Skip to main content

PROFESSOR'S PICKS: 5 Horror Films for Horror Novices

I once counted myself among the crowd who categorically dismissed scary movies simply because I didn't see myself as person who liked scary movies. They were uncomfortable, they were vile, and they were dumb. 

Today I'm a little more open to the horror genre in large part because I've learned that not all scary movies are so aggressively morbid. I owe much of this transition to the research I've put in to horror films of classical Hollywood. 

Until about the 1960's the Hays code placed heavy lines on what kind of content could be featured in films. Many filmmakers felt restricted by these limitations, but this limitation did force filmmakers to find ways to scare audiences without using gore or violence, two things that usually frighten viewers away from the genre. As a result, many films we would classify under the "horror" genre from pre-1965 are really good testing grounds for viewers curious about the genre. 

If you're certain Nightmare on Elm Street crosses a line but you still want to know what all the hoopla over horror is about, here are the Professor's Picks for five classical horror films that will mess with your mind but not your stomach.

--

1. Carnival of Souls (1962)

Rated "Chilling" for a whole bunch of undead figures staring straight into the camera without blinking

The sole survivor of a tragic accident takes a job as a church organist in Salt Lake City, mostly because it doesn’t require her to interact with others. Her drive takes her past an old abandoned bath house which immediately fills her with inexplicable foreboding, and strange visions begin haunting her waking mind, visions which soon give way to something much more frightening.

The movie is almost entirely devoid of any traditional "jump-scares" or other shoe-in tactics for eliciting fear from the audience. Rather, the tension cooks through long takes of frightening imagery that unsettle or spook rather than shock. Atmosphere is the name of the game in this film.

This film is kind of the king of horror indie-movies and accumulated a cult following through subsequent releases. This film is also in the public domain, which means it’s easy to find. (You may have to circle through a few sites to find a high-quality rendering of the film, however.) 


2. The Haunting (1963)

Rated "Unnerving" for frightening situations and one potent jump scare

Lonely soul, Eleanor, receives some long-awaited excitement in her life when she is invited to participate in a scientific study of paranormal phenomena. Along with a few other participants, Eleanor stays overnight in an old mansion long-since thought to be "haunted." The paranormal activities begin almost immediately, but each new scare only further draws Eleanor into the mental labyrinth of Hill House. 


Director Robert Wise adapted this film from Shirley Jackson's 1959 book "The Haunting of Hill House." This film was remade twice, first as a film in 1999 and then as a Netflix mini-series in 2018's "The Haunting of Hill House," but it has become the inspiration for every haunted house film that followed. 

This film dwells in suspense and tension, unsettling the audience through frightening sounds or watching the characters squirm under the terror of what neither they nor the audience can see.

The film also marks perhaps the most intensive character study of any of the films on this list. Similar to Carnival of Souls, this film is specially interested in self-imposed isolationism and the unsettling yearnings that fill in the space that should be reserved for human interaction. Eleanor is painted as a drifting soul so desperate for belonging that the sinister beating heart of this mansion only further validates and entices her, convincing her that a place as chilling as this could become a home to her. 

Robert Wise's next film? The Sound of Music. What a world.

3. The Spiral Staircase (1946)

Rated "Scary"  for frightening situations and a few bloodless deaths

A sinister serial murderer is sweeping through a quiet Vermont town, targeting women suffering from various disabilities. All the while, Helen, a mute woman under the employment of a wealthy bedridden widow, must confront her deepest fears and traumas in order to outwit the killer before she becomes its next victim.

This film was adapted from Ethel Lina White's 1933 novel "Some Must Watch." This is one of those rare classic Hollywood films to tackle the subject of disability. That it does so through the protagonist is even more noteworthy. 

The earliest patterns of what would become slasher films can be seen in this film with the element of defenseless women being preyed upon by predatory male figures. But Production Code fences placed limitations on how sadistic filmmakers were able to be in this regard. Even as she's being tormented and stalked, Helen is treated with more dignity and humanity than her slasher-film successors will be thirty years on.



