Skip to main content

The Great Movie Conquest of 2022: May


    Welcome back to The Professor's desperate campaign to watch every film he should have seen in film school. As I mentioned last time, we'll be looking specially at James Stewart this month.

Your Intro to James Stewart 

      Back when I was teaching labs for TMA 102, I would introduce James Stewart to my students as "basically the Tom Hanks of the 1940s and 50s," and they instantly knew what I meant. Indeed, Stewart made his mark playing characters who were extraordinarily likeable and extraordinarily virtuous. Many of his most iconic roles come through his films with Frank Capra, including It's a Wonderful LifeYou Can't Take it With You, and Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. But he was also a favorite of directors like Alfred Hitchcock and Anthony Mann, both of whom would sometimes lean into this aspect of his star persona and sometimes subvert it. 

    Stewart collected two Oscars during his career. One for his performance in The Philadelphia Story (1940) and an honorary Oscar in 1984 "For his fifty years of memorable performances, for his high ideals both on and off the screen, with respect and affection of his colleagues."

    One of Stewart's signature strengths was making idealism and gentility look like the most reasonable characteristics a person could possess. His contemporaries, like Cary Grant or John Wayne, valorized a more roguish leading man quality, which makes the soft-spoken politeness seem all the more striking. Stewart would have the chance to play opposite both Grant and Wayne, and they, like many of his coworkers, spoke highly of Stewart's character. 


Films I Watched With James Stewart

    Of the films I caught this month, the film that probably most floated on Stewart's persona was 1950's Broken Arrow, a fascinating glimpse into the 1950s brand of combatting racism. I think that when most modern viewers think about Native Americans and Westerns, they mostly think of the Cowboy vs Indian story. While you definitely had a lot of those, even classical Hollywood would sometimes use the Western genre to tell stories that were sympathetic to Native Americans. Mind you, they weren't necessarily perfect pictures of social equality. Even here most of the Apache characters were in fact portrayed by white actors. But they were trying, I guess ...

    This is relevant because Broken Arrow presents Stewart's character as an advocate for peace between the warring Apache tribe and the white settlers. His first notable action is treating the wounds of an injured Apache boy, and he spends the reminder of the film learning the customs and language of the tribe while trying to curb the aggression of the white settlers. James Stewart is exactly the kind of person one would cast for an apostle of peace.

   No Highway in the Sky saw Stewart bring a certain insecurity that I don't generally associate with him. Most the time he's quiet and unassuming, yes, but not necessarily lacking in confidence or borderline awkward, which makes this film's portrait of Stewart at once novel and familiar. The story saw him as a scientist who anticipates that the unique design of the airplane on which he is boarded will cause it to malfunction midflight. His claim is a little out there, but he gradually finds allies who are willing to trust him. I don't know. Probably because he's James Stewart.

   Stewart started to age out of Hollywood around the 1970s, when the cinematic anti-hero was on the rise and films started to revel in moral ambiguity. As I dig further into Stewart's filmography, I find myself more and more grateful that film has icons like him, people who make moral rightness seem like an aspiration. I'm certain the real James Stewart had his character flaws, but they were for him to wrestle with. The James Stewart who lit up the screen with his idealism and courage, we owe him a lot.


Films I Watched that Didn't Necessarily Have James Stewart

    You won't find my one review this month among this month's harvest. While Stranger Things is a force of nature in the pop culture world, as a television series it doesn't technically meet the conditions of this challenge. But I reviewed the first set of season 4 episodes anyways

    I was a bit late to the game with both of my theater trips this month, so I opted to not put in the time to formally review them, but while we're here ... 

    I almost felt obligated to give The Bad Guys a viewing after coming off my Megamind essay, an essay in which I highlighted the uphill battle animated films face. That said, I considered it a worthwhile investment. Heist films aren't really my forte (though I did recently discover that I like Baby Driver), but I liked the film taking a Zootopia-esque approach to the genre. And I've said it before (no, really, I said it in my review of The One and Only Ivan), but Sam Rockwell really has a talent for voice-acting. 

    I was totally here for Marvel making a horror film, but no part of me found Wanda's storyline in "Multiverse of Madness" a logical progression of her character, and for that I can't feel anything for the film but irritation. Maybe I'll get into it some other time ... 

    I actually recently had a conversation with a friend about Captains Courageous, the 1937 version, which I saw this month. That's Spencer Tracy you see in the picture teaching Freddie Bartholemew's "Harvey" how to man the fishing boat which takes him on after falling overboard from his own boat. The two of them build a relationship that moved me deeply. Anyone who's read my essay on A Perfect World and its presentation of intergenerational male affection will likely see a throughline between the two films.

    The film is based on a novel by Rudyard Kipling and even saw Tracy win an Oscar for actor in a leading role, yet my friend and I both remarked on a how this film, and many others like, fly completely under the radar. In a world where a film from the 1990s is considered vintage, what chance does a movie like this have at being discovered or celebrated? A lot of what I want to do with this blog is give coverage to films that deserve attention but feel out of reach toward mainstream audiences. It's admittedly an uphill battle, and I can't even say for certain I'm doing enough in that regard, but there are just way too many gems out there for me to feel comfortable writing only about Disney remakes. 

