The Great Movie Conquest of 2022

The Great Movie Conquest of 2022 - January

This fool's errand is the fruition of an idea I've wanted to try out for years now but have always talked myself out of. Watching a new movie a day for one full year is a bit of a challenge for a number of reasons, not in the least of which being that I'm the kind of guy who likes to revisit favorites. As a film lover, I'm prone to expanding my circle and watching films I haven't seen before, I've just never watched a new film every day for a year. So why am I going to attempt to pull that off at all, and why am I going to attempt it now?

I've put off a yearlong commitment because it just felt like too much to bite off. One such time, actually, was right when I first premiered this blog. You know ... the start of 2020? The year where we had nothing to do but watch Netflix all day? Time makes fools of us all, I guess.

I doubt it's ever going to be easier to pull off such a feat, so why not now?

Mostly, though, I really just want to help enliven my study of film. There are days when I am cocky enough to consider myself a critic of some expertise--I have seen a lot of movies--but the further I wade into the waters, the more I realize that there will always be more movies for me to see. More corners of the map I have yet to unlock. There are cult classics that have shaped the way movies are made today that I haven't seen. There are hidden gems begging to find their way to the mainstream that I haven't seen. There are sources of national trauma (looking at you, The Hobbit) that I haven't seen. Forcing yourself to diversify your exposure helps develop your palette, and this is a chance for me to do that in a significant way.

Anyways, some highlights from my first month into this endeavor ...

I hit the theaters twice in January. First with Belle, then with Scream the next week. Scream was the rare legacy sequel that arguably surpassed the film it was honoring while Belle genuinely left me reflecting on my purpose as a film critic. There was a good two-and-a-half month span this last year where I didn't much care for any of the movies that I reviewed, so I'm grateful that I got to come up for air.

The passing of Sidney Poitier compelled me to look more into his filmography, leading me to discover Pressure Point, a fascinating intersection between the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s and America reflecting on Naziism in the nation some twenty years earlier. I'm genuinely surprised that I haven't come across this exact movie before as both topics have been thrust into the public eye in recent years in such a large way.

I feel like the world should also be aware that in 1952 Cary Grant made a film with his at the time wife, Betsy Drake, called Room for One More. I guess I'd have to research the matter more thoroughly to be sure, but this film has to be one of the earliest onscreen depictions of the foster care system. If you loved the film "Instant Family," I'd heartily recommend checking this one out.

As recently as this week, I checked out the mini-series version of Stephen King's Salem's Lot after finishing the book this weekend. Regrettably, this adaptation did not leave me particularly impressed. It's fascinating how the film managed to translate almost all of the plot from the novel without carrying any of the personality. We're due for another film adaptation this September, and I'm praying it's much more lively than what we got here. I'm comforted remembering that the recent It movies were both leaps ahead of the 1990 miniseries based on the same novel. Perhaps we can hope for a similar jump when the new film hits theaters (I hope) this fall.

Anyways, one-twelfth of the way into this trek, and I haven't started to burn out yet. I'm hoping that I find some new favorites with this challenge. Wish me luck.

--The Professor

An image of The Professor bracing himself for the challenge (I'm the one in the blue)

January's Harvest:

His People (1925)

Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings (2021)

The Mortal Storm (1940)

Begin Again (2013)

The Batman (1989)

Alien: Resurrection (1997)

The Grand Hotel (1932)

Hans Christian Andersen (1952)

Room For One More (1952)

Promising Young Woman (2020)

Braveheart (1995)

Always Be My Maybe (2019)

Delightfully Dangerous (1945)

The Cider House Rules (1999)

Belle (2021)

Pressure Point (1962)

Scream (2022)

Armageddon (1998)

The Wild Swans (1977)

Robocop (1987)

I Am Sam (2001)

Children of the Corn (1984)

Tombstone (1993)

The Secret Life of Pets (2016)

The Fisher King (1991)

Mr. Robinson Crusoe (1932)

All the Right Moves (1983)

Beyond the Moon (1954)

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012)

Salem's Lot (1979)

The Tender Bar (2021)