4. The Most Dangerous Game (1932)

Rated "Thrilling" for a few chase sequences and one scene displaying dead human bodies

An enthusiastic hunter is shipwrecked on an exotic island on which an eccentric millionaire has constructed a lavish castle. Our protagonist is at first enthralled in the company of this man, with whom he shares a love of the hunting sport, but he soon learns the frightening extent of his new friend's love of the game.


This film has more in common with modern day adventure films than a film like A Quiet Place. One of the directors, Ernest B. Schoedsack, would in fact go on to direct King Kong the next year using many of these same sets, even lifting stars Robert Armstrong and Fay Wray. Just so, the film makes for a thrilling view that asks probing questions about our relationship to power and violence and plays with our notion of predator and prey. Urban legends even persist that the first cut of the film was even more horrifying, with our first look at the enigmatic trophy room featuring more grotesque displays of carnage that sent 1932 audiences running out of the theater.

This film was adapted from the 1924 short story by Richard Connel, a story which has been adapted countless times, even as recently as this year in the form of the Quibi series Most Dangerous Game. Perhaps this is because the premise strikes an uncomfortable nerve, confronting us with how even the most civilized of us court and celebrate slaughter. This is another film in the public domain, and this one is barely over an hour long, making it a very accessible watch.



5. Sorry, Wrong Number (1948)

Rated "Intense" for Barbra Stanwyck spending 80 minutes looking scared out of her skin

Leona Stevenson, a bed-ridden heiress, intercepts a phone call in which she overhears a murder plot. She desperately tries to intervene, and understand what her husband's business affairs have to do with all this, but confined to her bed, what all can she do?


The film is adapted from Louise Fletcher's 1943 radio play, with Fletcher returning to write the screenplay for the feature film. 

Similar to The Spiral Staircase, the film finds its horrific stride with its use of shadows and slow creeps, and by constantly reminding us how helpless Leona is. Though flashbacks take place over a larger landscape, the narrative proper is situated almost entirely in Leona's bedroom. The plot constantly reminds us how our protagonist is tethered to a bed, leaving her entirely helpless in what feels like a predecessor to Hitchcock's Rear Window six years later. 



--


Horror has a reputation for being 1) morbid and 2) low-brow. I think there's a lot of validity to the criticisms of how horror films can numb us to graphic depictions of violence or celebrate the ravaging of female bodies, and if we sat down for a minute, we could probably come up with a fair number of films to support this thesis. 

But Extreme Slasher Movie XXXVII doesn't represent the sum of the horror genre. Coming from someone who lives for Judy Garland and Gene Kelly films, I've come to learn of the inherent value of a film that exposes your fears and insecurities--which a well-made horror film can do so well. If you're not ready for Scream (1996) and don't think you'll ever bother with The Evil Dead (1981) maybe test the waters with some of these psychological scarers.

            --The Professor

Honorable Mentions: Island of Lost Souls (1932), The Cat and the Canary (1927), Cat People (1942)

I might also recommend some of the classic Universal Monsters Movies of the 1930's and 40's. 

Comments

  1. I remember many of these. Some Fun Flicks. I always liked movies that scared me when I was a younger man. This is a little trip down memory lane. In some ways, because of the standards of the day, directors, screenwriters, and actors had to be a bit more talented. The almost anything goes approach today in movies may require less from the directors, screenwriters, and actors. What these old films didn't have in standards and technology, they made up for in the cleverness of the directing, the writing, and the acting. I actually enjoy these old ones much more than the modern horror movies.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Elemental: Savoring Pixar's Fading Light

I’ve only been doing this writing thing for a short while. But in that space, I have been surprised at many of the developments I’ve gotten to witness unfolding in the popular film landscape. It was only five years ago, for example, that superhero movies were still thought to be unstoppable. Here in 2025, though, we know better. But the wheels coming off the Marvel machine accompanied a shift in their whole method of production and distribution, and it didn’t take long for the natural consequences to catch up with them as verifiable issues started appearing in their films. Thor: Love and Thunder (2022) No. The development that has most surprised me has been critics and their slow-motion break-up with Pixar. The only way I know how to describe what I’ve seen over the last five years … imagine that your roommate has been stuck for a long time dating a girl who was obviously bad for him, and after he finally breaks up with her he gets back into the dating ring. All the girls he takes out ...

