Skip to main content

PROFESSOR'S PICKS: 5 Horror Films for Horror Novices

I once counted myself among the crowd who categorically dismissed scary movies simply because I didn't see myself as person who liked scary movies. They were uncomfortable, they were vile, and they were dumb. 

Today I'm a little more open to the horror genre in large part because I've learned that not all scary movies are so aggressively morbid. I owe much of this transition to the research I've put in to horror films of classical Hollywood. 

Until about the 1960's the Hays code placed heavy lines on what kind of content could be featured in films. Many filmmakers felt restricted by these limitations, but this limitation did force filmmakers to find ways to scare audiences without using gore or violence, two things that usually frighten viewers away from the genre. As a result, many films we would classify under the "horror" genre from pre-1965 are really good testing grounds for viewers curious about the genre. 

If you're certain Nightmare on Elm Street crosses a line but you still want to know what all the hoopla over horror is about, here are the Professor's Picks for five classical horror films that will mess with your mind but not your stomach.

--

1. Carnival of Souls (1962)

Rated "Chilling" for a whole bunch of undead figures staring straight into the camera without blinking

The sole survivor of a tragic accident takes a job as a church organist in Salt Lake City, mostly because it doesn’t require her to interact with others. Her drive takes her past an old abandoned bath house which immediately fills her with inexplicable foreboding, and strange visions begin haunting her waking mind, visions which soon give way to something much more frightening.

The movie is almost entirely devoid of any traditional "jump-scares" or other shoe-in tactics for eliciting fear from the audience. Rather, the tension cooks through long takes of frightening imagery that unsettle or spook rather than shock. Atmosphere is the name of the game in this film.

This film is kind of the king of horror indie-movies and accumulated a cult following through subsequent releases. This film is also in the public domain, which means it’s easy to find. (You may have to circle through a few sites to find a high-quality rendering of the film, however.) 


2. The Haunting (1963)

Rated "Unnerving" for frightening situations and one potent jump scare

Lonely soul, Eleanor, receives some long-awaited excitement in her life when she is invited to participate in a scientific study of paranormal phenomena. Along with a few other participants, Eleanor stays overnight in an old mansion long-since thought to be "haunted." The paranormal activities begin almost immediately, but each new scare only further draws Eleanor into the mental labyrinth of Hill House. 


Director Robert Wise adapted this film from Shirley Jackson's 1959 book "The Haunting of Hill House." This film was remade twice, first as a film in 1999 and then as a Netflix mini-series in 2018's "The Haunting of Hill House," but it has become the inspiration for every haunted house film that followed. 

This film dwells in suspense and tension, unsettling the audience through frightening sounds or watching the characters squirm under the terror of what neither they nor the audience can see.

The film also marks perhaps the most intensive character study of any of the films on this list. Similar to Carnival of Souls, this film is specially interested in self-imposed isolationism and the unsettling yearnings that fill in the space that should be reserved for human interaction. Eleanor is painted as a drifting soul so desperate for belonging that the sinister beating heart of this mansion only further validates and entices her, convincing her that a place as chilling as this could become a home to her. 

Robert Wise's next film? The Sound of Music. What a world.

3. The Spiral Staircase (1946)

Rated "Scary"  for frightening situations and a few bloodless deaths

A sinister serial murderer is sweeping through a quiet Vermont town, targeting women suffering from various disabilities. All the while, Helen, a mute woman under the employment of a wealthy bedridden widow, must confront her deepest fears and traumas in order to outwit the killer before she becomes its next victim.

This film was adapted from Ethel Lina White's 1933 novel "Some Must Watch." This is one of those rare classic Hollywood films to tackle the subject of disability. That it does so through the protagonist is even more noteworthy. 

The earliest patterns of what would become slasher films can be seen in this film with the element of defenseless women being preyed upon by predatory male figures. But Production Code fences placed limitations on how sadistic filmmakers were able to be in this regard. Even as she's being tormented and stalked, Helen is treated with more dignity and humanity than her slasher-film successors will be thirty years on.



