Skip to main content

Professor's Picks: 5 More Musicals Ripe For a Remake


    I guess the term "remake" is something of an ill-fit. After all Steven Spielberg's new West Side Story, which inspired this piece, is less a "remake" of the 1961 film than simply another adaptation of the stage musical that the 1961 film is also based on. Semantics.

    This distinction highlights one way in which stage shows are privileged above feature films. Stage performances are restaged and reinvented all the time. The stage version of Les Miserables has been effectively "remade" a million different times over its 37-year run across a billion different venues all over the world. Meanwhile, we've only got a single film adaptation of the Les Mis musical.

    I know it's heresy to say that maybe Hollywood needs more remakes (I'm one of the rare people who doesn't on principle hate Disney Remakes), but it shouldn't be to say the world needs more musicals. And if Spielberg's new take on the show is a box office win, there's a very real possibility that we'll see Hollywood going back to the bank of established Broadway hits for inspiration. Just earlier this year, Paramount announced plans for such a remake of The King and I. Should this ball gain some momentum, Hollywood would be in no short supply for shows to restage, and I am in no short supply for ideas of where they should start.


1. Oliver!


We owe songs like "Where is Love," "As Long as He Needs Me," and "Who Will Buy" to the 1960 musical by Lional Bart, itself an adaptation of Oliver Twist, the novel by Charles Dickens. The 1968 film adaptation was famously the last musical best picture winner before Chicago in 2002. The story follows orphan Oliver as he searches for home in the desolate streets of 1830 England.

    A part of me is actually kind of surprised that we haven't seen a remake of this already. After Tom Hooper's experiment with Les Miserables, I'd have thought that this would be a natural next step. Like Les Miserables, Oliver! touches on issues of poverty and suffering. The show lends itself to hyper-realistic crafting that isn't a natural fit for most musical movies and offers a chance to further probe the intersection between our capacity for raw emotion and the genre's capacity for elevated storytelling.


2. South Pacific (1958)

Based on the 1949 Broadway show by Rodgers and Hammerstein, the 1958 film features songs like "Some Enchanted Evening," "You've Got to Be Carefully Taught," and "Bali Ha'i." The story follows the romantic pursuits of workers at an American military post stationed in the Pacific Islands during World War II. I'm pushing for a modern remake of this title because two things really date the 1958 film.

First, the technicolor overdose. Does this section's lead image look a little too ... yellow to you? The entire film isn't rendered in such intense color, but frequently throughout the film, usually in tandem with some high-volume emotion, the screen will suddenly be flooded with blue or purple. The attempt to add some extra emotion to the scene almost always comes off as distracting and desperate. I get the impulse to get the most out of a high-volume romantic moment using some grand display of filmmaking, but the flashing color just betrays a lack of confidence in not just the story, performers, and music, but also the lush beach backdrop that naturally lends itself to the illustriousness of musical storytelling. More than anything, it's this paradisical setting that really makes the case for another film adaptation. I really just want to see people singing on the beach.

Second, the complicated racial politics of the film. Point in this movie's favor: this is one of the first films to feature characters confronting their own internalized racism. One of the story's tensions comes from Nellie, our leading lady, realizing she has trouble accepting that her suitor has mixed-race children from his first wife. This is also one of the few films of the era to prominently feature actors of color, and the native islanders are themselves depicted as a benevolent community, but it's in these depictions that the film trips over itself a little. 

Despite the best intentions of the writers, the Polynesian community comes off a little othered. They're portrayed as friendly, yes, but with very little depth. They almost play like they are just here as decoration, entertainment for the white characters. This is particularly noticeable with the film's most central native character, Bloody Mary. "You is saxy," she tells the handsome American Lt. Cable upon first meeting him.

South Pacific is emblematic of racial conversations during the mid-20th century. The text itself is explicitly anti-racist, but through its ignorance it still perpetuates demeaning racial stereotypes. A more mature perspective would go a long way.


3. Guys and Dolls

    The 1955 film was based on the 1950 stage show with music by Frank Loesser. The adaptation includes numbers like "Luck Be a Lady" and "Sit Down, You're Rocking the Boat" directly from the Broadway show while also adding several new numbers like "The Eyes of a Woman in Love." 

