REVIEW: Stranger Things 4 Volume 1

The newest season of Stranger Things find our players scattered geographically, battered emotionally. Almost a year after the battle of Starcourt mall, Joyce moves her kids, including newly orphaned El, to California, away from the site of her grief. Meanwhile, those left in Hawkins get to try and put the pieces back together, and across the sea, Hopper fights to stay alive in the hopes that he might see his family again one day. It's not an ideal time for Hawkins to come under attack from the forces of the Upside Down, but when the Mind Flayer unleashes his newest threat, the cancerous Vecna, our heroes are all that stand between their home town and bottomless evil.

I'll acknowledge I miss the levity of the ten-year old players, but maturity looks really good on this cast. (The emotional depth, that is. I will never get used to Noah Schnapp's booming tones.) The best parts of this season feature our characters finally sowing wisdom from their experiences. They're not just getting older, they're growing up, and not just the kids. It's nice to know that all this time we've spent raking them across the monsters has given them some perspective. (Most of them, I guess. They apparently couldn't think up a better storyline for Nancy, one of their strongest characters, than to have her regress back to her sophomore love triangle.)

It's a token of the series' writing that the tension runs rich even when the monsters are nowhere in sight. While less graphic than last season, which literally saw human bodies being melted into flesh puddles, the monster violence plays more sadistically than seen with previous agents of the Upside Down.

Speaking of which, this arc devotes more time to worldbuilding than any season past. Questions we might have had about the Mind Flayer and the terrifying hellscape he reigns over all the way back in 2016 are beginning to be answered. In doing so, the series risks taking away what was arguably its funnest story element. One thing that separated this show from other fantasy shows was that there was no ambassador of the Underworld springing up to outline the terms and conditions, allowing the characters, and the audience with it, to take real ownership over the fantasy.

But even as various facets are finally defined and mapped, and even as its child stars begin to move past their grade school years, the show preserves its unique whimsy, a loyalty to a mindset that champions a childlike methodology. Gamers and nerds will stay standing long after the rest of us are gone.

A lot of the dialogue leading up to this season's premiere has centered around simply how big it is. The available episodes come in at about nine hours, and we haven't even hit the two-and-a-half hour finale yet. What's interesting is that the extra volume actually feels well-spent during the early half of the volume (the first third of the season overall). The extra time helps carve out the emotional intricacies of our heroes, which helps tether the action to a place that feels vulnerable. The latter-half, admittedly, feels a little bloated. Three episodes go by and you realize you've been spinning tires trying to break through problems that surely shouldn't be taking this long to resolve. From this side of the pay-off, it's difficult to say with much confidence whether the setup has been well-spent.

And yet, despite the darkness and despite the extra stuffing, the show remains loyally dedicated to the heart which has always set it apart. Episode 4 in particular culminates in a sequence which ranks as emotionally charged as anything else we've seen from this series.

With the season's final two episodes still hanging over us, much of this season's impact and success is still up in the air. With all the seeds this first batch of episodes has planted, it's not like that golden peak isn't within reach.

--The Professor

Comments

REVIEW: The Fall Guy

Someone show me another business as enthusiastic for its own self-deprecation as Hollywood. From affectionate self-parodies like Singin' in the Rain to darker reflections of the movie business like Sunset Boulevard , Hollywood has kind of built its empire on ridicule of itself. And why wouldn't it? Who wouldn't want to pay admission to feel like they're in on the secret: that movie magic is just smoke and mirrors? That silver screen titans actually have the most fragile egos? But these are not revelations, and I don't think they are intended to be. Hollywood doesn't really care about displaying its own pettiness and internal rot because it knows that all just makes for good entertainment. A t some point, this all stops feeling like a joke that we, the audience, are in on. At some point, it all stops feeling less like a confession and more like gloating. At what point, then, does the joke turn on us, the enablers of this cesspool whose claim to

Finding Nemo: The Thing About Film Criticism ...

Film is a mysterious thing. It triggers emotional responses in the audience that are as surprising as they are all-encompassing. As a medium, film is capable of painting stunning vistas that feel like they could only come to life behind the silver screen, but many of the most arresting displays on film arise from scenes that are familiar, perhaps even mundanely so. It’s an artform built on rules and guidelines–young film students are probably familiar with principles like the rule of thirds or the Kuleshov effect–but someone tell me the rule that explains why a line like “We’ll always have Paris,” just levels you. There are parts of the film discussion that cannot be anticipated by a formula or a rulebook, and for that we should be grateful. Arrival (2016) But the thing about film–and especially film criticism–is that film critics are not soothsayers. Their means of divining the artistic merit of a movie are not unknowable. There are patterns and touchstones that

The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Clash of the Titans

Anyone else remember the year we spent wondering if we would ever again see a movie that wasn't coming out in 3D? T hat surge in 3D films in the early months of 2010 led to a number of questionable executive decisions. We saw a lot of films envisioned as standard film experiences refitted into the 3D format at the eleventh hour. In the ten years since, 3D stopped being profitable because audiences quickly learned the difference between a film that was designed with the 3D experience in mind and the brazen imitators . Perhaps the most notorious victim of this trend was the 2010 remake of Clash of the Titans . Why am I suddenly so obsessed with the fallout of a film gone from the public consciousness ten years now? Maybe it's me recently finishing the first season of Blood of Zeus on Netflix and seeing so clearly what Clash of the Titans very nearly was. Maybe it's my evolving thoughts on the Percy Jackson movies and the forthcoming Disney+ series inevit

