Skip to main content

REVIEW: Wildwood


    Travis Knight's Wildwood has already generated above-normal discourse about the merits and application of animation as an artform. "Don't you realize that animation isn't just for KIDS, by Jove!?" (Don't you realize ... lots of us have been saying that for a while now?) This connects to a much larger conversation about the stigma the artform has held, a conversation that has generally placed the onus on animation--and animators--to prove they can be as good as "real films" and "real filmmakers."

    Animation as a form will need sustained support--from more than just the crowd who waited until now to decide that animated movies could be "good, actually." But Wildwood itself offers other contributions that I imagine will carry the field much further.

    Oregonian preteen Prue McKeel ignores her parents' instruction to not take her brother, Mac, outside. When a flock of crows descend and carry her brother off into the woods, Prue and the neighborhood weirdo fall into an enchanting wild domain full of bandits and warriors and all manners of wild beasts in order to bring him back.

    While I do support the voice acting industry as its own pool, in my honest experience, the familiarity of the voice matters much less than the performer's ability to recreate the feel of spontaneous, organic conversation--to disguise the reality that these words are emerging from a person behind a microphone in a sound booth. This is something the cast does very, very well. I recognized Carey Mulligan right off, but her performance as Alexandra, the sort of White Witch analogue, had all the gravitas of a fairy-tale villain, and all delivered with grace and ease. 

    Most of the cast is this way. I had the frequent experience of watching this film and recognizing a voice but not being able to place it until late in the film, or even during the end credits. And it's a pretty stacked cast, drawing upon the likes of Mahershala Ali, Jake Johnson, Angela Bassett, Awkwafina, and a dozen or so others.

    Stop-motion has always been a particularly difficult method of animation. In relying on physical materials to tell the story, it tends to be more proximate to reality than most other forms of the medium. This is a very high-risk/high reward scenario in an artform where verisimilitude can easily work against its own favor. Stop-motion has historically struggled with the rendering of human characters especially. I'd still say that the animal figures, like the majestic eagle Prue soars on midway through, were more captivating to me than most of the peoplefolk, but I was still impressed with how easily I bought into the human interactions.

    Where the medium really comes to life is in the breadth of this fantasy otherworld. This film has it both ways--vast and expansive yet also intricate and tactile. There's something very rewarding about seeing the band of coyote soldiers marching around in red suits with muskets yet still moving as only a coyote ever would.

    There are some spaces where the narrative coasts a little on the shorthand and goodwill of other fantasy adventures. Early on, there's some talk about Prue wanting to grow up too fast, which is why she gives no consideration for magic or fairy tales. And so when her dad tells her these things have value, that's our cue that she is going to spend the next two hours having some kind of spiritual awakening about these things.

    But by the time we return to this point, we are expected to just ignore how untested her father's theorem has been. Little of Prue's successes or failures have come down to how she has accepted or rejected the existence of magic. She shows some initial shock that birds can talk and coyotes wear pants, but she doesn't have any specific trouble integrating into this world after the fact. Neither does she solve many of her problems by choosing a more childlike method. I don't know how I'd cast "yells at tree to tell her what she wants" or "drugs her parents" as her holding the magic of fairy-tales in her heart. You could maybe argue that she's been learning to appreciate the magic in herself--and there is a specific moment of payoff with this in the climax. Even so, that's still a little too much water in the soup.

    Mind you, while this kind character economy has been implemented in epic fantasy, it's also not unprecedented for the protagonist more to serve as just audience's window into Wonderland. It's not always essential that the protagonist's interior world be as intricate as the vistas they are exploring. So, I'll count this less as a flaw and more maybe a missed opportunity.

    Wildwood may turn the tide. We may be on the dawn of getting an animated Best Picture Winner. We may also just be living through animation's La La Land moment where the idea of reviving a genre sounds like just the kind of thing the younger generation can secure bragging rights for--but eventually the novelty wears off, and suddenly everyone's asking why we're taking cartoons so seriously. 

    At the end of the day, animation is still the realm of fantasy. Even a "mature" animated film such as this still demands that you suspend your disbelief. And the "no filter" generation will have to really decide whether this is a train they'll actually feel like boarding. But it's a train that will press forward with or without them. 

            --The Professor



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: Clayface

    James Gunn promised early on that with his new DC Universe, not everything would be for everybody, but there would be something for everybody.      I have to assume he means he's eventually going to grant us the first proper superhero musical. (No, I still haven't seen "Joker 2.") But until such a time, James Watkins' new take on superheroes and horror with Clayface  is a valid offering just the same.     Rising actor, Matt Hagen (Tom Rhys Harris), is on top of the world, securing his first Oscar nomination, when he has a fatal night of passion with the girlfriend of a lord in the criminal underworld of Gotham. Matt is punished by having his lovely Hollywood face carved up irreparably. Matt's golden ticket to the front of the camera is ruined, and his reputation is smeared.      Driven to desperation, Matt seeks out a neuroscientist, Caitlyn Corr (Naomie Ackie), investing in an experimental form of therapy that could recover his...

Finding Nemo: The Thing About Film Criticism ...

       Film is a mysterious thing. It triggers emotional responses in the audience that are as surprising as they are all-encompassing. As a medium, film is capable of painting stunning vistas that feel like they could only come to life behind the silver screen, but many of the most arresting displays on film arise from scenes that are familiar, perhaps even mundanely so.       It’s an artform built on rules and guidelines–young film students are probably familiar with principles like the rule of thirds or the Kuleshov effect–but someone tell me the rule that explains why a line like “We’ll always have Paris,” just levels you. There are parts of the film discussion that cannot be anticipated by a formula or a rulebook, and for that we should be grateful.         Arrival (2016)      But the thing about film–and especially film criticism–is that film critics are not soothsayers. Their means of divining the artis...

