Skip to main content

The Great Movie Conquest of 2022 - January

This fool's errand is the fruition of an idea I've wanted to try out for years now but have always talked myself out of. Watching a new movie a day for one full year is a bit of a challenge for a number of reasons, not in the least of which being that I'm the kind of guy who likes to revisit favorites. As a film lover, I'm prone to expanding my circle and watching films I haven't seen before, I've just never watched a new film every day for a year. So why am I going to attempt to pull that off at all, and why am I going to attempt it now?

I've put off a yearlong commitment because it just felt like too much to bite off. One such time, actually, was right when I first premiered this blog. You know ... the start of 2020? The year where we had nothing to do but watch Netflix all day? Time makes fools of us all, I guess.

I doubt it's ever going to be easier to pull off such a feat, so why not now? 

    Mostly, though, I really just want to help enliven my study of film. There are days when I am cocky enough to consider myself a critic of some expertise--I have seen a lot of movies--but the further I wade into the waters, the more I realize that there will always be more movies for me to see. More corners of the map I have yet to unlock. There are cult classics that have shaped the way movies are made today that I haven't seen. There are hidden gems begging to find their way to the mainstream that I haven't seen. There are sources of national trauma (looking at you, The Hobbit) that I haven't seen. Forcing yourself to diversify your exposure helps develop your palette, and this is a chance for me to do that in a significant way.

Anyways, some highlights from my first month into this endeavor ... 

    I hit the theaters twice in January. First with Belle, then with Scream the next week. Scream was the rare legacy sequel that arguably surpassed the film it was honoring while Belle genuinely left me reflecting on my purpose as a film critic. There was a good two-and-a-half month span this last year where I didn't much care for any of the movies that I reviewed, so I'm grateful that I got to come up for air.

    The passing of Sidney Poitier compelled me to look more into his filmography, leading me to discover Pressure Point, a fascinating intersection between the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s and America reflecting on Naziism in the nation some twenty years earlier. I'm genuinely surprised that I haven't come across this exact movie before as both topics have been thrust into the public eye in recent years in such a large way.

I feel like the world should also be aware that in 1952 Cary Grant made a film with his at the time wife, Betsy Drake, called Room for One More. I guess I'd have to research the matter more thoroughly to be sure, but this film has to be one of the earliest onscreen depictions of the foster care system. If you loved the film "Instant Family," I'd heartily recommend checking this one out.

    As recently as this week, I checked out the mini-series version of Stephen King's Salem's Lot after finishing the book this weekend. Regrettably, this adaptation did not leave me particularly impressed. It's fascinating how the film managed to translate almost all of the plot from the novel without carrying any of the personality. We're due for another film adaptation this September, and I'm praying it's much more lively than what we got here. I'm comforted remembering that the recent It movies were both leaps ahead of the 1990 miniseries based on the same novel. Perhaps we can hope for a similar jump when the new film hits theaters (I hope) this fall.

    Anyways, one-twelfth of the way into this trek, and I haven't started to burn out yet. I'm hoping that I find some new favorites with this challenge. Wish me luck. 

--The Professor


An image of The Professor bracing himself for the challenge (I'm the one in the blue)



January's Harvest:

His People (1925)
Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings (2021)
The Mortal Storm (1940)
Begin Again (2013)
The Batman (1989)
Alien: Resurrection (1997)
The Grand Hotel (1932)
Hans Christian Andersen (1952)
Room For One More (1952)
Promising Young Woman (2020)
Braveheart (1995)
Always Be My Maybe (2019)
Delightfully Dangerous (1945)
The Cider House Rules (1999)
Belle (2021)
Pressure Point (1962)
Scream (2022)
Armageddon (1998)
The Wild Swans (1977)
Robocop (1987)
I Am Sam (2001)
Children of the Corn (1984)
Tombstone (1993)
The Secret Life of Pets (2016)
The Fisher King (1991)
Mr. Robinson Crusoe (1932)
All the Right Moves (1983)
Beyond the Moon (1954)
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012)
Salem's Lot (1979)
The Tender Bar (2021)
Labels:

Comments

  1. Mark DavisFebruary 28, 2022 at 2:32 PM

    1989' s Batman is the best of the Batman movies in my opinion. I love the reboot with Christian Bale but the Keaton/Nicholson version is the perfect balance of bleakness and cartoonishness. And of course it is, its a Tim Burton film.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: Clayface

    James Gunn promised early on that with his new DC Universe, not everything would be for everybody, but there would be something for everybody.      I have to assume he means he's eventually going to grant us the first proper superhero musical. (No, I still haven't seen "Joker 2.") But until such a time, James Watkins' new take on superheroes and horror with Clayface  is a valid offering just the same.     Rising actor, Matt Hagen (Tom Rhys Harris), is on top of the world, securing his first Oscar nomination, when he has a fatal night of passion with the girlfriend of a lord in the criminal underworld of Gotham. Matt is punished by having his lovely Hollywood face carved up irreparably. Matt's golden ticket to the front of the camera is ruined, and his reputation is smeared.      Driven to desperation, Matt seeks out a neuroscientist, Caitlyn Corr (Naomie Ackie), investing in an experimental form of therapy that could recover his...
Post a Comment
Read more

An Earnest Defense of Passengers

          I've heard a lot of back and forth over what the purpose of film is and what we should ask from it. Film as a social amenity kind of has a dual purpose. It's supposed to give the population common ground and find things that people of varying backgrounds and beliefs can unify around. On the other hand, film also creates this detached simulated reality through which we can explore complex and even testing ideas about the contradictions in human existence.     In theory, a film can fulfill both functions, but movies exist in a turbulent landscape. It's very rare for a film to try to walk both lanes, and it's even rarer for a film to be embraced upon entry for attempting to do so.  Let me explain by describing the premise of one of my favorite movies, Morten Tyldum's 2016 film, Passengers .      A key piece of this film ’s plot revolves around the main character, Jim Preston, a passenger onboard a spaceship, who premat...
1 comment
Read more

How Disney Liberated the Musical Genre

Anytime I’m getting ready for a new musical film, I generally try to put off listening to the soundtrack until after I’ve seen the movie. It’s just my way of ensuring that I experience the narrative in its full context upon its important premiere viewing. Most of the time I’m good about sticking to this, but nowhere is this feat harder than with the arrival of each new Disney musical.     I tried really hard with Encanto , but with Lin-Manuel Miranda writing for Disney, what can I say (except "You're Welcome"...) So, why am I talking about Disney musicals?     W hen I premiered my Jungle Book essay earlier this year, I decided that going forward I was ready to expand how I talked about Disney. Owing to Disney fans constantly having to justify their fandom, a lot of Disney discourse tends to be purely defensive. Disney fans only ever get to use their platform to try convincing the cool kids that--for the last time!--it's okay for adults without kids to go to...
Post a Comment
Read more

The "Stephen King's IT" Paradox - Can You Ever Go Home Again?

Though I think of myself as putting my heart and soul into this blog, I generally like to keep my offline persona mysterious. This is why I use a pen name and why you’ll never see a picture of my face on this page. But I’ll pull behind the curtain just a little today and share that … I attended my high school reunion not too long ago.           I actually ended up attending this reunion twice simply because the first reunion, our “real reunion,” was planned at sort of the last minute and had rather sparse attendance. And so those of us who made it to that resolved to see if we couldn’t pull off something a little more robust, which we did some months later with much more success. And I honestly didn’t mind going twice over.          I never actively put any distance between myself and my old pals, but I also never really made any effort to hold onto them after graduating beyond liking their posts on...
Post a Comment
Read more

Finding Nemo: The Thing About Film Criticism ...

       Film is a mysterious thing. It triggers emotional responses in the audience that are as surprising as they are all-encompassing. As a medium, film is capable of painting stunning vistas that feel like they could only come to life behind the silver screen, but many of the most arresting displays on film arise from scenes that are familiar, perhaps even mundanely so.       It’s an artform built on rules and guidelines–young film students are probably familiar with principles like the rule of thirds or the Kuleshov effect–but someone tell me the rule that explains why a line like “We’ll always have Paris,” just levels you. There are parts of the film discussion that cannot be anticipated by a formula or a rulebook, and for that we should be grateful.         Arrival (2016)      But the thing about film–and especially film criticism–is that film critics are not soothsayers. Their means of divining the artis...
2 comments
Read more

