Skip to main content

PROFESSOR'S PICKS: 5 Horror Films for Horror Novices

I once counted myself among the crowd who categorically dismissed scary movies simply because I didn't see myself as person who liked scary movies. They were uncomfortable, they were vile, and they were dumb. 

Today I'm a little more open to the horror genre in large part because I've learned that not all scary movies are so aggressively morbid. I owe much of this transition to the research I've put in to horror films of classical Hollywood. 

Until about the 1960's the Hays code placed heavy lines on what kind of content could be featured in films. Many filmmakers felt restricted by these limitations, but this limitation did force filmmakers to find ways to scare audiences without using gore or violence, two things that usually frighten viewers away from the genre. As a result, many films we would classify under the "horror" genre from pre-1965 are really good testing grounds for viewers curious about the genre. 

If you're certain Nightmare on Elm Street crosses a line but you still want to know what all the hoopla over horror is about, here are the Professor's Picks for five classical horror films that will mess with your mind but not your stomach.

--

1. Carnival of Souls (1962)

Rated "Chilling" for a whole bunch of undead figures staring straight into the camera without blinking

The sole survivor of a tragic accident takes a job as a church organist in Salt Lake City, mostly because it doesn’t require her to interact with others. Her drive takes her past an old abandoned bath house which immediately fills her with inexplicable foreboding, and strange visions begin haunting her waking mind, visions which soon give way to something much more frightening.

The movie is almost entirely devoid of any traditional "jump-scares" or other shoe-in tactics for eliciting fear from the audience. Rather, the tension cooks through long takes of frightening imagery that unsettle or spook rather than shock. Atmosphere is the name of the game in this film.

This film is kind of the king of horror indie-movies and accumulated a cult following through subsequent releases. This film is also in the public domain, which means it’s easy to find. (You may have to circle through a few sites to find a high-quality rendering of the film, however.) 


2. The Haunting (1963)

Rated "Unnerving" for frightening situations and one potent jump scare

Lonely soul, Eleanor, receives some long-awaited excitement in her life when she is invited to participate in a scientific study of paranormal phenomena. Along with a few other participants, Eleanor stays overnight in an old mansion long-since thought to be "haunted." The paranormal activities begin almost immediately, but each new scare only further draws Eleanor into the mental labyrinth of Hill House. 


Director Robert Wise adapted this film from Shirley Jackson's 1959 book "The Haunting of Hill House." This film was remade twice, first as a film in 1999 and then as a Netflix mini-series in 2018's "The Haunting of Hill House," but it has become the inspiration for every haunted house film that followed. 

This film dwells in suspense and tension, unsettling the audience through frightening sounds or watching the characters squirm under the terror of what neither they nor the audience can see.

The film also marks perhaps the most intensive character study of any of the films on this list. Similar to Carnival of Souls, this film is specially interested in self-imposed isolationism and the unsettling yearnings that fill in the space that should be reserved for human interaction. Eleanor is painted as a drifting soul so desperate for belonging that the sinister beating heart of this mansion only further validates and entices her, convincing her that a place as chilling as this could become a home to her. 

Robert Wise's next film? The Sound of Music. What a world.

3. The Spiral Staircase (1946)

Rated "Scary"  for frightening situations and a few bloodless deaths

A sinister serial murderer is sweeping through a quiet Vermont town, targeting women suffering from various disabilities. All the while, Helen, a mute woman under the employment of a wealthy bedridden widow, must confront her deepest fears and traumas in order to outwit the killer before she becomes its next victim.

This film was adapted from Ethel Lina White's 1933 novel "Some Must Watch." This is one of those rare classic Hollywood films to tackle the subject of disability. That it does so through the protagonist is even more noteworthy. 

The earliest patterns of what would become slasher films can be seen in this film with the element of defenseless women being preyed upon by predatory male figures. But Production Code fences placed limitations on how sadistic filmmakers were able to be in this regard. Even as she's being tormented and stalked, Helen is treated with more dignity and humanity than her slasher-film successors will be thirty years on.



