Skip to main content

The Great Movie Conquest of 2022 - August

    I was intentional in my focus on Netflix original films this month because I've long been fascinated by the questions they pose to film production, distribution, and reception. And yes, most other services also have their own catalogue of exclusive films, but I wanted to keep things focused. 

    Netflix started this train in 2015 when it began releasing its own feature films beginning with Beasts of No Nation. Plans were originally made to have the film debut simultaneously in theaters and on the service, but this was downgraded to a limited theatrical release when major theater chains started boycotting the movie. ("How dare Netflix disrespect the traditional 90-day window of theatrical exclusivity?") Producer Amy Kaufman said at the time, "It could be a game changer. This has the potential to change the way people perceive how movies and art are delivered to them," and still you wonder if she had any idea ... 

  What's interesting is that even as direct-to-streaming has come to be associated with run of the mill product, Beasts of No Nation was actually an attempt at producing more high-brow content. Here you had a social issue drama adapted from a novel featuring high-power talent like Idris Elba. That kind of recipe commands respect, or at least attention.

    Before films were "direct for streaming," you also had films that were "direct to video" or "made for television," and various streaming services have to prove that their exclusive films are meaningfully different than films of those class. Netflix has tried to counter these claims by courting top-tier talent like Alfonso Cuaron and Martin Scorsese to release their Oscar darlings through the service. And yet, as the service averages over a hundred original films per year, it's inevitable that some of these are going to be nothing more than fluff. I went into this chapter of my movie conquest hoping to reflect on my own potential biases on the matter.


Netflix Originals

    Patty Jenkins has famously said that streaming movies look like fake movies. I must have had this thought in the back of my mind when I observed that the early minutes of Extraction kind of looked like some of the films I saw being made by my classmates in TMA 185: Basic Media Production. 

    Extraction is actually a really good starting point for our discussion on the stigma around streaming exclusives because it was a smash hit for Netflix despite no one having high praise for it. The story drew some obvious parallels between Tyler's grief over his dead son and his mission to protect Ovi, and Ovi saw in Tyler a fatherly presence he's never gotten from his own dad. The ingredients are there, but I'd argue that any pay-off comes less from the film's execution of the relationship and more from a Pavlovian response that audiences are trained to recognize in films. We're about halfway through before Tyler and Ovi have a meaningful conversation, so their development falls flat. Again, you see what they're going for, but the film itself isn't trying as hard as it should be. 

    The movie's reception was proportionally middling, but a film like Extraction can still harvest a lot of eyeballs because audiences invest in streaming films differently than they do films they have to pay for directly. Extraction has a very marketable setup: take a recognizable movie star, put him in a familiar genre where he gets to be a hero, make sure the trailers show-off that somewhat gratuitous David Harbour cameo, and you've got yourself a film everyone has to talk about, even if they're not necessarily talking about how masterful the final product was.

    The film I probably came closest to liking was probably The Sea Beast. The movie's animation was top tier, but I found its attempt at social commentary desperate and graceless. Still, it's the kind of movie that probably wouldn't reach as wide an audience without being made widely available on a service like Netflix. And when people defend the Netflix model, that's usually the talking point they go to first: audiences are more willing to experiment with their movie selection on a streaming service than they are in theaters, and in theory that means higher exposure for more niche films. In theory.

    If I'm being honest, none of the films meant for this month's challenge left too deep an impression on me. I lament this because these films were probably made with genuine love by their cast and crew, but in a system where media outlets try to assert their dominance by showboating just how large their library is, not enough attention is given to the development of these films. It's also not like streaming movies can't be high quality. I can think of more than a few Netflix originals that I have genuinely loved, seen multiple times (Klaus will be a Christmas tradition until the stars turn cold). But this isn't an ecosystem where creativity thrives.

    Owing to increased competition from other services that have risen in its wake, Netflix has announced that it will be modifying its model in the years to come, moving away from quantity to quality: more individual attention to fewer films. This is also a riskier model for the service because with fewer horses to hedge their bets, the failure of any individual project can't be so easily buried. Just so, this can only mean Netflix invests more in each individual project. Perhaps this will pave the way for a golden age of Netflix originals? 


