Skip to main content

The Great Movie Conquest of 2022 - August

    I was intentional in my focus on Netflix original films this month because I've long been fascinated by the questions they pose to film production, distribution, and reception. And yes, most other services also have their own catalogue of exclusive films, but I wanted to keep things focused. 

    Netflix started this train in 2015 when it began releasing its own feature films beginning with Beasts of No Nation. Plans were originally made to have the film debut simultaneously in theaters and on the service, but this was downgraded to a limited theatrical release when major theater chains started boycotting the movie. ("How dare Netflix disrespect the traditional 90-day window of theatrical exclusivity?") Producer Amy Kaufman said at the time, "It could be a game changer. This has the potential to change the way people perceive how movies and art are delivered to them," and still you wonder if she had any idea ... 

  What's interesting is that even as direct-to-streaming has come to be associated with run of the mill product, Beasts of No Nation was actually an attempt at producing more high-brow content. Here you had a social issue drama adapted from a novel featuring high-power talent like Idris Elba. That kind of recipe commands respect, or at least attention.

    Before films were "direct for streaming," you also had films that were "direct to video" or "made for television," and various streaming services have to prove that their exclusive films are meaningfully different than films of those class. Netflix has tried to counter these claims by courting top-tier talent like Alfonso Cuaron and Martin Scorsese to release their Oscar darlings through the service. And yet, as the service averages over a hundred original films per year, it's inevitable that some of these are going to be nothing more than fluff. I went into this chapter of my movie conquest hoping to reflect on my own potential biases on the matter.


Netflix Originals

    Patty Jenkins has famously said that streaming movies look like fake movies. I must have had this thought in the back of my mind when I observed that the early minutes of Extraction kind of looked like some of the films I saw being made by my classmates in TMA 185: Basic Media Production. 

    Extraction is actually a really good starting point for our discussion on the stigma around streaming exclusives because it was a smash hit for Netflix despite no one having high praise for it. The story drew some obvious parallels between Tyler's grief over his dead son and his mission to protect Ovi, and Ovi saw in Tyler a fatherly presence he's never gotten from his own dad. The ingredients are there, but I'd argue that any pay-off comes less from the film's execution of the relationship and more from a Pavlovian response that audiences are trained to recognize in films. We're about halfway through before Tyler and Ovi have a meaningful conversation, so their development falls flat. Again, you see what they're going for, but the film itself isn't trying as hard as it should be. 

    The movie's reception was proportionally middling, but a film like Extraction can still harvest a lot of eyeballs because audiences invest in streaming films differently than they do films they have to pay for directly. Extraction has a very marketable setup: take a recognizable movie star, put him in a familiar genre where he gets to be a hero, make sure the trailers show-off that somewhat gratuitous David Harbour cameo, and you've got yourself a film everyone has to talk about, even if they're not necessarily talking about how masterful the final product was.

    The film I probably came closest to liking was probably The Sea Beast. The movie's animation was top tier, but I found its attempt at social commentary desperate and graceless. Still, it's the kind of movie that probably wouldn't reach as wide an audience without being made widely available on a service like Netflix. And when people defend the Netflix model, that's usually the talking point they go to first: audiences are more willing to experiment with their movie selection on a streaming service than they are in theaters, and in theory that means higher exposure for more niche films. In theory.

    If I'm being honest, none of the films meant for this month's challenge left too deep an impression on me. I lament this because these films were probably made with genuine love by their cast and crew, but in a system where media outlets try to assert their dominance by showboating just how large their library is, not enough attention is given to the development of these films. It's also not like streaming movies can't be high quality. I can think of more than a few Netflix originals that I have genuinely loved, seen multiple times (Klaus will be a Christmas tradition until the stars turn cold). But this isn't an ecosystem where creativity thrives.

    Owing to increased competition from other services that have risen in its wake, Netflix has announced that it will be modifying its model in the years to come, moving away from quantity to quality: more individual attention to fewer films. This is also a riskier model for the service because with fewer horses to hedge their bets, the failure of any individual project can't be so easily buried. Just so, this can only mean Netflix invests more in each individual project. Perhaps this will pave the way for a golden age of Netflix originals? 