4. The Most Dangerous Game (1932)

Rated "Thrilling" for a few chase sequences and one scene displaying dead human bodies

An enthusiastic hunter is shipwrecked on an exotic island on which an eccentric millionaire has constructed a lavish castle. Our protagonist is at first enthralled in the company of this man, with whom he shares a love of the hunting sport, but he soon learns the frightening extent of his new friend's love of the game.


This film has more in common with modern day adventure films than a film like A Quiet Place. One of the directors, Ernest B. Schoedsack, would in fact go on to direct King Kong the next year using many of these same sets, even lifting stars Robert Armstrong and Fay Wray. Just so, the film makes for a thrilling view that asks probing questions about our relationship to power and violence and plays with our notion of predator and prey. Urban legends even persist that the first cut of the film was even more horrifying, with our first look at the enigmatic trophy room featuring more grotesque displays of carnage that sent 1932 audiences running out of the theater.

This film was adapted from the 1924 short story by Richard Connel, a story which has been adapted countless times, even as recently as this year in the form of the Quibi series Most Dangerous Game. Perhaps this is because the premise strikes an uncomfortable nerve, confronting us with how even the most civilized of us court and celebrate slaughter. This is another film in the public domain, and this one is barely over an hour long, making it a very accessible watch.



5. Sorry, Wrong Number (1948)

Rated "Intense" for Barbra Stanwyck spending 80 minutes looking scared out of her skin

Leona Stevenson, a bed-ridden heiress, intercepts a phone call in which she overhears a murder plot. She desperately tries to intervene, and understand what her husband's business affairs have to do with all this, but confined to her bed, what all can she do?


The film is adapted from Louise Fletcher's 1943 radio play, with Fletcher returning to write the screenplay for the feature film. 

Similar to The Spiral Staircase, the film finds its horrific stride with its use of shadows and slow creeps, and by constantly reminding us how helpless Leona is. Though flashbacks take place over a larger landscape, the narrative proper is situated almost entirely in Leona's bedroom. The plot constantly reminds us how our protagonist is tethered to a bed, leaving her entirely helpless in what feels like a predecessor to Hitchcock's Rear Window six years later. 



--


Horror has a reputation for being 1) morbid and 2) low-brow. I think there's a lot of validity to the criticisms of how horror films can numb us to graphic depictions of violence or celebrate the ravaging of female bodies, and if we sat down for a minute, we could probably come up with a fair number of films to support this thesis. 

But Extreme Slasher Movie XXXVII doesn't represent the sum of the horror genre. Coming from someone who lives for Judy Garland and Gene Kelly films, I've come to learn of the inherent value of a film that exposes your fears and insecurities--which a well-made horror film can do so well. If you're not ready for Scream (1996) and don't think you'll ever bother with The Evil Dead (1981) maybe test the waters with some of these psychological scarers.

            --The Professor

Honorable Mentions: Island of Lost Souls (1932), The Cat and the Canary (1927), Cat People (1942)

I might also recommend some of the classic Universal Monsters Movies of the 1930's and 40's. 

Comments

  1. I remember many of these. Some Fun Flicks. I always liked movies that scared me when I was a younger man. This is a little trip down memory lane. In some ways, because of the standards of the day, directors, screenwriters, and actors had to be a bit more talented. The almost anything goes approach today in movies may require less from the directors, screenwriters, and actors. What these old films didn't have in standards and technology, they made up for in the cleverness of the directing, the writing, and the acting. I actually enjoy these old ones much more than the modern horror movies.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"When Did Disney Get So Woke?!" pt. 1 The Disney of Your Childhood

  So, I’m going to put out a somewhat controversial idea here today: The Walt Disney Company has had a tremendous amount of influence in the pop culture landscape, both in recent times and across film history. Further controversy: a lot of people really resent Disney for this.  I’ve spent a greater part of this blog’s lifetime tracking this kind of thing. I have only a dozen or so pieces deconstructing the mechanics of these arguments and exposing how baseless these claims tend to be. This sort of thing is never that far from my mind. But my general thoughts on the stigmatization of the Disney fandom have taken a very specific turn in recent times against recent headlines.       The Walt Disney Company has had some rather embarrassing box office flops in the last two or three years, and a lot of voices have been eager to link Disney’s recent financial woes to certain choices. Specifically, this idea that Disney has all the sudden “gone woke.”  Now,...