        A "remake" of this film has actually been in discussion at TriStar since the early 2010s, but it's been a few years since we've heard any new word on the production, and I really hope it comes through one way or another. The musical takes on a classic beauty and the beast love story in which a gambler takes on a bet that he can't take a lovely missionary on a romantic excursion to Havanna. In order to woo said missionary, he has to pretend to be an honest man. But, go figure, he comes to realize that maybe he actually has the capacity for genuine sincerity. 

    An underground gambler isn't exactly the most likely candidate to burst out into song in real life, but it's that discrepancy that makes it all the more exciting when you see something like a fully choreographed crap game. It's also this dichotomy of worldviews (cynicism vs altruism) that especially endears me to the film and makes me want to see it brought to life in the modern scene.  

        I don't know how this film would top Marlon Brando salsa dancing, but what have we got to lose?



4. How to Suceed in Business Without Really Trying

You might remember this musical as Daniel Radcliffe's little project while he was between Harry Potter films. I myself was introduced to the stage show when my high school performed this for their annual musical, and I've had fondness for the title ever since.

The 1967 film was adapted from the 1961 stage musical by Frank Loesser and book by Abe Burrows, Jack Weinstock, and Willie Gilbert, based on Shepherd Mead's 1952 book of the same name. It includes songs like "Coffee Break," "Rosemary," "Been a Long Day," and "Brotherhood of Men." 

The musical follows a window cleaner who trips into success with the help of a book. This mostly just consists of him playing into the arrogance of his colleagues and coworkers, like pretending to be from the same university as his boss. The recurring punchline is that any fool can climb the pyramid of success if he just knows the right things to say. Success is less a meritocracy than a game that someone wins if they know how to bend the rules in their favor.

While music is the window into very high-volume and profound emotions, it can also work really well as farce or social commentary. "How to Succeed" leans into this curve while not coming off quite as cynical as a musical like "Chicago." And musicals lampooning the absurdity of corporate culture are always in season.


5. The Phantom of the Opera (2004)

Andrew Lloyd Webber's musical mega-hit famously follows a naive young soprano, Christine Daae, performing in a Paris while under the tutelage of the geniusly gifted yet dangerously mysterious Phantom who haunts the opera house. In addition to the show's iconic title number, the musical gifted us songs such as "Music of the Night," "All I Ask of You," and "Wishing You Were Somehow Here Again."

The 2004 film adaptation has accrued mixed reactions, especially from the musical community, but I'll say up and front that I am not a hater of this film. It was one of my first exposures to live-action musicals and a sort of backdoor to the world of Broadway, and for that I could never hate it. I'm not in the camp that thinks the 2004 film is some blight upon the musical genre, but I am in the camp that thinks there is still a better Phantom of the Opera movie to be made. 

Broadway-caliber performers are generally the preference in musical storytelling, but the vocal limitations of Emmy Rossum and Gerard Butler are especially glaring given the characters they are playing. These aren't just any characters. They are angels of music. (Interesting note: the lead roles were originally offered to Anne Hathaway and Hugh Jackman, but both had to drop out due to scheduling conflicts. One of the great what-ifs of history.)

Mostly, I just think that the film is emblematic of the identity crisis that movie musicals went through in the early 21st century. The 2004 movie feels caught between the opulence of its source material and the timidity Hollywood felt around musicals around this time. It's this awkward tension that gives us things like characters speaking lines that were clearly meant to be sung or the Phantom's Underworld lair looking like a flooded garage. Just give us the Baz Lurhman-esque musical mardi gras we all deserve. 

---

In promotion for the upcoming West Side Story, actor Brian d'Arcy James recently gave this perspective:

“... I’ve spent a lot of time in the theater, where revivals are a main thread of what we do, particularly musicals. Any chance to reimagine or inject new life into something people already know is a little less sacrosanct in the theater. So that kind of thinking spills into this scenario. Then when you add in the idea that it’s Steven Spielberg and [writer] Tony Kushner, then you really don’t have to think twice.”

