Skip to main content

Your Train to Busan Viewing Companion

 

            There tends to be a divide between horror fans and horror skeptics. As someone who, as I’ve mentioned multiple times on this blog, only crossed that divide in recent years, movies like Train to Busan fascinate me endlessly.

              The movie follows single-father and businessman, Seok-woo, as he takes the train with his daughter, Su-an, to drop her off with her mother in Busan. The train leaves the station just as a zombie outbreak takes hold across the country, and the train is overcome with the ravenous undead. Seok-woo and Su-an are locked on the train with the zombies barely contained in the adjacent cars. Seok-woo has no idea how he’ll ever bring his daughter to safety, but if either of them are going to make it alive, he’ll have to rely on more than his own wits, he’ll have to learn to depend on others.

               The film is designated as a horror film, but I’d classify it as more horror adjacent than straight horror. More analogous to something like World War Z than anything by Jordan Peele, which makes it a lot more accessible to non-horror fans. 

    Train to Busan is also one of those rare non-English films to hit big with American audiences. Casual non-film school friends ask me what I think about Train to Busan in a way they don’t with films like Monsieur Ibrahim. I always appreciate when I observe this phenomenon because I believe any society benefits from exposure to the art of a language, country, and/or culture that is different from its own.

If you haven’t caught the bug yet, fear not, this is a safe space. I’m not going to judge, but I am going to spend the next 3,000 words selling you on why Train to Busan should be on your list.

              I call this essay a “viewer’s companion” because the range of dialogue I want to survey is kind of large. I want to first focus on why trains are such a fascinating stage for this film. Then there’s the genre lens—how do horror films at large treat their subjects, and how is this horror film unique in its presentation? I also want to try unpacking the zombie metaphor, and I want to do so from a few angles. And because we like character arcs here at Films and Feelings, we’re also going to do a little bit of that. Here we go.

 

              Why Trains?

              I feel there’s an expectation for me to contextualize this movie in the framework of the history of zombies on film, but I’m not going to do that. At least, not yet. Instead, we’re going to start by talking about trains onscreen (seriously) because the choice to set the story onboard a passenger train is one that really shapes the film.

             Modes of transport make for very fascinating set pieces in films when they become active agents of the story. In theory, you want your characters to undergo some kind of emotional journey—to arrive at a place different from where they were at the start of the narrative—and underscoring a character’s internal journey with a physical journey is an effective way to communicate that.

    Trains make for a rich stage for the drama to unfold because you can give your characters more moving room than you can with, say, a van or even an airplane, all while still preserving that sense of claustrophobia. Characters who are trapped on a train can still have room to go off on their own and get into trouble without escaping the tension.

              A passenger train is a frightening stage for a zombie breakout if you give the scenario more than two seconds’ thought. How do you get away from the zombies when you’re all locked in the same vehicle speeding 130 mph down the track? Traveling through a train is also a fairly linear process. What happens if you have to get from one car to the next to save your family and there are a whole bunch of zombies in the middle? You can’t very well go around them. You’ve got to just run through and hope for the best.

           But trains also pose an interesting question symbolically in that they connote progress and industry. The invention of the train allowed huge numbers of people to cross great distances in record time, which fundamentally changed the way that we think about time and distance. Trains are even linked to the advent of the technology of film itself. One of the earliest films screened for the masses was the 1895 Lumiere Brothers production, The Arrival of a Train at La Ciotat Stationa fifty second movie filming the arrival of a passenger train. Trains heralded an age of technological prosperity--they literally carried humans into the age of technological dominance. 

Why then is it so striking to have a zombie outbreak film set almost entirely on this beacon of technological dominance?  

It’s common for films (e.g. Jurassic Park) to take a “technology=bad” stance, linking a corporate lifestyle to selfishness or a lack of humanity, and Train to Busan is no different. Seok-woo has fallen prey to a certain mindset, that being successful in the field of work and business is the same as being a good person, which, of course, it isn't

This is focalized through Seok-woo’s relationship with his daughter. He has taken her for granted for all her life, or at least the last several years, and when the zombies start a-chomping, he is forced to confront how his business mindset is in conflict with the heart he needs to keep his daughter safe. He can't truly protect the thing that is most precious to him as long he holds on to his selfish mindset, and having him work through this character flaw aboard this symbol of industrial might sends a strong message.

