Skip to main content

REVIEW: WISH

 

Walt Disney was famous for his philosophy of making films not just for children, but for the child in all of us. It's a nice tagline, for sure, but for long-time lovers of the Disney mythos, this isn't just a marketing tool. It is the dividing line between that commercial-fare that oversaturates animation as an artform and the legendary storytelling that Disney has come to define itself by. And it is the measurement against which all Disney enthusiasts weigh each new offering from the sorcerer's workshop. 

Yet Disney's newest offering, which presents itself as a tribute to the studio's 100 year legacy, plays more like a film made for children. The film is not without magic or wisdom, I would be remiss to not acknowledge that I did tear up no less than three times, but for Walt Disney Animation's centennial capstone, viewers would be better directed to something like their short, Once Upon a Studio, which traffics in similar Disney-specific shorthand yet achieves much greater emotional depth in a fraction of the runtime.

In Disney's centennial film, the act of wishing itself is the center of the plot. The kingdom of Rosas calls dreamers from all around the world to offer their deepest wish, personified as a glowing blue orb, to King Magnifico, who promises to not only keep them safe, but to actually grant the wishes of those he deems worthy with the use of his sorcery. For Asha, working as his apprentice is its own kind of dream come true, but when she learns that the king deliberately grants only the wishes that serve his ends, she invokes the stars themselves to help her liberate the kingdom from Magnifico's wickedness. When one such Star falls from the heavens, Asha enlists its help to return the trapped wishes to the kingdom and stop Magnifico once and for all. (For context, yes, we are meant to believe that this is the same Star that Snow White, Tiana, and many others will one day wish upon, but the film doesn't close out with a montage from the Disney library. Though students of the Disney canon may still be compelled to stay through the end credits just the same.)

The problem at the root of the film is that it builds its foundation on contrivance. And I don't mean the flimsiness of the magic system or the worldbuilding (though I was left with some questions about that as well), but the contrivances of the characters. When a fairy-tale asks me to suspend my disbelief, it's usually because I am called to accept that a noble thief might rescue a Genie from a Cave of Wonders or that a mermaid princess might dream of walking on land. Such premises are fantastical, yes, but they stem naturally from truths about the human heart. 

Wish is the first fairy-tale that asks me to just believe that a king would ever demand that all his citizens give him their deepest desires, and these people, knowing that they won't even remember what they wished for, would not raise any eyebrows. We are meant to believe that there are thousands of people in this kingdom and, by his own admission, the king only grants about a dozen a year, and yet they are all taken aback by the revelation that this king is in fact hoarding their wishes. (And I suppose there is an earnest question buried somewhere in there about just how complicit people can be in unjust power structures, or how they sycophantically follow charismatic but corrupt leaders, but the film doesn't reach for such profundity, even through the magic of metaphor.) Too much of the plot hinges on character motivations that don't feel honest to the realities of human behavior.

Make no mistake, Wish is still earnest and will still touch the viewer that lets themselves be vulnerable. But it reaches for the mouthfeel of a Disney classic without letting the ingredients cook. The animation, for example, is fluid, clean, and sparkling. Likewise, the musical numbers are dazzling to behold and might make for great background music in a Disneyland parade, and kudos to Ariana Debose for featuring in nearly every number in the soundtrack. 

Just so, few of the greats from the Disney songbook rely so heavily on repetition (and when they do, the lyrics they're echoing are more imaginative than "that's a lie, lie, lie, lie"). In the best musicals, in and out of Disney, song is the space where the characters share the things they don't know how to express through spoken word. But the songs in Wish never transport the viewer, emotionally or otherwise. They just repeat what we already know in case you weren't paying attention.

For the studied Disney fan, the lingering fear tends to be the potential loss of a certain sincerity in their animated output. (To its credit, while the film does make some internal shoutouts to other Disney films like Zootopia and Peter Pan, the film actually refrains from the metatextual commentary or intentional lamp shading that's intruded on the Disney lineup for too long.) The film never treads far from that ripe emotionality that animation lends itself to so naturally. But one thing we can take from the lesson of Wish is a reminder that the best of Disney has never floated on sentimentality alone, and it is okay to ask for more.