    The great thing about music is that the same song can sound good sung by a wide variety of voices. Different performers and directors know how to elicit different colors and sensations from the same songbook, and it's a shame we don't see Hollywood try its hand at musical revivals more often. It's not a slight against any of these musicals, or the films they inspired, to suggest that these soundtracks would benefit from another round. The world always needs more music.

            --The Professor


Honorable Mentions: Hello Dolly!, Annie Get Your Gun, Porgy and Bess, Camelot

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: The Wild Robot

     I think I must have known that Chris Sanders had another movie on deck, but I guess I had forgotten it was coming out so soon. For whatever reason, when I saw his name at the end of the credits for The Wild Robot , out this weekend, I was caught off guard ... and then realized that it actually explained a lot. The basic premise felt broadly reminiscent of Lilo & Stitch , and there was at least one sequence that definitely recalled How to Train Your Dragon , both of which Sanders co-directed with Dean Deblois (executive producer on this film). With his latest offering for Dreamworks, Sanders cements his position as a titan in the world of animation.     The movie sees ROZ, a shipwrecked robot stranded on an island completely untouched by humans. One would think that such an Eden would be bereft of the squabbles that humans seem so happy to create, but the animals of the island revile this new intruder and put up every fence they have. The only thing on this rock that doesn'

Changing Film History With a Smile--and Perhaps, a Tear: Charlie Chaplin's The Kid

  Film has this weird thing called “emotionality” that sees itself at the center of a lot of haranguing in the critical discourse. There is a sort of classism in dialogue that privileges film as a purely cerebral space, detached from all things base and emotional, and if your concerns in film tend to err on the side of sentiment or emotions, you have probably been on the receiving end of patronizing glances from those who consider themselves more discerning because their favorite movie is 2001: A Space Odyssey . Tyler Sage, another film critic I follow, said it best when he described emotionality’s close cousin, “sentimentality " and the way it is generally discussed : The Godfather (1972) “These days, if you are one of these types who likes to opine knowingly in the public sphere – say, a highfalutin film critic – it's one of the most powerful aspersions there is. ‘I just found it so sentimental ,’ … [and] you can be certain no one will contradict you, because to defend sent

REVIEW: Salem's Lot

    I'll forgive you if you forgot this movie was coming. After shelving this project some two years ago, Warner Bros. has remained awfully mum about when we could expect to see Salem's Lot , only to decide to drop it on MAX with little more than two weeks of preparation, a bewildering practice that perhaps says more about the state of Hollywood at present than the content of the film itself.  But that's not the ravenous evil that we're here to discuss today.      In Gary Dauberman's adaptation of the famous Stephen King book, author Benjamin Mears returns to his childhood home of Jerusalem's Lot, or "Salem's Lot" to the locals, imagining that it might help spark an idea for a new book. How was he supposed to know that his hometown chose this of all days to start playing host to an ancient evil, one bent on spreading its illness into every home? Overnight, Salem's Lot is in the grip of darkness, and only Ben and a paltry group of makeshift vamp

A Patch of Blue: Sidney Poitier, Representation, and The Virtue of Choice

      Way, way back (about this time last year), I premiered my piece on the responsibility that younger viewers have to engage with older cinema --specifically the films of old Hollywood. There was a lot of ground that I wanted to cover in that essay--literally an entire era of filmmaking--so most of my talking points had to be concise, which is not how most writers prefer to discuss a thing for which they have passion enough to design and maintain their own blog. There is a bounty of discussion when it comes to film history and the people who made it.     Today I'd like to take the opportunity to dig a little deeper into one such island: that of legendary actor and trailblazer, Sidney Poitier.      Dwandalyn Reece, curator of the performing arts at the Smithsonian's National Museum of African American History and Culture, described Poitier , “He fully inhabits both sides of that personality, or those tensions, of being a Black person in America … But he also demonstrated this