              There’s a shot in this film’s climax that I’ve always found particularly charged. After the train crashes just outside of Busan, you get these snapshots of the zombies leaping out of the ruins of the car in a frenzy to pursue the protagonists. Because they’re springing fully formed from the wreckage, the shot seems to visually suggest that the train is giving birth to these zombies, that these undead monsters are products of the machine.

    I’m reminded of a similar shot in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. There's a scene where a train enters the scene carrying the lawmen tasked with capturing our heroes. The enigmatic lawmen spring forth from the train car, and it carries that same suggestion. In that film, the train symbolizes the industrial and societal progress that is eventually going to run Butch and Sundance out of the wild west, and so the audience draws a natural link between the two. I think there’s a parallel to be drawn between the train “giving birth” to the lawmen in that film and the train “giving birth” to the zombies in this film.

              This ties into one of the central themes of the story—the way that corporate culture and technological advances have sapped us of our humanity, turning us into mindless predators out to turn more people into mindless predators. This question of human goodness is even more pointed than the film’s comment on technology. 

 

              Horror Films and Kindness           

               As the zombies take over the train and the country, the survivors must continually decide how to respond to the growing threat. A large segment of this population immediately adopts an every-man-for-himself mentality, and this only amplifies the problems. 

“Busan” isn’t terribly unique for exploring the question of human goodness in the face of crisis. We’ve been here before many times. In horror films, you generally run into one of two viewpoints: 

           You have horror films that expose the futility of the impulse to help your fellow human. Sam Raimi’s 1981 film, The Evil Dead, follows a gaggle of brain-dead college kids, who on a weekend cabin excursion, recklessly awaken vengeful evil spirits which go on to possess each of them in turn. These demons can only be destroyed if you decapitate a living host, which puts the survivors in the uncomfortable position of having to gruesomely dismember their best friends. They’re naturally hesitant to do so, and so they are all killed off by the end of the film. (I think. I guess Bruce Campbell’s character comes back for the sequels. Somehow.) Horror films like this prod at our insecurity that maybe good manners won't save you come the apocalypse.

              And then on the other end, you have horror movies that hold a mirror to the way modern living saps humans of their empathy, turning them into monsters. It’s part of our modern social contract to not butcher each other, and it’s the point of interest of many films to explore what could drive a person to unleash such unthinkable evil. This is where you get movies like The Shining which explores how isolation and alcoholism drive a man to try slaughtering his wife and kid while they’re stuck in an empty hotel for the winter.

             Between the two forms, I think we can already see that Train to Busan takes after the latter class. “Busan” comments on how society actively creates monsters by stealing their humanity, by looking at how crises reveal a person’s selfish or selfless tendencies. Once zombies infect the train, many characters immediately adopt an every-man-for-himself approach while others feel a natural kinship with the other passengers who are, after all, braving the same crisis. The film sets up this dichotomy by creating two groups of characters—those are altruistic, and those who are selfish—and having Seok-woo navigate the space between.

              Seok-woo starts the film definitively in the selfish crowd. This group is headed by Yon-suk. Like Seok-woo, Yon-suk is a man of business, which partially explains his cutthroat, self-serving instinct. He not only looks out for himself exclusively, he also stokes paranoia in others as well. One of the most frustrating sequences in the film has Yon-suk scare an entire group of survivors into barricading the train car against the heroes, an act which has dire consequences for a group of characters we’ve come to love.

    In the altruistic group, you have the characters who become Seok-woo’s allies. There’s a homeless man who sneaks onboard the train at the start and is just looking for a quiet place to be left alone but also possesses a kind heart. You have a group of high school baseball players heading to an away game with their cheerleader friend (all but one of the players gets infected during the zombie attack at Daejeon station). But the most significant players are dedicated father Sang-hwa and his pregnant wife, Seong-kyeong.

If Yon-suk the businessman represents the character Seok-woo is, Sang-hwa represents the character we want him to be, certainly the character Soo-an deserves for a father. Sang-hwa is positioned as the foil to Seok-woo, which is interesting because Sang-hwa himself isn’t unerringly benevolent. Early on he casually threatens to punch Seok-woo in the face after he shows inadequate remorse for nearly letting them be zombified. But he has the thing that Seok-woo lacks, that being a strong moral compass and a concern for others.

