Year in Review: 2024

Let me start this party by admitting ... I really dropped the ball on reviews this year, folks. Not counting my Percy Jackson response, which in practice plays more like one of my essays anyways, there was a six-month gap between reviews with Wish last November and The Fall Guy this May.

More than once during that drought, I took my notebook to the theater and came back with a page full of notes, but for various reasons I was unable to piece together anything. It didn't help also that deliveries this year were comparatively sparse, what with the strikes strangling the production line ... I will try to do better this year. (For those curious, I am also going to try to review the final season of Stranger Things, like I did with the 4th season, when it drops sometime this year. That will all depend on a lot of things, including the method by which Netflix chooses to release these episodes.)

My reviews didn't particularly favor many of the box office hits this year--you'll all have to wait before you hear my opinion on Twisters, I guess--but I do try to remain at least plugged into the pop culture discourse. After all, aside from the "Percy Jackson" show response, my biggest review was for the Wicked film adaptation.

No surprise. I had a lot invested in the success of this movie, not just as a fan of the property, but as a champion of the musical genre. My musical survey essay nearly two years ago was largely in anticipation of this film, which I knew would be a turning point for studios deciding whether or not they were going to keep throwing money at this trickiest of genres. The financial and critical success of this project, then, gives me hope that musicals might live to fight another day, and I eagerly look forward to reviewing Wicked's concluding installment this Thanksgiving.

The essay round-up this year includes:

-Reveling in the Mixed Messages of Miss Congeniality - A thematic dissection of Miss Congeniality and its seemingly contradictory representation of gender dynamics.

-The Banshees of Inisherin: The Death Knell of Male Friendship - A look at The Banshees of Inisherin as a reflection of the complexities in maintaining adult male friendship.

-Finding Nemo: The Thing About Film Criticism ... - A deep-dive into the mechanics of Pixar masterpiece, Finding Nemo, and what it means for the critical attitudes toward film as a whole and animation specifically.

-Nights of Cabiria: What IS Cinema? - A meditation on the function and purpose of the cinematic form as reflected in the 1957 Italian film, Nights of Cabiria.

-The Other Woman: Empathy isn't Easy - An exercise in understanding character likeability as seen in the 2009 independent film, The Other Woman with Natalie Portman.

-We Did Not Deserve The Lion King - A history of the production of Disney's The Lion King and a look at its unusual place within the Disney canon.

-How Guardians of the Galaxy Tricks You into Feeling Things - A retrospective of the intricate emotional dialogue underpinning James Gunn's Guardians of the Galaxy trilogy.

-The Power of the Dog doesn't (want to) Understand Toxic Masculinity: A History and Deconstruction of the Toxic Cowboy - ... this one's pretty self-explanatory.

-A Patch of Blue: Sidney Poitier, Representation, and the Virtue of Choice - A tribute to actor and activist, Sidney Poitier, seen through the lens of his best film, A Patch of Blue.

-Children of a Lesser God: Between Sound and Silence - A look at the landmark film in deaf representation, including its historic win for Best Leading Actress from deaf performer, Marlee Matlin.

-My Best Friend's Wedding: Deconstructing the Deconstructive Rom-Com - An exploration of the post-modern attitudes toward the rom-com genre at work in My Best Friend's Wedding.

Identifying which movies are going to earn the spotlight this time around is always half the battle, not because I am lacking for movies I feel strongly about, but because I'm always trying to decide how best to distribute my promotion across branches of the film tree that deserve it most. I'm trying to make it a regular feature to rope in discussion on movies that don't have a lot of coverage. Ideally, indie-films that didn't receive any Oscar noms.

Scarlet Street (1945)

As always, I also try to make regular forays into the world of old Hollywood and give my readers ample opportunity to engage with cinema's long legacy. There have been some developments that have given me more hope for the future of classical cinema (my discovery of TUBI, mostly), but I still feel a significant call to generate more discussion on older films, so expect more of those to come.

Additionally, I'm becoming more interested in discussing films that I think are interesting but not necessarily masterworks. Somewhere between a rave and a rant. Something like my Clash of the Titans essay a few years back. There's tremendous catharsis in writing about something on either end of the spectrum, but to do away with extremes and dial in on the intricacies of a film's delivery, that demands a very refined analytical ability. Learning to deal in the gray, in the nuance, is a key to vivid discourse. Moreover, the film discussion doesn't just live or die on the highest and lowest points. Lots of films deserve discussion.

I call it a battle to identify viable candidates, but that's generally describing the amount of brain power demanded, not the timeline by which it occurs: by mid-January of last year, I had already figured out almost every single essay I was going to write in 2024.

I had a lot of time to prep my "Thor" essay

This ... is not so uncommon. Neither have I found it to be a significant stumbling block in my creative process. I like to leave some surprises for myself, but I'm also learning not to necessarily resist this part of how I work.

I have historically, for example, been very coy about promoting my work too far in advance in order to sidestep any awkwardness that might come up if I end up having to drop a piece in production (that has happened before) that I have already publicly committed to. But this kind of thing has been very rare, which has me wondering if this practice has been so useful after all and has also inspired me to try something new this year.