An Earnest Defense of Passengers

          I've heard a lot of back and forth over what the purpose of film is and what we should ask from it. Film as a social amenity kind of has a dual purpose. It's supposed to give the population common ground and find things that people of varying backgrounds and beliefs can unify around. On the other hand, film also creates this detached simulated reality through which we can explore complex and even testing ideas about the contradictions in human existence.     In theory, a film can fulfill both functions, but movies exist in a turbulent landscape. It's very rare for a film to try to walk both lanes, and it's even rarer for a film to be embraced upon entry for attempting to do so.  Let me explain by describing the premise of one of my favorite movies, Morten Tyldum's 2016 film, Passengers .      A key piece of this film ’s plot revolves around the main character, Jim Preston, a passenger onboard a spaceship, who premat...

The "Stephen King's IT" Paradox - Can You Ever Go Home Again?

Though I think of myself as putting my heart and soul into this blog, I generally like to keep my offline persona mysterious. This is why I use a pen name and why you’ll never see a picture of my face on this page. But I’ll pull behind the curtain just a little today and share that … I attended my high school reunion not too long ago.           I actually ended up attending this reunion twice simply because the first reunion, our “real reunion,” was planned at sort of the last minute and had rather sparse attendance. And so those of us who made it to that resolved to see if we couldn’t pull off something a little more robust, which we did some months later with much more success. And I honestly didn’t mind going twice over.          I never actively put any distance between myself and my old pals, but I also never really made any effort to hold onto them after graduating beyond liking their posts on...

How Disney Liberated the Musical Genre

Anytime I’m getting ready for a new musical film, I generally try to put off listening to the soundtrack until after I’ve seen the movie. It’s just my way of ensuring that I experience the narrative in its full context upon its important premiere viewing. Most of the time I’m good about sticking to this, but nowhere is this feat harder than with the arrival of each new Disney musical.     I tried really hard with Encanto , but with Lin-Manuel Miranda writing for Disney, what can I say (except "You're Welcome"...) So, why am I talking about Disney musicals?     W hen I premiered my Jungle Book essay earlier this year, I decided that going forward I was ready to expand how I talked about Disney. Owing to Disney fans constantly having to justify their fandom, a lot of Disney discourse tends to be purely defensive. Disney fans only ever get to use their platform to try convincing the cool kids that--for the last time!--it's okay for adults without kids to go to...

The Other Woman: Empathy Isn't Easy

          Anyone else remember that one time Padme wrecked Phoebe's marriage to Max Medina? Directed by Don Roos, The Other Woman first premiered in Toronto in 2009. At the time, the movie was sporting the title of the book from which it was adapted, Love, and Other Impossible Pursuits . But the film didn’t receive any kind of widespread theatrical release until 2011, when it also sported its new title. We can assume perhaps distributors were more eager to showcase the film after Portman’s Oscar win for Black Swan at the 2011 ceremony . I myself caught the film on Netflix circa 2017, a time I remember as being especially fruitful for discovering underseen and independently financed films on the service (back before most of Netflix's budget went instead to funding such homegrown masterworks as Extraction or Damsel ...). In the tentpole-driven film world that we were already seeing emerge in 2009, an underground Netflix following is typically the highest t...

The Notebook Has No Excuses

     The thing about film is … the more you think about it, the less sense it makes. Film tells us, even in a society obsessed with wealth and gain, “Remember, George, no man is a failure who has friends.” Film warns us that the most unnatural evil lies in wait at the Overlook Hotel and peeks out when all the guests leave for the winter–and that the heart of it resides in room 237–knowing we'll trip over ourselves wanting to open that door. Film is what makes us believe that the vessel for the deepest human emotion could be contained in a cartoon clownfish taking his unhatched cartoon son and holding him in his cartoon fin and telling him he will never let anything happen to him.  Nights of Cabiria (1957) Even when it tries to plant its feet aggressively in realism, film winds up being an inherently emotional realm. We feel safer to view and express all manners of passions or desires here in the space where the rules of propriety just don’t matter anymore. So a fa...

Hating Disney Princesses Has Never Been Feminist pt. 1

     Because the consumption of art, even in a capitalist society, is such a personal experience, it can be difficult to quantify exactly how an individual interprets and internalizes the films they are participating in.      We filter our artistic interpretations through our own personal biases and viewpoints, and this can sometimes lead to a person or groups assigning a reading to a work that the author did not design and may not even accurately reflect the nature of the work they are interacting with (e.g. the alt-right seeing Mel Brooks’ The Producers as somehow affirming their disregard for political correctness when the film is very much lampooning bigotry and Nazis specifically). We often learn as much or more about a culture by the way they react to a piece of media as we do from the media itself. Anyways, you know where this is going. Let’s talk about Disney Princesses. Pinning down exactly when Disney Princesses entered the picture is a hard thi...

The Belle Complex

As Disney fandom increasingly moves toward the mainstream, the discussions and questions that travel around the community become increasingly nuanced and diverse. Is the true color of Aurora's dress blue or pink? Is it more fun to sit in the back or the front on Big Thunder Mountain? Is the company's continued emphasis on producing content for Disney+ negatively impacting not only their output but the landscape for theatrical release as a whole?  However, on two things, the fandom is eternally united. First, Gargoyles  was a masterpiece in television storytelling and should have experienced a much longer run than it did. Second, Belle's prom dress in the 2017 remake was just abominable.      While overwhelmingly successful at the box office, the 2017 adaptation is also a bruise for many in the Disney community. Even right out the gate, the film came under fire for a myriad of factors: the auto-tuned soundtrack, Ewan McGregor's flimsy accent, the distracting plot...