Skip to main content

REVIEW: WISH

 

Walt Disney was famous for his philosophy of making films not just for children, but for the child in all of us. It's a nice tagline, for sure, but for long-time lovers of the Disney mythos, this isn't just a marketing tool. It is the dividing line between that commercial-fare that oversaturates animation as an artform and the legendary storytelling that Disney has come to define itself by. And it is the measurement against which all Disney enthusiasts weigh each new offering from the sorcerer's workshop. 

Yet Disney's newest offering, which presents itself as a tribute to the studio's 100 year legacy, plays more like a film made for children. The film is not without magic or wisdom, I would be remiss to not acknowledge that I did tear up no less than three times, but for Walt Disney Animation's centennial capstone, viewers would be better directed to something like their short, Once Upon a Studio, which traffics in similar Disney-specific shorthand yet achieves much greater emotional depth in a fraction of the runtime.

In Disney's centennial film, the act of wishing itself is the center of the plot. The kingdom of Rosas calls dreamers from all around the world to offer their deepest wish, personified as a glowing blue orb, to King Magnifico, who promises to not only keep them safe, but to actually grant the wishes of those he deems worthy with the use of his sorcery. For Asha, working as his apprentice is its own kind of dream come true, but when she learns that the king deliberately grants only the wishes that serve his ends, she invokes the stars themselves to help her liberate the kingdom from Magnifico's wickedness. When one such Star falls from the heavens, Asha enlists its help to return the trapped wishes to the kingdom and stop Magnifico once and for all. (For context, yes, we are meant to believe that this is the same Star that Snow White, Tiana, and many others will one day wish upon, but the film doesn't close out with a montage from the Disney library. Though students of the Disney canon may still be compelled to stay through the end credits just the same.)

The problem at the root of the film is that it builds its foundation on contrivance. And I don't mean the flimsiness of the magic system or the worldbuilding (though I was left with some questions about that as well), but the contrivances of the characters. When a fairy-tale asks me to suspend my disbelief, it's usually because I am called to accept that a noble thief might rescue a Genie from a Cave of Wonders or that a mermaid princess might dream of walking on land. Such premises are fantastical, yes, but they stem naturally from truths about the human heart. 

Wish is the first fairy-tale that asks me to just believe that a king would ever demand that all his citizens give him their deepest desires, and these people, knowing that they won't even remember what they wished for, would not raise any eyebrows. We are meant to believe that there are thousands of people in this kingdom and, by his own admission, the king only grants about a dozen a year, and yet they are all taken aback by the revelation that this king is in fact hoarding their wishes. (And I suppose there is an earnest question buried somewhere in there about just how complicit people can be in unjust power structures, or how they sycophantically follow charismatic but corrupt leaders, but the film doesn't reach for such profundity, even through the magic of metaphor.) Too much of the plot hinges on character motivations that don't feel honest to the realities of human behavior.

Make no mistake, Wish is still earnest and will still touch the viewer that lets themselves be vulnerable. But it reaches for the mouthfeel of a Disney classic without letting the ingredients cook. The animation, for example, is fluid, clean, and sparkling. Likewise, the musical numbers are dazzling to behold and might make for great background music in a Disneyland parade, and kudos to Ariana Debose for featuring in nearly every number in the soundtrack. 

Just so, few of the greats from the Disney songbook rely so heavily on repetition (and when they do, the lyrics they're echoing are more imaginative than "that's a lie, lie, lie, lie"). In the best musicals, in and out of Disney, song is the space where the characters share the things they don't know how to express through spoken word. But the songs in Wish never transport the viewer, emotionally or otherwise. They just repeat what we already know in case you weren't paying attention.

For the studied Disney fan, the lingering fear tends to be the potential loss of a certain sincerity in their animated output. (To its credit, while the film does make some internal shoutouts to other Disney films like Zootopia and Peter Pan, the film actually refrains from the metatextual commentary or intentional lamp shading that's intruded on the Disney lineup for too long.) The film never treads far from that ripe emotionality that animation lends itself to so naturally. But one thing we can take from the lesson of Wish is a reminder that the best of Disney has never floated on sentimentality alone, and it is okay to ask for more.