Knowing that, help yourself to this peek at some highly classified information.

This year's suspects

This is also a year I've given extra thought to what a critic's job even is.

As best as I can put it, a critic ought to be someone who opens your eyes. This should be someone with a good knowledge of the medium's history and linguistics--someone who can actually tell you whether or not what a film is trying to do is novel or even noteworthy. Films are a reflection of life and the cornucopia of worldviews and perspectives that can find their way onscreen, and so ideally your critic knows a thing or two about that as well.

And the goal of criticism isn't necessarily consensus. We all bring our own values and perspective to the game. As a result, two equally qualified critics can have two conflicting reads of the same piece of media--that's part of the fun. The secret of criticism is that you don't actually have to convince anyone to change their colors. You just have to get them see new ones. I really respect film critics who pull that off.

Modern Criticism ...

These things are, of course, hard to measure, hard for writing outlets to anticipate. And so, they reward critics who are not necessarily the best thinkers, but the best at harvesting eyeballs. And so, the ecosystem ends up platforming critics who tell us what we already want to hear. This leads to incurious criticism--dialogue that does not seek to understand the text of the film, but the appetites of the people consuming it. The trouble is, this kind of criticism does not actually serve the audience, nor even the film it is examining, but rather the critic themselves.

Advances like Rotten Tomatoes scores and IMDb's rating system have also shaped the landscape. The goal of the critic becomes to anticipate where the movie's going to land and tailor your review in advance so you're not caught on the wrong end of the YouTube comments. I'm not here to bag on those sites--I especially find a lot of IMDb's features useful for both assembling my writing and my own personal uses as a casual film fan. I just think it's worth reflecting on how the ability to immediately assign a film a numerical value impacts the way films are discussed, and also whether or not there's anything proactive film lovers can do to keep audiences on their toes.

The challenges that face thoughtful film discussion have maybe never been easy, but I also don't think that contemporary film lovers ought to take that as an excuse to shirk from our responsibility to keep the conversation not just alive, but healthy as well.

--The Professor

Kolya (1996)

Comments

"What Are Happy Endings For Anyway?" (II) - The Docks of New York

Yes, fellas. Your calendar is correct. We are, in fact, 10 years out from La La Land . My main point of interest in Damien Chazelle’s groundbreaking 2016 musical has historically been its role in helping set off the sort of stealth renaissance of musicals we’ve been experiencing the last ten years where we all try to see how big we can make the genre before anyone notices. Chazelle explained at the time , “Now more than ever we need hope and romance on the screen, and I think there’s something about musicals that just get at something that only movies can do. That idea of movies as a dreamland, movies as the language of our dreams and movies as a way of expressing a world in which you break into song, that emotions can violate the rules of reality.” The hook for this film, though, is very much the film’s ultimate rejection of the traditional happy ending for which musicals are so well known. That is the reason why...

An Earnest Defense of Passengers

I've heard a lot of back and forth over what the purpose of film is and what we should ask from it. Film as a social amenity kind of has a dual purpose. It's supposed to give the population common ground and find things that people of varying backgrounds and beliefs can unify around. On the other hand, film also creates this detached simulated reality through which we can explore complex and even testing ideas about the contradictions in human existence. In theory, a film can fulfill both functions, but movies exist in a turbulent landscape. It's very rare for a film to try to walk both lanes, and it's even rarer for a film to be embraced upon entry for attempting to do so. Let me explain by describing the premise of one of my favorite movies, Morten Tyldum's 2016 film, Passengers . A key piece of this film ’s plot revolves around the main character, Jim Preston, a passenger onboard a spaceship, who premat...

REVIEW: Clayface

James Gunn promised early on that with his new DC Universe, not everything would be for everybody, but there would be something for everybody. I have to assume he means he's eventually going to grant us the first proper superhero musical. (No, I still haven't seen "Joker 2.") But until such a time, James Watkins' new take on superheroes and horror with Clayface is a valid offering just the same. Rising actor, Matt Hagen (Tom Rhys Harris), is on top of the world, securing his first Oscar nomination, when he has a fatal night of passion with the girlfriend of a lord in the criminal underworld of Gotham. Matt is punished by having his lovely Hollywood face carved up irreparably. Matt's golden ticket to the front of the camera is ruined, and his reputation is smeared. Driven to desperation, Matt seeks out a neuroscientist, Caitlyn Corr (Naomie Ackie), investing in an experimental form of therapy that could recover his...

How Disney Liberated the Musical Genre

Anytime I’m getting ready for a new musical film, I generally try to put off listening to the soundtrack until after I’ve seen the movie. It’s just my way of ensuring that I experience the narrative in its full context upon its important premiere viewing. Most of the time I’m good about sticking to this, but nowhere is this feat harder than with the arrival of each new Disney musical. I tried really hard with Encanto , but with Lin-Manuel Miranda writing for Disney, what can I say (except "You're Welcome"...) So, why am I talking about Disney musicals? W hen I premiered my Jungle Book essay earlier this year, I decided that going forward I was ready to expand how I talked about Disney. Owing to Disney fans constantly having to justify their fandom, a lot of Disney discourse tends to be purely defensive. Disney fans only ever get to use their platform to try convincing the cool kids that--for the last time!--it's okay for adults without kids to go to...