           Seok-woo doesn’t actively begin to attain these characteristics until the stop in Daejon. This is where the passengers disembark with the promise of the military escorting them to safety only to find that the military has also been infected, leaving them to flee back to the train. A few things happen during this chapter that initiate Seok-woo’s all-important character growth.

              First, his own methods fail him. He tries to sneak out the back door so he doesn’t have to go into quarantine with all the other plebians, and this only puts him and Su-an in danger when he discovers that the zombies have taken over the station. Second, he sees firsthand that his approach only put him and his daughter in danger, and not just in the hypothetical danger she was in on the train. There’s a sequence that spells out explicitly that he put Soo-an in a position where she is in danger of being taken by the zombies and he cannot save her. Soo-an is only spared because Sang-hwa is there to scoop her out of the jaws of the undead, and that’s the third thing: Seok-woo realizes he cannot make it out of this without leaning on the goodness of others, even those he considers “beneath” him.

           From there, he allies with Sangh-hwa and the other survivors. One of the most memorable sequences of the film has Seok-woo and the others braving the zombie-infested train to rescue their loved ones after being separated during the massacre at Daejon. They ultimately succeed in this endeavor, but Sangh-hwa will have to seal their victory by sacrificing his life.

              Sang-hwa’s death is arguably the first death that hurts on a personal level. With the initial slaughter, and even in the massacre at the train station, our focus is more on the weight of the threat, the ravenousness with which the zombies mow down the passengers. Here, we see that threat starts to take a personal toll: we’ve lost a character that we care about.

            The irony is that being selfless isn’t the thing that cost Sang-Wah’s life. It was, as it is in most of the deaths in this movie, the selfishness of another character. This is that episode where Yon-suk has the entire car shut out the heroes as they are fighting off the zombies. Sang-hwa then sacrifices himself holding back the zombies while Seok-woo and the others break down the door. This becomes a recurring theme throughout the film. Many of the characters will choose to sacrifice their own life to protect the party, but the sacrifice was always necessitated by another character (usually the dude in the suit).

            The film’s final confrontation has Seok-woo, Su-an, and Seong-kyeong finally on the train car that will carry them to the safety of Busan, and it’s on this car that they encounter Yon-suk as a freshly turned zombie. In true hero fashion, Seok-woo faces off against Yon-suk, symbolic of him facing off against his own vices. He is able to toss Yon-suk off the train, but not before he is bitten. He’s allowed a few minutes to say goodbye to his daughter, who will now go with Seong-kyeong, before throwing himself off the train before the zombie takes over. 

                  This focus on systemic human selfishness is fairly commonplace within the genre of horror. What isn’t necessarily a given in horror movies is the protagonist, the vessel of human flaws, getting to move past their vices or human failings. Seok-woo is allowed to eventually make amends with this daughter before giving his life for her.

               Alright, now we’re going to give a little of that historical context to film zombies.


               Zombies and Social Turmoil

Just before the zombie outbreak on the train, some passengers watching the news view a story about the police quelling civilian riots. Understanding what kind of movie this is, we the audience immediately make the connection that this is the beginning of the zombie apocalypse, even if it will take the characters a little while to catch on. Referring to the “rioters,” an old lady watching the story mutters to her sister, “In the old days, they’d be reeducated.”                

              The movie is possibly referencing the dictatorship that covered South Korea through the 1980s, a time where the government was actively quashing civilian rebellion. This period was marked by episodes like the Gwangju Uprising of 1980 which saw university students pushing back against the martial law enforced by the country’s dictator. A few years later the country endured the June democracy protests of 1987, wherein the population of South Korea rioted against the military regime instituting the country’s new president. The aftermath of said protests lead to the country adopting the election-based government it knows today. It’s also worth remarking that Train to Busan was released amid the protests against then President Park Geun-hye, whose political misbehavings would elicit her impeachment in December of 2016.

Shortly after the zombie takeover on the train, we get this sequence where images of the country being flooded with zombies are overlaid with the government spreading this story about civilian protests. Note how much the carnage of the zombie outbreaks in Train to Busan mirror this description of the Gwangju Uprising.

