Skip to main content

Your Train to Busan Viewing Companion

 

            There tends to be a divide between horror fans and horror skeptics. As someone who, as I’ve mentioned multiple times on this blog, only crossed that divide in recent years, movies like Train to Busan fascinate me endlessly.

              The movie follows single-father and businessman, Seok-woo, as he takes the train with his daughter, Su-an, to drop her off with her mother in Busan. The train leaves the station just as a zombie outbreak takes hold across the country, and the train is overcome with the ravenous undead. Seok-woo and Su-an are locked on the train with the zombies barely contained in the adjacent cars. Seok-woo has no idea how he’ll ever bring his daughter to safety, but if either of them are going to make it alive, he’ll have to rely on more than his own wits, he’ll have to learn to depend on others.

               The film is designated as a horror film, but I’d classify it as more horror adjacent than straight horror. More analogous to something like World War Z than anything by Jordan Peele, which makes it a lot more accessible to non-horror fans. 

    Train to Busan is also one of those rare non-English films to hit big with American audiences. Casual non-film school friends ask me what I think about Train to Busan in a way they don’t with films like Monsieur Ibrahim. I always appreciate when I observe this phenomenon because I believe any society benefits from exposure to the art of a language, country, and/or culture that is different from its own.

If you haven’t caught the bug yet, fear not, this is a safe space. I’m not going to judge, but I am going to spend the next 3,000 words selling you on why Train to Busan should be on your list.

              I call this essay a “viewer’s companion” because the range of dialogue I want to survey is kind of large. I want to first focus on why trains are such a fascinating stage for this film. Then there’s the genre lens—how do horror films at large treat their subjects, and how is this horror film unique in its presentation? I also want to try unpacking the zombie metaphor, and I want to do so from a few angles. And because we like character arcs here at Films and Feelings, we’re also going to do a little bit of that. Here we go.

 

              Why Trains?

              I feel there’s an expectation for me to contextualize this movie in the framework of the history of zombies on film, but I’m not going to do that. At least, not yet. Instead, we’re going to start by talking about trains onscreen (seriously) because the choice to set the story onboard a passenger train is one that really shapes the film.

             Modes of transport make for very fascinating set pieces in films when they become active agents of the story. In theory, you want your characters to undergo some kind of emotional journey—to arrive at a place different from where they were at the start of the narrative—and underscoring a character’s internal journey with a physical journey is an effective way to communicate that.

    Trains make for a rich stage for the drama to unfold because you can give your characters more moving room than you can with, say, a van or even an airplane, all while still preserving that sense of claustrophobia. Characters who are trapped on a train can still have room to go off on their own and get into trouble without escaping the tension.

              A passenger train is a frightening stage for a zombie breakout if you give the scenario more than two seconds’ thought. How do you get away from the zombies when you’re all locked in the same vehicle speeding 130 mph down the track? Traveling through a train is also a fairly linear process. What happens if you have to get from one car to the next to save your family and there are a whole bunch of zombies in the middle? You can’t very well go around them. You’ve got to just run through and hope for the best.

           But trains also pose an interesting question symbolically in that they connote progress and industry. The invention of the train allowed huge numbers of people to cross great distances in record time, which fundamentally changed the way that we think about time and distance. Trains are even linked to the advent of the technology of film itself. One of the earliest films screened for the masses was the 1895 Lumiere Brothers production, The Arrival of a Train at La Ciotat Stationa fifty second movie filming the arrival of a passenger train. Trains heralded an age of technological prosperity--they literally carried humans into the age of technological dominance. 

Why then is it so striking to have a zombie outbreak film set almost entirely on this beacon of technological dominance?  

It’s common for films (e.g. Jurassic Park) to take a “technology=bad” stance, linking a corporate lifestyle to selfishness or a lack of humanity, and Train to Busan is no different. Seok-woo has fallen prey to a certain mindset, that being successful in the field of work and business is the same as being a good person, which, of course, it isn't

This is focalized through Seok-woo’s relationship with his daughter. He has taken her for granted for all her life, or at least the last several years, and when the zombies start a-chomping, he is forced to confront how his business mindset is in conflict with the heart he needs to keep his daughter safe. He can't truly protect the thing that is most precious to him as long he holds on to his selfish mindset, and having him work through this character flaw aboard this symbol of industrial might sends a strong message.