4. The Most Dangerous Game (1932)

Rated "Thrilling" for a few chase sequences and one scene displaying dead human bodies

An enthusiastic hunter is shipwrecked on an exotic island on which an eccentric millionaire has constructed a lavish castle. Our protagonist is at first enthralled in the company of this man, with whom he shares a love of the hunting sport, but he soon learns the frightening extent of his new friend's love of the game.


This film has more in common with modern day adventure films than a film like A Quiet Place. One of the directors, Ernest B. Schoedsack, would in fact go on to direct King Kong the next year using many of these same sets, even lifting stars Robert Armstrong and Fay Wray. Just so, the film makes for a thrilling view that asks probing questions about our relationship to power and violence and plays with our notion of predator and prey. Urban legends even persist that the first cut of the film was even more horrifying, with our first look at the enigmatic trophy room featuring more grotesque displays of carnage that sent 1932 audiences running out of the theater.

This film was adapted from the 1924 short story by Richard Connel, a story which has been adapted countless times, even as recently as this year in the form of the Quibi series Most Dangerous Game. Perhaps this is because the premise strikes an uncomfortable nerve, confronting us with how even the most civilized of us court and celebrate slaughter. This is another film in the public domain, and this one is barely over an hour long, making it a very accessible watch.



5. Sorry, Wrong Number (1948)

Rated "Intense" for Barbra Stanwyck spending 80 minutes looking scared out of her skin

Leona Stevenson, a bed-ridden heiress, intercepts a phone call in which she overhears a murder plot. She desperately tries to intervene, and understand what her husband's business affairs have to do with all this, but confined to her bed, what all can she do?


The film is adapted from Louise Fletcher's 1943 radio play, with Fletcher returning to write the screenplay for the feature film. 

Similar to The Spiral Staircase, the film finds its horrific stride with its use of shadows and slow creeps, and by constantly reminding us how helpless Leona is. Though flashbacks take place over a larger landscape, the narrative proper is situated almost entirely in Leona's bedroom. The plot constantly reminds us how our protagonist is tethered to a bed, leaving her entirely helpless in what feels like a predecessor to Hitchcock's Rear Window six years later. 



--


Horror has a reputation for being 1) morbid and 2) low-brow. I think there's a lot of validity to the criticisms of how horror films can numb us to graphic depictions of violence or celebrate the ravaging of female bodies, and if we sat down for a minute, we could probably come up with a fair number of films to support this thesis. 

But Extreme Slasher Movie XXXVII doesn't represent the sum of the horror genre. Coming from someone who lives for Judy Garland and Gene Kelly films, I've come to learn of the inherent value of a film that exposes your fears and insecurities--which a well-made horror film can do so well. If you're not ready for Scream (1996) and don't think you'll ever bother with The Evil Dead (1981) maybe test the waters with some of these psychological scarers.

            --The Professor

Honorable Mentions: Island of Lost Souls (1932), The Cat and the Canary (1927), Cat People (1942)

I might also recommend some of the classic Universal Monsters Movies of the 1930's and 40's. 

Comments

  1. I remember many of these. Some Fun Flicks. I always liked movies that scared me when I was a younger man. This is a little trip down memory lane. In some ways, because of the standards of the day, directors, screenwriters, and actors had to be a bit more talented. The almost anything goes approach today in movies may require less from the directors, screenwriters, and actors. What these old films didn't have in standards and technology, they made up for in the cleverness of the directing, the writing, and the acting. I actually enjoy these old ones much more than the modern horror movies.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: The Fall Guy

     Someone show me another business as enthusiastic for its own self-deprecation as Hollywood.      From affectionate self-parodies like Singin' in the Rain to darker reflections of the movie business like Sunset Boulevard , Hollywood has kind of built its empire on ridicule of itself. And why wouldn't it? Who wouldn't want to pay admission to feel like they're in on the secret: that movie magic is just smoke and mirrors? That silver screen titans actually have the most fragile egos?       But these are not revelations, and I don't think they are intended to be. Hollywood doesn't really care about displaying its own pettiness and internal rot because it knows that all just makes for good entertainment.  A t some point, this all stops feeling like a joke that we, the audience, are in on. At some point, it all stops feeling less like a confession and more like gloating. At what point, then, does the joke turn on us, the enablers of this cesspool whose claim to

Finding Nemo: The Thing About Film Criticism ...

