Skip to main content

The Great Movie Conquest of 2022: March

    For this month's installment, I reached out to something like ten or so roommates I lived with over the course of three or four years. You can thank them for finally making me watch Baby Driver.

    Despite everyone in my TMA 391 class abounding in love over Baby Driver, I wasn't expecting it to do much for me. Heist movies aren't really my niche, and I don't love Ansel Elgort. The sum total of my knowledge of the film pre-viewing was Ansel Elgort, Kevin Spacey, Lily James (?), driving, and a "really dope soundtrack." I guess the blank slate gave the film a lot of room to grow because I really enjoyed the film. I just want to know where they got the idea for "Baby" as a character. So much to unpack there.

        Initially, I thought that About Time trapped itself in a premise with no tension since the entire film is about a guy who can press rewind on any given episode of his life, but I was grateful the story found a way to give his actions some weight, and it ended up taking me to a very profound place. 

    Knowing what I do about Werner Herzog, it's no surprise to me that he would be so fascinated by someone like Timothy Treadwell and make him the subject of one of his projects. I had a complex reaction to Grizzly Man that I've tried articulating a good half dozen times in this piece, to no success. I'll have to give it a try some other time. 

    Of the two reviews that I put out this month, only one of them was a theater experience, and I resent that very much. Turning Red was such a welcome addition to the Pixar canon, I've already gone back to give it a second viewing. The Lost City, meanwhile, was nothing to journal about, but I guess it filled a need.

    I actually ended up seeing most of the nominees for this year's Oscars. (I've still only seen like two of the BP nominees from last year, and I only caught those in the last few months.) The two that I hit this month were Guillermo Del Toro's Nightmare Alley and Sian Heder's CODA. The former I thought was well-made, but not particularly to my taste, even with Bradley Cooper. I mostly like Del Toro when he's making monsters --like actual monsters, not just metaphorical ones. 

    
CODA
, meanwhile, was arguably the best item I've hit while doing this challenge. The film punched some really strong emotions without going for easy hits. I wasn't even counting on it taking home the big trophy on Sunday, but I was not complaining. I'm really excited to see what all the attention this movie is receiving will do for Apple TV+ as a service.

    As I was reaching out to my old roommates for suggestions, they would sometimes preface their lists with, "I don't really know movies," or "you're the film guy, don't know what I can offer here." This was, of course, a non-issue. They had a plentitude of good suggestions.

    But it did get me thinking about why we give more intellectual weight to certain kinds of films--why we might think that our favorite films don't "have a lot to offer." In my experience, when someone expresses this opinion, or one like it, they're usually admitting that they feel insecure about their tastes being too mainstream. 

    Without getting into an essay's worth of pontificating on the arbitrary divide between "high art" and popular entertainment, it's worth acknowledging here that intelligent discussion isn't limited to films in the criterion collection. The alchemy between the language of film and the complexity of the human heart is available across any range of film. Even a "brainless action pic" like the Clash of the Titans remake can elicit a complex response from me that will gestate over the span of several years. I always advocate for seeking out films that aren't in your comfort zone, but that's not as straightforward as devaluing superhero movies. 

    Looking forward, the votes are in for April, and I will be focusing on films from Japan for the upcoming month. (Will this be the day I finally see Seven Samurai?) Thanks to everyone who shared their voice. 

Then in May I will be anchoring my viewing on a specific actor. I've narrowed the options down to the two handsomest devils in old Hollywood, James Stewart and Cary Grant. You can cast your votes here

This is all just one really long way to say ... we are one quarter of the way through the year. Congrats.

--The Professor

Time to Move Ooooooon to April

March's Harvest: 

A Fish Called Wanda (1988)

Guest in the House (1944)

About Time (2013)

Scooby Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed (2004)

Hell's Kitchen (1939)

Sunday in the Park with George (1986)

The Hobbit: The Battle of Five Armies (2014)

Diner (1982)

Brute Force (1947)

The Green Mile (1999)

Turning Red (2022)

Baby Driver (2017)

Moby Dick (1956)

Empire of the Sun (1987)

Monos (2019)

Vertical Limit (2000)

The More the Merrier (1943)

My Führer  (2007)

CODA (2021)

Dangerous Crossing (1953)

