Skip to main content

PROFESSOR'S PICKS: 5 Horror Films for Horror Novices

I once counted myself among the crowd who categorically dismissed scary movies simply because I didn't see myself as person who liked scary movies. They were uncomfortable, they were vile, and they were dumb. 

Today I'm a little more open to the horror genre in large part because I've learned that not all scary movies are so aggressively morbid. I owe much of this transition to the research I've put in to horror films of classical Hollywood. 

Until about the 1960's the Hays code placed heavy lines on what kind of content could be featured in films. Many filmmakers felt restricted by these limitations, but this limitation did force filmmakers to find ways to scare audiences without using gore or violence, two things that usually frighten viewers away from the genre. As a result, many films we would classify under the "horror" genre from pre-1965 are really good testing grounds for viewers curious about the genre. 

If you're certain Nightmare on Elm Street crosses a line but you still want to know what all the hoopla over horror is about, here are the Professor's Picks for five classical horror films that will mess with your mind but not your stomach.

--

1. Carnival of Souls (1962)

Rated "Chilling" for a whole bunch of undead figures staring straight into the camera without blinking

The sole survivor of a tragic accident takes a job as a church organist in Salt Lake City, mostly because it doesn’t require her to interact with others. Her drive takes her past an old abandoned bath house which immediately fills her with inexplicable foreboding, and strange visions begin haunting her waking mind, visions which soon give way to something much more frightening.

The movie is almost entirely devoid of any traditional "jump-scares" or other shoe-in tactics for eliciting fear from the audience. Rather, the tension cooks through long takes of frightening imagery that unsettle or spook rather than shock. Atmosphere is the name of the game in this film.

This film is kind of the king of horror indie-movies and accumulated a cult following through subsequent releases. This film is also in the public domain, which means it’s easy to find. (You may have to circle through a few sites to find a high-quality rendering of the film, however.) 


2. The Haunting (1963)

Rated "Unnerving" for frightening situations and one potent jump scare

Lonely soul, Eleanor, receives some long-awaited excitement in her life when she is invited to participate in a scientific study of paranormal phenomena. Along with a few other participants, Eleanor stays overnight in an old mansion long-since thought to be "haunted." The paranormal activities begin almost immediately, but each new scare only further draws Eleanor into the mental labyrinth of Hill House. 


Director Robert Wise adapted this film from Shirley Jackson's 1959 book "The Haunting of Hill House." This film was remade twice, first as a film in 1999 and then as a Netflix mini-series in 2018's "The Haunting of Hill House," but it has become the inspiration for every haunted house film that followed. 

This film dwells in suspense and tension, unsettling the audience through frightening sounds or watching the characters squirm under the terror of what neither they nor the audience can see.

The film also marks perhaps the most intensive character study of any of the films on this list. Similar to Carnival of Souls, this film is specially interested in self-imposed isolationism and the unsettling yearnings that fill in the space that should be reserved for human interaction. Eleanor is painted as a drifting soul so desperate for belonging that the sinister beating heart of this mansion only further validates and entices her, convincing her that a place as chilling as this could become a home to her. 

Robert Wise's next film? The Sound of Music. What a world.

3. The Spiral Staircase (1946)

Rated "Scary"  for frightening situations and a few bloodless deaths

A sinister serial murderer is sweeping through a quiet Vermont town, targeting women suffering from various disabilities. All the while, Helen, a mute woman under the employment of a wealthy bedridden widow, must confront her deepest fears and traumas in order to outwit the killer before she becomes its next victim.

This film was adapted from Ethel Lina White's 1933 novel "Some Must Watch." This is one of those rare classic Hollywood films to tackle the subject of disability. That it does so through the protagonist is even more noteworthy. 

The earliest patterns of what would become slasher films can be seen in this film with the element of defenseless women being preyed upon by predatory male figures. But Production Code fences placed limitations on how sadistic filmmakers were able to be in this regard. Even as she's being tormented and stalked, Helen is treated with more dignity and humanity than her slasher-film successors will be thirty years on.



