Skip to main content

The Great Movie Conquest of 2022 - January

This fool's errand is the fruition of an idea I've wanted to try out for years now but have always talked myself out of. Watching a new movie a day for one full year is a bit of a challenge for a number of reasons, not in the least of which being that I'm the kind of guy who likes to revisit favorites. As a film lover, I'm prone to expanding my circle and watching films I haven't seen before, I've just never watched a new film every day for a year. So why am I going to attempt to pull that off at all, and why am I going to attempt it now?

I've put off a yearlong commitment because it just felt like too much to bite off. One such time, actually, was right when I first premiered this blog. You know ... the start of 2020? The year where we had nothing to do but watch Netflix all day? Time makes fools of us all, I guess.

I doubt it's ever going to be easier to pull off such a feat, so why not now? 

    Mostly, though, I really just want to help enliven my study of film. There are days when I am cocky enough to consider myself a critic of some expertise--I have seen a lot of movies--but the further I wade into the waters, the more I realize that there will always be more movies for me to see. More corners of the map I have yet to unlock. There are cult classics that have shaped the way movies are made today that I haven't seen. There are hidden gems begging to find their way to the mainstream that I haven't seen. There are sources of national trauma (looking at you, The Hobbit) that I haven't seen. Forcing yourself to diversify your exposure helps develop your palette, and this is a chance for me to do that in a significant way.

Anyways, some highlights from my first month into this endeavor ... 

    I hit the theaters twice in January. First with Belle, then with Scream the next week. Scream was the rare legacy sequel that arguably surpassed the film it was honoring while Belle genuinely left me reflecting on my purpose as a film critic. There was a good two-and-a-half month span this last year where I didn't much care for any of the movies that I reviewed, so I'm grateful that I got to come up for air.

    The passing of Sidney Poitier compelled me to look more into his filmography, leading me to discover Pressure Point, a fascinating intersection between the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s and America reflecting on Naziism in the nation some twenty years earlier. I'm genuinely surprised that I haven't come across this exact movie before as both topics have been thrust into the public eye in recent years in such a large way.

I feel like the world should also be aware that in 1952 Cary Grant made a film with his at the time wife, Betsy Drake, called Room for One More. I guess I'd have to research the matter more thoroughly to be sure, but this film has to be one of the earliest onscreen depictions of the foster care system. If you loved the film "Instant Family," I'd heartily recommend checking this one out.

    As recently as this week, I checked out the mini-series version of Stephen King's Salem's Lot after finishing the book this weekend. Regrettably, this adaptation did not leave me particularly impressed. It's fascinating how the film managed to translate almost all of the plot from the novel without carrying any of the personality. We're due for another film adaptation this September, and I'm praying it's much more lively than what we got here. I'm comforted remembering that the recent It movies were both leaps ahead of the 1990 miniseries based on the same novel. Perhaps we can hope for a similar jump when the new film hits theaters (I hope) this fall.

    Anyways, one-twelfth of the way into this trek, and I haven't started to burn out yet. I'm hoping that I find some new favorites with this challenge. Wish me luck. 

--The Professor


An image of The Professor bracing himself for the challenge (I'm the one in the blue)



January's Harvest:

His People (1925)
Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings (2021)
The Mortal Storm (1940)
Begin Again (2013)
The Batman (1989)
Alien: Resurrection (1997)
The Grand Hotel (1932)
Hans Christian Andersen (1952)
Room For One More (1952)
Promising Young Woman (2020)
Braveheart (1995)
Always Be My Maybe (2019)
Delightfully Dangerous (1945)
The Cider House Rules (1999)
Belle (2021)
Pressure Point (1962)
Scream (2022)
Armageddon (1998)
The Wild Swans (1977)
Robocop (1987)
I Am Sam (2001)
Children of the Corn (1984)
Tombstone (1993)
The Secret Life of Pets (2016)
The Fisher King (1991)
Mr. Robinson Crusoe (1932)
All the Right Moves (1983)
Beyond the Moon (1954)
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012)
Salem's Lot (1979)
The Tender Bar (2021)
Labels:

Comments

  1. Mark DavisFebruary 28, 2022 at 2:32 PM

    1989' s Batman is the best of the Batman movies in my opinion. I love the reboot with Christian Bale but the Keaton/Nicholson version is the perfect balance of bleakness and cartoonishness. And of course it is, its a Tim Burton film.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: HOPPERS

     In the 1950s under the threat of nuclear warfare, Hollywood premiered such exercises as The Day the Earth Stood Still or War of the Worlds where an alien power would pass judgment on humankind, holding its fate in its hands. Here in the 2020s under the shadow of such threats as climate change, Hollywood sends to be our judge ... beavers.     Let me back up ...      Daniel Chong's new film from Pixar Animation, Hoppers , sees  Mabel (Piper Curda), a college student whose self-appointed mission is to preserve the glade where she used to find sanctuary with her now deceased grandmother. Her biggest opponent is hometown boy and beloved mayor, Jerry (Jon Hamm), who has designs to plow over the glade in order to open his new freeway--estimated to save travelers four whole minutes of commuting.       Mabel gets her golden opportunity when she uncovers secret technology pioneered by her professor which allows a human to rem...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Official Story: When Oppression Hits Home

  This last month, Wim Wenders, the director behind movies such as Wings of Desire (1987) and Perfect Days (2023), made a statement at the 76th Berlin Film Festival that’s been scratching at me. In his words, “Yes, movies can change the world. Not in a political way. No movie has really changed any politician’s idea, but … we can change the idea that people have of how they should live.” Wenders was speaking specifically on the subject of film festivals taking active stances on things such as the Israel-Palestine conflict, further describing, “Cinema has an incredible power of being compassionate and empathetic. The news is not empathetic. Politics is not empathetic, but movies are. And that’s our duty.”   I think the dressing of this verdict was supposed to be optimistic, but the sentiment reminded me of something that actress Jennifer Lawrence said also very recently on why she’s pulled back from using her official platforms to speak out against the Trump Administrati...
Post a Comment
Read more

Social Utopia in Raya and the Last Dragon

          I think every filmmaker hopes that their film will change the world for the better, but how to measure that when the exact effects a film has on society are impossible to quantify? Did Patty Jenkins’   Wonder Woman   instigate #MeToo, or were both just natural products of the shifting social dynamics that had been morphing for a long time? Maybe we're just kidding ourselves when we put our faith in movies to heal the wrongs of the world.  After all,  Kramer vs Kramer has been out for over forty years now, and some dads still struggle to prioritize love and attention for their kids.          I'm also thinking of  Raya and the Last Dragon. Disney's 59th animated film takes place in a fictional world known as Kumandra, a land that was once home to the benevolent and majestic dragons. In the film’s prologue we learn that the dragons disappeared thousands of years ago to seal away an ancient evil know...
Post a Comment
Read more

Silver Linings Playbook: What are Happy Endings For Anyway?

            Legendary film critic Roger Ebert gave the following words in July of 2005 at the dedication of his plaque outside the Chicago Theatre: Nights of Cabiria (1957) “For me, movies are like a machine that generates empathy. If it’s a great movie, it lets you understand a little bit more about what it’s like to be a different gender, a different race, a different age, a different economic class, a different nationality, a different profession, different hopes, aspirations, dreams and fears. It helps us to identify with the people who are sharing this journey with us. And that, to me, is the most noble thing that good movies can do and it’s a reason to encourage them and to support them and to go to them.” Ebert had been reviewing films for coming on forty years when he gave that assessment. I haven’t been doing it for a tenth as long. I don’t know if I’ve really earned the right to pontificate in this same manner. But film ...
Post a Comment
Read more

An Earnest Defense of Passengers

          I've heard a lot of back and forth over what the purpose of film is and what we should ask from it. Film as a social amenity kind of has a dual purpose. It's supposed to give the population common ground and find things that people of varying backgrounds and beliefs can unify around. On the other hand, film also creates this detached simulated reality through which we can explore complex and even testing ideas about the contradictions in human existence.     In theory, a film can fulfill both functions, but movies exist in a turbulent landscape. It's very rare for a film to try to walk both lanes, and it's even rarer for a film to be embraced upon entry for attempting to do so.  Let me explain by describing the premise of one of my favorite movies, Morten Tyldum's 2016 film, Passengers .      A key piece of this film ’s plot revolves around the main character, Jim Preston, a passenger onboard a spaceship, who premat...
1 comment
Read more