“In the early hours of May 18, 1980, martial law was extended to the entirety of South Korea. Troops were sent across the country, with troops arriving in Gwangju and occupying local university campuses. Like many of their fellow citizens, students in Gwangju began to hold protests. The protests soon turned violent when the troops began to respond by beating students with clubs. When the situation escalated, more troops were sent into Gwangju — this time with machine guns. Students and the citizens who joined them in protesting were ruthlessly brutalized and murdered at the hands of their own armed forces.”

So there’s something really chilling about the in-universe government trying to disguise a zombie outbreak as the masses needing disciplining. Images of the masses devolving into a body of mindless destruction can easily speak to anxiety over the social conditions in which a given population might be moved to rioting.

Consider that zombies really began to take hold in American cinema with movies like Night of the Living Dead during the late 1960s, a time that was also marked by wide protest. Curiously, as America has slid into a phase of civil unrest in recent years, we haven’t really seen a resurgence of zombie-related media. Part of this probably has something to do with the fact that zombies have leaked into the mainstream on their own terms and redefined what the zombie even means. 

    The Walking Dead was one of the most popular shows of the 2010s, the zombies here standing less for civil unrest and more a quiet fear that modern convenience can be unraveled with a single crisis. You can find some media, like CW’s iZombie or BBC’s In the Flesh, that present zombies as an exploited underclass, but 21st century zombies have overall been relatively apolitical. By finding popularity in a comparatively stable ecosystem, the connotation of the zombie has shifted from unrest to its exact opposite: boredom. Horror-comedies especially like Shaun of the Dead or Warm Bodies have commandeered zombie mythology to comment on how 21st century living can sometimes feel more like a state of being undead.

            Train to Busan kind of brings this full circle. The film comments on how modern living drains us of our humanity, but where this is mostly played as satire in films like Shaun of the Dead or Warm BodiesTrain to Busan gives the zombies back their bite. This it does by focalizing what specifically makes modern living not just numbing but dehumanizing. It’s not just mundanity that's the problem, but the way that corporate culture and the impulse to get ahead at any cost breeds monsters. Note the scene shortly before the climax when Seok-woo learns his company is in fact responsible for the virus that caused this disaster, the scene culminating with him tearfully washing his hands in the sink to scrub off the blood, symbolic of the blood on his hands from his reckless commercial exploitation.

              Train to Busan shows how larger institutions, be they corporate or government, disempower the individual. It’s only when people rediscover the safety of individual connection that they find true strength and resilience.


              Legacy

Train to Busan grossed nearly a hundred million dollars worldwide on a budget of less than ten million. Very respectable, especially for a non-English film, so naturally there’s been incentive to franchise the property.

           Train to Busan was followed by a sequel in 2020, simply called Peninsula. Despite taking place in the same universe, the characters from “Busan” are not even mentioned. In that fashion, the characters we do meet in this film are nowhere near as engaging as the heroes in Busan. When I can bring myself to try remembering what even happens in this sequel, I mostly remember the lame plot contrivances. The survivors in this hellscape, for example, host these zombie gladiator games wherein the losers are all inevitably turned into zombies themselves, and no one seems to recognize this for the containment issue that it is.

              Where Train to Busan has a very straightforward premise, the zombie outbreak feels almost incidental to the main plot. And where the emotional stuff is usually a pleasant surprise to people watching Train to Busan for the first time, the emotional bits in Peninsula feel forced and even intrusive. The human goodness piece is still there, nominally. In this film it’s the mother who makes the sacrifice play for her kids, though she is saved at the last minute from having to actually go through with it.

              New Line Cinema also is currently in the process of producing an English remake, Last Train to New York, and we’ll see what happens there. I don’t love the idea of Hollywood having to make a whole new version of a film just so American audiences don’t have to watch a film with subtitles (but I won’t deny that I actually prefer The Ring to the original Japanese Ringu, so I can’t say my hands are clean either). The universe is still trying to decide what to do with Train to Busan’s success, and while the efforts to franchise the thing have been predictably messy, I think we can take comfort in what we’ve got.