"When Did Disney Get So Woke?!" pt. 2 Disney vs the 21st Century

  In the first half of this series , we looked at this construction of the Disney image that the company has sold itself on for several decades now. Walt himself saw the purpose of his entertainment enterprise as depiction a happier world than that which he and the audience emerged from, and that formed the basis of his formidable fanbase. But because the larger culture only knows how to discuss these things in the context of consumerism, a lot of intricacies get obscured in the conversation about The Walt Disney Company, its interaction with larger culture, and the people who happily participate in this fandom.  Basically, critics spent something like fifty years daring The Walt Disney Company to start being more proactive in how they participated in the multi-culture. And when Disney finally showed up in court to prove its case, the world just did not know what to do ... The 21st Century          With the development of the inter...

An Earnest Defense of Passengers

          Recall with me, if you will, the scene in Hollywood December 2016. We were less than a year away from #MeToo, and the internet was keenly aware of Hollywood’s suffocating influence on its females on and off screen but not yet sure what to do about it.       Enter Morten Tyldum’s film Passengers , a movie which, despite featuring the two hottest stars in Hollywood at the apex of their fame, was mangled by internet critics immediately after take-off. A key piece of Passengers ’ plot revolves around the main character, Jim Preston, a passenger onboard a spaceship, who prematurely awakens from a century-long hibernation and faces a lifetime of solitude adrift in outer space; rather than suffer through a life of loneliness, he eventually decides to deliberately awaken another passenger, Aurora Lane, condemning her to his same fate.    So this is obviously a film with a moral dilemma at its center. Morten Tyldum, direc...

The Paradox of The Graduate

     If you've been following my writings for long, you might know that I'm really not a fan of American Beauty . I find its depiction of domestic America scathing, reductive, and, most of all, without insight. I don't regret having dedicated an entire essay to how squirmy the film is, or that it's still one of my best-performing pieces.       But maybe, one might say, I just don't like films that critique the American dream? Maybe I think that domestic suburbia is just beyond analysis or interrogation. To that I say ... I really like  The Graduate .      I find that film's observations both more on-point and more meaningful. I think it's got great performances and witty dialogue, and it strikes the balance between drama and comedy gracefully. And I'm not alone in my assessment. The Graduate was a smash hit when it was released in 1967, landing on five or six AFI Top 100 lists in the years since.      But what's int...

Tangled: Disney Sees the Light

On November 21st, 2010, The LA Times ran its article “ Disney Animation is Closing the Book on Fairy Tales .” It pronounced that although the Walt Disney company was built on films in the style of Sleeping Beauty and The Little Mermaid , that form of Disney magic was history, reporting, iCarly (2007) “Among girls, princesses and the romanticized ideal they represent — revolving around finding the man of your dreams — have a limited shelf life. With the advent of ‘tween’ TV, the tiara-wearing ideal of femininity has been supplanted by new adolescent role models such as the Disney Channel’s Selena Gomez and Nickelodeon’s Miranda Cosgrove.” “You’ve got to go with the times,” MGA Chief Executive Isaac Larian said. “You can’t keep selling what the mothers and the fathers played with before. You’ve got to see life through their lens.”    Th e same day this article ran, the executives at Disney disavowed the viewpoints expressed and assured the public that Disney was NOT in fact s...