       Film is a mysterious thing. It triggers emotional responses in the audience that are as surprising as they are all-encompassing. As a medium, film is capable of painting stunning vistas that feel like they could only come to life behind the silver screen, but many of the most arresting displays on film arise from scenes that are familiar, perhaps even mundanely so. It’s an artform built on rules and guidelines–young film students are probably familiar with principles like the rule of thirds or the Kuleshov effect–but someone tell me the rule that explains why a line like “We’ll always have Paris,” just levels you. There are parts of the film discussion that cannot be anticipated by a formula or a rulebook, and for that we should be grateful.         Arrival (2016)      But the thing about film–and especially film criticism–is that film critics are not soothsayers. Their means of divining the artistic merit of a movie are not unknowable. There are patterns and touchstones that

The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Clash of the Titans

  Anyone else remember the year we spent wondering if we would ever again see a movie that wasn't coming out in 3D?      T hat surge in 3D films in the early months of 2010 led to a number of questionable executive decisions. We saw a lot of films envisioned as standard film experiences refitted into the 3D format at the eleventh hour. In the ten years since, 3D stopped being profitable because audiences quickly learned the difference between a film that was designed with the 3D experience in mind and the brazen imitators . Perhaps the most notorious victim of this trend was the 2010 remake of Clash of the Titans .        Why am I suddenly so obsessed with the fallout of a film gone from the public consciousness ten years now? Maybe it's me recently finishing the first season of  Blood of Zeus  on Netflix and seeing so clearly what  Clash of the Titans  very nearly was. Maybe it's my  evolving thoughts on the Percy Jackson movies  and the forthcoming Disney+ series inevit

REVIEW: Belfast

     I've said it before, and I'll say it again: the world needs more black and white movies.      The latest to answer the call is Kenneth Branagh with his  semi-autobiographical film, Belfast . The film follows Buddy, the audience-insert character, as he grows up in the streets of Belfast, Ireland in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Though Buddy and his family thrive on these familiar streets, communal turmoil leads to organized violence that throws Buddy's life into disarray. What's a family to do? On the one hand, the father recognizes that a warzone is no place for a family. But to the mother, even the turmoil of her community's civil war feels safer than the world out there. Memory feels safer than maturation.      As these films often go, the plot is drifting and episodic yet always manages to hold one's focus. Unbrushed authenticity is a hard thing to put to film, and a film aiming for just that always walks a fine line between avant-garde and just plain

The Great Movie Conquest of 2022 - January

This fool's errand is the fruition of an idea I've wanted to try out for years now but have always talked myself out of. Watching a new movie a day for one full year is a bit of a challenge for a number of reasons, not in the least of which being that I'm the kind of guy who likes to revisit favorites. As a film lover, I'm prone to expanding my circle and watching films I haven't seen before, I've just never watched a new film every day for a year. So why am I going to attempt to pull that off at all, and why am I going to attempt it now? I've put off a yearlong commitment because it just felt like too much to bite off. One such time, actually, was right when I first premiered this blog. You know ... the start of 2020? The year where we had nothing to do but watch Netflix all day? Time makes fools of us all, I guess. I doubt it's ever going to be easier to pull off such a feat, so why not now?       Mostly, though, I really just want to help enliven my