Professor's Picks: 5 Academic Film Books That Influenced Me

    The question of whether a person needs a literal degree in film to be a "real film critic" is one I wrestle with often.     On the one hand, the film discourse has been mired by players who lack any base of knowledge in the thing they are critiquing. The YouTube algorithm rewards voices who know how to get clicks, not people who possess any special eye for the semantics or historical context for film. On the other hand, it's not fair to keep all the keys to the conversation to those who have the means to pursue a literal graduate and post-graduate education, nor should film lovers shirk from insights that come from alternative sources.  Sherlock Jr (1924)    While I am invested in a future that includes graduates of film school--institutes dedicated specially to cultivating knowledge about the artform--I also don't necessarily think a person needs to get the grade in order to be qualified to talk about film, but they  do  need to do their homework. A part of this

No, Disney Didn't Ruin Kipling's The Jungle Book

     When I told my inner editing circle that I was going to write a defense of Disney’s The Jungle Book , the general reaction was, “Wait, there are actually people who don’t like The Jungle Book?”      Kind of.     The Jungle Book doesn’t typically inspire the same ire as other installments within the Disney gallery. People outside the Disney umbrella don’t hate it the way they hate Frozen for making all the money or the way they hate The Little Mermaid for, I don’t know, letting its heroine be a fully formed character. Even the film's awkward racial coding is typically discussed in package with similar transgressions from films like Peter Pan and Lady and the Tramp . The common viewer doesn't "hate" The Jungle Book so much as underestimate it.      There is, however, one crowd for which the Disney version of The Jungle Book often elicits genuine disdain: lovers of Rudyard Kipling, the author who wrote the original Jungle Book stories.      You’ll see it with

The Power of the Dog Doesn't (want to) Understand Toxic Masculinity: A Deconstruction and History of the "Toxic Cowboy"

              I want to start this piece by recounting my very first experience watching John Ford’s 1956 masterpiece, The Searchers .         The film sees John Wayne playing Ethan Edwards, rugged cowboy who embarks on a years-long quest to recover his young niece, Debbie, after she is kidnapped by a band of Comanche Indians, who also murder her entire family. Ethan is joined on this adventure by Debbie’s adopted older brother, Martin, played by Jeffrey Hunter. Ethan does not welcome Martin’s presence on this mission and even tries to leave him behind at the start, and he will continue to menace Martin as they travail the desert. Part of this is because Ethan does not consider Martin to be Debbie’s real family, and he also resents Martin’s Native American lineage. But most of his animosity stems from the fact that he simply sees Martin as weak. He does not seem like the kind of guy who can hold his own on the wild frontier. But through their time together, Ethan does come to quiet

A Quiet Place: Scaredy-Cats Taking Back the Horror Movie

       Raise your hand if growing up you were “that friend” who couldn’t stomach scary movies.      Don’t worry, this is a safe space. I hated scary movies for as long as I could remember.      In my youth I didn’t find the sensation of clenching your toes for 80 minutes straight particularly appealing, so I just let horror movies exist in their lane. Their lane, approximately 39 and a half feet away from mine. Of course, fast forward fifteen years and one Media Arts Studies degree later, and that’s not really an option anymore. The Cabinet of Doctor Caligari (1920)      My scholarly dives into the genre have taken me to some interesting places, most of them very fascinating. The Shining stands out as one example of a film I never thought I’d love growing up, but here I am. But unfortunately, that's not the experience I have with every scary movie.     T his summer, I finally viewed a certain horror film, a milestone within horror culture that has amassed a loyal following over th

REVIEW: The Tomorrow War

With the summer season comes the slate of action movies, what with their monsters and superheroes dueling it out. With this particular summer season also comes scorching heat suffocating a world fresh out of a global pandemic. It's into this landscape that Chris McKay's "The Tomorrow War," hits Amazon Prime, at once an escapism dream and a wake-up call. Dan Forester is a retired soldier now teaching earth science to high schoolers. He is no more prepared than anyone else when armed soldiers emerge from a timehole to pronounce that thirty years from now, Earth will be overrun by an alien army. Mankind is losing this fight, and the only way the future stands a chance is if the present takes action now. Dan is among the drafted, and when he is launched into the future to fight this war, aliens won't be the worst monsters he has to face. The impending devastation has obvious parallels to real-world threats (e.g. climate change, racism, political discord, etc.) No part