Other Movies I Watched

    It's kind of poetic that the one film I reviewed this month was itself a streaming exclusive but landed on a service other than the one I was spotlighting--Amazon Prime Video's Samaritan. I would be happy to report that this was the movie that restored my faith in the current state of streaming films ... if that were actually the case.

    I closed out the month finally watching Pixar's Lightyear (yup, it took me this long to watch a Pixar movie), and wow did it leave me with a lot to unpack. I would honestly need to devote a whole essay to wrap my mind around how incoherent the film was and what it reveals about the state of Pixar, but I'd need to rewatch the film several times to pull this off, which I'm not eager to do. Perhaps we can take comfort, then, that Pixar at least gave us Turning Red this year. 

    Also, I loathed Deadpool. That's all I feel like saying right now.

    But even if this was one of the limper months of this challenge, it wasn't all for naught. I finally got around to The Postman Always Rings Twice, which is somehow the perfect embodiment of 1940s ennui. Cynical, yet so dignified. Most of my favorite movies this month were of that classical Hollywood brand (in addition to Shaun of the Dead ... don't know what to say about that).

    A film I didn't particularly like but can't stop thinking about was The Talented Mr. Ripley. The talent assembled made for a force of nature, but what really fascinated me was the film's twisted look at male affection. I can't help but wonder if I'm the only one who's given this thought. I've been here many times before: I tell myself I didn't like the movie, I keep thinking about movie anyways, and somehow it lands among my favorites. I imagine we'll be seeing each other again, Mr. Ripley. (But let me assure my readers it will be safely on dry land.) 


Looking Forward

    This month we'll be returning to my cinema world tour by exploring the library of Brazil. I anticipate this will be more a challenge because, unlike my exploration of Japanese cinema, I'm coming into this not especially fluent in the genres, directors, or movements of the country's filmography. But that's kind of the point. I'm wanting to learn more about a country whose films I'm not super familiar with. We'll see how that goes.

    As I head into the final third of the year, I'm really trying to close in on what kinds of movies I want to fill these last hundred or so days with. I used to love thinking about all the favorite movies I haven't found yet, and finally finding them has been one of the greatest parts of being a film nerd. I think I started this challenge in large part because I wanted to explore that feeling in a big way. Eight months into my mission, it's sometimes easy for me to take for granted what an opportunity it is to really survey the terrain and absorb so much of what the world of cinema has to offer. I'm holding out for a few undiscovered favorites before the year's out. 

    As always, thanks for indulging me. 

            --The Professor


Yes, Simon Pegg, only four months left of this challenge. And I still haven't seen Trainspotting ...

August's Harvest: 

Eternals (2021)
The Hunchback Horse (1947)
The Adam Project (2022)
Hooper (1978)
Pulp Fiction (1994)
Elmer Gantry (1960)
Lonesome (1928)
Passing (2021)
Wages of Fear (1953)
Deadpool (2016)
Blood on the Moon (1948)
Extraction (2020)
A Fistful of Dollars (1968)
The Sea Beast (2022)
Licorice Pizza (2021)
Ivanhoe (1952)
The Literary Guernsey and Potato Peel Pie Society (2018)
Working Girl (1988)
The Talented Mr. Ripley (1999)
Lolita (1962)
Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003)
Key Largo (1948)
Beasts of No Nation (2015)
Shaun of the Dead (2004)
The Phantom from 10,000 League (1955)
Samaritan (2022)
The Irishman (2019)
The Big Sleep (1946)
The Big Short (2015)
The Postman Always Rings Twice (1946)
Lightyear (2022)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"When Did Disney Get So Woke?!" pt. 1 The Disney of Your Childhood