REVIEW: SCARLET

    There isn't a story on the books that can't somehow trace its genealogy to the works of William Shakespeare. Such is the nature of inspiration and archetype.       But the latest film from anime auteur, Mamoru Hosoda, is almost an adaptation of, rather than a homage to, Shakespeare's Hamlet , carrying over character names and even a few iconic lines.  Yet it's not what Scarlet borrows from Shakespeare that gives the story its weight, but what it adds--and I'm not just talking about the giant thunder dragon in the sky.      The Prince of Denmark in this story is reimagined as Princess Scarlet. This film sees her failing in her quest to avenge her father and being doomed to wander in some sort of desolate afterlife. Her only consolation is the idea that she might find her treacherous uncle somewhere in this wasteland and see her vengeance fulfilled in this world. But her quest sees her crossing paths with someone else, a medic from a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Belle Complex

As Disney fandom increasingly moves toward the mainstream, the discussions and questions that travel around the community become increasingly nuanced and diverse. Is the true color of Aurora's dress blue or pink? Is it more fun to sit in the back or the front on Big Thunder Mountain? Is the company's continued emphasis on producing content for Disney+ negatively impacting not only their output but the landscape for theatrical release as a whole?  However, on two things, the fandom is eternally united. First, Gargoyles  was a masterpiece in television storytelling and should have experienced a much longer run than it did. Second, Belle's prom dress in the 2017 remake was just insulting.      While overwhelmingly successful at the box office, the 2017 adaptation is also a bruise for many in the Disney community. Even right out the gate, the film came under fire for a myriad of factors: the auto-tuned soundtrack, Ewan McGregor's flimsy accent, the distracting plot ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Banshees of Inisherin: The Death Knell of Male Friendship

           I’m going to go out on a limb today and put out the idea that our society is kind of obsessed with romance. In popular storytelling, t he topic has two whole genres to itself (romantic-comedy, romantic-drama), which gives it a huge slice of the media pie. Yet even in narratives where romance is not the focus, it still has this standing invitation to weave itself onto basically any kind of story. It’s almost more worth remarking upon when a story doesn’t feature some subplot with the main character getting the guy or the girl. Annie Hall (1977)      And it’s also not just the romantic happy ending that we’re obsessed with. Some of the most cathartic stories of romance see the main couple breaking up or falling apart, and there’s something to be gained from seeing that playing out on screen as well. But what’s interesting is that it is assumed that a person has a singular “one and only” romantic partner. By contras...
1 comment
Read more

A Patch of Blue: Sidney Poitier, Representation, and The Virtue of Choice

      Way, way back (about this time last year), I premiered my piece on the responsibility that younger viewers have to engage with older cinema --specifically the films of old Hollywood. There was a lot of ground that I wanted to cover in that essay--literally an entire era of filmmaking--so most of my talking points had to be concise, which is not how most writers prefer to discuss a thing for which they have passion enough to design and maintain their own blog. There is a bounty of discussion when it comes to film history and the people who made it.     Today I'd like to take the opportunity to dig a little deeper into one such island: that of legendary actor and trailblazer, Sidney Poitier.      Dwandalyn Reece, curator of the performing arts at the Smithsonian's National Museum of African American History and Culture, described Poitier , “He fully inhabits both sides of that personality, or those tensions, of being a Black person i...
Post a Comment
Read more

REVIEW: Jurassic World - Rebirth

     I had a mixed reaction to  Jurassic World: Rebirth,  but it did make for one of the most enjoyable theater experiences I've had in recent memory.      I have to imagine that a part of this is because my most common theater appointments are matinee screenings, but I had the opportunity to see this one at a fairly well-attended midnight screening. And there's nary a film more tailored for surround-sound roaring and screens wide enough to contain these de-extinct creatures. ("Objects on the screen feel closer than they appear.") It was natural for me to cap the experience by applauding as the credits stared to roll, even if, as usual, I was the only one in the auditorium to do so.     Yes, I am that kind of moviegoer; yes, I enjoyed the experience that much, and I imagine I will revisit it across time.      That's not to imagine the movie is beyond reproach, but I suppose it bears mentioning that, generally , this i...
Post a Comment
Read more