Mamma Mia: Musicals Deserve Better

       Earlier this week, Variety ran a piece speculating on the future of musicals and the roles they may play in helping a post-corona theater business bounce back. After all, this year is impressively stacked with musicals. In addition to last month's fantastic "In the Heights," we've got a half dozen or so musicals slated for theatrical release. Musical master, Lin Manuel-Miranda expresses optimism about the future of musicals, declaring “[While it] hasn’t always been the case, the movie musical is now alive and well.”      I'm always hopeful for the return of the genre, but I don't know if I share Lin's confidence that the world is ready to take musicals seriously. Not when a triumph like "In the Heights" plays to such a small audience. (Curse thee, "FRIENDS Reunion," for making everyone renew their HBO Max subscription two weeks before In the Heights hits theaters.) The narrative of “stop overthinking it, it’s just a musical,”

REVIEW: All Together Now

The unceasing search for new acting talent to mine continues with Netflix's new film,  All Together Now, which premiered this week on the service. This film features Moana alum Auli'i Cravalho as Amber Appleton, a bright but underprivileged high schooler with high aspirations. Netflix's new film plays like a trial run for Cravalho to see if this Disney starlet can lead a live-action film outside the Disney umbrella. Cravalho would need to play against a slightly stronger narrative backbone for us to know for sure, but early signs are promising.  All Together Now follows Amber Appleton, a musically talented teen overflowing with love for her classmates, her coworkers, and her community. Amber reads like George Bailey reincarnated as a high school girl, throwing herself into any opportunity to better the world around her, like hosting her high school's annual for benefit Variety Show. But Amber's boundless optimism conceals an impoverished home life. She and her moth

Changing Film History With a Smile--and Perhaps, a Tear: Charlie Chaplin's The Kid

  Film has this weird thing called “emotionality” that sees itself at the center of a lot of haranguing in the critical discourse. There is a sort of classism in dialogue that privileges film as a purely cerebral space, detached from all things base and emotional, and if your concerns in film tend to err on the side of sentiment or emotions, you have probably been on the receiving end of patronizing glances from those who consider themselves more discerning because their favorite movie is 2001: A Space Odyssey . Tyler Sage, another freelance film critic I follow, said it best when he described emotionality’s close cousin, “sentimentality " and the way it is generally discussed in the public sphere : The Godfather (1972) “These days, if you are one of these types who likes to opine knowingly in the public sphere – say, a highfalutin film critic – it's one of the most powerful aspersions there is. ‘I just found it so sentimental ,’ … [and] you can be certain no one will contrad

REVIEW: ONWARD

The Walt Disney Company as a whole seems to be in constant danger of being overtaken by its own cannibalistic tendency--cashing in on the successes of their past hits at the expense of creating the kinds of stories that merited these reimaginings to begin with. Pixar, coming fresh off a decade marked by a deluge of sequels, is certainly susceptible to this pattern as well. Though movies like Inside Out and Coco have helped breathe necessary life into the studio, audiences invested in the creative lifeblood of the studio should take note when an opportunity comes for either Disney or Pixar animation to flex their creative muscles. This year we'll have three such opportunities between the two studios. [EDIT: Okay, maybe not. Thanks, Corona.] The first of these, ONWARD directed by Dan Scanlon, opens this weekend and paints a hopeful picture of a future where Pixar allows empathetic and novel storytelling to guide its output. The film imagines a world where fantasy creatur

Nights of Cabiria: What IS Cinema?

  So here’s some light table talk … what is cinema? What is it for ?       On the one hand, film is the perfect medium to capture life as it really is. With the roll of the camera, you can do what painters and sculptors had been trying to do for centuries and record the sights and sounds of a place exactly as they are. On the other hand, film is the perfect medium for dreaming. Is there any other place besides the movies where the human heart is so unfettered, so open to fantasy? If you’ve studied film formally, this is probably one of the first discussions you had in your Intro to Film theory course, in a class that may have forced you to read about Dziga Vertov and his theory about film and the Kino-eye (another day, another day …)      In some ways, we could use basically any of thousands of cinematic works to jumpstart this discussion, but I have a particular film in mind. The lens I want to explore this idea through today is not only a strong example of strong cinematic cra