4. The Most Dangerous Game (1932)

Rated "Thrilling" for a few chase sequences and one scene displaying dead human bodies

An enthusiastic hunter is shipwrecked on an exotic island on which an eccentric millionaire has constructed a lavish castle. Our protagonist is at first enthralled in the company of this man, with whom he shares a love of the hunting sport, but he soon learns the frightening extent of his new friend's love of the game.


This film has more in common with modern day adventure films than a film like A Quiet Place. One of the directors, Ernest B. Schoedsack, would in fact go on to direct King Kong the next year using many of these same sets, even lifting stars Robert Armstrong and Fay Wray. Just so, the film makes for a thrilling view that asks probing questions about our relationship to power and violence and plays with our notion of predator and prey. Urban legends even persist that the first cut of the film was even more horrifying, with our first look at the enigmatic trophy room featuring more grotesque displays of carnage that sent 1932 audiences running out of the theater.

This film was adapted from the 1924 short story by Richard Connel, a story which has been adapted countless times, even as recently as this year in the form of the Quibi series Most Dangerous Game. Perhaps this is because the premise strikes an uncomfortable nerve, confronting us with how even the most civilized of us court and celebrate slaughter. This is another film in the public domain, and this one is barely over an hour long, making it a very accessible watch.



5. Sorry, Wrong Number (1948)

Rated "Intense" for Barbra Stanwyck spending 80 minutes looking scared out of her skin

Leona Stevenson, a bed-ridden heiress, intercepts a phone call in which she overhears a murder plot. She desperately tries to intervene, and understand what her husband's business affairs have to do with all this, but confined to her bed, what all can she do?


The film is adapted from Louise Fletcher's 1943 radio play, with Fletcher returning to write the screenplay for the feature film. 

Similar to The Spiral Staircase, the film finds its horrific stride with its use of shadows and slow creeps, and by constantly reminding us how helpless Leona is. Though flashbacks take place over a larger landscape, the narrative proper is situated almost entirely in Leona's bedroom. The plot constantly reminds us how our protagonist is tethered to a bed, leaving her entirely helpless in what feels like a predecessor to Hitchcock's Rear Window six years later. 



--


Horror has a reputation for being 1) morbid and 2) low-brow. I think there's a lot of validity to the criticisms of how horror films can numb us to graphic depictions of violence or celebrate the ravaging of female bodies, and if we sat down for a minute, we could probably come up with a fair number of films to support this thesis. 

But Extreme Slasher Movie XXXVII doesn't represent the sum of the horror genre. Coming from someone who lives for Judy Garland and Gene Kelly films, I've come to learn of the inherent value of a film that exposes your fears and insecurities--which a well-made horror film can do so well. If you're not ready for Scream (1996) and don't think you'll ever bother with The Evil Dead (1981) maybe test the waters with some of these psychological scarers.

            --The Professor

Honorable Mentions: Island of Lost Souls (1932), The Cat and the Canary (1927), Cat People (1942)

I might also recommend some of the classic Universal Monsters Movies of the 1930's and 40's. 

Comments

  1. I remember many of these. Some Fun Flicks. I always liked movies that scared me when I was a younger man. This is a little trip down memory lane. In some ways, because of the standards of the day, directors, screenwriters, and actors had to be a bit more talented. The almost anything goes approach today in movies may require less from the directors, screenwriters, and actors. What these old films didn't have in standards and technology, they made up for in the cleverness of the directing, the writing, and the acting. I actually enjoy these old ones much more than the modern horror movies.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: The Wild Robot