              There’s a shot in this film’s climax that I’ve always found particularly charged. After the train crashes just outside of Busan, you get these snapshots of the zombies leaping out of the ruins of the car in a frenzy to pursue the protagonists. Because they’re springing fully formed from the wreckage, the shot seems to visually suggest that the train is giving birth to these zombies, that these undead monsters are products of the machine.

    I’m reminded of a similar shot in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. There's a scene where a train enters the scene carrying the lawmen tasked with capturing our heroes. The enigmatic lawmen spring forth from the train car, and it carries that same suggestion. In that film, the train symbolizes the industrial and societal progress that is eventually going to run Butch and Sundance out of the wild west, and so the audience draws a natural link between the two. I think there’s a parallel to be drawn between the train “giving birth” to the lawmen in that film and the train “giving birth” to the zombies in this film.

              This ties into one of the central themes of the story—the way that corporate culture and technological advances have sapped us of our humanity, turning us into mindless predators out to turn more people into mindless predators. This question of human goodness is even more pointed than the film’s comment on technology. 

 

              Horror Films and Kindness           

               As the zombies take over the train and the country, the survivors must continually decide how to respond to the growing threat. A large segment of this population immediately adopts an every-man-for-himself mentality, and this only amplifies the problems. 

“Busan” isn’t terribly unique for exploring the question of human goodness in the face of crisis. We’ve been here before many times. In horror films, you generally run into one of two viewpoints: 

           You have horror films that expose the futility of the impulse to help your fellow human. Sam Raimi’s 1981 film, The Evil Dead, follows a gaggle of brain-dead college kids, who on a weekend cabin excursion, recklessly awaken vengeful evil spirits which go on to possess each of them in turn. These demons can only be destroyed if you decapitate a living host, which puts the survivors in the uncomfortable position of having to gruesomely dismember their best friends. They’re naturally hesitant to do so, and so they are all killed off by the end of the film. (I think. I guess Bruce Campbell’s character comes back for the sequels. Somehow.) Horror films like this prod at our insecurity that maybe good manners won't save you come the apocalypse.

              And then on the other end, you have horror movies that hold a mirror to the way modern living saps humans of their empathy, turning them into monsters. It’s part of our modern social contract to not butcher each other, and it’s the point of interest of many films to explore what could drive a person to unleash such unthinkable evil. This is where you get movies like The Shining which explores how isolation and alcoholism drive a man to try slaughtering his wife and kid while they’re stuck in an empty hotel for the winter.

             Between the two forms, I think we can already see that Train to Busan takes after the latter class. “Busan” comments on how society actively creates monsters by stealing their humanity, by looking at how crises reveal a person’s selfish or selfless tendencies. Once zombies infect the train, many characters immediately adopt an every-man-for-himself approach while others feel a natural kinship with the other passengers who are, after all, braving the same crisis. The film sets up this dichotomy by creating two groups of characters—those are altruistic, and those who are selfish—and having Seok-woo navigate the space between.

              Seok-woo starts the film definitively in the selfish crowd. This group is headed by Yon-suk. Like Seok-woo, Yon-suk is a man of business, which partially explains his cutthroat, self-serving instinct. He not only looks out for himself exclusively, he also stokes paranoia in others as well. One of the most frustrating sequences in the film has Yon-suk scare an entire group of survivors into barricading the train car against the heroes, an act which has dire consequences for a group of characters we’ve come to love.

    In the altruistic group, you have the characters who become Seok-woo’s allies. There’s a homeless man who sneaks onboard the train at the start and is just looking for a quiet place to be left alone but also possesses a kind heart. You have a group of high school baseball players heading to an away game with their cheerleader friend (all but one of the players gets infected during the zombie attack at Daejeon station). But the most significant players are dedicated father Sang-hwa and his pregnant wife, Seong-kyeong.

If Yon-suk the businessman represents the character Seok-woo is, Sang-hwa represents the character we want him to be, certainly the character Soo-an deserves for a father. Sang-hwa is positioned as the foil to Seok-woo, which is interesting because Sang-hwa himself isn’t unerringly benevolent. Early on he casually threatens to punch Seok-woo in the face after he shows inadequate remorse for nearly letting them be zombified. But he has the thing that Seok-woo lacks, that being a strong moral compass and a concern for others.