REVIEW: Belfast

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: the world needs more black and white movies. The latest to answer the call is Kenneth Branagh with his semi-autobiographical film, Belfast . The film follows Buddy, the audience-insert character, as he grows up in the streets of Belfast, Ireland in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Though Buddy and his family thrive on these familiar streets, communal turmoil leads to organized violence that throws Buddy's life into disarray. What's a family to do? On the one hand, the father recognizes that a warzone is no place for a family. But to the mother, even the turmoil of her community's civil war feels safer than the world out there. Memory feels safer than maturation. As these films often go, the plot is drifting and episodic yet always manages to hold one's focus. Unbrushed authenticity is a hard thing to put to film, and a film aiming for just that always walks a fine line between avant-garde and just plain

The Great Movie Conquest of 2022 - January

This fool's errand is the fruition of an idea I've wanted to try out for years now but have always talked myself out of. Watching a new movie a day for one full year is a bit of a challenge for a number of reasons, not in the least of which being that I'm the kind of guy who likes to revisit favorites. As a film lover, I'm prone to expanding my circle and watching films I haven't seen before, I've just never watched a new film every day for a year. So why am I going to attempt to pull that off at all, and why am I going to attempt it now? I've put off a yearlong commitment because it just felt like too much to bite off. One such time, actually, was right when I first premiered this blog. You know ... the start of 2020? The year where we had nothing to do but watch Netflix all day? Time makes fools of us all, I guess. I doubt it's ever going to be easier to pull off such a feat, so why not now? Mostly, though, I really just want to help enliven my

REVIEW: All Together Now

The unceasing search for new acting talent to mine continues with Netflix's new film, All Together Now, which premiered this week on the service. This film features Moana alum Auli'i Cravalho as Amber Appleton, a bright but underprivileged high schooler with high aspirations. Netflix's new film plays like a trial run for Cravalho to see if this Disney starlet can lead a live-action film outside the Disney umbrella. Cravalho would need to play against a slightly stronger narrative backbone for us to know for sure, but early signs are promising. All Together Now follows Amber Appleton, a musically talented teen overflowing with love for her classmates, her coworkers, and her community. Amber reads like George Bailey reincarnated as a high school girl, throwing herself into any opportunity to better the world around her, like hosting her high school's annual for benefit Variety Show. But Amber's boundless optimism conceals an impoverished home life. She and her moth

Changing Film History With a Smile--and Perhaps, a Tear: Charlie Chaplin's The Kid

Film has this weird thing called “emotionality” that sees itself at the center of a lot of haranguing in the critical discourse. There is a sort of classism in dialogue that privileges film as a purely cerebral space, detached from all things base and emotional, and if your concerns in film tend to err on the side of sentiment or emotions, you have probably been on the receiving end of patronizing glances from those who consider themselves more discerning because their favorite movie is 2001: A Space Odyssey . Tyler Sage, another freelance film critic I follow, said it best when he described emotionality’s close cousin, “sentimentality " and the way it is generally discussed in the public sphere : The Godfather (1972) “These days, if you are one of these types who likes to opine knowingly in the public sphere – say, a highfalutin film critic – it's one of the most powerful aspersions there is. ‘I just found it so sentimental ,’ … [and] you can be certain no one will contrad

REVIEW: ONWARD

The Walt Disney Company as a whole seems to be in constant danger of being overtaken by its own cannibalistic tendency--cashing in on the successes of their past hits at the expense of creating the kinds of stories that merited these reimaginings to begin with. Pixar, coming fresh off a decade marked by a deluge of sequels, is certainly susceptible to this pattern as well. Though movies like Inside Out and Coco have helped breathe necessary life into the studio, audiences invested in the creative lifeblood of the studio should take note when an opportunity comes for either Disney or Pixar animation to flex their creative muscles. This year we'll have three such opportunities between the two studios. [EDIT: Okay, maybe not. Thanks, Corona.] The first of these, ONWARD directed by Dan Scanlon, opens this weekend and paints a hopeful picture of a future where Pixar allows empathetic and novel storytelling to guide its output. The film imagines a world where fantasy creatur

Nights of Cabiria: What IS Cinema?

So here’s some light table talk … what is cinema? What is it for ? On the one hand, film is the perfect medium to capture life as it really is. With the roll of the camera, you can do what painters and sculptors had been trying to do for centuries and record the sights and sounds of a place exactly as they are. On the other hand, film is the perfect medium for dreaming. Is there any other place besides the movies where the human heart is so unfettered, so open to fantasy? If you’ve studied film formally, this is probably one of the first discussions you had in your Intro to Film theory course, in a class that may have forced you to read about Dziga Vertov and his theory about film and the Kino-eye (another day, another day …) In some ways, we could use basically any of thousands of cinematic works to jumpstart this discussion, but I have a particular film in mind. The lens I want to explore this idea through today is not only a strong example of strong cinematic cra

Mamma Mia: Musicals Deserve Better

Earlier this week, Variety ran a piece speculating on the future of musicals and the roles they may play in helping a post-corona theater business bounce back. After all, this year is impressively stacked with musicals. In addition to last month's fantastic "In the Heights," we've got a half dozen or so musicals slated for theatrical release. Musical master, Lin Manuel-Miranda expresses optimism about the future of musicals, declaring “[While it] hasn’t always been the case, the movie musical is now alive and well.” I'm always hopeful for the return of the genre, but I don't know if I share Lin's confidence that the world is ready to take musicals seriously. Not when a triumph like "In the Heights" plays to such a small audience. (Curse thee, "FRIENDS Reunion," for making everyone renew their HBO Max subscription two weeks before In the Heights hits theaters.) The narrative of “stop overthinking it, it’s just a musical,”

Films and Feelings

Search This Blog