     I think I must have known that Chris Sanders had another movie on deck, but I guess I had forgotten it was coming out so soon. For whatever reason, when I saw his name at the end of the credits for The Wild Robot , out this weekend, I was caught off guard ... and then realized that it actually explained a lot. The basic premise felt broadly reminiscent of Lilo & Stitch , and there was at least one sequence that definitely recalled How to Train Your Dragon , both of which Sanders co-directed with Dean Deblois (executive producer on this film). With his latest offering for Dreamworks, Sanders cements his position as a titan in the world of animation.     The movie sees ROZ, a shipwrecked robot stranded on an island completely untouched by humans. One would think that such an Eden would be bereft of the squabbles that humans seem so happy to create, but the animals of the island revile this new intruder and put up every fence they have. The only thing on this rock that doesn'

REVIEW: Scream

     Stop me if you've heard this before about slasher films, in or out of the Scream franchise:       "Don't overthink it. It's just a scary movie."       What an insulting thought for anyone who's ever found themselves in the throes of a gripping horror film. Good slasher films, like the original Scream , look honestly at the thing that scares us most and gives it a face. They know that the point of the slasher isn't in the chasing or the stabbing, but the unmasking. The overcoming of the thing that scares you. Good slasher films "overthink" it.     I'm grateful to report that the directors of the newest Scream film,  Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett, not only understand this principle, they embrace it wholly. In doing so, they may have created a sequel that not only meets but surpasses the film it tries to emulate.     Twenty-five years after Sidney Prescott's first encounter with Ghostface, we meet Sam Carpenter, a native of

Children of a Lesser God: Between Sound and Silence

Loyal readers may remember last month when I talked about Sidney Poitier and Elizabeth Hartman in A Patch of Blue and how I casually alluded to the larger framework of disability within film and promised to talk about it one day. Well, this isn’t like with my Disney Princess series where I teased the project for years before finally getting to it. I’m making good on that promise here today. You’re welcome.  Now, when I say “disability within film,” that’s a really large slice of the pie. The discussion of disability in Hollywood is a vast and complex field of study. There’s obviously overlap across the broader discussion, but people of different disabilities experience ableism differently, similar to how members of different ethnic identities experience racism differently, and it’s a machine that has to be dismantled on multiple fronts.  But with this piece, I’m not so interested in airing all the ways the industry has let down members of these communities. Today, I’d mostly li

Are We in Another Golden Age of Musicals?

  In early 2017, Variety ran a piece titled “ Will Musicals See a ‘La La Land’ Boost ?” alongside said movie’s victory lap around the box office and critics at large. Justin Paul, who wrote the music for La La Land alongside his partner, Benj Pasek, was optimistic about the doors his movie was opening: “I have to believe that other studios, other producers, would only be encouraged by the impact of ‘La La Land,’ both critically and at the box office.” Their agent, Richard Kraft, shared a similar sentiment. “I think people are growing tired of snark and skepticism and pessimism. [La La Land] hit the zeitgeist for smart and unapologetic optimism. Even in times of strife and conflict, people still fall in love and follow dreams.”  These are the kinds of statements that don’t go unnoticed by a musical nerd who chose to write his semesterly report on Meet Me in St. Louis when all his fellow film students wrote on Woody Allen. Classical musicals had always just been that gateway into c

American Beauty is Bad for your Soul

  The 1990s was a relatively stable period of time in American history. We weren’t scared of the communists or the nuclear bomb, and social unrest for the most part took the decade off. The white-picket fence ideal was as accessible as it had ever been for most Americans. Domesticity was commonplace, mundane even, and we had time to think about things like the superficiality of modern living. It's in an environment like this that a movie like Sam Mendes' 1999 film American Beauty can not only be made but also find overwhelming success. In 1999 this film was praised for its bold and honest insight into American suburban life. The Detroit News Film Critic called this film “a rare and felicitous movie that brings together a writer, director and company perfectly matched in intelligence and sense of purpose” and Variety hailed it as “a real American original.” The film premiered to only a select number of screens, but upon its smashing success was upgraded to

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind: Do Clementine and Joel Stay Together or Not?

