percy Jackson Show (again)

I have wondered if I was the only one who thought that "Sea of Monsters" was the weakest of the Percy Jackson and the Olympians pentalogy, but I have seen my reading echoed by other book loyalists. This second installment is perhaps penalized partially because it marks several major junctions in the larger series. This is, for example, the part of the series where the scope of the adventure really starts to enlarge. We know going in that there's an angry, deceased titan out to destroy Olympus, and that he's amassing an army, and so we need a sense that this threat is growing stronger. But this also marks a turning point in how series author, Rick Riordan, chooses to develop his main character. And so, season 2 of the Disney+ television adaptation faces similar crossroads. Season 3 of this show is already filming as we speak, so its immediate future is already spoken for, as far as production goes. But stylistically, this second seas...

REVIEW: MERCY

Everyone who was despairing that Star-Lord and Taser-Face never got their showdown, your moment in the sun has come. In MERCY , out this weekend, future Los Angeles has adopted a justice system in which criminals are weighed before an AI judge. Those on trial are allowed the full disposal of public surveillance and digital footprints in order to clear their name within a 90-minute timeframe. And this is the situation in which recovering alcoholic and policeman, Chris Raven, (Chris Pratt) find himself as he is charged with the murder of his wife, and he is left to make his case before the commanding Judge Maddox (Rebecca Ferguson) or face execution. The movie's buoyed up by a respectable ensemble cast, including Kali Reis, Annabelle Wallis, Kylie Rogers, Jeff Piere, and Chris Sullivan. Pratt and Ferguson are both up to the task, but we've also seen more memorable work from both of them. The movie knows ...

REVIEW: Mickey 17

Coming into Mickey 17 having not read the source material by Edward Ashton, I can easily see why this movie spoke to the sensibilities of Bong Joon Ho, particularly in the wake of his historic Academy Award win five years ago. Published in 2022, it feels like Ashton could have been doing his Oscars homework when he conceived of the story--a sort of mashup of Parasite , Aliens , and Charlie Chaplin's Modern Times . Desperate to escape planet earth, Mickey applies for a special assignment as an "expendable," a person whose sole requirement is to perform tasks too dangerous for normal consideration--the kind that absolutely arise in an outer space voyage to colonize other planets. It is expected that Mickey expire during his line of duty, but never fear. The computer has all his data and can simply reproduce him in the lab the next day for his next assignment. Rinse and repeat. It's a system that we are assured cannot fail ... until of course it does. I'll admit my ...

REVIEW: SCARLET

There isn't a story on the books that can't somehow trace its genealogy to the works of William Shakespeare. Such is the nature of inspiration and archetype. But the latest film from anime auteur, Mamoru Hosoda, is almost an adaptation of, rather than a homage to, Shakespeare's Hamlet , carrying over character names and even a few iconic lines. Yet it's not what Scarlet borrows from Shakespeare that gives the story its weight, but what it adds--and I'm not just talking about the giant thunder dragon in the sky. The Prince of Denmark in this story is reimagined as Princess Scarlet. This film sees her failing in her quest to avenge her father and being doomed to wander in some sort of desolate afterlife. Her only consolation is the idea that she might find her treacherous uncle somewhere in this wasteland and see her vengeance fulfilled in this world. But her quest sees her crossing paths with someone else, a medic from a ...

REVIEW: West Side Story

Slight spoiler, the first shot of Steven Spielberg's West Side Story adaptation opens on a pile of rubble, a crumbled building wrecked to make way for new development. I amusedly wondered if this was maybe an accidental metaphor, a comment on this new adaptation of the stage show supplanting the legendary film version in 1961. There's not a lot about the 2021 film adaptation that deviates largely from the blueprint of the 1961 film or the stage musical on which it is based. That blueprint, of course, being the romance between two teenagers on opposite ends of a gang rivalry in 1950s New York. A few songs get swapped around, the casting is more appropriate, but there's no gimmick. We have to assume, then, that at the end of the day, Spielberg just wanted to try his hand at remaking a childhood favorite. Filmmakers, take note. Follow Spielberg's example. When revisiting an old text, you don't need a gimmick. Good taste is enough. ...

