Skip to main content

REVIEW: ZOOTOPIA 2

 

    Any follow-up to the 2016 masterpiece, Zootopia, is going to be disadvantaged. Cinema was still a year ahead of Jordan Peele's "Get Out" when Disney released one of the most articulate explanations of race, allyship, and accountability ever put to film. Now that everyone knows how good, even "timely," a Disney pic can be, how do you surprise everyone a second time?

    The insights in this sequel won't spur any new chapters in your sociology 101 textbook. Though honestly, neither was the deflection of white saviourship that novel back in 2016. We more or less knew how racial profiling and biases played out in the landscape. What surprised many of us (and validated the rest of us) was the idea that these ideas could be articulated so eloquently in a children's film.

    It seems that the studio tried the same thing here with Zootopia 2 that it did with Frozen II six years ago. I think a lot of people wanted that movie to find more princess tropes to rebut; what they ended up doing was just following the tracks of the characters and unearthing deeper insights, richer epiphanies. I found myself really appreciating that then, and I think it works here too. Byron Howard and Jared Bush appear to have caught onto the idea that nearly ten years later, the world still needs mirrors for examining what it means for all sorts of animals to exist in one space, and we luckily have a rabbit and fox who know something about that.

    At the start of this film, Nick and Judy are still early into their official partnership, and not everyone's sold on this whole idea of a fox and a bunny working on the police force--let alone as partners. And frankly, Nick and Judy themselves are still trying to convince themselves that it's not just wishful thinking.

    Meanwhile, Zootopia is fast approaching the centennial celebration of the device that allows for the distinct climate districts in the city. Everyone knows that this invention happened to coincide with a deadly reptile attack, which is why there are no reptiles in Zootopia. And so when a certain blue serpent slithers onto the scene, everyone is nervous--except of course, a soft-hearted rabbit and the shrewd fox she drags along for the ride. If they want to prove to everyone that they belong on the force, they'll have to figure out what exactly happened 100 years ago and how to tell the world.

    The nucleus of this film is Gary De'Snake, brought to life brilliantly by Ke Huy Quan. He is darn near the cutest reptile ever put to film--and also woefully underused. A lot of Judy and Nick's revelations about reptiles tend to be fueled more by conversations they have about him than actions he takes himself--you really want to see more of the snake.

    A few parts of this film feel like they were edited for broadcast. This is another one of those movies where they obviously did a lot more research and made a lot more drawings than they needed to. That's all good and fine for worldbuilding, but the film feels a little crowded with cameos or one-off characters. Too many faces from the first movie wanted to make sure you remembered they were there.

    The animation team builds on the playground of the first film--we were absolutely overdue for a marine-mammal section of Zootopia. But it's not just that the animal metropolis makes for some stunning vistas. We get to dive into the wheels and gears of this animal kingdom, and almost always while we're on the run. This film takes us on so many roller coasters that could only exist in this world.

    A part of me wants to give this film a tepid review simply because I'm scared of what it represents. Particularly in the wake of last year's Moana 2 tumor, I'll always be hesitant to sign off on any Disney Animated movie with a number in its title. (Seriously folks, if you are going to feed Toy Story 5, consider also checking out Pixar's Hoppers or Disney Animation's Hexed next year.) 

    But this sequel sidesteps what made the 2010 Pixar sequels so nauseating. This film's external conflict fits alongside a compelling internal conflict between the characters--and not like a "Wreck-it Ralph is being forced to resolve some attachment anxiety that he definitely didn't have in the last movie" kind of conflict. Judy and Nick have some of the slickest verbal repartee of any animated pairing, but this kind of writing is even more important. 

    Nick and Judy are in conflict here, yes, but the film finds the optimal balance. Their mismatched viewpoints generate real tension between them and put their viability as a partnership into question. Judy asserts "The world will never be a better place until people are brave enough to do the right thing." To which Nick returns, "Sometimes being a hero doesn't make a difference." But they're never so biting that you lose sight of what makes their friendship so endearing in the first place. 

    So if I am to be subjected to Encanto 2, perhaps they can at least take notes from this movie. 

            --The Professor


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: ELIO

    Here's a fact: the term "flying saucer" predates the term "UFO." The United States Air Force found the former description too limiting to describe the variety of potential aerial phenomena that might arise when discussing the possibility of life beyond earth.      There may have to be a similar expansion of vocabulary within the alien lexicon with Pixar's latest film, Elio , turning the idea of an alien abduction into every kid's dream come true.      The titular Elio is a displaced kid who recently moved in with his aunt after his parents died. She doesn't seem to understand him any better than his peers do. He can't imagine a place on planet earth where he feels he fits in. What's a kid to do except send a distress cry out into the great, big void of outer space?      But m iracle of miracles: his cries into the universe are heard, and a band of benevolent aliens adopt him into their "communiverse" as the honorary ambassador o...

Fine, I Will Review The Percy Jackson Show (again)

     I have wondered if I was the only one who thought that "Sea of Monsters" was the weakest of the Percy Jackson and the Olympians pentalogy, but I have seen my reading echoed by other book loyalists.      This second installment is perhaps penalized partially because it marks several major junctions in the larger series. This is, for example, the part of the series where the scope of the adventure really starts to enlarge. We know going in that there's an angry, deceased titan out to destroy Olympus, and that he's amassing an army, and so we need a sense that this threat is growing stronger. But this also marks a turning point in how series author, Rick Riordan, chooses to develop his main character. And so, season 2 of the Disney+ television adaptation faces similar crossroads.     Season 3 of this show is already filming as we speak, so its immediate future is already spoken for, as far as production goes. But stylistically, this second seas...