           Seok-woo doesn’t actively begin to attain these characteristics until the stop in Daejon. This is where the passengers disembark with the promise of the military escorting them to safety only to find that the military has also been infected, leaving them to flee back to the train. A few things happen during this chapter that initiate Seok-woo’s all-important character growth.

              First, his own methods fail him. He tries to sneak out the back door so he doesn’t have to go into quarantine with all the other plebians, and this only puts him and Su-an in danger when he discovers that the zombies have taken over the station. Second, he sees firsthand that his approach only put him and his daughter in danger, and not just in the hypothetical danger she was in on the train. There’s a sequence that spells out explicitly that he put Soo-an in a position where she is in danger of being taken by the zombies and he cannot save her. Soo-an is only spared because Sang-hwa is there to scoop her out of the jaws of the undead, and that’s the third thing: Seok-woo realizes he cannot make it out of this without leaning on the goodness of others, even those he considers “beneath” him.

           From there, he allies with Sangh-hwa and the other survivors. One of the most memorable sequences of the film has Seok-woo and the others braving the zombie-infested train to rescue their loved ones after being separated during the massacre at Daejon. They ultimately succeed in this endeavor, but Sangh-hwa will have to seal their victory by sacrificing his life.

              Sang-hwa’s death is arguably the first death that hurts on a personal level. With the initial slaughter, and even in the massacre at the train station, our focus is more on the weight of the threat, the ravenousness with which the zombies mow down the passengers. Here, we see that threat starts to take a personal toll: we’ve lost a character that we care about.

            The irony is that being selfless isn’t the thing that cost Sang-Wah’s life. It was, as it is in most of the deaths in this movie, the selfishness of another character. This is that episode where Yon-suk has the entire car shut out the heroes as they are fighting off the zombies. Sang-hwa then sacrifices himself holding back the zombies while Seok-woo and the others break down the door. This becomes a recurring theme throughout the film. Many of the characters will choose to sacrifice their own life to protect the party, but the sacrifice was always necessitated by another character (usually the dude in the suit).

       The film’s final confrontation has Seok-woo, Su-an, and Seong-kyeong finally on the train car that will carry them to the safety of Busan, and it’s on this car that they encounter Yon-suk as a freshly turned zombie. In true hero fashion, Seok-woo faces off against Yon-suk, symbolic of him facing off against his own vices. He is able to toss Yon-suk off the train, but not before he is bitten. He’s allowed a few minutes to say goodbye to his daughter, who will now go with Seong-kyeong, before throwing himself off the train before the zombie takes over. 

                  This focus on systemic human selfishness is fairly commonplace within the genre of horror. What isn’t necessarily a given in horror movies is the protagonist, the vessel of human flaws, getting to move past their vices or human failings. Seok-woo is allowed to eventually make amends with this daughter before giving his life for her.

               Alright, now we’re going to give a little of that historical context to film zombies.


               Zombies and Social Turmoil

Just before the zombie outbreak on the train, some passengers watching the news view a story about the police quelling civilian riots. Understanding what kind of movie this is, we the audience immediately make the connection that this is the beginning of the zombie apocalypse, even if it will take the characters a little while to catch on. Referring to the “rioters,” an old lady watching the story mutters to her sister, “In the old days, they’d be reeducated.”                

              The movie is possibly referencing the dictatorship that covered South Korea through the 1980s, a time where the government was actively quashing civilian rebellion. This period was marked by episodes like the Gwangju Uprising of 1980 which saw university students pushing back against the martial law enforced by the country’s dictator. A few years later the country endured the June democracy protests of 1987, wherein the population of South Korea rioted against the military regime instituting the country’s new president. The aftermath of said protests lead to the country adopting the election-based government it knows today. It’s also worth remarking that Train to Busan was released amid the protests against then President Park Geun-hye, whose political misbehavings would elicit her impeachment in December of 2016.