REVIEW: ONWARD

     The Walt Disney Company as a whole seems to be in constant danger of being overtaken by its own cannibalistic tendency--cashing in on the successes of their past hits at the expense of creating the kinds of stories that merited these reimaginings to begin with.       Pixar, coming fresh off a decade marked by a deluge of sequels, is certainly susceptible to this pattern as well. Though movies like Inside Out and Coco have helped breathe necessary life into the studio, audiences invested in the creative lifeblood of the studio should take note when an opportunity comes for either Disney or Pixar animation to flex their creative muscles.       This year we'll have three such opportunities between the two studios. [EDIT: Okay, maybe not. Thanks, Corona.] The first of these, ONWARD directed by Dan Scanlon, opens this weekend and paints a hopeful picture of a future where Pixar allows empathetic and novel storytelling to gui...

REVIEW: The Long Walk

I suppose we owe some respect to the new film adaptation of The Long Walk . Based on one of the earliest novels by Stephen King, this sort of ancestor to The Hunger Games sees a group of boys, living in an authoritarian society. willingly entering an annual state-sponsored competition in which they all embark on a nationwide walk, all maintaining a consistent walking pace. If they fall below that, they get a bullet to the cranium. Last boy walking wins. Full credit, there aren't a lot of studio films that stitch together a solid piece of entertainment with such basic materials. There's minimal computer-generation and only a handful of actors, none of whom are really household names. (The obvious exception being Mark Hamill.) Much of the film is portrayed in relaxed long-takes that really let the actors' charisma shine. This movie proves that creative film language can be enough to turn a walk down the country road into a full-on warzone.  But the movie has a system error t...

My Crush on Sarah Connor is Hard to Explain

  I had an experience this last fall working at a residential treatment facility for boys with behavioral issues.  My boys had been dying all week to watch Black Widow. These boys very seldom got to watch new movies while they were with us except for special field trips or when on home visits, and this movie  had only just become available on Disney+. The staff all agreed to let them have a special viewing as a reward for their deep cleaning leading up to Parents' Weekend.  I was really proud of my boys for their enthusiasm. I took it as a token of their evolving social awareness that they were as excited for a female-led superhero pic as they had been for Falcon and the Winter Soldier. My boys were becoming little feminists, or so I thought.       Imagine my disappointment when we finally watched the film and they spent the entire runtime catcalling Natasha and her sister. An entire film dedicated to a powerful heroine moving heaven and earth to ...

REVIEW: ELIO

    Here's a fact: the term "flying saucer" predates the term "UFO." The United States Air Force found the former description too limiting to describe the variety of potential aerial phenomena that might arise when discussing the possibility of life beyond earth.      There may have to be a similar expansion of vocabulary within the alien lexicon with Pixar's latest film, Elio , turning the idea of an alien abduction into every kid's dream come true.      The titular Elio is a displaced kid who recently moved in with his aunt after his parents died. She doesn't seem to understand him any better than his peers do. He can't imagine a place on planet earth where he feels he fits in. What's a kid to do except send a distress cry out into the great, big void of outer space?      But m iracle of miracles: his cries into the universe are heard, and a band of benevolent aliens adopt him into their "communiverse" as the honorary ambassador o...

Do You Hear the People Sing?: "Les Miserables" and the Untrained Singer

          Perhaps no film genre is as neglected in the 21 st century as the musical. With rare exception, the o nly offerings we get are the occasional Disney film, the occasional remake of a Disney film, and adaptations of Broadway stage shows. When we are graced with a proper musical film, the demand is high among musical fans for optimum musical performance, and when a musical film doesn’t deliver this, these fans are unforgiving.  From the moment talking was introduced in cinema, the musical film has been a gathering place where vocal demigods assemble in kaleidoscopic dance numbers in a whirl of cinematic ecstasy too fantastical for this world. What motivation, then, could Tom Hooper possibly have for tethering this landmark of modern musical fandom in grounded, dirty reality?       This movie’s claim to fame is the use of completely live-singing, detailed in this featurette, something no previous movie musical had attempted to...