        --The Professor

Comments

  1. You make a great point about the soundtrack for this one. I haven't seen the movie, but I've listened to some of the songs. Disney has had a history of creating memorable music; soundtracks that had staying power. Not this one, however! It's almost like everyone skilled was working on another project, so they had my 3-year-old grandson, Alonzo, write the music for this one. A bit dissapointing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Clash of the Titans

  Anyone else remember the year we spent wondering if we would ever again see a movie that wasn't coming out in 3D?      T hat surge in 3D films in the early months of 2010 led to a number of questionable executive decisions. We saw a lot of films envisioned as standard film experiences refitted into the 3D format at the eleventh hour. In the ten years since, 3D stopped being profitable because audiences quickly learned the difference between a film that was designed with the 3D experience in mind and the brazen imitators . Perhaps the most notorious victim of this trend was the 2010 remake of Clash of the Titans .        Why am I suddenly so obsessed with the fallout of a film gone from the public consciousness ten years now? Maybe it's me recently finishing the first season of  Blood of Zeus  on Netflix and seeing so clearly what  Clash of the Titans  very nearly was. Maybe it's my  evolving thoughts on the Percy Jackson movies  and the forthcoming Disney+ series inevit

REVIEW: ONWARD

The Walt Disney Company as a whole seems to be in constant danger of being overtaken by its own cannibalistic tendency--cashing in on the successes of their past hits at the expense of creating the kinds of stories that merited these reimaginings to begin with. Pixar, coming fresh off a decade marked by a deluge of sequels, is certainly susceptible to this pattern as well. Though movies like Inside Out and Coco have helped breathe necessary life into the studio, audiences invested in the creative lifeblood of the studio should take note when an opportunity comes for either Disney or Pixar animation to flex their creative muscles. This year we'll have three such opportunities between the two studios. [EDIT: Okay, maybe not. Thanks, Corona.] The first of these, ONWARD directed by Dan Scanlon, opens this weekend and paints a hopeful picture of a future where Pixar allows empathetic and novel storytelling to guide its output. The film imagines a world where fantasy creatur

The Great Movie Conquest of 2022 - January

This fool's errand is the fruition of an idea I've wanted to try out for years now but have always talked myself out of. Watching a new movie a day for one full year is a bit of a challenge for a number of reasons, not in the least of which being that I'm the kind of guy who likes to revisit favorites. As a film lover, I'm prone to expanding my circle and watching films I haven't seen before, I've just never watched a new film every day for a year. So why am I going to attempt to pull that off at all, and why am I going to attempt it now? I've put off a yearlong commitment because it just felt like too much to bite off. One such time, actually, was right when I first premiered this blog. You know ... the start of 2020? The year where we had nothing to do but watch Netflix all day? Time makes fools of us all, I guess. I doubt it's ever going to be easier to pull off such a feat, so why not now?       Mostly, though, I really just want to help enliven my

The Banshees of Inisherin: The Death Knell of Male Friendship

           I’m going to go out on a limb today and put out the idea that our society is kind of obsessed with romance. Annie Hall (1977) In popular storytelling, t he topic has two whole genres to itself (romantic-comedy, romantic-drama), which gives it a huge slice of the media pie. Yet even in narratives where romance is not the focus, it still has this standing invitation to weave itself onto basically any kind of story. It’s almost more worth remarking upon when a story doesn’t feature some subplot with the main character getting the guy or the girl. And it’s also not just the romantic happy ending that we’re obsessed with. Some of the most cathartic stories of romance see the main couple breaking up or falling apart, and there’s something to be gained from seeing that playing out on screen as well. But what’s interesting is that it is assumed that a person has a singular “one and only” romantic partner. By contrast, a functioning adult has the capacity to enjoy many platonic f

Changing Film History With a Smile--and Perhaps, a Tear: Charlie Chaplin's The Kid

