Skip to main content

The Great Movie Conquest of 2022: May


    Welcome back to The Professor's desperate campaign to watch every film he should have seen in film school. As I mentioned last time, we'll be looking specially at James Stewart this month.

Your Intro to James Stewart 

      Back when I was teaching labs for TMA 102, I would introduce James Stewart to my students as "basically the Tom Hanks of the 1940s and 50s," and they instantly knew what I meant. Indeed, Stewart made his mark playing characters who were extraordinarily likeable and extraordinarily virtuous. Many of his most iconic roles come through his films with Frank Capra, including It's a Wonderful LifeYou Can't Take it With You, and Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. But he was also a favorite of directors like Alfred Hitchcock and Anthony Mann, both of whom would sometimes lean into this aspect of his star persona and sometimes subvert it. 

    Stewart collected two Oscars during his career. One for his performance in The Philadelphia Story (1940) and an honorary Oscar in 1984 "For his fifty years of memorable performances, for his high ideals both on and off the screen, with respect and affection of his colleagues."

    One of Stewart's signature strengths was making idealism and gentility look like the most reasonable characteristics a person could possess. His contemporaries, like Cary Grant or John Wayne, valorized a more roguish leading man quality, which makes the soft-spoken politeness seem all the more striking. Stewart would have the chance to play opposite both Grant and Wayne, and they, like many of his coworkers, spoke highly of Stewart's character. 


Films I Watched With James Stewart

    Of the films I caught this month, the film that probably most floated on Stewart's persona was 1950's Broken Arrow, a fascinating glimpse into the 1950s brand of combatting racism. I think that when most modern viewers think about Native Americans and Westerns, they mostly think of the Cowboy vs Indian story. While you definitely had a lot of those, even classical Hollywood would sometimes use the Western genre to tell stories that were sympathetic to Native Americans. Mind you, they weren't necessarily perfect pictures of social equality. Even here most of the Apache characters were in fact portrayed by white actors. But they were trying, I guess ...

    This is relevant because Broken Arrow presents Stewart's character as an advocate for peace between the warring Apache tribe and the white settlers. His first notable action is treating the wounds of an injured Apache boy, and he spends the reminder of the film learning the customs and language of the tribe while trying to curb the aggression of the white settlers. James Stewart is exactly the kind of person one would cast for an apostle of peace.

   No Highway in the Sky saw Stewart bring a certain insecurity that I don't generally associate with him. Most the time he's quiet and unassuming, yes, but not necessarily lacking in confidence or borderline awkward, which makes this film's portrait of Stewart at once novel and familiar. The story saw him as a scientist who anticipates that the unique design of the airplane on which he is boarded will cause it to malfunction midflight. His claim is a little out there, but he gradually finds allies who are willing to trust him. I don't know. Probably because he's James Stewart.

   Stewart started to age out of Hollywood around the 1970s, when the cinematic anti-hero was on the rise and films started to revel in moral ambiguity. As I dig further into Stewart's filmography, I find myself more and more grateful that film has icons like him, people who make moral rightness seem like an aspiration. I'm certain the real James Stewart had his character flaws, but they were for him to wrestle with. The James Stewart who lit up the screen with his idealism and courage, we owe him a lot.


Films I Watched that Didn't Necessarily Have James Stewart

    You won't find my one review this month among this month's harvest. While Stranger Things is a force of nature in the pop culture world, as a television series it doesn't technically meet the conditions of this challenge. But I reviewed the first set of season 4 episodes anyways

    I was a bit late to the game with both of my theater trips this month, so I opted to not put in the time to formally review them, but while we're here ... 

    I almost felt obligated to give The Bad Guys a viewing after coming off my Megamind essay, an essay in which I highlighted the uphill battle animated films face. That said, I considered it a worthwhile investment. Heist films aren't really my forte (though I did recently discover that I like Baby Driver), but I liked the film taking a Zootopia-esque approach to the genre. And I've said it before (no, really, I said it in my review of The One and Only Ivan), but Sam Rockwell really has a talent for voice-acting. 

    I was totally here for Marvel making a horror film, but no part of me found Wanda's storyline in "Multiverse of Madness" a logical progression of her character, and for that I can't feel anything for the film but irritation. Maybe I'll get into it some other time ... 

    I actually recently had a conversation with a friend about Captains Courageous, the 1937 version, which I saw this month. That's Spencer Tracy you see in the picture teaching Freddie Bartholemew's "Harvey" how to man the fishing boat which takes him on after falling overboard from his own boat. The two of them build a relationship that moved me deeply. Anyone who's read my essay on A Perfect World and its presentation of intergenerational male affection will likely see a throughline between the two films.

    The film is based on a novel by Rudyard Kipling and even saw Tracy win an Oscar for actor in a leading role, yet my friend and I both remarked on a how this film, and many others like, fly completely under the radar. In a world where a film from the 1990s is considered vintage, what chance does a movie like this have at being discovered or celebrated? A lot of what I want to do with this blog is give coverage to films that deserve attention but feel out of reach toward mainstream audiences. It's admittedly an uphill battle, and I can't even say for certain I'm doing enough in that regard, but there are just way too many gems out there for me to feel comfortable writing only about Disney remakes. 