        --The Professor

Comments

  1. You make a great point about the soundtrack for this one. I haven't seen the movie, but I've listened to some of the songs. Disney has had a history of creating memorable music; soundtracks that had staying power. Not this one, however! It's almost like everyone skilled was working on another project, so they had my 3-year-old grandson, Alonzo, write the music for this one. A bit dissapointing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: Clayface

    James Gunn promised early on that with his new DC Universe, not everything would be for everybody, but there would be something for everybody.      I have to assume he means he's eventually going to grant us the first proper superhero musical. (No, I still haven't seen "Joker 2.") But until such a time, James Watkins' new take on superheroes and horror with Clayface  is a valid offering just the same.     Rising actor, Matt Hagen (Tom Rhys Harris), is on top of the world, securing his first Oscar nomination, when he has a fatal night of passion with the girlfriend of a lord in the criminal underworld of Gotham. Matt is punished by having his lovely Hollywood face carved up irreparably. Matt's golden ticket to the front of the camera is ruined, and his reputation is smeared.      Driven to desperation, Matt seeks out a neuroscientist, Caitlyn Corr (Naomie Ackie), investing in an experimental form of therapy that could recover his...

Finding Nemo: The Thing About Film Criticism ...

       Film is a mysterious thing. It triggers emotional responses in the audience that are as surprising as they are all-encompassing. As a medium, film is capable of painting stunning vistas that feel like they could only come to life behind the silver screen, but many of the most arresting displays on film arise from scenes that are familiar, perhaps even mundanely so.       It’s an artform built on rules and guidelines–young film students are probably familiar with principles like the rule of thirds or the Kuleshov effect–but someone tell me the rule that explains why a line like “We’ll always have Paris,” just levels you. There are parts of the film discussion that cannot be anticipated by a formula or a rulebook, and for that we should be grateful.         Arrival (2016)      But the thing about film–and especially film criticism–is that film critics are not soothsayers. Their means of divining the artis...

An Earnest Defense of Passengers

          I've heard a lot of back and forth over what the purpose of film is and what we should ask from it. Film as a social amenity kind of has a dual purpose. It's supposed to give the population common ground and find things that people of varying backgrounds and beliefs can unify around. On the other hand, film also creates this detached simulated reality through which we can explore complex and even testing ideas about the contradictions in human existence.     In theory, a film can fulfill both functions, but movies exist in a turbulent landscape. It's very rare for a film to try to walk both lanes, and it's even rarer for a film to be embraced upon entry for attempting to do so.  Let me explain by describing the premise of one of my favorite movies, Morten Tyldum's 2016 film, Passengers .      A key piece of this film ’s plot revolves around the main character, Jim Preston, a passenger onboard a spaceship, who premat...

The "Stephen King's IT" Paradox - Can You Ever Go Home Again?

Though I think of myself as putting my heart and soul into this blog, I generally like to keep my offline persona mysterious. This is why I use a pen name and why you’ll never see a picture of my face on this page. But I’ll pull behind the curtain just a little today and share that … I attended my high school reunion not too long ago.           I actually ended up attending this reunion twice simply because the first reunion, our “real reunion,” was planned at sort of the last minute and had rather sparse attendance. And so those of us who made it to that resolved to see if we couldn’t pull off something a little more robust, which we did some months later with much more success. And I honestly didn’t mind going twice over.          I never actively put any distance between myself and my old pals, but I also never really made any effort to hold onto them after graduating beyond liking their posts on...

How Disney Liberated the Musical Genre

Anytime I’m getting ready for a new musical film, I generally try to put off listening to the soundtrack until after I’ve seen the movie. It’s just my way of ensuring that I experience the narrative in its full context upon its important premiere viewing. Most of the time I’m good about sticking to this, but nowhere is this feat harder than with the arrival of each new Disney musical.     I tried really hard with Encanto , but with Lin-Manuel Miranda writing for Disney, what can I say (except "You're Welcome"...) So, why am I talking about Disney musicals?     W hen I premiered my Jungle Book essay earlier this year, I decided that going forward I was ready to expand how I talked about Disney. Owing to Disney fans constantly having to justify their fandom, a lot of Disney discourse tends to be purely defensive. Disney fans only ever get to use their platform to try convincing the cool kids that--for the last time!--it's okay for adults without kids to go to...