    The world has long used zombie lore and iconography to explore what it means to live in a world where the masses can suddenly lose their humanity and individuality under the shadow of social turmoil. Again, it's peculiar that as the United States has in recent years confronted the monsters in its own systems, it hasn't really seen an upturn in zombie media. Then again, given its embrace of Train to Busan, maybe it's not so mysterious after all.

            --The Professor 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: The Fall Guy

     Someone show me another business as enthusiastic for its own self-deprecation as Hollywood.      From affectionate self-parodies like Singin' in the Rain to darker reflections of the movie business like Sunset Boulevard , Hollywood has kind of built its empire on ridicule of itself. And why wouldn't it? Who wouldn't want to pay admission to feel like they're in on the secret: that movie magic is just smoke and mirrors? That silver screen titans actually have the most fragile egos?       But these are not revelations, and I don't think they are intended to be. Hollywood doesn't really care about displaying its own pettiness and internal rot because it knows that all just makes for good entertainment.  A t some point, this all stops feeling like a joke that we, the audience, are in on. At some point, it all stops feeling less like a confession and more like gloating. At what point, then, does the joke turn on us, the enablers of this cesspool whose claim to

Finding Nemo: The Thing About Film Criticism ...

       Film is a mysterious thing. It triggers emotional responses in the audience that are as surprising as they are all-encompassing. As a medium, film is capable of painting stunning vistas that feel like they could only come to life behind the silver screen, but many of the most arresting displays on film arise from scenes that are familiar, perhaps even mundanely so. It’s an artform built on rules and guidelines–young film students are probably familiar with principles like the rule of thirds or the Kuleshov effect–but someone tell me the rule that explains why a line like “We’ll always have Paris,” just levels you. There are parts of the film discussion that cannot be anticipated by a formula or a rulebook, and for that we should be grateful.         Arrival (2016)      But the thing about film–and especially film criticism–is that film critics are not soothsayers. Their means of divining the artistic merit of a movie are not unknowable. There are patterns and touchstones that

REVIEW: All Together Now

The unceasing search for new acting talent to mine continues with Netflix's new film,  All Together Now, which premiered this week on the service. This film features Moana alum Auli'i Cravalho as Amber Appleton, a bright but underprivileged high schooler with high aspirations. Netflix's new film plays like a trial run for Cravalho to see if this Disney starlet can lead a live-action film outside the Disney umbrella. Cravalho would need to play against a slightly stronger narrative backbone for us to know for sure, but early signs are promising.  All Together Now follows Amber Appleton, a musically talented teen overflowing with love for her classmates, her coworkers, and her community. Amber reads like George Bailey reincarnated as a high school girl, throwing herself into any opportunity to better the world around her, like hosting her high school's annual for benefit Variety Show. But Amber's boundless optimism conceals an impoverished home life. She and her moth

The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Clash of the Titans

  Anyone else remember the year we spent wondering if we would ever again see a movie that wasn't coming out in 3D?      T hat surge in 3D films in the early months of 2010 led to a number of questionable executive decisions. We saw a lot of films envisioned as standard film experiences refitted into the 3D format at the eleventh hour. In the ten years since, 3D stopped being profitable because audiences quickly learned the difference between a film that was designed with the 3D experience in mind and the brazen imitators . Perhaps the most notorious victim of this trend was the 2010 remake of Clash of the Titans .        Why am I suddenly so obsessed with the fallout of a film gone from the public consciousness ten years now? Maybe it's me recently finishing the first season of  Blood of Zeus  on Netflix and seeing so clearly what  Clash of the Titans  very nearly was. Maybe it's my  evolving thoughts on the Percy Jackson movies  and the forthcoming Disney+ series inevit

American Beauty is Bad for your Soul

  The 1990s was a relatively stable period of time in American history. We weren’t scared of the communists or the nuclear bomb, and social unrest for the most part took the decade off. The white-picket fence ideal was as accessible as it had ever been for most Americans. Domesticity was commonplace, mundane even, and we had time to think about things like the superficiality of modern living. It's in an environment like this that a movie like Sam Mendes' 1999 film American Beauty can not only be made but also find overwhelming success. In 1999 this film was praised for its bold and honest insight into American suburban life. The Detroit News Film Critic called this film “a rare and felicitous movie that brings together a writer, director and company perfectly matched in intelligence and sense of purpose” and Variety hailed it as “a real American original.” The film premiered to only a select number of screens, but upon its smashing success was upgraded to