PROFESSOR'S PICKS: Five Lessons Hollywood Ought to Learn from the Success of WICKED

    That which has teased studios since the freak success of La La Land and The Greatest Showman has finally come to pass: Hollywood has finally launched a successful musical. Or rather, they've launched two.     The musical is sort of like the golden idol at the start of Raiders of the Lost Ark . It's valuable beyond imagination--but only if you know just how to retrieve it. There have been specific periods where the musical has yielded tremendous rewards for Hollywood, but for the greater part of the lifespan of feature-filmmaking, studios have been punished for reaching beyond their means.     Yet after ages of dormancy, t he years leading up to the Wicked movies were lined with musicals, more than we'd seen in the previous decade. A few of them were quite well crafted. Others were ... learning experiences. None really became what we'd call "mainstream."      But Wicked and Wicked: For Good have both seen rare success. I'm publishing ...

REVIEW: ELIO

    Here's a fact: the term "flying saucer" predates the term "UFO." The United States Air Force found the former description too limiting to describe the variety of potential aerial phenomena that might arise when discussing the possibility of life beyond earth.      There may have to be a similar expansion of vocabulary within the alien lexicon with Pixar's latest film, Elio , turning the idea of an alien abduction into every kid's dream come true.      The titular Elio is a displaced kid who recently moved in with his aunt after his parents died. She doesn't seem to understand him any better than his peers do. He can't imagine a place on planet earth where he feels he fits in. What's a kid to do except send a distress cry out into the great, big void of outer space?      But m iracle of miracles: his cries into the universe are heard, and a band of benevolent aliens adopt him into their "communiverse" as the honorary ambassador o...

Year in Review: 2025

     So, I guess I’ll start out by saying that … I wasn’t kidding last year when I said I was gonna do better with reviews, folks. This is the first time in three years that my review count landed in the double digits, and I reached that benchmark barely past the year’s halfway point. My total this year landed at 19. This breaks my previous record of 17 from 2021 and also outpaces the total haul from 2024 and 2023 combined.       Once again, " WICKED " pulled through as the biggest contributor this year, and I wouldn't have had that any other way. These last two years of active anticipation have been some of the most gratifying I've ever had as a person who feels investment in moving pictures. I'm even more excited, though, for this duology to be folded into film history: that thing I really love writing about.   I will always regret not reviewing The Holdovers (2023)      In the past, I have let myself get away with checki...

The Great Movie Conquest of 2022 - Febuary

    Welcome back, one and all, to my latest attempt to justify being enslaved to a million different streaming services. My efforts to watch one new movie a day all year haven't worn me out yet, but we're not even past the first quarter yet.           My first film of the month brought me to Baz Lurhmann's Australia , and it reminded me what a beautifully mysterious animal the feature film is. My writer's brain identified a small handful of technical issues with the film's plotting, but the emotional current of the film took me to a place that was epic, even spiritual. I don't know. When a film cuts straight to the core of your psyche, do setup and payoff even matter anymore? I think this film is fated for repeated viewings over the years as I untangle my response to this film.     One of my favorite films of all time is Billy Wilder's The Apartment with Jack Lemmon and Shirley MacLaine.  You'd think, then, that learning that the t...