Other Movies I Watched

    It's kind of poetic that the one film I reviewed this month was itself a streaming exclusive but landed on a service other than the one I was spotlighting--Amazon Prime Video's Samaritan. I would be happy to report that this was the movie that restored my faith in the current state of streaming films ... if that were actually the case.

    I closed out the month finally watching Pixar's Lightyear (yup, it took me this long to watch a Pixar movie), and wow did it leave me with a lot to unpack. I would honestly need to devote a whole essay to wrap my mind around how incoherent the film was and what it reveals about the state of Pixar, but I'd need to rewatch the film several times to pull this off, which I'm not eager to do. Perhaps we can take comfort, then, that Pixar at least gave us Turning Red this year. 

    Also, I loathed Deadpool. That's all I feel like saying right now.

    But even if this was one of the limper months of this challenge, it wasn't all for naught. I finally got around to The Postman Always Rings Twice, which is somehow the perfect embodiment of 1940s ennui. Cynical, yet so dignified. Most of my favorite movies this month were of that classical Hollywood brand (in addition to Shaun of the Dead ... don't know what to say about that).

    A film I didn't particularly like but can't stop thinking about was The Talented Mr. Ripley. The talent assembled made for a force of nature, but what really fascinated me was the film's twisted look at male affection. I can't help but wonder if I'm the only one who's given this thought. I've been here many times before: I tell myself I didn't like the movie, I keep thinking about movie anyways, and somehow it lands among my favorites. I imagine we'll be seeing each other again, Mr. Ripley. (But let me assure my readers it will be safely on dry land.) 


Looking Forward

    This month we'll be returning to my cinema world tour by exploring the library of Brazil. I anticipate this will be more a challenge because, unlike my exploration of Japanese cinema, I'm coming into this not especially fluent in the genres, directors, or movements of the country's filmography. But that's kind of the point. I'm wanting to learn more about a country whose films I'm not super familiar with. We'll see how that goes.

    As I head into the final third of the year, I'm really trying to close in on what kinds of movies I want to fill these last hundred or so days with. I used to love thinking about all the favorite movies I haven't found yet, and finally finding them has been one of the greatest parts of being a film nerd. I think I started this challenge in large part because I wanted to explore that feeling in a big way. Eight months into my mission, it's sometimes easy for me to take for granted what an opportunity it is to really survey the terrain and absorb so much of what the world of cinema has to offer. I'm holding out for a few undiscovered favorites before the year's out. 

    As always, thanks for indulging me. 

            --The Professor


Yes, Simon Pegg, only four months left of this challenge. And I still haven't seen Trainspotting ...

August's Harvest: 

Eternals (2021)
The Hunchback Horse (1947)
The Adam Project (2022)
Hooper (1978)
Pulp Fiction (1994)
Elmer Gantry (1960)
Lonesome (1928)
Passing (2021)
Wages of Fear (1953)
Deadpool (2016)
Blood on the Moon (1948)
Extraction (2020)
A Fistful of Dollars (1968)
The Sea Beast (2022)
Licorice Pizza (2021)
Ivanhoe (1952)
The Literary Guernsey and Potato Peel Pie Society (2018)
Working Girl (1988)
The Talented Mr. Ripley (1999)
Lolita (1962)
Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003)
Key Largo (1948)
Beasts of No Nation (2015)
Shaun of the Dead (2004)
The Phantom from 10,000 League (1955)
Samaritan (2022)
The Irishman (2019)
The Big Sleep (1946)
The Big Short (2015)
The Postman Always Rings Twice (1946)
Lightyear (2022)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Seven Brides for Seven Brothers Question