    A couple of other films deserve mention, I suppose. I really enjoyed Ben-Hur and Sliding Doors, and I'm haunted by the borderline necrophilia that plagued Branagh's "Frankenstein" adaptation. 

Looking Forward


    The verdict is out, and this month I will be centering my studies on the works of the irreplaceable Amy Adams. (Watch this be the month I finally watch Justice League.) I've always admired Adams for the way she demonstrates how light and intellect can coexist in one space at the same time so effortlessly, and I look forward to exploring her filmography even further.

    Meanwhile I'll confess I have yet to select options for a theme for July, but I'll try to get on that. Check back on my blog's Facebook page for updates. 

    As always, thanks for reading, and congratulations on making it almost halfway through the year. 

            ---The Professor


May we all aspire to have the class of Shirley MacLaine telling Meryl Streep she is good enough to play Carrie Fisher

May's Harvest

Under the Tuscan Sun (2003)

The Bad Guys (2022)

Broken Arrow (1950)

The Hollars (2016)

Five Easy Pieces (1970)

Love Affair (1936)

St. Vincent (2014)

The Flight of the Phoenix (1965)

Blinded by the Light (2019)

Ben-Hur (1959)

Dazed and Confused (1993)

Sliding Doors (1998)

Take Her, She's Mine (1963)

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022)

No Highway in the Sky (1951)

Clouds (2020)

Captains Courageous (1937)

How to Murder Your Wife (1965)

Winchester '73 (1950)

Corpse Bride (2005)

Breaking Away (1979)

Without Love (1945)

Girl, Interrupted (1999)

The Glen Miller Story (1954)

Yojimbo (1961)

Postcards from the Edge (1990)

Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (1994)

Bell, Book, and Candle (1958)

Libeled Lady (1936)

Monster's Ball (2001)

Raging Bull (1980)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: You, Me & Tuscany

    I've learned not to be ungrateful for movies like  You, Me & Tuscany . It's the kind of picture that can be easily written off as predictable or derivative.      And Kat Cairo's film definitely rides on some genre shorthand. Halle Bailey's Anna has very similar flaws to most rom-com heroines as this untethered 20-something trying to figure out how to stretch a check. And the story itself lands about where every one of these movies do. (Though, remind me, how does every Tom Cruise movie end?)      After the screening concluded, one of the ladies sitting behind me even said something much like, "Yeah, that was a lot like While You Were Sleeping ." But she didn't sound smug in her assessment. Her pronouncement was more encoded with the excitement that comes with discovery--the realization that she had found something like a worthy successor. And as a fan of Sandra Bullock's second-best rom-com, I was inclined to agree with this la...

All The Ways Sunset Boulevard Has Aged Gracefully

So, stop me if you’ve heard this before: Hollywood has a dark side.          Particularly in the wake of something like #MeToo or the double strikes of 2023, you can really get a sense for just how famishing, even degrading, it can be trying to make a living in Hollywood. But of course, it all goes back much further than those. One of my very first essays for this blog was a catalogue of all the ways Hollywood ravaged Judy Garland , to point to another example. Yet for all its mess, we cannot take our eyes off of Hollywood, or the people who build it.  Stardom in particular becomes a popular focal point—what is it really like being on the other side of all that spotlighting? And Hollywood has naturally supplied the market with all sorts of imaginings for this as well. Thus, each generation gets its own version of A Star is Born. John Wayne and Maureen O'Hara in The Quiet Man (1952)      Ty Burr wrote in his landmark work,...

PROFESSOR'S PICKS: 10 Movie Theater Experiences That Changed Me

   So, January 2012: Disney is rereleasing their 1991 animated masterpiece, Beauty and the Beast into theaters, and in 3D format, and I'm able to coerce a friend into seeing it with me.       This was a big deal because, as with most of the Disney movies we'd call "classic," Beauty and the Beast had its day in theaters before my time, and this was an opportunity to experience the movie in its proper element, and maybe imagine what it would have been when the legendary tunes by Howard Ashman and Alan Menken graced the public for the first time.     My larger circle was none-too-impressed with my choice. Didn't I know that the movie was already on DVD? That I could just watch it anytime in the comfort of my own home without having to pay for another ticket? How could I be so careless with my finances? (Incidentally, many of these same friends would pay top-dollar to see the Beauty and the Beast remake five years later on opening weekend ...)  ...

What's Up, Doc?: Why Everyone Needs the Rom-Com

            Though the library of master songwriter, Stephen Sondheim, reaches a pedigree of acclaim that is perhaps unrivaled, his most profound work is arguably his Tony award winning show, Company .  Premiering in 1969,  Company  follows Bobby, the only bachelor among his loving network of married friends.  Yeah, I know Bobby is sometimes played as a woman, but this particular metaphor is more clear with a male protagonist      The story is presented through a series of snapshots showing Bobby’s interactions with his coupled friends intercut with scenes from Bobby’s own romantic pursuits, and it’s through these little vignettes that we understand what it is that keeps Bobby tethered to single life: Bobby fears the chaos of being married to another person. Seeing up front all the turmoil that his married cohorts are subjected to, and faced with his own relationship woes, Bobby contemplates h...

