The Great Movie Conquest of 2022

The Great Movie Conquest of 2022 - August

I was intentional in my focus on Netflix original films this month because I've long been fascinated by the questions they pose to film production, distribution, and reception. And yes, most other services also have their own catalogue of exclusive films, but I wanted to keep things focused.

Netflix started this train in 2015 when it began releasing its own feature films beginning with Beasts of No Nation. Plans were originally made to have the film debut simultaneously in theaters and on the service, but this was downgraded to a limited theatrical release when major theater chains started boycotting the movie. ("How dare Netflix disrespect the traditional 90-day window of theatrical exclusivity?") Producer Amy Kaufman said at the time, "It could be a game changer. This has the potential to change the way people perceive how movies and art are delivered to them," and still you wonder if she had any idea ...

What's interesting is that even as direct-to-streaming has come to be associated with run of the mill product, Beasts of No Nation was actually an attempt at producing more high-brow content. Here you had a social issue drama adapted from a novel featuring high-power talent like Idris Elba. That kind of recipe commands respect, or at least attention.

Before films were "direct for streaming," you also had films that were "direct to video" or "made for television," and various streaming services have to prove that their exclusive films are meaningfully different than films of those class. Netflix has tried to counter these claims by courting top-tier talent like Alfonso Cuaron and Martin Scorsese to release their Oscar darlings through the service. And yet, as the service averages over a hundred original films per year, it's inevitable that some of these are going to be nothing more than fluff. I went into this chapter of my movie conquest hoping to reflect on my own potential biases on the matter.

Netflix Originals

Patty Jenkins has famously said that streaming movies look like fake movies. I must have had this thought in the back of my mind when I observed that the early minutes of Extraction kind of looked like some of the films I saw being made by my classmates in TMA 185: Basic Media Production.

Extraction is actually a really good starting point for our discussion on the stigma around streaming exclusives because it was a smash hit for Netflix despite no one having high praise for it. The story drew some obvious parallels between Tyler's grief over his dead son and his mission to protect Ovi, and Ovi saw in Tyler a fatherly presence he's never gotten from his own dad. The ingredients are there, but I'd argue that any pay-off comes less from the film's execution of the relationship and more from a Pavlovian response that audiences are trained to recognize in films. We're about halfway through before Tyler and Ovi have a meaningful conversation, so their development falls flat. Again, you see what they're going for, but the film itself isn't trying as hard as it should be.

The movie's reception was proportionally middling, but a film like Extraction can still harvest a lot of eyeballs because audiences invest in streaming films differently than they do films they have to pay for directly. Extraction has a very marketable setup: take a recognizable movie star, put him in a familiar genre where he gets to be a hero, make sure the trailers show-off that somewhat gratuitous David Harbour cameo, and you've got yourself a film everyone has to talk about, even if they're not necessarily talking about how masterful the final product was.

The film I probably came closest to liking was probably The Sea Beast. The movie's animation was top tier, but I found its attempt at social commentary desperate and graceless. Still, it's the kind of movie that probably wouldn't reach as wide an audience without being made widely available on a service like Netflix. And when people defend the Netflix model, that's usually the talking point they go to first: audiences are more willing to experiment with their movie selection on a streaming service than they are in theaters, and in theory that means higher exposure for more niche films. In theory.

If I'm being honest, none of the films meant for this month's challenge left too deep an impression on me. I lament this because these films were probably made with genuine love by their cast and crew, but in a system where media outlets try to assert their dominance by showboating just how large their library is, not enough attention is given to the development of these films. It's also not like streaming movies can't be high quality. I can think of more than a few Netflix originals that I have genuinely loved, seen multiple times (Klaus will be a Christmas tradition until the stars turn cold). But this isn't an ecosystem where creativity thrives.

Owing to increased competition from other services that have risen in its wake, Netflix has announced that it will be modifying its model in the years to come, moving away from quantity to quality: more individual attention to fewer films. This is also a riskier model for the service because with fewer horses to hedge their bets, the failure of any individual project can't be so easily buried. Just so, this can only mean Netflix invests more in each individual project. Perhaps this will pave the way for a golden age of Netflix originals?