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald (2018)

Nightmare Alley (2021)

Splendor in the Grass (1961)

Grizzly Man (2005)

Theodora Goes Wild (1936)

The Lost City (2022)

Man of La Mancha (1972)

Peter Pan (1924)

Free Guy (2021)

Chronicle (2012)

Shane (1953)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: You, Me & Tuscany

    I've learned not to be ungrateful for movies like  You, Me & Tuscany . It's the kind of picture that can be easily written off as predictable or derivative.      And Kat Cairo's film definitely rides on some genre shorthand. Halle Bailey's Anna has very similar flaws to most rom-com heroines as this untethered 20-something trying to figure out how to stretch a check. And the story itself lands about where every one of these movies do. (Though, remind me, how does every Tom Cruise movie end?)      After the screening concluded, one of the ladies sitting behind me even said something much like, "Yeah, that was a lot like While You Were Sleeping ." But she didn't sound smug in her assessment. Her pronouncement was more encoded with the excitement that comes with discovery--the realization that she had found something like a worthy successor. And as a fan of Sandra Bullock's second-best rom-com, I was inclined to agree with this la...

All The Ways Sunset Boulevard Has Aged Gracefully

So, stop me if you’ve heard this before: Hollywood has a dark side.          Particularly in the wake of something like #MeToo or the double strikes of 2023, you can really get a sense for just how famishing, even degrading, it can be trying to make a living in Hollywood. But of course, it all goes back much further than those. One of my very first essays for this blog was a catalogue of all the ways Hollywood ravaged Judy Garland , to point to another example. Yet for all its mess, we cannot take our eyes off of Hollywood, or the people who build it.  Stardom in particular becomes a popular focal point—what is it really like being on the other side of all that spotlighting? And Hollywood has naturally supplied the market with all sorts of imaginings for this as well. Thus, each generation gets its own version of A Star is Born. John Wayne and Maureen O'Hara in The Quiet Man (1952)      Ty Burr wrote in his landmark work,...

PROFESSOR'S PICKS: 10 Movie Theater Experiences That Changed Me

   So, January 2012: Disney is rereleasing their 1991 animated masterpiece, Beauty and the Beast into theaters, and in 3D format, and I'm able to coerce a friend into seeing it with me.       This was a big deal because, as with most of the Disney movies we'd call "classic," Beauty and the Beast had its day in theaters before my time, and this was an opportunity to experience the movie in its proper element, and maybe imagine what it would have been when the legendary tunes by Howard Ashman and Alan Menken graced the public for the first time.     My larger circle was none-too-impressed with my choice. Didn't I know that the movie was already on DVD? That I could just watch it anytime in the comfort of my own home without having to pay for another ticket? How could I be so careless with my finances? (Incidentally, many of these same friends would pay top-dollar to see the Beauty and the Beast remake five years later on opening weekend ...)  ...

What's Up, Doc?: Why Everyone Needs the Rom-Com

            Though the library of master songwriter, Stephen Sondheim, reaches a pedigree of acclaim that is perhaps unrivaled, his most profound work is arguably his Tony award winning show, Company .  Premiering in 1969,  Company  follows Bobby, the only bachelor among his loving network of married friends.  Yeah, I know Bobby is sometimes played as a woman, but this particular metaphor is more clear with a male protagonist      The story is presented through a series of snapshots showing Bobby’s interactions with his coupled friends intercut with scenes from Bobby’s own romantic pursuits, and it’s through these little vignettes that we understand what it is that keeps Bobby tethered to single life: Bobby fears the chaos of being married to another person. Seeing up front all the turmoil that his married cohorts are subjected to, and faced with his own relationship woes, Bobby contemplates h...

An Earnest Defense of Passengers

          I've heard a lot of back and forth over what the purpose of film is and what we should ask from it. Film as a social amenity kind of has a dual purpose. It's supposed to give the population common ground and find things that people of varying backgrounds and beliefs can unify around. On the other hand, film also creates this detached simulated reality through which we can explore complex and even testing ideas about the contradictions in human existence.     In theory, a film can fulfill both functions, but movies exist in a turbulent landscape. It's very rare for a film to try to walk both lanes, and it's even rarer for a film to be embraced upon entry for attempting to do so.  Let me explain by describing the premise of one of my favorite movies, Morten Tyldum's 2016 film, Passengers .      A key piece of this film ’s plot revolves around the main character, Jim Preston, a passenger onboard a spaceship, who premat...