    A couple of other films deserve mention, I suppose. I really enjoyed Ben-Hur and Sliding Doors, and I'm haunted by the borderline necrophilia that plagued Branagh's "Frankenstein" adaptation. 

Looking Forward


    The verdict is out, and this month I will be centering my studies on the works of the irreplaceable Amy Adams. (Watch this be the month I finally watch Justice League.) I've always admired Adams for the way she demonstrates how light and intellect can coexist in one space at the same time so effortlessly, and I look forward to exploring her filmography even further.

    Meanwhile I'll confess I have yet to select options for a theme for July, but I'll try to get on that. Check back on my blog's Facebook page for updates. 

    As always, thanks for reading, and congratulations on making it almost halfway through the year. 

            ---The Professor


May we all aspire to have the class of Shirley MacLaine telling Meryl Streep she is good enough to play Carrie Fisher

May's Harvest

Under the Tuscan Sun (2003)

The Bad Guys (2022)

Broken Arrow (1950)

The Hollars (2016)

Five Easy Pieces (1970)

Love Affair (1936)

St. Vincent (2014)

The Flight of the Phoenix (1965)

Blinded by the Light (2019)

Ben-Hur (1959)

Dazed and Confused (1993)

Sliding Doors (1998)

Take Her, She's Mine (1963)

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022)

No Highway in the Sky (1951)

Clouds (2020)

Captains Courageous (1937)

How to Murder Your Wife (1965)

Winchester '73 (1950)

Corpse Bride (2005)

Breaking Away (1979)

Without Love (1945)

Girl, Interrupted (1999)

The Glen Miller Story (1954)

Yojimbo (1961)

Postcards from the Edge (1990)

Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (1994)

Bell, Book, and Candle (1958)

Libeled Lady (1936)

Monster's Ball (2001)

Raging Bull (1980)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Toy Story 4: Pixar's Tribute to Regression

          It was about this time last year that I came across the one person who actually hated Toy Story 3 .          I was reading Jason Sperb’s book “Flickers of Film: Nostalgia in the Age of Digital Cinema” as part of my research for my essay on Who Framed Roger Rabbit and Pokemon: Detective Pikachu . It was in one of his chapters on the Pixar phenomenon that he shared his observation from the ending of Toy Story 3 , essentially casting the film as this nostalgia mousetrap for adults: “ If Andy lets go of his childhood nostalgia and moves on, then Toy Story fans don’t really have to , as the narrative recognition in the potential value in such an act is sufficient. Actually moving on becomes indefinitely deferred in an endless cycle of consumption (rewatching the movies, purchasing new versions of the movie, purchasing more and more Toy Story-related merchandise, rewatching them yet again with the next generat...

REVIEW: HOPPERS

     In the 1950s under the threat of nuclear warfare, Hollywood premiered such exercises as The Day the Earth Stood Still or War of the Worlds where an alien power would pass judgment on humankind, holding its fate in its hands. Here in the 2020s under the shadow of such threats as climate change, Hollywood sends to be our judge ... beavers.     Let me back up ...      Daniel Chong's new film from Pixar Animation, Hoppers , sees  Mabel (Piper Curda), a college student whose self-appointed mission is to preserve the glade where she used to find sanctuary with her now deceased grandmother. Her biggest opponent is hometown boy and beloved mayor, Jerry (Jon Hamm), who has designs to plow over the glade in order to open his new freeway--estimated to save travelers four whole minutes of commuting.       Mabel gets her golden opportunity when she uncovers secret technology pioneered by her professor which allows a human to rem...

The Night of the Hunter: Redefining "Childlike Innocence"

I n the early 1960s, American professor and psychologist, Lawrence Kohlberg developed what is now considered to be a fundamental cornerstone of understanding humans and morality. He introduced a model by which human beings start out determining what is right and wrong based on which course of action elicits the least punishment. Successful movement through this model sees a person gradually becoming motivated by principles , not simple reward or punishment, and Kohlberg anticipated that a person did not achieve this stage until adulthood, if ever. How the Grinch Stole Christmas (2000)     This is interesting because t he media likes to cast children as vessels of uncompromised goodness that adults could only ever hope to emulate. T heir purity forms the bedrock of much of American conversation. Because the future hinges upon their innocence, efforts to preserve their unblemished state can go to any length. You can justify any number of actions as long as you are doing i...

(Almost) A Love Letter to the "Percy Jackson" Movies

    Maybe it's just living through a pandemic-stained world rife where each election feels like a last-ditch effort to rescue liberty from the oblivion, but I'm sometimes nostalgic for the days when the most traumatic thing in my life was a poor adaptation of a favorite book.      My generation will remember the film adaptation of the popular YA fantasy book Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief by Rick Riordan with something like embarrassment, if not outright lividity. The book follows a young teen, Percy Jackson, who discovers that the gods of ancient Greece not only exist, but also sire modern day heroes. As a child of one of these gods, Percy is continually drawn into their Olympian-sized conflicts wherein he gets to prove himself every bit as much a hero as Hercules.       Each installment of the five-book series reads like a theme-park ride through Greek mythology as the teens travel across the country battling ancient m...