  So, I’m going to put out a somewhat controversial idea here today: The Walt Disney Company has had a tremendous amount of influence in the pop culture landscape, both in recent times and across film history. Further controversy: a lot of people really resent Disney for this.  I’ve spent a greater part of this blog’s lifetime tracking this kind of thing. I have only a dozen or so pieces deconstructing the mechanics of these arguments and exposing how baseless these claims tend to be. This sort of thing is never that far from my mind. But my general thoughts on the stigmatization of the Disney fandom have taken a very specific turn in recent times against recent headlines.       The Walt Disney Company has had some rather embarrassing box office flops in the last two or three years, and a lot of voices have been eager to link Disney’s recent financial woes to certain choices. Specifically, this idea that Disney has all the sudden “gone woke.”  Now,...

"When Did Disney Get So Woke?!" pt. 2 Disney vs the 21st Century

  In the first half of this series , we looked at this construction of the Disney image that the company has sold itself on for several decades now. Walt himself saw the purpose of his entertainment enterprise as depiction a happier world than that which he and the audience emerged from, and that formed the basis of his formidable fanbase. But because the larger culture only knows how to discuss these things in the context of consumerism, a lot of intricacies get obscured in the conversation about The Walt Disney Company, its interaction with larger culture, and the people who happily participate in this fandom.  Basically, critics spent something like fifty years daring The Walt Disney Company to start being more proactive in how they participated in the multi-culture. And when Disney finally showed up in court to prove its case, the world just did not know what to do ... The 21st Century          With the development of the inter...

An Earnest Defense of Passengers

          Recall with me, if you will, the scene in Hollywood December 2016. We were less than a year away from #MeToo, and the internet was keenly aware of Hollywood’s suffocating influence on its females on and off screen but not yet sure what to do about it.       Enter Morten Tyldum’s film Passengers , a movie which, despite featuring the two hottest stars in Hollywood at the apex of their fame, was mangled by internet critics immediately after take-off. A key piece of Passengers ’ plot revolves around the main character, Jim Preston, a passenger onboard a spaceship, who prematurely awakens from a century-long hibernation and faces a lifetime of solitude adrift in outer space; rather than suffer through a life of loneliness, he eventually decides to deliberately awaken another passenger, Aurora Lane, condemning her to his same fate.    So this is obviously a film with a moral dilemma at its center. Morten Tyldum, direc...

The Paradox of The Graduate

     If you've been following my writings for long, you might know that I'm really not a fan of American Beauty . I find its depiction of domestic America scathing, reductive, and, most of all, without insight. I don't regret having dedicated an entire essay to how squirmy the film is, or that it's still one of my best-performing pieces.       But maybe, one might say, I just don't like films that critique the American dream? Maybe I think that domestic suburbia is just beyond analysis or interrogation. To that I say ... I really like  The Graduate .      I find that film's observations both more on-point and more meaningful. I think it's got great performances and witty dialogue, and it strikes the balance between drama and comedy gracefully. And I'm not alone in my assessment. The Graduate was a smash hit when it was released in 1967, landing on five or six AFI Top 100 lists in the years since.      But what's int...

REVIEW: ELIO

    Here's a fact: the term "flying saucer" predates the term "UFO." The United States Air Force found the former description too limiting to describe the variety of potential aerial phenomena that might arise when discussing the possibility of life beyond earth.      There may have to be a similar expansion of vocabulary within the alien lexicon with Pixar's latest film, Elio , turning the idea of an alien abduction into every kid's dream come true.      The titular Elio is a displaced kid who recently moved in with his aunt after his parents died. She doesn't seem to understand him any better than his peers do. He can't imagine a place on planet earth where he feels he fits in. What's a kid to do except send a distress cry out into the great, big void of outer space?      But m iracle of miracles: his cries into the universe are heard, and a band of benevolent aliens adopt him into their "communiverse" as the honorary ambassador o...