REVIEW: MERCY

     Everyone who was despairing that Star-Lord and Taser-Face never got their showdown, your moment in the sun has come.      In MERCY , out this weekend, future Los Angeles has adopted a justice system in which criminals are weighed before an AI judge. Those on trial are allowed the full disposal of public surveillance and digital footprints in order to clear their name within a 90-minute timeframe. And this is the situation in which recovering alcoholic and policeman, Chris Raven, (Chris Pratt) find himself as he is charged with the murder of his wife, and he is left to make his case before the commanding Judge Maddox (Rebecca Ferguson) or face execution.      The movie's buoyed up by a respectable ensemble cast, including Kali Reis, Annabelle Wallis, Kylie Rogers, Jeff Piere, and Chris Sullivan.  Pratt and Ferguson are both up to the task, but we've also seen more memorable work from both of them.      The movie knows ...

Edward G. Robinson: Patron Saint of Forgotten Men

             I want to start off this essay by talking about one of my go-to movie stars, Chris Pratt.            My first exposure to him was at the end of my freshmen summer term when he landed as Peter Quill/Star Lord in Guardians of the Galaxy , a film I very much enjoyed, as you all know. (I would also see The Lego Movie for the first time around here). And by the time he was up for Jurassic World the next summer, I was up to date with my Parks and Recreation viewing, and the world had accepted him as a household name.           Like a lot of celebrities who came into prominence in the wake of social media, part of Pratt’s strengths lies in his supreme accessibility. But where someone like Ryan Reynolds found his market as being this cynical son-of-a-gun, Pratt’s appeal was his complete lack of pretense. His sincerity. Whe...

REVIEW: Mickey 17

Coming into Mickey 17 having not read the source material by Edward Ashton, I can easily see why this movie spoke to the sensibilities of Bong Joon Ho, particularly in the wake of his historic Academy Award win five years ago. Published in 2022, it feels like Ashton could have been doing his Oscars homework when he conceived of the story--a sort of mashup of Parasite , Aliens , and Charlie Chaplin's Modern Times . Desperate to escape planet earth, Mickey applies for a special assignment as an "expendable," a person whose sole requirement is to perform tasks too dangerous for normal consideration--the kind that absolutely arise in an outer space voyage to colonize other planets. It is expected that Mickey expire during his line of duty, but never fear. The computer has all his data and can simply reproduce him in the lab the next day for his next assignment. Rinse and repeat. It's a system that we are assured cannot fail ... until of course it does.  I'll admit my ...

REVIEW: The Running Man

      A lot of people have wanted to discuss Edgar Wright's new The Running Man outing as "the remake" of the 1987 film (with Arnold Schwarzenegger playing a very different Ben Richards). As for me, I find it more natural to think of it as "another adaptation of ..."      Even so, my mind was also on action blockbusters of the 1980s watching this movie today. But my thoughts didn't linger so much on the Paul Michael Glaser film specifically so much as the general action scene of the day. The era of Bruce Willis and Kurt Russell and the he-men they brought to life. These machine-gun wielding, foul-mouthed anarchists who wanted to tear down the establishment fed a real need for men with a lot of directionless anger.       This was, as it would turn out, the same era in which Stephen King first published The Running Man , telling the story of a down-on-his luck man who tries to rescue his wife and daughter from poverty by winning a telev...

REVIEW: Jurassic World - Rebirth

     I had a mixed reaction to  Jurassic World: Rebirth,  but it did make for one of the most enjoyable theater experiences I've had in recent memory.      I have to imagine that a part of this is because my most common theater appointments are matinee screenings, but I had the opportunity to see this one at a fairly well-attended midnight screening. And there's nary a film more tailored for surround-sound roaring and screens wide enough to contain these de-extinct creatures. ("Objects on the screen feel closer than they appear.") It was natural for me to cap the experience by applauding as the credits stared to roll, even if, as usual, I was the only one in the auditorium to do so.     Yes, I am that kind of moviegoer; yes, I enjoyed the experience that much, and I imagine I will revisit it across time.      That's not to imagine the movie is beyond reproach, but I suppose it bears mentioning that, generally , this i...

REVIEW: West Side Story

      Slight spoiler, the first shot of Steven Spielberg's West Side Story adaptation opens on a pile of rubble, a crumbled building wrecked to make way for new development. I amusedly wondered if this was maybe an accidental metaphor, a comment on this new adaptation of the stage show supplanting the legendary film version in 1961.     There's not a lot about the 2021 film adaptation that deviates largely from the blueprint of the 1961 film or the stage musical on which it is based. That blueprint, of course, being the romance between two teenagers on opposite ends of a gang rivalry in 1950s New York. A few songs get swapped around, the casting is more appropriate, but there's no gimmick.     We have to assume, then, that at the end of the day, Spielberg just wanted to try his hand at remaking a childhood favorite. Filmmakers, take note. Follow Spielberg's example. When revisiting an old text, you don't need a gimmick. Good taste is enough. ...

The Belle Complex

As Disney fandom increasingly moves toward the mainstream, the discussions and questions that travel around the community become increasingly nuanced and diverse. Is the true color of Aurora's dress blue or pink? Is it more fun to sit in the back or the front on Big Thunder Mountain? Is the company's continued emphasis on producing content for Disney+ negatively impacting not only their output but the landscape for theatrical release as a whole?  However, on two things, the fandom is eternally united. First, Gargoyles  was a masterpiece in television storytelling and should have experienced a much longer run than it did. Second, Belle's prom dress in the 2017 remake was just insulting.      While overwhelmingly successful at the box office, the 2017 adaptation is also a bruise for many in the Disney community. Even right out the gate, the film came under fire for a myriad of factors: the auto-tuned soundtrack, Ewan McGregor's flimsy accent, the distracting plot ...