  Film has this weird thing called “emotionality” that sees itself at the center of a lot of haranguing in the critical discourse. There is a sort of classism in dialogue that privileges film as a purely cerebral space, detached from all things base and emotional, and if your concerns in film tend to err on the side of sentiment or emotions, you have probably been on the receiving end of patronizing glances from those who consider themselves more discerning because their favorite movie is 2001: A Space Odyssey . Tyler Sage, another freelance film critic I follow, said it best when he described emotionality’s close cousin, “sentimentality " and the way it is generally discussed in the public sphere : The Godfather (1972) “These days, if you are one of these types who likes to opine knowingly in the public sphere – say, a highfalutin film critic – it's one of the most powerful aspersions there is. ‘I just found it so sentimental ,’ … [and] you can be certain no one will contrad

Do You Hear the People Sing?: "Les Miserables" and the Untrained Singer

          Perhaps no film genre is as neglected in the 21 st century as the musical. With rare exception, the o nly offerings we get are the occasional Disney film, the occasional remake of a Disney film, and adaptations of Broadway stage shows. When we are graced with a proper musical film, the demand is high among musical fans for optimum musical performance, and when a musical film doesn’t deliver this, these fans are unforgiving.  From the moment talking was introduced in cinema, the musical film has been a gathering place where vocal demigods assemble in kaleidoscopic dance numbers in a whirl of cinematic ecstasy too fantastical for this world. What motivation, then, could Tom Hooper possibly have for tethering this landmark of modern musical fandom in grounded, dirty reality?       This movie’s claim to fame is the use of completely live-singing, detailed in this featurette, something no previous movie musical had attempted to this scale. The pay-off, Hooper claims, was

REVIEW: In The Heights

  I can pinpoint the exact moment in the theater I was certain I was going to like In the Heights after all. There's a specific shot in the opening number, I believe it even features in one of the trailers, that has lead character Usnavi staring out the window of his shop observing the folks of his hometown carried away in dance. The reflection of this display of kinetic dreaming is imposed on the window over Usnavi's own yearnful expression as he admires from behind the glass plane. He's at once a part of the magic, yet totally separate from it. The effect has an oddly fantastical feel to it, yet it's achieved through the most rudimentary of filming tricks. This is but one of many instances in which director Jon M. Chu finds music and light in the most mundane of corners. Viewers won't have to work so hard to find the magic with In the Heights.      The film is anchored in the life of storeowner, Usnavi, as he comes to a crossroads. For as long as he's run his

Everybody's Got a Wolf Man

The late 19 th and early 20 th century brought about a newfound interest in human nature within the field of psychology. Of particular note from this era was the development of Sigmund Freud's theory about the human subconscious. This surge in interest in human nature overlapped with another leap forward for mankind, this one of the technological sort, that of moving pictures, and it wasn’t long until the two converged. Film theorists have long typed the medium as a sort of glimpse into the human subconscious, displaying human desires and fears through code in a form that almost resembles a dream. In December 1941, Universal released one of the most striking blendings of psychology and film: part boogeyman bedtime story, part Shakespearean tragedy, Universal Studios introduced “The Wolf Man.”      In this film, Lawrence “Larry” Talbot returns to the house of his father, Sir John Talbot, for the first time in years. He quickly becomes smitten with local antique shop owner, Gwen Co

My Criminal Father Surrogate: Masculinity in A Perfect World

     I've been wanting to tackle the subject of "masculinity" in film for quite some time now, but I hadn't quite known how best to do that. There's a certain buzzword, "toxic masculinity," that especially elicits a lot of strong feelings from a lot of different angles. While a post-#MeToo world has exposed some very disturbing truths about the way masculinity has historically performed, I'm not here to roast 50% of the world population. Actually, I really want to talk about a man's capacity for good. Ted Lasso (2020)      There’s a lot of discussion to be had for newer media celebrating men for possessing attributes not historically coded as "manly." But what's even more fascinating to me are the attempts to bridge the gap between traditional masculinity and new age expectations--to reframe an older vision of manhood in a way that feels true to what we know about how it functions today. Take Clint Eastwood’s 1993 film, A Perfect Wo