Other Movies I Watched

It's kind of poetic that the one film I reviewed this month was itself a streaming exclusive but landed on a service other than the one I was spotlighting--Amazon Prime Video's Samaritan. I would be happy to report that this was the movie that restored my faith in the current state of streaming films ... if that were actually the case.

I closed out the month finally watching Pixar's Lightyear (yup, it took me this long to watch a Pixar movie), and wow did it leave me with a lot to unpack. I would honestly need to devote a whole essay to wrap my mind around how incoherent the film was and what it reveals about the state of Pixar, but I'd need to rewatch the film several times to pull this off, which I'm not eager to do. Perhaps we can take comfort, then, that Pixar at least gave us Turning Red this year.

Also, I loathed Deadpool. That's all I feel like saying right now.

But even if this was one of the limper months of this challenge, it wasn't all for naught. I finally got around to The Postman Always Rings Twice, which is somehow the perfect embodiment of 1940s ennui. Cynical, yet so dignified. Most of my favorite movies this month were of that classical Hollywood brand (in addition to Shaun of the Dead ... don't know what to say about that).

A film I didn't particularly like but can't stop thinking about was The Talented Mr. Ripley. The talent assembled made for a force of nature, but what really fascinated me was the film's twisted look at male affection. I can't help but wonder if I'm the only one who's given this thought. I've been here many times before: I tell myself I didn't like the movie, I keep thinking about movie anyways, and somehow it lands among my favorites. I imagine we'll be seeing each other again, Mr. Ripley. (But let me assure my readers it will be safely on dry land.)

Looking Forward

This month we'll be returning to my cinema world tour by exploring the library of Brazil. I anticipate this will be more a challenge because, unlike my exploration of Japanese cinema, I'm coming into this not especially fluent in the genres, directors, or movements of the country's filmography. But that's kind of the point. I'm wanting to learn more about a country whose films I'm not super familiar with. We'll see how that goes.

As I head into the final third of the year, I'm really trying to close in on what kinds of movies I want to fill these last hundred or so days with. I used to love thinking about all the favorite movies I haven't found yet, and finally finding them has been one of the greatest parts of being a film nerd. I think I started this challenge in large part because I wanted to explore that feeling in a big way. Eight months into my mission, it's sometimes easy for me to take for granted what an opportunity it is to really survey the terrain and absorb so much of what the world of cinema has to offer. I'm holding out for a few undiscovered favorites before the year's out.

As always, thanks for indulging me.

--The Professor

Yes, Simon Pegg, only four months left of this challenge. And I still haven't seen Trainspotting ...

August's Harvest:

Eternals (2021)

The Hunchback Horse (1947)

The Adam Project (2022)

Hooper (1978)

Pulp Fiction (1994)

Elmer Gantry (1960)

Lonesome (1928)

Passing (2021)

Wages of Fear (1953)

Deadpool (2016)

Blood on the Moon (1948)

Extraction (2020)
A Fistful of Dollars (1968)
The Sea Beast (2022)

Licorice Pizza (2021)

Ivanhoe (1952)

The Literary Guernsey and Potato Peel Pie Society (2018)
Working Girl (1988)
The Talented Mr. Ripley (1999)

Lolita (1962)

Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003)

Key Largo (1948)

Beasts of No Nation (2015)

Shaun of the Dead (2004)
The Phantom from 10,000 League (1955)

Samaritan (2022)
The Irishman (2019)

The Big Sleep (1946)

The Big Short (2015)

The Postman Always Rings Twice (1946)

Lightyear (2022)

Comments

REVIEW: HOPPERS

In the 1950s under the threat of nuclear warfare, Hollywood premiered such exercises as The Day the Earth Stood Still or War of the Worlds where an alien power would pass judgment on humankind, holding its fate in its hands. Here in the 2020s under the shadow of such threats as climate change, Hollywood sends to be our judge ... beavers. Let me back up ... Daniel Chong's new film from Pixar Animation, Hoppers , sees Mabel (Piper Curda), a college student whose self-appointed mission is to preserve the glade where she used to find sanctuary with her now deceased grandmother. Her biggest opponent is hometown boy and beloved mayor, Jerry (Jon Hamm), who has designs to plow over the glade in order to open his new freeway--estimated to save travelers four whole minutes of commuting. Mabel gets her golden opportunity when she uncovers secret technology pioneered by her professor which allows a human to rem...