Pan's Labyrinth: The Fantasy and Reality of Good and Evil

     So here’s a question I’m sure no one’s asked yet: what is the point of fantasy?          Ask your resident D&D enthusiast or aspiring fantasy writer what it is about the fantasy genre that excites them so much, and you’re bound to get a variety of answers, but the topic of escapism tends to be a common thread. Sometimes the trash compactor of the real world just stinks so much, and you just need to vacation in someone else’s world. You can only stew in real world politics for so long before you just have to unwind by tracing the Jedi lineage or memorizing the rules of alomancy.  This is where you commonly run into thoughts that fantasy nerds are just incompatible with reality and are deliberately shirking any responsibility from participating in it. This mindset has a lot in common with the nostalgia stigma we discussed with “Roger Rabbit” and “Detective Pikachu.” It is also a very elitist perspective born out of the same attitude...

Children of a Lesser God: Between Sound and Silence

    So ... you all remember how I was really annoyed by The Power of the Dog ?      Despite being an early prediction for the big trophy, I found that attempt rather shallow and self-congratulatory. I am more than perfectly fine that the Best Picture award went to the much better CODA . I thought it was much more enjoyable as a piece of film, and unlike The Power of the Dog , it did showed honest interest in the community it was reporting to champion. In the case of CODA , that was, of course, the deaf community.      But it's actually not CODA I want to talk about in detail at this time. That movie's milestones exist along a timeline that extends ... further back than I can track today, but at least as far back as  March 30, 1987, when Marlee Matlin became the first deaf actor to receive an Academy Award for her performance in Children of a Lesser God . Randa Haines’ 1986 film centers on the romance between a hearing man and a deaf woman a...

Saying Goodbye to Stranger Things

     There's a quote from critic Mark Caro that I think about a lot. I shared it back when I did my critical survey of Pixar movies . Writing about Finding Nemo , Caro wrote in the  Chicago Tribune in 2003 , "Classic film eras tend to get recognized in retrospect while we take for granted timeless works passing before our eyes. So let's pause to appreciate what's been going on at Pixar Animation Studios."      I think that captures the aspirations of all active-minded media consumers. Or at least, it ought to. "This good thing won't last forever, so savor it before the sun goes down."  Modern Times (1936)      But this is also a very hard mindset to access in an online culture that is always seeking to stamp labels and scores on a thing before we shove it on the conveyor belt and move on to the next parcel.       It's something I have been thinking about for the last year or so as the completion of the Stranger ...

Do You Hear the People Sing?: "Les Miserables" and the Untrained Singer

          Perhaps no film genre is as neglected in the 21 st century as the musical. With rare exception, the o nly offerings we get are the occasional Disney film, the occasional remake of a Disney film, and adaptations of Broadway stage shows. When we are graced with a proper musical film, the demand is high among musical fans for optimum musical performance, and when a musical film doesn’t deliver this, these fans are unforgiving.  From the moment talking was introduced in cinema, the musical film has been a gathering place where vocal demigods assemble in kaleidoscopic dance numbers in a whirl of cinematic ecstasy too fantastical for this world. What motivation, then, could Tom Hooper possibly have for tethering this landmark of modern musical fandom in grounded, dirty reality?       This movie’s claim to fame is the use of completely live-singing, detailed in this featurette, something no previous movie musical had attempted to...

REVIEW: Song Sung Blue

     I came into Craig Brewer's Song Sung Blue with little context for the real-life couple at the center of this movie, for Neil Diamond, or for the world of celebrity  impersonators  interpreters. There are no doubt subterranean connotations to the specific songs that they chose to sing at certain moments in the narrative that are lost on me. I have no doubt, though, that the intended audience will find this movie before long.  But the film was still viable enough that even a relative neophyte like me could still find himself humming along to this musical drama.     The film documents the real-life couple of Mike and Claire Sardina, celebrity impersonators who fall in love, marry, and form a tribute band for legendary singer, Neil Diamond. We track their relationship from its beginning through their career aspirations and the crossroads in their marriage, including a violent accident that changes their family forever.     Again, I don...