REVIEW: ONWARD

The Walt Disney Company as a whole seems to be in constant danger of being overtaken by its own cannibalistic tendency--cashing in on the successes of their past hits at the expense of creating the kinds of stories that merited these reimaginings to begin with. Pixar, coming fresh off a decade marked by a deluge of sequels, is certainly susceptible to this pattern as well. Though movies like Inside Out and Coco have helped breathe necessary life into the studio, audiences invested in the creative lifeblood of the studio should take note when an opportunity comes for either Disney or Pixar animation to flex their creative muscles. This year we'll have three such opportunities between the two studios. [EDIT: Okay, maybe not. Thanks, Corona.] The first of these, ONWARD directed by Dan Scanlon, opens this weekend and paints a hopeful picture of a future where Pixar allows empathetic and novel storytelling to guide its output. The film imagines a world where fantasy creatur

REVIEW: Belfast

     I've said it before, and I'll say it again: the world needs more black and white movies.      The latest to answer the call is Kenneth Branagh with his  semi-autobiographical film, Belfast . The film follows Buddy, the audience-insert character, as he grows up in the streets of Belfast, Ireland in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Though Buddy and his family thrive on these familiar streets, communal turmoil leads to organized violence that throws Buddy's life into disarray. What's a family to do? On the one hand, the father recognizes that a warzone is no place for a family. But to the mother, even the turmoil of her community's civil war feels safer than the world out there. Memory feels safer than maturation.      As these films often go, the plot is drifting and episodic yet always manages to hold one's focus. Unbrushed authenticity is a hard thing to put to film, and a film aiming for just that always walks a fine line between avant-garde and just plain

The Great Movie Conquest of 2022 - January

This fool's errand is the fruition of an idea I've wanted to try out for years now but have always talked myself out of. Watching a new movie a day for one full year is a bit of a challenge for a number of reasons, not in the least of which being that I'm the kind of guy who likes to revisit favorites. As a film lover, I'm prone to expanding my circle and watching films I haven't seen before, I've just never watched a new film every day for a year. So why am I going to attempt to pull that off at all, and why am I going to attempt it now? I've put off a yearlong commitment because it just felt like too much to bite off. One such time, actually, was right when I first premiered this blog. You know ... the start of 2020? The year where we had nothing to do but watch Netflix all day? Time makes fools of us all, I guess. I doubt it's ever going to be easier to pull off such a feat, so why not now?       Mostly, though, I really just want to help enliven my

Nights of Cabiria: What IS Cinema?

  So here’s some light table talk … what is cinema? What is it for ?       On the one hand, film is the perfect medium to capture life as it really is. With the roll of the camera, you can do what painters and sculptors had been trying to do for centuries and record the sights and sounds of a place exactly as they are. On the other hand, film is the perfect medium for dreaming. Is there any other place besides the movies where the human heart is so unfettered, so open to fantasy? If you’ve studied film formally, this is probably one of the first discussions you had in your Intro to Film theory course, in a class that may have forced you to read about Dziga Vertov and his theory about film and the Kino-eye (another day, another day …)      In some ways, we could use basically any of thousands of cinematic works to jumpstart this discussion, but I have a particular film in mind. The lens I want to explore this idea through today is not only a strong example of strong cinematic cra

Mamma Mia: Musicals Deserve Better

       Earlier this week, Variety ran a piece speculating on the future of musicals and the roles they may play in helping a post-corona theater business bounce back. After all, this year is impressively stacked with musicals. In addition to last month's fantastic "In the Heights," we've got a half dozen or so musicals slated for theatrical release. Musical master, Lin Manuel-Miranda expresses optimism about the future of musicals, declaring “[While it] hasn’t always been the case, the movie musical is now alive and well.”      I'm always hopeful for the return of the genre, but I don't know if I share Lin's confidence that the world is ready to take musicals seriously. Not when a triumph like "In the Heights" plays to such a small audience. (Curse thee, "FRIENDS Reunion," for making everyone renew their HBO Max subscription two weeks before In the Heights hits theaters.) The narrative of “stop overthinking it, it’s just a musical,”