The Notebook Has No Excuses

The thing about film is … the more you think about it, the less sense it makes. Film tells us, even in a society obsessed with wealth and gain, “Remember, George, no man is a failure who has friends.” Film warns us that the most unnatural evil lies in wait at the Overlook Hotel and peeks out when all the guests leave for the winter–and that the heart of it resides in room 237–knowing we'll trip over ourselves wanting to open that door. Film is what makes us believe that the vessel for the deepest human emotion could be contained in a cartoon clownfish taking his unhatched cartoon son and holding him in his cartoon fin and telling him he will never let anything happen to him. Nights of Cabiria (1957) Even when it tries to plant its feet aggressively in realism, film winds up being an inherently emotional realm. We feel safer to view and express all manners of passions or desires here in the space where the rules of propriety just don’t matter anymore. So a fa...

The "Stephen King's IT" Paradox - Can You Ever Go Home Again?

Though I think of myself as putting my heart and soul into this blog, I generally like to keep my offline persona mysterious. This is why I use a pen name and why you’ll never see a picture of my face on this page. But I’ll pull behind the curtain just a little today and share that … I attended my high school reunion not too long ago. I actually ended up attending this reunion twice simply because the first reunion, our “real reunion,” was planned at sort of the last minute and had rather sparse attendance. And so those of us who made it to that resolved to see if we couldn’t pull off something a little more robust, which we did some months later with much more success. And I honestly didn’t mind going twice over. I never actively put any distance between myself and my old pals, but I also never really made any effort to hold onto them after graduating beyond liking their posts on...

REVIEW: Disenchanted

Once Upon a Time, Disney's Enchanted reminded us that deep down inside, even the most cynical of us was pining for a fairy-tale. In those days, a musical rom-com featuring hand-drawn animation and overtly referencing films of the Disney animated catalog actually felt novel, even daring. But today is a different climate. Disney fairy-tales are unambiguously a popular presence in modern pop culture. They are regularly referenced, discussed, and abused both by their parent company and the public at large. Any sequel to such a film wouldn't have the same opportunity to feel revelatory or groundbreaking. But this proves to be an inadequate defense for this movie's shortcomings. Turns out, you can sing about fairy-tales for two hours without earnestly exploring what makes them so special to begin with. I say shortcomings deliberately because there's not a lot that's actively wrong with this movie. Almost everything about this movie could have worked if it had been pr...

Finding Nemo: The Thing About Film Criticism ...

Film is a mysterious thing. It triggers emotional responses in the audience that are as surprising as they are all-encompassing. As a medium, film is capable of painting stunning vistas that feel like they could only come to life behind the silver screen, but many of the most arresting displays on film arise from scenes that are familiar, perhaps even mundanely so. It’s an artform built on rules and guidelines–young film students are probably familiar with principles like the rule of thirds or the Kuleshov effect–but someone tell me the rule that explains why a line like “We’ll always have Paris,” just levels you. There are parts of the film discussion that cannot be anticipated by a formula or a rulebook, and for that we should be grateful. Arrival (2016) But the thing about film–and especially film criticism–is that film critics are not soothsayers. Their means of divining the artis...

REVIEW: Jungle Cruise

Disney has relied on branding for their box-office since Walt himself started using fairy-tales as a launching pad. Flash forward 80 years, and the branding wars have escalated not just within the Disney company, but the industry all around. Disney's Jungle Cruise walks the line between original and remix, and not just because it's adapted from a theme-park ride. This film, a pastiche of adventure flicks over the last 60 years, absorbs the best from its sources of inspiration but falls just short of congealing them into something truly groundbreaking. Tales a mythical tree of life have beckoned explorers since it bloomed into legend hundreds of years ago. This catches the interest of explorer Lily Houghton who makes it her mission to find the tree, first to distribute its gifts to the world and second to keep it from the hands of less benevolent seekers. Her success hinges on joining forces with the gruff Frank Wolff. He'll ferry Lily and her brother, McGregor, across th...

Hating Disney Princesses Has Never Been Feminist pt. 1

Because the consumption of art, even in a capitalist society, is such a personal experience, it can be difficult to quantify exactly how an individual interprets and internalizes the films they are participating in. We filter our artistic interpretations through our own personal biases and viewpoints, and this can sometimes lead to a person or groups assigning a reading to a work that the author did not design and may not even accurately reflect the nature of the work they are interacting with (e.g. the alt-right seeing Mel Brooks’ The Producers as somehow affirming their disregard for political correctness when the film is very much lampooning bigotry and Nazis specifically). We often learn as much or more about a culture by the way they react to a piece of media as we do from the media itself. Anyways, you know where this is going. Let’s talk about Disney Princesses. Pinning down exactly when Disney Princesses entered the picture is a hard thi...

Films and Feelings

Search This Blog