Shortly after the zombie takeover on the train, we get this sequence where images of the country being flooded with zombies are overlaid with the government spreading this story about civilian protests. Note how much the carnage of the zombie outbreaks in Train to Busan mirror this description of the Gwangju Uprising.

“In the early hours of May 18, 1980, martial law was extended to the entirety of South Korea. Troops were sent across the country, with troops arriving in Gwangju and occupying local university campuses. Like many of their fellow citizens, students in Gwangju began to hold protests. The protests soon turned violent when the troops began to respond by beating students with clubs. When the situation escalated, more troops were sent into Gwangju — this time with machine guns. Students and the citizens who joined them in protesting were ruthlessly brutalized and murdered at the hands of their own armed forces.”

So there’s something really chilling about the in-universe government trying to disguise a zombie outbreak as the masses needing disciplining. Images of the masses devolving into a body of mindless destruction can easily speak to anxiety over the social conditions in which a given population might be moved to rioting.

Consider that zombies really began to take hold in American cinema with movies like Night of the Living Dead during the late 1960s, a time that was also marked by wide protest. Curiously, as America has slid into a phase of civil unrest in recent years, we haven’t really seen a resurgence of zombie-related media. Part of this probably has something to do with the fact that zombies have leaked into the mainstream on their own terms and redefined what the zombie even means. 

    The Walking Dead was one of the most popular shows of the 2010s, the zombies here standing less for civil unrest and more a quiet fear that modern convenience can be unraveled with a single crisis. You can find some media, like CW’s iZombie or BBC’s In the Flesh, that present zombies as an exploited underclass, but 21st century zombies have overall been relatively apolitical. By finding popularity in a comparatively stable ecosystem, the connotation of the zombie has shifted from unrest to its exact opposite: boredom. Horror-comedies especially like Shaun of the Dead or Warm Bodies have commandeered zombie mythology to comment on how 21st century living can sometimes feel more like a state of being undead.

            Train to Busan kind of brings this full circle. The film comments on how modern living drains us of our humanity, but where this is mostly played as satire in films like Shaun of the Dead or Warm BodiesTrain to Busan gives the zombies back their bite. This it does by focalizing what specifically makes modern living not just numbing but dehumanizing. It’s not just mundanity that's the problem, but the way that corporate culture and the impulse to get ahead at any cost breeds monsters. Note the scene shortly before the climax when Seok-woo learns his company is in fact responsible for the virus that caused this disaster, the scene culminating with him tearfully washing his hands in the sink to scrub off the blood, symbolic of the blood on his hands from his reckless commercial exploitation.

              Train to Busan shows how larger institutions, be they corporate or government, disempower the individual. It’s only when people rediscover the safety of individual connection that they find true strength and resilience.


              Legacy

Train to Busan grossed nearly a hundred million dollars worldwide on a budget of less than ten million. Very respectable, especially for a non-English film, so naturally there’s been incentive to franchise the property.

           Train to Busan was followed by a sequel in 2020, simply called Peninsula. Despite taking place in the same universe, the characters from “Busan” are not even mentioned. In that fashion, the characters we do meet in this film are nowhere near as engaging as the heroes in Busan. When I can bring myself to try remembering what even happens in this sequel, I mostly remember the lame plot contrivances. The survivors in this hellscape, for example, host these zombie gladiator games wherein the losers are all inevitably turned into zombies themselves, and no one seems to recognize this for the containment issue that it is.

              Where Train to Busan has a very straightforward premise, the zombie outbreak feels almost incidental to the main plot. And where the emotional stuff is usually a pleasant surprise to people watching Train to Busan for the first time, the emotional bits in Peninsula feel forced and even intrusive. The human goodness piece is still there, nominally. In this film it’s the mother who makes the sacrifice play for her kids, though she is saved at the last minute from having to actually go through with it.

              New Line Cinema also is currently in the process of producing an English remake, Last Train to New York, and we’ll see what happens there. I don’t love the idea of Hollywood having to make a whole new version of a film just so American audiences don’t have to watch a film with subtitles (but I won’t deny that I actually prefer The Ring to the original Japanese Ringu, so I can’t say my hands are clean either). The universe is still trying to decide what to do with Train to Busan’s success, and while the efforts to franchise the thing have been predictably messy, I think we can take comfort in what we’ve got.