The Pleasantville Lie

Lynn Hunt, American Historical Association, University of California 2002, is best known for her 2007 work Inventing Human Rights , a cornerstone for academic work on the history of human interaction. This landmark work tracked the developing concept of human empathy across European history, especially the function that art and literature played in allowing humans to recognize the interiority and dignity of other humans who were different from them. But in 2002, she shared in the May Issue of Perspectives on History her observations in “presentism,” and the uphill battle of even getting students to engage with history at all, Gladiator (2000) “Presentism, at its worst, encourages a kind of moral complacency and self-congratulation. Interpreting the past in terms of present concerns usually leads us to find ourselves morally superior; the Greeks had slavery, even David Hume was a racist, and European women endorsed imperial ventures. Our forebears constantly fail to measure up to our ...

An Earnest Defense of Passengers

I've heard a lot of back and forth over what the purpose of film is and what we should ask from it. Film as a social amenity kind of has a dual purpose. It's supposed to give the population common ground and find things that people of varying backgrounds and beliefs can unify around. On the other hand, film also creates this detached simulated reality through which we can explore complex and even testing ideas about the contradictions in human existence. In theory, a film can fulfill both functions, but movies exist in a turbulent landscape. It's very rare for a film to try to walk both lanes, and it's even rarer for a film to be embraced upon entry for attempting to do so. Let me explain by describing the premise of one of my favorite movies, Morten Tyldum's 2016 film, Passengers . A key piece of this film ’s plot revolves around the main character, Jim Preston, a passenger onboard a spaceship, who premat...

The Night of the Hunter: Redefining "Childlike Innocence"

I n the early 1960s, American professor and psychologist, Lawrence Kohlberg developed what is now considered to be a fundamental cornerstone of understanding humans and morality. He introduced a model by which human beings start out determining what is right and wrong based on which course of action elicits the least punishment. Successful movement through this model sees a person gradually becoming motivated by principles , not simple reward or punishment, and Kohlberg anticipated that a person did not achieve this stage until adulthood, if ever. How the Grinch Stole Christmas (2000) This is interesting because t he media likes to cast children as vessels of uncompromised goodness that adults could only ever hope to emulate. T heir purity forms the bedrock of much of American conversation. Because the future hinges upon their innocence, efforts to preserve their unblemished state can go to any length. You can justify any number of actions as long as you are doing i...

REVIEW: Star Wars - The Mandalorian and Grogu

I haven't historically considered myself a "Star Wars" kid. And to be clear, I take no pride in saying that or anything. I respect the property and what it's given to pop culture. But I do feel like it's worth mentioning in this review that I didn't really go into Jon Favreu's The Mandalorian and Grogu thinking I had much of what I'd call nostalgia for this movie to exploit. And yet watching this movie, I found myself hearkening back to the things about Star Wars that caught my attention as a kid. For me, that was the gladiator-style match in "Attack of the Clones." This film offers quite a few roller-coasters along those lines. And as far as the creature designs go for the monsters in these arenas, they were quite good. I wasn't trying too hard to anticipate which were computer-generated and which were puppeted, but the aesthetics of both the Jim Henson era and the Spielberg era sat very well here in this vessel....