    I spend a lot of effort in this space trying to champion the musical genre as the peak of cinematic achievement.  And so it sometimes surprises my associates to find out that, no, I wasn't at all raised in a household that particularly favored musicals. I wasn't the kid who went out for the annual school musical or anything. My environment wasn't exactly hostile toward these things, but it actually did very little to nurture my study of the genre.  Cinderella (1950)      I obviously had exposure through things like the Disney animated musicals, which absolutely had a profound effect on the larger musical genre . But I didn’t see The Sound of Music until high school, and I didn’t see Singin’ in the Rain until college.      Seven Brides for Seven Brothers , though, it was just always there. And so I guess that's really where I got infected. I'm referring to the 1954 musical directed by Stanley Donen with music by Gene de Paul ,...

Lamb: The Controversy of Vulnerability

In a landscape where the court of public opinion is ruled by sensationalism, where there is a reward for snap judgments and “thumbs down” reactions, it is imperative that we continue to train ourselves in the art of nuance and ambiguity. Some things aren’t easily classified as one thing or another, as good or bad, and they reveal limitations within our individual and collective perspective. This life and its overlapping matrices create more pressure points and junctions than we can hope to avoid. And so, we expose ourselves to contradictions not to desensitize ourselves or become permissive, but to add texture to our definitions.  Which brings me today’s subject,  Lamb, a 2015 independent film directed by Ross Partridge. Based on the novel by Bonnie Nadzam, the film finds a despondent 47-year-old man, David Lamb (played by Partridge himself), who strikes up a friendship with a neglected 11-year-old girl named Tommie (Oona Laurence). Their relationship is a sort of ac...

An Earnest Defense of Passengers

          Recall with me, if you will, the scene in Hollywood December 2016. We were less than a year away from #MeToo, and the internet was keenly aware of Hollywood’s suffocating influence on its females on and off screen but not yet sure what to do about it.       Enter Morten Tyldum’s film Passengers , a movie which, despite featuring the two hottest stars in Hollywood at the apex of their fame, was mangled by internet critics immediately after take-off. A key piece of Passengers ’ plot revolves around the main character, Jim Preston, a passenger onboard a spaceship, who prematurely awakens from a century-long hibernation and faces a lifetime of solitude adrift in outer space; rather than suffer through a life of loneliness, he eventually decides to deliberately awaken another passenger, Aurora Lane, condemning her to his same fate.    So this is obviously a film with a moral dilemma at its center. Morten Tyldum, direc...

REVIEW: Lilo & Stitch

       By now the system errors of Disney's live-action remake matrix are well codified. These outputs tend to have pacing that feels like it was okayed by a chain store manager trying to lower the quarterly statement. They also show weird deference to very specific gags from their animated source yet don't bother to ask whether they fit well in the photorealistic world of live-action. And combing through the screenplay, you always seem to get snagged on certain lines of dialogue that someone must have thought belonged in a children's movie ("Being gross is against galactic regulation!").      These are all present in this  summer's live-action reinvention of "Lilo & Stitch." But mercifully, this remake allows itself to go off-script here and there. The result may be one of the stronger Disney remakes ... whatever that's worth.     The 2002 animated masterpiece by Dean Deblois and Chris Sanders (who voices the little blue alien in b...

REVIEW: Artemis Fowl

Fans of Eion Colfer's teen fantasy book, Artemis Fowl, have no doubt been eyeing this movie adaptation with some unrest in between all the shuffling of release dates and strict secrecy pertaining to the movie's plot and development. A beacon of hope amidst this was the assurance of Kenneth Brannagh's proficiency as a director. Unfortunately, Brannagh just appears complicit to this movie's ultimate dive-bombing. Brannagh remains one of my favorite directors currently working, some of my favorite works of his (such as his 2015 reimagining of Cinderella) even came from under the Disney banner, so I can only imagine what must have happened to Brannagh that caused him to forget how to competently direct a film. The film follows 12-year-old super genius, Artemis Fowl, (Ferdia Shaw) son of controversial public figure, Artemis Fowl Sr. (Colin Farrell) the only person for whom Artemis has any respect. When his father mysteriously disappears and Artemis receives a sinister ransom...