    The world has long used zombie lore and iconography to explore what it means to live in a world where the masses can suddenly lose their humanity and individuality under the shadow of social turmoil. Again, it's peculiar that as the United States has in recent years confronted the monsters in its own systems, it hasn't really seen an upturn in zombie media. Then again, given its embrace of Train to Busan, maybe it's not so mysterious after all.

            --The Professor 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PROFESSOR'S PICKS: 25 Most Essential Movies of the Century

       "Best." "Favorite." "Awesomest." I spent a while trying to land on which adjective best suited the purposes of this list. After all, the methods and criteria with which we measure goodness in film vary wildly. "Favorite" is different than "Best," but I would never put a movie under "Best" that I don't at least like. And any film critic will tell you that their favorite films are inevitably also the best films anyways ...      But here at the quarter-century mark, I wanted to give  some  kind of space to reflect on which films are really deserving of celebration. Which films ought to be discussed as classics in the years ahead. So ... let's just say these are the films of the 21st century that I want future champions of the film world--critics and craftsmen--to be familiar with.  Sian Hader directing the cast of  CODA (2021)     There are a billion or so ways to measure a film's merit--its technical perfectio...

Year in Review: 2024

    Let me start this party by admitting ...  I really dropped the ball on reviews this year, folks. Not counting my Percy Jackson response , which in practice plays more like one of my essays anyways, there was a six-month gap between reviews with Wish last November and The Fall Guy this May.       More than once during that drought, I took my notebook to the theater and came back with a page full of notes, but for various reasons I was unable to piece together anything. It didn't help also that deliveries this year were comparatively sparse, what with the strikes strangling the production line. I will try to do better this year. (For those curious, I am also going to try to review the final season of  Stranger Things , like I did with the 4th season, when it drops sometime this year. That will all depend on a lot of things, including the method by which Netflix chooses to release these episodes.)      My reviews didn't par...

REVIEW: Enola Holmes

Inspired by the children's book series by Nancy Springer, Netflix's new film, Enola Holmes , turns the spotlight onto the younger sister of the famed detective as a new mystery thrusts her into an insidious conspiracy that compels her to take control of her own life and leave her own mark. The film's greatest achievement is reaffirming that lead actress Millie Bobby Brown of Stranger Things is indeed one of the most promising up and coming talents around and can seemingly step into any role with enthusiasm, but beyond that there's little about this film to celebrate. Enola Holmes lives alone with her mother, Eudoria (Helena Bonham-Carter), away from the pursuits of her much older, much more accomplished older brothers--the snooty Mycroft (Sam Clafin) and the ever-charming, ever famous Sherlock (Henry Cavill). Enola enjoys the attention of her mother until Eudoria vanishes without warning. It is this disappearance that summons her older brothers back to the estate to se...

REVIEW: Wolf Man

     The thing about any figure as iconic as The Wolf Man is ... you already know how his story ends because there's only one way it can end. Much in the same way that any "King Kong" movie has to end with the ape falling off of the Empire State Building. Any other ending just feels incongruent. Grafted from some other story. The equation can only produce a single sum. As Maria Ouspenskaya warned us in the original Wolf Man, "So tears run to a predestined end."       I'll break the film critic's seal here a little and say that, if you love the Wolf Man figure, then you already know what happens to him at the end of Leigh Whannel's film, and you already basically know why.       But I don't for a second count that as a bad thing. Reinvention is easy. Doing your homework, that takes commitment. And Whannel's new film does its homework.     Here, our Wolf Man is Blake, a loving father living in the city with his daughter, Gi...

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind: Do Clementine and Joel Stay Together or Not?

                    Maybe. The answer is maybe.             Not wanting to be that guy who teases a definitive answer to a difficult question and forces you to read a ten-page essay only to cop-out with a non-committal excuse of an answer, I’m telling you up and front the answer is maybe. Though nations have long warred over this matter of great importance, the film itself does not answer once and for all whether or not Joel Barrish and Clementine Krychinzki find lasting happiness together at conclusion of the film Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Min d. I cannot give a definitive answer as to whether Joel and Clementine’s love will last until the stars turn cold or just through the weekend. This essay cannot do that.             What this essay can do is explore the in-text evidence the film gives for either side t...