My Best Friend's Wedding: Deconstructing the Deconstructive Rom-Com

Well, Wicked is doing laps around the box office, so it looks as though the Hollywood musical is saved, at least for a season, so I guess we’ll turn our attention to another neglected genre. As with something like the musical, the rom-com is one of those genres that the rising generation will always want to interrogate, to catch it on its lie. The whole thing seems to float on fabrication and promising that of which we can always be skeptical—the happy ending. This is also why they’re easy to make fun of and are made to feel second-tier after “realer” films which aren’t building a fantasy. You know? Movies like Die Hard … We could choose any number of rom-coms, but the one that I feel like diving into today is 1997’s underrated My Best Friend’s Wedding . I’m selecting it for a number of reasons. Among these is my own personal fondness for the film, and also the fact that it boasts a paltry 6.3 on IMDb despite its ...

All The Ways Sunset Boulevard Has Aged Gracefully

So, stop me if you’ve heard this before: Hollywood has a dark side. Particularly in the wake of something like #MeToo or the double strikes of 2023, you can really get a sense for just how famishing, even degrading, it can be trying to make a living in Hollywood. But of course, it all goes back much further than those. One of my very first essays for this blog, for example, was a catalogue of all the ways Hollywood ravaged Judy Garland . Yet for all its mess, we cannot take our eyes off of Hollywood, or the people who build it. Stardom in particular becomes a popular focal point—what is it really like being on the other side of all that spotlighting? And Hollywood has naturally supplied the market with all sorts of imaginings for this as well. Thus, each generation gets its own version of A Star is Born. John Wayne and Maureen O'Hara in The Quiet Man (1952) Ty Burr wrote in his landmark work, Gods Like Us , “...

Silver Linings Playbook: What are Happy Endings For Anyway?

Legendary film critic Roger Ebert gave the following words in July of 2005 at the dedication of his plaque outside the Chicago Theatre: Nights of Cabiria (1957) “For me, movies are like a machine that generates empathy. If it’s a great movie, it lets you understand a little bit more about what it’s like to be a different gender, a different race, a different age, a different economic class, a different nationality, a different profession, different hopes, aspirations, dreams and fears. It helps us to identify with the people who are sharing this journey with us. And that, to me, is the most noble thing that good movies can do and it’s a reason to encourage them and to support them and to go to them.” Ebert had been reviewing films for coming on forty years when he gave that assessment. I haven’t been doing it for a tenth as long. I don’t know if I’ve really earned the right to pontificate in this same manner. But film ...

REVIEW: The Super Mario Galaxy Movie

The fanboy renaissance manages to reach even higher heights with the new "Super Mario Galaxy Movie." The easter eggs and cameos are back with a vengeance, and in much richer resolution than we'd have thought possible even five years ago. It's for this kind of thing that the movie will be called "wish fulfillment" for video game nerds, but I personally felt fed as an animation enthusiast. To see such caricatured designs playing on such a vivid, textured playground is a rarity. It's only when you see the bricks of a giant, fairy-tale castle splintering and disintegrating that you feel like this world has weight, consequences, and there is something about that which feels strangely validating. And as with the last movie, as with the Mario universe as a whole, the animated world's command over its own landscape lets you swim between all sorts of exotic and eclectic locales and genres at leisure. Every single cast member...

How Disney Liberated the Musical Genre

Anytime I’m getting ready for a new musical film, I generally try to put off listening to the soundtrack until after I’ve seen the movie. It’s just my way of ensuring that I experience the narrative in its full context upon its important premiere viewing. Most of the time I’m good about sticking to this, but nowhere is this feat harder than with the arrival of each new Disney musical. I tried really hard with Encanto , but with Lin-Manuel Miranda writing for Disney, what can I say (except "You're Welcome"...) So, why am I talking about Disney musicals? W hen I premiered my Jungle Book essay earlier this year, I decided that going forward I was ready to expand how I talked about Disney. Owing to Disney fans constantly having to justify their fandom, a lot of Disney discourse tends to be purely defensive. Disney fans only ever get to use their platform to try convincing the cool kids that--for the last time!--it's okay for adults without kids to go to...

Films and Feelings

Search This Blog