Comments

Mark DavisFebruary 28, 2022 at 2:32 PM
1989' s Batman is the best of the Batman movies in my opinion. I love the reboot with Christian Bale but the Keaton/Nicholson version is the perfect balance of bleakness and cartoonishness. And of course it is, its a Tim Burton film.
ReplyDelete
Replies

Add comment

REVIEW: COYOTE VS. ACME

The secret weapon of The Looney Tunes has always been their natural eloquence with meta-textuality. Seriously. Go rewatch "Duck Amuck." It's high art. That trick isn't really new here in a landscape where "self-awareness" is just generally baked into the fabric of most millennial media. But Coyote vs Acme nonetheless feels cut from a very different cloth. I don't even know if that's from anything extra this film does so much as what it doesn't do. This movie never feels like it's trying to prove how much smarter it is than the audience. It doesn't feel smug or self-promoting. Like, it takes a different kind of self-awareness to look at how many times a certain Wile E. Coyote has tried to get his hands around a certain speeding bird and ask if maybe the poor guy, who has literally tried everything under the sun, has just had the odds stacked against him. It takes a certain kind of movie to decide that this dude just needs so...

REVIEW: Star Wars - The Mandalorian and Grogu

I haven't historically considered myself a "Star Wars" kid. And to be clear, I take no pride in saying that or anything. I respect the property and what it's given to pop culture. But I do feel like it's worth mentioning in this review that I didn't really go into Jon Favreu's The Mandalorian and Grogu thinking I had much of what I'd call nostalgia for this movie to exploit. And yet watching this movie, I found myself hearkening back to the things about Star Wars that caught my attention as a kid. For me, that was the gladiator-style match in "Attack of the Clones." This film offers quite a few roller-coasters along those lines. And as far as the creature designs go for the monsters in these arenas, they were quite good. I wasn't trying too hard to anticipate which were computer-generated and which were puppeted, but the aesthetics of both the Jim Henson era and the Spielberg era sat very well here in this vessel....

PROFESSOR'S PICKS: 10 Movie Theater Experiences That Changed Me

So, January 2012: Disney is rereleasing their 1991 animated masterpiece, Beauty and the Beast into theaters, and in 3D format, and I'm able to coerce a friend into seeing it with me. This was a big deal because, as with most of the Disney movies we'd call "classic," Beauty and the Beast had its day in theaters before my time, and this was an opportunity to experience the movie in its proper element, and maybe imagine what it would have been when the legendary tunes by Howard Ashman and Alan Menken graced the public for the first time. My larger circle was none-too-impressed with my choice. Didn't I know that the movie was already on DVD? That I could just watch it anytime in the comfort of my own home without having to pay for another ticket? How could I be so careless with my finances? (Incidentally, many of these same friends would pay top-dollar to see the Beauty and the Beast remake five years later on opening weekend ...) ...

Making Room for Classic Movies

Way back in my film school days, I had an interaction with a favorite cousin whom I had not seen in some time. This opportunity to reconnect saw our first interaction since I had been accepted as a film student, and so he asked me what basically everyone asks me right after I tell them I’m studying film, “So, like what’s your favorite movie, then?” When approached with this question, at least by associates who are not necessarily film buffs, my default response is usually something I know has been on Netflix in the last year. (Though if I had to pick an answer ... maybe Silver Linings Playbook .) I think this time I said James Cameron’s Titanic . He then had a sort of illuminated reaction and followed up with, “I see, so you like … old movies.” My response to this was something in the vein of, “Well, yes , but NOOOO …” Steven Spielberg being a 29-year-old on the set of Jaws In academic circles, t he demarcation between “c...

"What Are Happy Endings For Anyway?" (II) - The Docks of New York

Yes, fellas. Your calendar is correct. We are, in fact, 10 years out from La La Land . My main point of interest in Damien Chazelle’s groundbreaking 2016 musical has historically been its role in helping set off the sort of stealth renaissance of musicals we’ve been experiencing the last ten years where we all try to see how big we can make the genre before anyone notices. Chazelle explained at the time , “Now more than ever we need hope and romance on the screen, and I think there’s something about musicals that just get at something that only movies can do. That idea of movies as a dreamland, movies as the language of our dreams and movies as a way of expressing a world in which you break into song, that emotions can violate the rules of reality.” The hook for this film, though, is very much the film’s ultimate rejection of the traditional happy ending for which musicals are so well known. That is the reason why...