Making Room for Classic Movies

Way back in my film school days, I had an interaction with a favorite cousin whom I had not seen in some time. This opportunity to reconnect saw our first interaction since I had been accepted as a film student, and so he asked me what basically everyone asks me right after I tell them I’m studying film, “So, like what’s your favorite movie, then?”      When approached with this question, at least by associates who are not necessarily film buffs, my default response is usually something I know has been on Netflix in the last year. (Though if I had to pick an answer ... maybe Silver Linings Playbook .) I think this time I said James Cameron’s Titanic . He then had a sort of illuminated reaction and followed up with, “I see, so you like … old movies.”  My response to this was something in the vein of, “Well, yes , but NOOOO …”  Steven Spielberg being a 29-year-old on the set of Jaws     In academic circles, t he demarcation between “c...

REVIEW: The Legend of Ochi

    This decade has seen a renaissance of movies claiming to be "this generation's ET ," but you probably can't remember their names any better than I can. We could have all sorts of debates why it is no one seems to know how to access that these days, though I don't think for a moment that it's because 2020s America is actually beyond considering what it means to touch that childhood innocence.      But A24's newest film, The Legend of Ochi , does have me thinking this mental block is mostly self-inflicted by a world whose extoling of childhood is more driven by a dislike of the older generation than anything else.  Fitting together narratives like How to Train Your Dragon with Fiddler on the Roof and tossing it in the sock drawer with 1980s dark fantasy, The Legend of Ochi is intermittently enchanting, but it's undermined by its own cynicism.     On an island stepped out of time, a secluded community wages war against the local population of ...

REVIEW: Thunderbolts*

       Ever since Star Lord and company discoed onto the scene in 2014, Marvel has basically been trying to chase the Guardians of the Galaxy high. And ever since we entered Disney+ era, that meant spray painting every project with a skittles color palette. And no situation couldn't be improved with a joke-- any joke.      The premise of Marvel's newest film, Thunderbolts* , even bears some cursory resemblances to Gunn's film: it's an ensemble piece about former criminals trying to make good. But it winds up taking the opposite lessons from "Guardians" that movies like "Love and Thunder" tried to pilfer. And in the process, it actually becomes the first movie to successfully implement the Guardians of the Galaxy magic in a long time.     In a world that has moved on from the Avengers, six B-level heroes, many of whom have criminal history, are put in a position to take down a shared enemy. What begins as a non-aggression pact transforms in...

REVIEW: ELIO

    Here's a fact: the term "flying saucer" predates the term "UFO." The United States Air Force found the former description too limiting to describe the variety of potential aerial phenomena that might arise when discussing the possibility of life beyond earth.      There may have to be a similar expansion of vocabulary within the alien lexicon with Pixar's latest film, Elio , turning the idea of an alien abduction into every kid's dream come true.      The titular Elio is a displaced kid who recently moved in with his aunt after his parents died. She doesn't seem to understand him any better than his peers do. He can't imagine a place on planet earth where he feels he fits in. What's a kid to do except send a distress cry out into the great, big void of outer space?      But m iracle of miracles: his cries into the universe are heard, and a band of benevolent aliens adopt him into their "communiverse" as the honorary ambassador o...

REVIEW: Superman

      I feel like it's essential that I establish early on in this review that this marks my first time seeing a Superman movie in theaters.      The Zack Snyder saga was actually in swing while I was in high school and college--back when I was in what most would consider in the target audience for these films--but that kind of passed by me without my attention.      And I'll be clear that I take no specific pride in this. I wasn't really avoiding the films by any means. My buddies all just went to see them without me while I was at a church youth-camp, and I just didn't bother catching up until much, much later.  I'm disclosing all this to lay down that I don't really have any nostalgic partiality to the Superman story. Most of my context for the mythology comes from its echoes on larger pop culture.     I know, for example, that Clark Kent was raised in a smalltown farm community with his adopted parents, and it was them who...