                    Maybe. The answer is maybe.             Not wanting to be that guy who teases a definitive answer to a difficult question and forces you to read a ten-page essay only to cop-out with a non-committal excuse of an answer, I’m telling you up and front the answer is maybe. Though nations have long warred over this matter of great importance, the film itself does not answer once and for all whether or not Joel Barrish and Clementine Krychinzki find lasting happiness together at conclusion of the film Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Min d. I cannot give a definitive answer as to whether Joel and Clementine’s love will last until the stars turn cold or just through the weekend. This essay cannot do that.             What this essay can do is explore the in-text evidence the film gives for either side to help you, the reader, understand the mechanics, merits, and blindspots of either interpretation of the ending. It can also reveal the underlying assumptions of either

REVIEW: A Quiet Place - DAY ONE

I remember back when I reviewed A Quiet Place Part II , the thing that was on my mind a world crawling out of a global pandemic.  I now dive into Michael Sarnoski's newest take on the mythology with A Quiet Place: Day One having just this morning heard the news that a certain convicted felon is being granted immunity for his involvement in trying to overthrow democracy, and I am left wondering (not for the first time) what surviving in a world that already balances on borrowed time even means. This is more or less the mindset of the film's protagonist, Sam, a terminally ill cancer patient who was already done with existing well before killer aliens started dropping out from the sky. The only things she cares about in the world are her "emotional support" cat, Frodo, and getting a taste of some proper New York pizza before this cancer takes her, alien invasion or not! While the rest of the city is running off to catch the last boat off Manhattan, she just digs deeper

REVIEW: Cyrano

    The modern push for the movie musical tends to favor a modern sound--songs with undertones of rap or rock. It must have taken director Joe Wright a special kind of tenacity, then, to throw his heart and soul into a musical project (itself a bold undertaking) that surrenders to pure classicalism with his new film Cyrano . Whatever his thought process, it's hard to argue with the results. With its heavenly design, vulnerable performances, and gorgeous musical numbers, the last musical offering of 2021 (or perhaps the first of 2022) is endlessly enchanting.     Cyrano de Bergerac's small stature makes him easy prey for the scorn and ridicule of the high-class Victorian society, but there has yet to be a foe that he could not disarm with his sharp mind and even sharper tongue. The person who could ever truly reject him is Roxanne, his childhood friend for whom he harbors love of the most romantic variety. Too afraid to court Roxanne himself, he chooses to use the handsome but t

Part of That World: Understanding Racebent Ariel

          I’ve said before that the public discourse around the current parade of live-action Disney remakes has been very contentious. Trying to have a civil conversation about the potential creative merits is something of an uphill battle. In most cases, this is just the general opposition to Hollywood’s penchant for repackaged material, but the mess does spill into other conversations.              Take the casting announcement of Halle Bailey in the role of the upcoming remake of The Little Mermaid . When Disney announced on July 3, 2019 that the highly coveted role of Ariel would go to an African-American actress, you saw a lot of excitement from crowds championing fair representation. You also saw a lot of outrage, most clear in the trending hashtag #NotMyAriel.              I hear a lot of people shouting that “Ariel has been white for two-hundred years. Why change that all the sudden?” But the fact is she hasn’t even “been Ariel” for that long. “Ariel” is the name the merma

Silver Linings Playbook: What are Happy Endings For Anyway?

            Legendary film critic Roger Ebert gave the following words in July of 2005 at the dedication of his plaque outside the Chicago Theatre: Nights of Cabiria (1957) “For me, movies are like a machine that generates empathy. If it’s a great movie, it lets you understand a little bit more about what it’s like to be a different gender, a different race, a different age, a different economic class, a different nationality, a different profession, different hopes, aspirations, dreams and fears. It helps us to identify with the people who are sharing this journey with us. And that, to me, is the most noble thing that good movies can do and it’s a reason to encourage them and to support them and to go to them.” Ebert had been reviewing films for coming on forty years when he gave that assessment. I haven’t been doing it for a tenth as long. I don’t know if I’ve really earned the right to ponder out loud what the purpose of a good film is. But film critics new and old don’t need much