An Earnest Defense of Passengers

I've heard a lot of back and forth over what the purpose of film is and what we should ask from it. Film as a social amenity kind of has a dual purpose. It's supposed to give the population common ground and find things that people of varying backgrounds and beliefs can unify around. On the other hand, film also creates this detached simulated reality through which we can explore complex and even testing ideas about the contradictions in human existence. In theory, a film can fulfill both functions, but movies exist in a turbulent landscape. It's very rare for a film to try to walk both lanes, and it's even rarer for a film to be embraced upon entry for attempting to do so. Let me explain by describing the premise of one of my favorite movies, Morten Tyldum's 2016 film, Passengers . A key piece of this film ’s plot revolves around the main character, Jim Preston, a passenger onboard a spaceship, who premat...

Elemental: Savoring Pixar's Fading Light

I’ve only been doing this writing thing for a short while. But in that space, I have been surprised at many of the developments I’ve gotten to witness unfolding in the popular film landscape. It was only five years ago, for example, that superhero movies were still thought to be unstoppable. Here in 2025, though, we know better. But the wheels coming off the Marvel machine accompanied a shift in their whole method of production and distribution, and it didn’t take long for the natural consequences to catch up with them as verifiable issues started appearing in their films. Thor: Love and Thunder (2022) No. The development that has most surprised me has been critics and their slow-motion break-up with Pixar. The only way I know how to describe what I’ve seen over the last five years … imagine that your roommate has been stuck for a long time dating a girl who was obviously bad for him, and after he finally breaks up with her he gets back into the dating ring. All the girls he takes out ...

The Belle Complex

As Disney fandom increasingly moves toward the mainstream, the discussions and questions that travel around the community become increasingly nuanced and diverse. Is the true color of Aurora's dress blue or pink? Is it more fun to sit in the back or the front on Big Thunder Mountain? Is the company's continued emphasis on producing content for Disney+ negatively impacting not only their output but the landscape for theatrical release as a whole? However, on two things, the fandom is eternally united. First, Gargoyles was a masterpiece in television storytelling and should have experienced a much longer run than it did. Second, Belle's prom dress in the 2017 remake was just insulting. While overwhelmingly successful at the box office, the 2017 adaptation is also a bruise for many in the Disney community. Even right out the gate, the film came under fire for a myriad of factors: the auto-tuned soundtrack, Ewan McGregor's flimsy accent, the distracting plot ...

REVIEW: ZOOTOPIA 2

Any follow-up to the 2016 masterpiece, Zootopia , is going to be disadvantaged. Cinema was still a year ahead of Jordan Peele's "Get Out" when Disney released one of the most articulate explanations of race, allyship, and accountability ever put to film. Now that everyone knows how good, even "timely," a Disney pic can be, how do you surprise everyone a second time? The insights in this sequel won't spur any new chapters in your sociology 101 textbook. Though honestly, neither was the deflection of white saviourship that novel back in 2016. We more or less knew how racial profiling and biases played out in the landscape. What surprised many of us (and validated the rest of us) was the idea that these ideas could be articulated so eloquently in a children's film. It seems that the studio tried the same thing here with Zootopia 2 that it did with Frozen II six years ago. I think a lot of people wanted that m...

A Patch of Blue: Sidney Poitier, Representation, and The Virtue of Choice

Way, way back (about this time last year), I premiered my piece on the responsibility that younger viewers have to engage with older cinema --specifically the films of old Hollywood. There was a lot of ground that I wanted to cover in that essay--literally an entire era of filmmaking--so most of my talking points had to be concise, which is not how most writers prefer to discuss a thing for which they have passion enough to design and maintain their own blog. There is a bounty of discussion when it comes to film history and the people who made it. Today I'd like to take the opportunity to dig a little deeper into one such island: that of legendary actor and trailblazer, Sidney Poitier. Dwandalyn Reece, curator of the performing arts at the Smithsonian's National Museum of African American History and Culture, described Poitier , “He fully inhabits both sides of that personality, or those tensions, of being a Black person i...

Films and Feelings

Search This Blog