My Best Friend's Wedding: Deconstructing the Deconstructive Rom-Com

Well, Wicked is doing laps around the box office, so it looks as though the Hollywood musical is saved, at least for a season, so I guess we’ll turn our attention to another neglected genre.           As with something like the musical, the rom-com is one of those genres that the rising generation will always want to interrogate, to catch it on its lie. The whole thing seems to float on fabrication and promising that of which we can always be skeptical—the happy ending. This is also why they’re easy to make fun of and are made to feel second-tier after “realer” films which aren’t building a fantasy. You know? Movies like Die Hard …  We could choose any number of rom-coms, but the one that I feel like diving into today is a film I consider to be supremely underrated: My Best Friend’s Wedding . I’m selecting it for a number of reasons. Among these is my own personal fondness for the film, and also the fact that it boasts a paltry 6....

An Earnest Defense of Passengers

          I've heard a lot of back and forth over what the purpose of film is and what we should ask from it. Film as a social amenity kind of has a dual purpose. It's supposed to give the population common ground and find things that people of varying backgrounds and beliefs can unify around. On the other hand, film also creates this detached simulated reality through which we can explore complex and even testing ideas about the contradictions in human existence.     In theory, a film can fulfill both functions, but movies exist in a turbulent landscape. It's very rare for a film to try to walk both lanes, and it's even rarer for a film to be embraced upon entry for attempting to do so.  Let me explain by describing the premise of one of my favorite movies, Morten Tyldum's 2016 film, Passengers .      A key piece of this film ’s plot revolves around the main character, Jim Preston, a passenger onboard a spaceship, who premat...

REVIEW: Disclosure Day

     Maybe it was self-control that compelled Spielberg to build his whole movie around aliens but give the aliens themselves as little screentime as possible. (Or, for all I know, he did it on a dare.)  But this is only one of the risks taken by his latest film.       This first encounter picture is distanced from something like Independence Day and more toward something like 2001: A Space Odyssey --and it's even closer to something like Arrival . The film sees a cyber-security worker, Daniel Kilner (Josh O'Connor) who defects with the intent to reveal what he knows to the world: the government has had repeated, secret encounters with extraterrestrial life. He has a team of underground sympathizers, lead by Hugo Wakefield (Colmon Domingo), but he also has agent Noah Scanlon (Colin Firth) out to stop the truth at any cost. Kilner's only chance getting the truth out there is in joining up with Margaret Fairchild (Emily Blunt), a newscast personali...

The Notebook Has No Excuses

     The thing about film is … the more you think about it, the less sense it makes. Film tells us, even in a society obsessed with wealth and gain, “Remember, George, no man is a failure who has friends.” Film warns us that the most unnatural evil lies in wait at the Overlook Hotel and peeks out when all the guests leave for the winter–and that the heart of it resides in room 237–knowing we'll trip over ourselves wanting to open that door. Film is what makes us believe that the vessel for the deepest human emotion could be contained in a cartoon clownfish taking his unhatched cartoon son and holding him in his cartoon fin and telling him he will never let anything happen to him.  Nights of Cabiria (1957) Even when it tries to plant its feet aggressively in realism, film winds up being an inherently emotional realm. We feel safer to view and express all manners of passions or desires here in the space where the rules of propriety just don’t matter anymore. So a fa...

REVIEW: Song Sung Blue

     I came into Craig Brewer's Song Sung Blue with little context for the real-life couple at the center of this movie, for Neil Diamond, or for the world of celebrity  impersonators  interpreters. There are no doubt subterranean connotations to the specific songs that they chose to sing at certain moments in the narrative that are lost on me. I have no doubt, though, that the intended audience will find this movie before long.  But the film was still viable enough that even a relative neophyte like me could still find himself humming along to this musical drama.     The film documents the real-life couple of Mike and Claire Sardina, celebrity impersonators who fall in love, marry, and form a tribute band for legendary singer, Neil Diamond. We track their relationship from its beginning through their career aspirations and the crossroads in their marriage, including a violent accident that changes their family forever.     Again, I don...

REVIEW: Soul

Pixar's latest film, Soul , dropped on Disney+ Christmas day, another regrettable casualty of the virus. This time around, we follow a hopeful musician bursting with enthusiasm. Music is an oddly appropriate metaphor for the film: both certainly touch the outer rim of mankind's emotional faculty, but good luck summarizing the experience to your friends. Joe Gardner is a music teacher at a public school whose enthusiasm for music is spilling out of the walls of his classroom. Opportunity strikes Joe the same day that misfortune does, and a fatal accident lands him in a celestial plane of existence known as "The Great Before," where souls are developed and finessed before being sent to earth to experience human existence. Joe is saddled with mentoring 22, a soul sapling who has settled in The Great Before for several hundred years and has no intention of ever giving mortality a chance. But in 22, Joe sees a chance to return back to earth and fulfill his purpose if he ca...