The Belle Complex

As Disney fandom increasingly moves toward the mainstream, the discussions and questions that travel around the community become increasingly nuanced and diverse. Is the true color of Aurora's dress blue or pink? Is it more fun to sit in the back or the front on Big Thunder Mountain? Is the company's continued emphasis on producing content for Disney+ negatively impacting not only their output but the landscape for theatrical release as a whole?  However, on two things, the fandom is eternally united. First, Gargoyles  was a masterpiece in television storytelling and should have experienced a much longer run than it did. Second, Belle's prom dress in the 2017 remake was just abominable.      While overwhelmingly successful at the box office, the 2017 adaptation is also a bruise for many in the Disney community. Even right out the gate, the film came under fire for a myriad of factors: the auto-tuned soundtrack, Ewan McGregor's flimsy accent, the distracting plot...
Post a Comment
Read more

REVIEW: Jungle Cruise

  Disney has relied on branding for their box-office since Walt himself started using fairy-tales as a launching pad. Flash forward 80 years, and the branding wars have escalated not just within the Disney company, but the industry all around. Disney's Jungle Cruise walks the line between original and remix, and not just because it's adapted from a theme-park ride. This film, a pastiche of adventure flicks over the last 60 years, absorbs the best from its sources of inspiration but falls just short of congealing them into something truly groundbreaking. Tales a mythical tree of life have beckoned explorers since it bloomed into legend hundreds of years ago. This catches the interest of explorer Lily Houghton who makes it her mission to find the tree, first to distribute its gifts to the world and second to keep it from the hands of less benevolent seekers. Her success hinges on joining forces with the gruff Frank Wolff. He'll ferry Lily and her brother, McGregor, across th...
Post a Comment
Read more

My Criminal Father Surrogate: Masculinity in A Perfect World

     I've been wanting to tackle the subject of "masculinity" in film for quite some time now, but I hadn't quite known how best to do that. There's a certain buzzword, "toxic masculinity," that especially elicits a lot of strong feelings from a lot of different angles. While a post-#MeToo world has exposed some very disturbing truths about the way masculinity has historically performed, I'm not here to roast 50% of the world population. Actually, I really want to talk about a man's capacity for good. Ted Lasso (2020)      There’s certainly a lot of discussion to be had for newer media celebrating men for possessing attributes not historically coded as "manly." But what's even more fascinating to me are the attempts to bridge the gap between traditional masculinity and new age expectations--to reframe an older vision of manhood within our modern context.       Which brings me to Clint Eastwood’s 1993 film, A Perfect World.   ...
1 comment
Read more

The Other Woman: Empathy Isn't Easy

          Anyone else remember that one time Padme wrecked Phoebe's marriage to Max Medina? Directed by Don Roos, The Other Woman first premiered in Toronto in 2009. At the time, the movie was sporting the title of the book from which it was adapted, Love, and Other Impossible Pursuits . But the film didn’t receive any kind of widespread theatrical release until 2011, when it also sported its new title. We can assume perhaps distributors were more eager to showcase the film after Portman’s Oscar win for Black Swan at the 2011 ceremony . I myself caught the film on Netflix circa 2017, a time I remember as being especially fruitful for discovering underseen and independently financed films on the service (back before most of Netflix's budget went instead to funding such homegrown masterworks as Extraction or Damsel ...). In the tentpole-driven film world that we were already seeing emerge in 2009, an underground Netflix following is typically the highest t...
Post a Comment
Read more

REVIEW: Wildwood

    Travis Knight's Wildwood has already generated above-normal discourse about the merits and application of animation as an artform. "Don't you realize that animation isn't just for KIDS, by Jove!?" (Don't you realize ... lots of us have been saying that for a while now?)  This connects to a much larger conversation about the stigma the artform has held, a conversation that has generally placed the onus on animation--and animators--to prove they can be as good as "real films" and "real filmmakers."     Animation as a form will need sustained support--from more than just the crowd who waited until now to decide that animated movies could be "good, actually." But Wildwood  itself offers other contributions that I imagine will carry the field much further.     Oregonian preteen Prue McKeel ignores her parents' instruction to not take her brother, Mac, outside. When a flock of crows descend and carry her brother off into the w...
Post a Comment
Read more