The Other Woman: Empathy Isn't Easy

          Anyone else remember that one time Padme wrecked Phoebe's marriage to Max Medina? Directed by Don Roos, The Other Woman first premiered in Toronto in 2009. At the time, the movie was sporting the title of the book from which it was adapted, Love, and Other Impossible Pursuits . But the film didn’t receive any kind of widespread theatrical release until 2011, when it also sported its new title. We can assume perhaps distributors were more eager to showcase the film after Portman’s Oscar win for Black Swan at the 2011 ceremony . I myself caught the film on Netflix circa 2017, a time I remember as being especially fruitful for discovering underseen and independently financed films on the service (back before most of Netflix's budget went instead to funding such homegrown masterworks as Extraction or Damsel ...). In the tentpole-driven film world that we were already seeing emerge in 2009, an underground Netflix following is typically the highest t...

REVIEW: Wildwood

    Travis Knight's Wildwood has already generated above-normal discourse about the merits and application of animation as an artform. "Don't you realize that animation isn't just for KIDS, by Jove!?" (Don't you realize ... lots of us have been saying that for a while now?)  This connects to a much larger conversation about the stigma the artform has held, a conversation that has generally placed the onus on animation--and animators--to prove they can be as good as "real films" and "real filmmakers."     Animation as a form will need sustained support--from more than just the crowd who waited until now to decide that animated movies could be "good, actually." But Wildwood  itself offers other contributions that I imagine will carry the field much further.     Oregonian preteen Prue McKeel ignores her parents' instruction to not take her brother, Mac, outside. When a flock of crows descend and carry her brother off into the w...

The Notebook Has No Excuses

     The thing about film is … the more you think about it, the less sense it makes. Film tells us, even in a society obsessed with wealth and gain, “Remember, George, no man is a failure who has friends.” Film warns us that the most unnatural evil lies in wait at the Overlook Hotel and peeks out when all the guests leave for the winter–and that the heart of it resides in room 237–knowing we'll trip over ourselves wanting to open that door. Film is what makes us believe that the vessel for the deepest human emotion could be contained in a cartoon clownfish taking his unhatched cartoon son and holding him in his cartoon fin and telling him he will never let anything happen to him.  Nights of Cabiria (1957) Even when it tries to plant its feet aggressively in realism, film winds up being an inherently emotional realm. We feel safer to view and express all manners of passions or desires here in the space where the rules of propriety just don’t matter anymore. So a fa...

My Criminal Father Surrogate: Masculinity in A Perfect World

     I've been wanting to tackle the subject of "masculinity" in film for quite some time now, but I hadn't quite known how best to do that. There's a certain buzzword, "toxic masculinity," that especially elicits a lot of strong feelings from a lot of different angles. While a post-#MeToo world has exposed some very disturbing truths about the way masculinity has historically performed, I'm not here to roast 50% of the world population. Actually, I really want to talk about a man's capacity for good. Ted Lasso (2020)      There’s certainly a lot of discussion to be had for newer media celebrating men for possessing attributes not historically coded as "manly." But what's even more fascinating to me are the attempts to bridge the gap between traditional masculinity and new age expectations--to reframe an older vision of manhood within our modern context.       Which brings me to Clint Eastwood’s 1993 film, A Perfect World.   ...

The Belle Complex

As Disney fandom increasingly moves toward the mainstream, the discussions and questions that travel around the community become increasingly nuanced and diverse. Is the true color of Aurora's dress blue or pink? Is it more fun to sit in the back or the front on Big Thunder Mountain? Is the company's continued emphasis on producing content for Disney+ negatively impacting not only their output but the landscape for theatrical release as a whole?  However, on two things, the fandom is eternally united. First, Gargoyles  was a masterpiece in television storytelling and should have experienced a much longer run than it did. Second, Belle's prom dress in the 2017 remake was just abominable.      While overwhelmingly successful at the box office, the 2017 adaptation is also a bruise for many in the Disney community. Even right out the gate, the film came under fire for a myriad of factors: the auto-tuned soundtrack, Ewan McGregor's flimsy accent, the distracting plot...