REVIEW: Mufasa - The Lion King

    To get to the point, Disney's new origin story for The Lion King 's Mufasa fails at the ultimate directive of all prequels. By the end of the adventure, you don't actually feel like you know these guys any better.           Such  has been the curse for nearly Disney's live-action spin-offs/remakes of the 2010s on. Disney supposes it's enough to learn more facts or anecdotes about your favorite characters, but the interview has always been more intricate than all that. There is no catharsis nor identification for the audience during Mufasa's culminating moment of uniting the animals of The Pridelands because the momentum pushing us here has been carried by cliche, not archetype.      Director Barry Jenkins' not-so-secret weapon has always been his ability to derive pathos from lyrical imagery, and he does great things with the African landscape without stepping into literal fantasy. This is much more aesthetically interestin...

Pan's Labyrinth: The Fantasy and Reality of Good and Evil

     So here’s a question I’m sure no one’s asked yet: what is the point of fantasy?          Ask your resident D&D enthusiast or aspiring fantasy writer what it is about the fantasy genre that excites them so much, and you’re bound to get a variety of answers, but the topic of escapism tends to be a common thread. Sometimes the trash compactor of the real world just stinks so much, and you just need to vacation in someone else’s world. You can only stew in real world politics for so long before you just have to unwind by tracing the Jedi lineage or memorizing the rules of alomancy.  This is where you commonly run into thoughts that fantasy nerds are just incompatible with reality and are deliberately shirking any responsibility from participating in it. This mindset has a lot in common with the nostalgia stigma we discussed with “Roger Rabbit” and “Detective Pikachu.” It is also a very elitist perspective born out of the same attitude...

The Power of the Dog Doesn't (want to) Understand Toxic Masculinity: A Deconstruction and History of the "Toxic Cowboy"

              I want to start this piece by recounting my very first experience watching John Ford’s 1956 masterpiece, The Searchers .         The film sees John Wayne playing Ethan Edwards, rugged cowboy who embarks on a years-long quest to recover his young niece, Debbie, after she is kidnapped by a band of Comanche Indians, who also murder her entire family. Ethan is joined on this adventure by Debbie’s adopted older brother, Martin, played by Jeffrey Hunter. Ethan does not welcome Martin’s presence on this mission and even tries to leave him behind at the start, and he will continue to menace Martin as they travail the desert. Part of this is because Ethan does not consider Martin to be Debbie’s real family, and he also resents Martin’s Native American lineage. But most of his animosity stems from the fact that he simply sees Martin as weak. He does not seem like the kind of guy who can ...

We Did Not Deserve The Lion King

Concept Art by Lorna Cook      It has been thirty years since household pets everywhere started resenting Walt Disney Animation.   In the three decades since The Lion King popularized the ritual of hoisting the nearest small animal up to the heavens against its will, the film has cemented itself as a fixture not just within Disney animation, but pop culture as a whole. The internet has an ongoing culture war with Disney as the cradle of all evil, as seen with something like the bad-faith criticisms of The Disney Princess brand ( which I have already talked about ), but these conversations tend to skip out on The Lion King . There are some critiques about things like the coding of the hyena characters or the Kimba controversy, but I don't see these weaponized nearly as often, and I see them less as time goes on while the discourse around the movie itself marches on unimpeded. (We can speculate why movies like The Little Mermaid or Cinderella are subjected to more s...

REVIEW - The Little Mermaid

     There's been a mermaid on the horizon ever since it became clear sometime in the last decade that Disney did intend to give all of their signature titles the live-action treatment--we've had a long time to prepare for this. (For reference, this July will mark four years since Halle Bailey's casting as Ariel made headlines.)       Arguing whether this or any of the live-action remakes "live up" to their animated predecessor is always going to be a losing battle. Even ignoring the nostalgic element, it's impossible for them to earn the same degree of admiration because the terrain in which these animated films rose to legend has long eroded. This is especially the case for The Little Mermaid . Where this remake is riding off a years long commercial high for the Walt Disney Company, the Disney that made The Little Mermaid in 1989 was twenty years past its cultural goodwill. Putting out an animated fairy-tale musical was not a sure thing, yet its suc...