Tangled: Disney Sees the Light

On November 21st, 2010, The LA Times ran its article “ Disney Animation is Closing the Book on Fairy Tales .” It pronounced that although the Walt Disney company was built on films in the style of Sleeping Beauty and The Little Mermaid , that form of Disney magic was history, reporting, iCarly (2007) “Among girls, princesses and the romanticized ideal they represent — revolving around finding the man of your dreams — have a limited shelf life. With the advent of ‘tween’ TV, the tiara-wearing ideal of femininity has been supplanted by new adolescent role models such as the Disney Channel’s Selena Gomez and Nickelodeon’s Miranda Cosgrove.” “You’ve got to go with the times,” MGA Chief Executive Isaac Larian said. “You can’t keep selling what the mothers and the fathers played with before. You’ve got to see life through their lens.”    Th e same day this article ran, the executives at Disney disavowed the viewpoints expressed and assured the public that Disney was NOT in fact s...

REVIEW: The Long Walk

I suppose we owe some respect to the new film adaptation of The Long Walk . Based on one of the earliest novels by Stephen King, this sort of ancestor to The Hunger Games sees a group of boys, living in an authoritarian society. willingly entering an annual state-sponsored competition in which they all embark on a nationwide walk, all maintaining a consistent walking pace. If they fall below that, they get a bullet to the cranium. Last boy walking wins. Full credit, there aren't a lot of studio films that stitch together a solid piece of entertainment with such basic materials. There's minimal computer-generation and only a handful of actors, none of whom are really household names. (The obvious exception being Mark Hamill.) Much of the film is portrayed in relaxed long-takes that really let the actors' charisma shine. This movie proves that creative film language can be enough to turn a walk down the country road into a full-on warzone.  But the movie has a system error t...

My Crush on Sarah Connor is Hard to Explain

  I had an experience this last fall working at a residential treatment facility for boys with behavioral issues.  My boys had been dying all week to watch Black Widow. These boys very seldom got to watch new movies while they were with us except for special field trips or when on home visits, and this movie  had only just become available on Disney+. The staff all agreed to let them have a special viewing as a reward for their deep cleaning leading up to Parents' Weekend.  I was really proud of my boys for their enthusiasm. I took it as a token of their evolving social awareness that they were as excited for a female-led superhero pic as they had been for Falcon and the Winter Soldier. My boys were becoming little feminists, or so I thought.       Imagine my disappointment when we finally watched the film and they spent the entire runtime catcalling Natasha and her sister. An entire film dedicated to a powerful heroine moving heaven and earth to ...

Do You Hear the People Sing?: "Les Miserables" and the Untrained Singer

          Perhaps no film genre is as neglected in the 21 st century as the musical. With rare exception, the o nly offerings we get are the occasional Disney film, the occasional remake of a Disney film, and adaptations of Broadway stage shows. When we are graced with a proper musical film, the demand is high among musical fans for optimum musical performance, and when a musical film doesn’t deliver this, these fans are unforgiving.  From the moment talking was introduced in cinema, the musical film has been a gathering place where vocal demigods assemble in kaleidoscopic dance numbers in a whirl of cinematic ecstasy too fantastical for this world. What motivation, then, could Tom Hooper possibly have for tethering this landmark of modern musical fandom in grounded, dirty reality?       This movie’s claim to fame is the use of completely live-singing, detailed in this featurette, something no previous movie musical had attempted to...

REVIEW: The Legend of Ochi

    This decade has seen a renaissance of movies claiming to be "this generation's ET ," but you probably can't remember their names any better than I can. We could have all sorts of debates why it is no one seems to know how to access that these days, though I don't think for a moment that it's because 2020s America is actually beyond considering what it means to touch that childhood innocence.      But A24's newest film, The Legend of Ochi , does have me thinking this mental block is mostly self-inflicted by a world whose extoling of childhood is more driven by a dislike of the older generation than anything else.  Fitting together narratives like How to Train Your Dragon with Fiddler on the Roof and tossing it in the sock drawer with 1980s dark fantasy, The Legend of Ochi is intermittently enchanting, but it's undermined by its own cynicism.     On an island stepped out of time, a secluded community wages war against the local population of ...