REVIEW: HOPPERS

In the 1950s under the threat of nuclear warfare, Hollywood premiered such exercises as The Day the Earth Stood Still or War of the Worlds where an alien power would pass judgment on humankind, holding its fate in its hands. Here in the 2020s under the shadow of such threats as climate change, Hollywood sends to be our judge ... beavers. Let me back up ... Daniel Chong's new film from Pixar Animation, Hoppers , sees Mabel (Piper Curda), a college student whose self-appointed mission is to preserve the glade where she used to find sanctuary with her now deceased grandmother. Her biggest opponent is hometown boy and beloved mayor, Jerry (Jon Hamm), who has designs to plow over the glade in order to open his new freeway--estimated to save travelers four whole minutes of commuting. Mabel gets her golden opportunity when she uncovers secret technology pioneered by her professor which allows a human to rem...

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind: Do Clementine and Joel Stay Together or Not?

Maybe. The answer is maybe. Not wanting to be that guy who teases a definitive answer to a difficult question and forces you to read a ten-page essay only to cop-out with a non-committal excuse of an answer, I’m telling you up and front the answer is maybe. Though nations have long warred over this matter, the film itself does not answer once and for all whether or not Joel Barrish and Clementine Krychinzki find lasting happiness together at conclusion of the film Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Min d. I cannot give a definitive answer as to whether Joel and Clementine’s love will last until the stars turn cold or just through the weekend. This essay cannot do that. What this essay can do is explore the in-text evidence the film gives for either ...

REVIEW: Jungle Cruise

Disney has relied on branding for their box-office since Walt himself started using fairy-tales as a launching pad. Flash forward 80 years, and the branding wars have escalated not just within the Disney company, but the industry all around. Disney's Jungle Cruise walks the line between original and remix, and not just because it's adapted from a theme-park ride. This film, a pastiche of adventure flicks over the last 60 years, absorbs the best from its sources of inspiration but falls just short of congealing them into something truly groundbreaking. Tales a mythical tree of life have beckoned explorers since it bloomed into legend hundreds of years ago. This catches the interest of explorer Lily Houghton who makes it her mission to find the tree, first to distribute its gifts to the world and second to keep it from the hands of less benevolent seekers. Her success hinges on joining forces with the gruff Frank Wolff. He'll ferry Lily and her brother, McGregor, across th...

How Disney Liberated the Musical Genre

Anytime I’m getting ready for a new musical film, I generally try to put off listening to the soundtrack until after I’ve seen the movie. It’s just my way of ensuring that I experience the narrative in its full context upon its important premiere viewing. Most of the time I’m good about sticking to this, but nowhere is this feat harder than with the arrival of each new Disney musical. I tried really hard with Encanto , but with Lin-Manuel Miranda writing for Disney, what can I say (except "You're Welcome"...) So, why am I talking about Disney musicals? W hen I premiered my Jungle Book essay earlier this year, I decided that going forward I was ready to expand how I talked about Disney. Owing to Disney fans constantly having to justify their fandom, a lot of Disney discourse tends to be purely defensive. Disney fans only ever get to use their platform to try convincing the cool kids that--for the last time!--it's okay for adults without kids to go to...

Finding Nemo: The Thing About Film Criticism ...

Film is a mysterious thing. It triggers emotional responses in the audience that are as surprising as they are all-encompassing. As a medium, film is capable of painting stunning vistas that feel like they could only come to life behind the silver screen, but many of the most arresting displays on film arise from scenes that are familiar, perhaps even mundanely so. It’s an artform built on rules and guidelines–young film students are probably familiar with principles like the rule of thirds or the Kuleshov effect–but someone tell me the rule that explains why a line like “We’ll always have Paris,” just levels you. There are parts of the film discussion that cannot be anticipated by a formula or a rulebook, and for that we should be grateful. Arrival (2016) But the thing about film–and especially film criticism–is that film critics are not soothsayers. Their means of divining the artis...

Films and Feelings

Search This Blog