The Seven Brides for Seven Brothers Question

    I spend a lot of effort in this space trying to champion the musical genre as the peak of cinematic achievement.  And so it sometimes surprises my associates to find out that, no, I wasn't at all raised in a household that particularly favored musicals. I wasn't the kid who went out for the annual school musical or anything. My environment wasn't exactly hostile toward these things, but it actually did very little to nurture my study of the genre.  Cinderella (1950)      I obviously had exposure through things like the Disney animated musicals, which absolutely had a profound effect on the larger musical genre . But I didn’t see The Sound of Music until high school, and I didn’t see Singin’ in the Rain until college.      Seven Brides for Seven Brothers , though, it was just always there. And so I guess that's really where I got infected. I'm referring to the 1954 musical directed by Stanley Donen with music by Gene de Paul ,...

"When Did Disney Get So Woke?!" pt. 1 The Disney of Your Childhood

  So, I’m going to put out a somewhat controversial idea here today: The Walt Disney Company has had a tremendous amount of influence in the pop culture landscape, both in recent times and across film history. Further controversy: a lot of people really resent Disney for this.  I’ve spent a greater part of this blog’s lifetime tracking this kind of thing. I have only a dozen or so pieces deconstructing the mechanics of these arguments and exposing how baseless these claims tend to be. This sort of thing is never that far from my mind. But my general thoughts on the stigmatization of the Disney fandom have taken a very specific turn in recent times against recent headlines.       The Walt Disney Company has had some rather embarrassing box office flops in the last two or three years, and a lot of voices have been eager to link Disney’s recent financial woes to certain choices. Specifically, this idea that Disney has all the sudden “gone woke.”  Now,...

REVIEW: ELIO

    Here's a fact: the term "flying saucer" predates the term "UFO." The United States Air Force found the former description too limiting to describe the variety of potential aerial phenomena that might arise when discussing the possibility of life beyond earth.      There may have to be a similar expansion of vocabulary within the alien lexicon with Pixar's latest film, Elio , turning the idea of an alien abduction into every kid's dream come true.      The titular Elio is a displaced kid who recently moved in with his aunt after his parents died. She doesn't seem to understand him any better than his peers do. He can't imagine a place on planet earth where he feels he fits in. What's a kid to do except send a distress cry out into the great, big void of outer space?      But m iracle of miracles: his cries into the universe are heard, and a band of benevolent aliens adopt him into their "communiverse" as the honorary ambassador o...

REVIEW: AVATAR - Fire and Ash

     The "Avatar" chapters have generally renewed their interest to the masses based on which exciting new locale and which new culture whichever film opts to explore.      Following that dance,  "Fire and Ash" introduces yet another Na'Vi clan, this one hailing from the scorched plains under the shadow of an erupted volcano. But their biome is decidedly less spectacular than the lush jungles of the Omaticaya or the rich coral reefs where the Metkayina dive. Between the ashen grounds of the volcano clan and the metallic fortress of the humans, this is comfortably the most monochromatic of the three Avatar films. And yet, Avatar: Fire and Ash is no less gripping for it.      And this is where the internet really starts to reckon with what us fans of the franchise have always kind of known: that the many screensavers offered by the Avatar world ... they have been  nice . But these films would have never made the impact they have if th...

The Case for Pre-Ragnarök Thor

  The Marvel Cinematic Universe has become such a fixture of pop culture that it’s difficult to imagine that the whole ordeal was actually a massive crapshoot.                     The biggest conceit of the MCU has been its ability to straddle a thousand different heroes—each with their own stories, casts, and universes—into one cohesive whole. It’s a balancing act like nothing that’s ever been attempted before in the hundred years of filmmaking. A lot of the brand’s success can be attributed to the way that each individual story adheres to the rules of its own specific universe. The Captain America movies serve a different purpose than the Spiderman movies, and all the movies in the Captain America trilogy have to feel like they belong together.      There are, of course, questions posed by this model. In a network of films that all exist to set up other ...