An Earnest Defense of Passengers

          I've heard a lot of back and forth over what the purpose of film is and what we should ask from it. Film as a social amenity kind of has a dual purpose. It's supposed to give the population common ground and find things that people of varying backgrounds and beliefs can unify around. On the other hand, film also creates this detached simulated reality through which we can explore complex and even testing ideas about the contradictions in human existence.     In theory, a film can fulfill both functions, but movies exist in a turbulent landscape. It's very rare for a film to try to walk both lanes, and it's even rarer for a film to be embraced upon entry for attempting to do so.  Let me explain by describing the premise of one of my favorite movies, Morten Tyldum's 2016 film, Passengers .      A key piece of this film ’s plot revolves around the main character, Jim Preston, a passenger onboard a spaceship, who premat...

The Seven Brides for Seven Brothers Question

    I spend a lot of effort in this space trying to champion the musical genre as the peak of cinematic achievement.  And so it sometimes surprises my associates to find out that, no, I wasn't at all raised in a household that particularly favored musicals. I wasn't the kid who went out for the annual school musical or anything. My environment wasn't exactly hostile toward these things, but it actually did very little to nurture my study of the genre.  Cinderella (1950)      I obviously had exposure through things like the Disney animated musicals, which absolutely had a profound effect on the larger musical genre . But I didn’t see The Sound of Music until high school, and I didn’t see Singin’ in the Rain until college.      Seven Brides for Seven Brothers , though, it was just always there. And so I guess that's really where I got infected. I'm referring to the 1954 musical directed by Stanley Donen with music by Gene de Paul ,...

"When Did Disney Get So Woke?!" pt. 1 The Disney of Your Childhood

  So, I’m going to put out a somewhat controversial idea here today: The Walt Disney Company has had a tremendous amount of influence in the pop culture landscape, both in recent times and across film history. Further controversy: a lot of people really resent Disney for this.  I’ve spent a greater part of this blog’s lifetime tracking this kind of thing. I have only a dozen or so pieces deconstructing the mechanics of these arguments and exposing how baseless these claims tend to be. This sort of thing is never that far from my mind. But my general thoughts on the stigmatization of the Disney fandom have taken a very specific turn in recent times against recent headlines.       The Walt Disney Company has had some rather embarrassing box office flops in the last two or three years, and a lot of voices have been eager to link Disney’s recent financial woes to certain choices. Specifically, this idea that Disney has all the sudden “gone woke.”  Now,...

REVIEW: ELIO

    Here's a fact: the term "flying saucer" predates the term "UFO." The United States Air Force found the former description too limiting to describe the variety of potential aerial phenomena that might arise when discussing the possibility of life beyond earth.      There may have to be a similar expansion of vocabulary within the alien lexicon with Pixar's latest film, Elio , turning the idea of an alien abduction into every kid's dream come true.      The titular Elio is a displaced kid who recently moved in with his aunt after his parents died. She doesn't seem to understand him any better than his peers do. He can't imagine a place on planet earth where he feels he fits in. What's a kid to do except send a distress cry out into the great, big void of outer space?      But m iracle of miracles: his cries into the universe are heard, and a band of benevolent aliens adopt him into their "communiverse" as the honorary ambassador o...

REVIEW: AVATAR - Fire and Ash

     The "Avatar" chapters have generally renewed their interest to the masses based on which exciting new locale and which new culture whichever film opts to explore.      Following that dance,  "Fire and Ash" introduces yet another Na'Vi clan, this one hailing from the scorched plains under the shadow of an erupted volcano. But their biome is decidedly less spectacular than the lush jungles of the Omaticaya or the rich coral reefs where the Metkayina dive. Between the ashen grounds of the volcano clan and the metallic fortress of the humans, this is comfortably the most monochromatic of the three Avatar films. And yet, Avatar: Fire and Ash is no less gripping for it.      And this is where the internet really starts to reckon with what us fans of the franchise have always kind of known: that the many screensavers offered by the Avatar world ... they have been  nice . But these films would have never made the impact they have if th...

The Case for Pre-Ragnarök Thor

  The Marvel Cinematic Universe has become such a fixture of pop culture that it’s difficult to imagine that the whole ordeal was actually a massive crapshoot.                     The biggest conceit of the MCU has been its ability to straddle a thousand different heroes—each with their own stories, casts, and universes—into one cohesive whole. It’s a balancing act like nothing that’s ever been attempted before in the hundred years of filmmaking. A lot of the brand’s success can be attributed to the way that each individual story adheres to the rules of its own specific universe. The Captain America movies serve a different purpose than the Spiderman movies, and all the movies in the Captain America trilogy have to feel like they belong together.      There are, of course, questions posed by this model. In a network of films that all exist to set up other ...